Search (186 results, page 10 of 10)

0.004570095 = product of:
  0.013710285 = sum of:
    0.013710285 = product of:
      0.02742057 = sum of:
        0.02742057 = weight(_text_:library in 1890) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02742057 = score(doc=1890,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13484047 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051282257 = queryNorm
            0.20335563 = fieldWeight in 1890, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1890)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Source

Library science with a slant to documentation. 12(1975), S.33-39

0.004570095 = product of:
  0.013710285 = sum of:
    0.013710285 = product of:
      0.02742057 = sum of:
        0.02742057 = weight(_text_:library in 5461) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02742057 = score(doc=5461,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13484047 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051282257 = queryNorm
            0.20335563 = fieldWeight in 5461, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5461)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Source

Library quarterly. 46(1976) no.2, S.153-167

0.003917224 = product of:
  0.011751671 = sum of:
    0.011751671 = product of:
      0.023503343 = sum of:
        0.023503343 = weight(_text_:library in 1197) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023503343 = score(doc=1197,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13484047 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051282257 = queryNorm
            0.17430481 = fieldWeight in 1197, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1197)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Source

Library resources and technical services. 23(1979), S.101-115

0.003917224 = product of:
  0.011751671 = sum of:
    0.011751671 = product of:
      0.023503343 = sum of:
        0.023503343 = weight(_text_:library in 348) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023503343 = score(doc=348,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13484047 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051282257 = queryNorm
            0.17430481 = fieldWeight in 348, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=348)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Footnote

Rez. in: Journal of library automation 13(1980) S.289-290 (E. Svenonius)

0.003917224 = product of:
  0.011751671 = sum of:
    0.011751671 = product of:
      0.023503343 = sum of:
        0.023503343 = weight(_text_:library in 982) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023503343 = score(doc=982,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13484047 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051282257 = queryNorm
            0.17430481 = fieldWeight in 982, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=982)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

This fourth paper in the series on PRECIS will consider the theoretical model of the indexing operation proposed in an earlier paper, and extend its application to one of the Romance languages, namely French. The present author has noted, throughout the publication of this series, how closely these logico-linguistic explanations could be applied to indexing in the French language. It is realised that experiments into PRECIS as a multilingual system are not complete, and that a new phase has undoubtedly started with the current British Library investigation of its translingual potential. Nevertheless, it would appear that the major problems still facing the researchers, such as the treatment of inflections, infixes, etc., are mostly related to the Germanic languages. As far as French is concerned, it is a relatively simple matter to give a positive answer to the question posed in the first paper: " . . . Do the codes and procedures developed so far (including the specified additions) amount to a general system which is capable of operating in any of the major European (and other) languages?"

0.0022850474 = product of:
  0.0068551423 = sum of:
    0.0068551423 = product of:
      0.013710285 = sum of:
        0.013710285 = weight(_text_:library in 3431) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013710285 = score(doc=3431,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13484047 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051282257 = queryNorm
            0.10167781 = fieldWeight in 3431, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3431)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Content

Enthält u.a. die Beiträge: HENRIKSEN, T.: A linguistic description model for indexing languages; MONTGOMERY, C.A.: Toward a natural language communications inferface; SPANG-HANSSEN, H.: Are classification systems similar to natural languages; LANCASTER, F.W.: Vocabulary control for on-line interactive retrieval systems: requirements and possible approaches; DAHLBERG, I.: On the theory of the concept; GROLIER, E. de: In search of an objective basis for the organization of knowledge; BELING, G.: Towards a set theoretical foundation of classification; BHATTACHARYYA, G.: Fundamenbtal of subject indexing languages; CAVALCANTI, C.R.: Universal integrated media for information processing; DESAI, A.R.: Theory of integrative levels, general systems theory, theory of classification, theory of wvolution, and theory of pattern recognition (abstract); GOPINATH, M.A. u. S. SEETHARAMA: Interdisciplinary subjects and their classification; IMMROTH, J.P.: A lexical essay toward the developments of the theory of indexes to classification schemes; KOCHEN, M.: Organising knowledge for coping with needs; KURBAKOV, K.I. u. V.G. BOLDOV: Problem of compatibility of information classification systems and some probable methods of its solution; MAIXNER, V.: Classification systems and retrieval languages; MEINCKE, P.P.M. u. P. ATHERTON: Knowledge space: a conceptual basis for the organization of knowledge; NEELAMEGHAN, A.: Absolute syntax and structure of an indexing and switching language; NEILL, S.D. MacLuhan and classification; RICHMOND, P.A. u. N.J. WILLIAMSON: Three dimensional physical models in classification; SVENONIUS, E.: Translation between hierarchical structures: an exercise in abstract classification; BORKO, H.: Changing roles of and developments in automated classification; DREESE, M.J.: Comparison of document retrieval using UDC - notation given by UDC - expert with catch-words taken from title by clerk, stored in computer memory; GARFIELD, E., MALIN, M.V. u. H. SMALL: A system for automatic classification of scientific literature (abstract); HEAPS, H.S. u. K.V. LEuNG: Automatic document classification based on a theory of relevance; HOYLE, W.G.: A measure of overlap in classification systems; KLESZCZ: Method of information retrieval and subject index compilation for abstracting periodicals with the use of a thesaurus enlarged with machine part classification; SCHNEIDER, J.H.: AUTOCLASS: a computer system for facilitating the creation and updating of hierarchical classifications; JANOS, J.: Information systems with automated indexing based an the analysis of texts; RIGBY, M.: Advances since Elsinore in the use of automated equipment for vocabulary, classification schedule and information or data control on a universal scale; TOMAN, J.: Trend of the future: two ordering system used together? TOMAN, J. u. G.A. Lloyd: Introduction to the Subject-field Reference Code (SRC) or Broad System of Ordering (BSO) for UNISIST purposes; AUSTIN, D.: Differences between library classifications and machine-based subject retrieval systems; some inferences drawn from research in Britain, 1963-1973; JACHOWICZ, R.L.: Application of classification as basis for the formulation of thesaurus; KOFNOVEC, L. u. D. SIMANDL: Quantitative structure of world scientific and technical literature and its use for optimizing general classifications; RAJAN, T.N. u. B. GUHA: A comparative study of subject heading structuring according to POPSI and PRECIS; ROLLING, L.N.: Computer management of multi-lingual thesauri; SOKOLOV, A.V.: Compound indexing languages; VILENSKAYA, S.C.: Systems approach as a principle of thesaurus building on the basis of the subject headings language; WAHLIN, E.: Special classification systems used together with a common reference system; the AR-complex; WERSIG, G.: Experiences in compatibility research in documentary languages; WOLFF-TERROINE, M.: A macrothesaurus. Why? How? SAMUELSON, K.: Information ordering in worldwise communications; SHEPHERD, M. u. C. WATTERS: Hierarchical retrieval from structured text