Search (296 results, page 1 of 15)

  • × language_ss:"e"
  • × year_i:[1970 TO 1980}
  1. Radecki, T.: Mathematical model of information retrieval systems based on the concept of fuzzy thesaurus (1976) 0.06
    0.061321586 = product of:
      0.09198238 = sum of:
        0.03993309 = weight(_text_:information in 5478) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03993309 = score(doc=5478,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0518325 = queryNorm
            0.43886948 = fieldWeight in 5478, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5478)
        0.052049287 = product of:
          0.10409857 = sum of:
            0.10409857 = weight(_text_:management in 5478) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10409857 = score(doc=5478,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17470726 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0518325 = queryNorm
                0.5958457 = fieldWeight in 5478, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5478)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 12(1976), S.313-318
  2. Radecki, T.: Mathematical model and time effective information retrieval systems based on the theory of fuzzy sets (1977) 0.06
    0.061321586 = product of:
      0.09198238 = sum of:
        0.03993309 = weight(_text_:information in 5479) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03993309 = score(doc=5479,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0518325 = queryNorm
            0.43886948 = fieldWeight in 5479, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5479)
        0.052049287 = product of:
          0.10409857 = sum of:
            0.10409857 = weight(_text_:management in 5479) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10409857 = score(doc=5479,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17470726 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0518325 = queryNorm
                0.5958457 = fieldWeight in 5479, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5479)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 13(1977), S.109-116
  3. Salton, G.; Waldstein, R.H.: Term relevance weights in on-line information retrieval (1978) 0.06
    0.061321586 = product of:
      0.09198238 = sum of:
        0.03993309 = weight(_text_:information in 5484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03993309 = score(doc=5484,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0518325 = queryNorm
            0.43886948 = fieldWeight in 5484, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5484)
        0.052049287 = product of:
          0.10409857 = sum of:
            0.10409857 = weight(_text_:management in 5484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10409857 = score(doc=5484,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17470726 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0518325 = queryNorm
                0.5958457 = fieldWeight in 5484, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5484)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 14(1978), S.20-35
  4. Artandi, S.: Document retrieval and the concept of sets (1971) 0.06
    0.05627845 = product of:
      0.08441767 = sum of:
        0.02823696 = weight(_text_:information in 5458) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02823696 = score(doc=5458,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0518325 = queryNorm
            0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 5458, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5458)
        0.056180708 = product of:
          0.112361416 = sum of:
            0.112361416 = weight(_text_:22 in 5458) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.112361416 = score(doc=5458,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18150859 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0518325 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 5458, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5458)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 22(1971) no.4, S.289-290
  5. Bates, M.J.: System meets user : problems in matching subject search terms (1977) 0.05
    0.053524166 = product of:
      0.08028625 = sum of:
        0.02823696 = weight(_text_:information in 731) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02823696 = score(doc=731,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0518325 = queryNorm
            0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 731, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=731)
        0.052049287 = product of:
          0.10409857 = sum of:
            0.10409857 = weight(_text_:management in 731) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10409857 = score(doc=731,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17470726 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0518325 = queryNorm
                0.5958457 = fieldWeight in 731, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=731)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 13(1977), S.367-375
  6. Borko, H.: Toward a theory of indexing (1977) 0.05
    0.053524166 = product of:
      0.08028625 = sum of:
        0.02823696 = weight(_text_:information in 2591) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02823696 = score(doc=2591,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0518325 = queryNorm
            0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 2591, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2591)
        0.052049287 = product of:
          0.10409857 = sum of:
            0.10409857 = weight(_text_:management in 2591) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10409857 = score(doc=2591,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17470726 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0518325 = queryNorm
                0.5958457 = fieldWeight in 2591, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2591)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 13(1977), S.355-365
  7. Tahani, V.: ¬A fuzzy model of document retrieval systems (1976) 0.05
    0.053524166 = product of:
      0.08028625 = sum of:
        0.02823696 = weight(_text_:information in 5477) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02823696 = score(doc=5477,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0518325 = queryNorm
            0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 5477, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5477)
        0.052049287 = product of:
          0.10409857 = sum of:
            0.10409857 = weight(_text_:management in 5477) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10409857 = score(doc=5477,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17470726 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0518325 = queryNorm
                0.5958457 = fieldWeight in 5477, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5477)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 12(1976), S.177-188
  8. Bourne, C.P.: Frequency and impact of spelling errors in bibliographic databases (1977) 0.05
    0.053524166 = product of:
      0.08028625 = sum of:
        0.02823696 = weight(_text_:information in 6913) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02823696 = score(doc=6913,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0518325 = queryNorm
            0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 6913, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6913)
        0.052049287 = product of:
          0.10409857 = sum of:
            0.10409857 = weight(_text_:management in 6913) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10409857 = score(doc=6913,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17470726 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0518325 = queryNorm
                0.5958457 = fieldWeight in 6913, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6913)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 13(1977) no.1, S.1-12
  9. Robertson, S.E.: ¬The probabilistic character of relevance (1977) 0.05
    0.053524166 = product of:
      0.08028625 = sum of:
        0.02823696 = weight(_text_:information in 7399) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02823696 = score(doc=7399,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0518325 = queryNorm
            0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 7399, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=7399)
        0.052049287 = product of:
          0.10409857 = sum of:
            0.10409857 = weight(_text_:management in 7399) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10409857 = score(doc=7399,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17470726 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0518325 = queryNorm
                0.5958457 = fieldWeight in 7399, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=7399)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 13(1977), S.247-251
  10. Cooper, W.S.: ¬The paradoxal role of unexamined documents in the evaluation of retrieval effectiveness (1976) 0.05
    0.053524166 = product of:
      0.08028625 = sum of:
        0.02823696 = weight(_text_:information in 2186) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02823696 = score(doc=2186,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0518325 = queryNorm
            0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 2186, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2186)
        0.052049287 = product of:
          0.10409857 = sum of:
            0.10409857 = weight(_text_:management in 2186) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10409857 = score(doc=2186,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17470726 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0518325 = queryNorm
                0.5958457 = fieldWeight in 2186, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2186)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 12(1976), S.367-375
  11. King, D.W.: Assessing the value of information (1976) 0.05
    0.053524166 = product of:
      0.08028625 = sum of:
        0.02823696 = weight(_text_:information in 5374) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02823696 = score(doc=5374,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0518325 = queryNorm
            0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 5374, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5374)
        0.052049287 = product of:
          0.10409857 = sum of:
            0.10409857 = weight(_text_:management in 5374) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10409857 = score(doc=5374,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17470726 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0518325 = queryNorm
                0.5958457 = fieldWeight in 5374, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5374)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Source
    Management datamatics. 5(1976) no.4, S.171-180
  12. Huffenberger, M.A.; Wigington, R.L.: Database management systems (1979) 0.05
    0.053524166 = product of:
      0.08028625 = sum of:
        0.02823696 = weight(_text_:information in 281) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02823696 = score(doc=281,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0518325 = queryNorm
            0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 281, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=281)
        0.052049287 = product of:
          0.10409857 = sum of:
            0.10409857 = weight(_text_:management in 281) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10409857 = score(doc=281,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17470726 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0518325 = queryNorm
                0.5958457 = fieldWeight in 281, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=281)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 14(1979), S.153-190
  13. Stokolova, N.A.: ¬The concepts of relevance and information language : Pt.1 of: Elements of a semantic theory of information retrieval (1977) 0.05
    0.05047857 = product of:
      0.07571785 = sum of:
        0.03668089 = weight(_text_:information in 1887) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03668089 = score(doc=1887,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0518325 = queryNorm
            0.40312737 = fieldWeight in 1887, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1887)
        0.039036963 = product of:
          0.078073926 = sum of:
            0.078073926 = weight(_text_:management in 1887) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.078073926 = score(doc=1887,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17470726 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0518325 = queryNorm
                0.44688427 = fieldWeight in 1887, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1887)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 13(1977), S.153-160
  14. Kwok, K.L.: ¬The use of titles and cited titles as document representations for automatic classification (1975) 0.05
    0.046833646 = product of:
      0.07025047 = sum of:
        0.02470734 = weight(_text_:information in 4347) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02470734 = score(doc=4347,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0518325 = queryNorm
            0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 4347, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4347)
        0.045543127 = product of:
          0.09108625 = sum of:
            0.09108625 = weight(_text_:management in 4347) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09108625 = score(doc=4347,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17470726 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0518325 = queryNorm
                0.521365 = fieldWeight in 4347, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4347)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 11(1975), S.201-206
  15. Rijsbergen, C.J. van: Information retrieval (1979) 0.04
    0.043259062 = product of:
      0.06488859 = sum of:
        0.032684736 = weight(_text_:information in 856) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.032684736 = score(doc=856,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0518325 = queryNorm
            0.3592092 = fieldWeight in 856, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=856)
        0.032203853 = product of:
          0.064407706 = sum of:
            0.064407706 = weight(_text_:management in 856) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.064407706 = score(doc=856,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.17470726 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0518325 = queryNorm
                0.36866072 = fieldWeight in 856, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=856)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Classification
    ST 271 Informatik / Monographien / Software und -entwicklung / Datenbanken, Datenbanksysteme, Data base management, Informationssysteme / Einzelne Datenbanksprachen und Datenbanksysteme
    LCSH
    Information storage and retrieval systems
    RSWK
    Information Retrieval
    Datenverarbeitung / Information Retrieval
    RVK
    ST 271 Informatik / Monographien / Software und -entwicklung / Datenbanken, Datenbanksysteme, Data base management, Informationssysteme / Einzelne Datenbanksprachen und Datenbanksysteme
    Subject
    Information Retrieval
    Datenverarbeitung / Information Retrieval
    Information storage and retrieval systems
  16. Jones, R.K.: Language universalization for improved information management : necessity for Esperanto (1978) 0.04
    0.037940796 = product of:
      0.056911193 = sum of:
        0.02470734 = weight(_text_:information in 7408) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02470734 = score(doc=7408,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0518325 = queryNorm
            0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 7408, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7408)
        0.032203853 = product of:
          0.064407706 = sum of:
            0.064407706 = weight(_text_:management in 7408) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.064407706 = score(doc=7408,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.17470726 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0518325 = queryNorm
                0.36866072 = fieldWeight in 7408, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7408)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Lacking a universal working language, information managers around the world cannot now deal reliably and efficiently with multilingual documentation. Language mismatch paralyses international cooperative efforts such as multinational bibliographic standardisation, linking of collections, and sharing the work of classification and indexing. Knowledge of the same second language by all information managers can open the communication channels needed for worldwide cooperation. Ethnis and ideological rivalries prclude success in this role by any of the conventional languages. The planned language, Esperanto, is the logical choice because of its neutrality, rational structure, clarity and expressive power. Pioneering projects in automatic language processing, not possible in English, are feasible in Esperanto
    Source
    Information processing and management. 14(1978) no.6, S.363-368
  17. Popper, K.R.: Three worlds : the Tanner lecture on human values. Deliverd at the University of Michigan, April 7, 1978 (1978) 0.04
    0.036588337 = product of:
      0.10976501 = sum of:
        0.10976501 = product of:
          0.329295 = sum of:
            0.329295 = weight(_text_:3a in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.329295 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.43943653 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0518325 = queryNorm
                0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    https%3A%2F%2Ftannerlectures.utah.edu%2F_documents%2Fa-to-z%2Fp%2Fpopper80.pdf&usg=AOvVaw3f4QRTEH-OEBmoYr2J_c7H
  18. Analyses of bibliographies (1973) 0.04
    0.035174027 = product of:
      0.05276104 = sum of:
        0.017648099 = weight(_text_:information in 3846) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017648099 = score(doc=3846,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0518325 = queryNorm
            0.19395474 = fieldWeight in 3846, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3846)
        0.035112944 = product of:
          0.07022589 = sum of:
            0.07022589 = weight(_text_:22 in 3846) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07022589 = score(doc=3846,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18150859 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0518325 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3846, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3846)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Content
    SIMON, H.R.: Introduction: why analyze bibliographies?; MARTYN, J.: Secondary services and the rising tide of paper; BROOKES, B.C.: Numerical methods of bibliographic analysis; THOMPSON, L.S.: The humanities: a state of the art report; BOTTLE, R.T.: Information obtainable from analyses of scientific bibliographies; SIMON, H.R.: Outlook: the analyses of bibliographies in the future
    Source
    Library trends. 22(1973), no.1
  19. Mazur, Z.: Inverted file organization in the information retrieval system based on thesaurus with weights (1979) 0.03
    0.03365238 = product of:
      0.05047857 = sum of:
        0.024453925 = weight(_text_:information in 5494) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024453925 = score(doc=5494,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0518325 = queryNorm
            0.2687516 = fieldWeight in 5494, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5494)
        0.026024643 = product of:
          0.052049287 = sum of:
            0.052049287 = weight(_text_:management in 5494) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.052049287 = score(doc=5494,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17470726 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0518325 = queryNorm
                0.29792285 = fieldWeight in 5494, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5494)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    The inverted file structure is often used to organize data in the information retrieval system. When the hierarchy relation on the set descriptors and weights of descriptors in document description would be taken into account, the conventional concept of the inverted file may be extended. Properties and operations on inverted files, which are used in systems based on thesaurus with weights, are studied in this paper
    Source
    Information processing and management. 15(1979), S.227-234
  20. Montgomery, C.A.: Linguistics and information science (1972) 0.03
    0.031689316 = product of:
      0.04753397 = sum of:
        0.028015489 = weight(_text_:information in 6669) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028015489 = score(doc=6669,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.09099081 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0518325 = queryNorm
            0.3078936 = fieldWeight in 6669, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6669)
        0.019518482 = product of:
          0.039036963 = sum of:
            0.039036963 = weight(_text_:management in 6669) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.039036963 = score(doc=6669,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17470726 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0518325 = queryNorm
                0.22344214 = fieldWeight in 6669, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6669)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    This paper defines the relationship between linguistics and information science in terms of a common interest in natural language. The notion of automated processing of natural language - i.e., machine simulation of the language processing activities of a human - provides novel possibilities for interaction between linguistics, who have a theoretical interest in such activities, and information scientists, who have more practical goals, e.g. simulating the language processing activities of an indexer with a machine. The concept of a natural language information system is introduces as a framenwork for reviewing automated language processing efforts by computational linguists and information scientists. In terms of this framework, the former have concentrated on automating the operations of the component for content analysis and representation, while the latter have emphasized the data management component. The complementary nature of these developments allows the postulation of an integrated approach to automated language processing. This approach, which is outlined in the final sections of the paper, incorporates current notions in linguistic theory and information science, as well as design features of recent computational linguistic models
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 23(1972), S.195-219

Authors

Types

  • a 238
  • m 38
  • s 10
  • b 5
  • ? 3
  • d 2
  • r 2
  • el 1
  • p 1
  • More… Less…

Classifications