Search (7555 results, page 3 of 378)

  • × language_ss:"e"
  • × year_i:[1990 TO 2000}
  1. Hopkinson, A.: International data exchange : a question of formats (1992) 0.10
    0.10219695 = product of:
      0.1362626 = sum of:
        0.019420752 = weight(_text_:information in 6951) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019420752 = score(doc=6951,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.21943474 = fieldWeight in 6951, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6951)
        0.088519044 = weight(_text_:standards in 6951) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.088519044 = score(doc=6951,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22470023 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.39394283 = fieldWeight in 6951, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6951)
        0.028322803 = product of:
          0.056645606 = sum of:
            0.056645606 = weight(_text_:organization in 6951) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.056645606 = score(doc=6951,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17974974 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050415643 = queryNorm
                0.31513596 = fieldWeight in 6951, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6951)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.75 = coord(3/4)
    
    Abstract
    Paper presented at the International Symposium on Information Technology; Standards for biliographic control, Bangkok, Thailand, 4-8 Sept 89. Reviews the 3 formats for the international exchange of bibliographic data: UNIMARC, UNISIST Reference Manual, and UNESCO's Common Communication Format (CCF) and describes the origins, technical features and typical users for all 3 formats. Selection of the most appropriate format depends upon whether users participate in a library network, are employed by technical institutes, or need to exchange information with both types of organization
  2. Dempsey, L.; Russell, R.; Kirriemur, J.W.: Towards distributed library systems : Z39.50 in a European context (1996) 0.10
    0.10144671 = product of:
      0.13526228 = sum of:
        0.019420752 = weight(_text_:information in 127) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019420752 = score(doc=127,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.21943474 = fieldWeight in 127, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=127)
        0.088519044 = weight(_text_:standards in 127) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.088519044 = score(doc=127,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22470023 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.39394283 = fieldWeight in 127, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=127)
        0.027322493 = product of:
          0.054644987 = sum of:
            0.054644987 = weight(_text_:22 in 127) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054644987 = score(doc=127,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17654699 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050415643 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 127, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=127)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.75 = coord(3/4)
    
    Abstract
    Z39.50 is an information retrieval protocol. It has generated much interest but is so far little deployed in UK systems and services. Gives a functional overview of the protocol itself and the standards background, describes some European initiatives which make use of it, and outlines various issues to do with its future use and acceptance. Z39.50 is a crucial building block of future distributed information systems but it needs to be considered alongside other protocols and services to provide useful applications
    Source
    Program. 30(1996) no.1, S.1-22
  3. ¬The Fifth Text Retrieval Conference (TREC-5) (1997) 0.10
    0.10144671 = product of:
      0.13526228 = sum of:
        0.019420752 = weight(_text_:information in 3087) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019420752 = score(doc=3087,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.21943474 = fieldWeight in 3087, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3087)
        0.088519044 = weight(_text_:standards in 3087) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.088519044 = score(doc=3087,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22470023 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.39394283 = fieldWeight in 3087, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3087)
        0.027322493 = product of:
          0.054644987 = sum of:
            0.054644987 = weight(_text_:22 in 3087) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054644987 = score(doc=3087,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17654699 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050415643 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3087, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3087)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.75 = coord(3/4)
    
    Abstract
    Proceedings of the 5th TREC-confrerence held in Gaithersburgh, Maryland, Nov 20-22, 1996. Aim of the conference was discussion on retrieval techniques for large test collections. Different research groups used different techniques, such as automated thesauri, term weighting, natural language techniques, relevance feedback and advanced pattern matching, for information retrieval from the same large database. This procedure makes it possible to compare the results. The proceedings include papers, tables of the system results, and brief system descriptions including timing and storage information
    Imprint
    Gaithersburgh, MD : National Institute of Standards and Technology
  4. Mylopoulos, J.; Jurisica, J.; Yu, E.: Computational mechanisms for knowledge organization (1998) 0.10
    0.099881545 = product of:
      0.19976309 = sum of:
        0.020812286 = weight(_text_:information in 68) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020812286 = score(doc=68,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.23515764 = fieldWeight in 68, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=68)
        0.1789508 = sum of:
          0.13113643 = weight(_text_:organization in 68) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.13113643 = score(doc=68,freq=14.0), product of:
              0.17974974 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                0.050415643 = queryNorm
              0.72955 = fieldWeight in 68, product of:
                3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                  14.0 = termFreq=14.0
                3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=68)
          0.047814365 = weight(_text_:22 in 68) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.047814365 = score(doc=68,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17654699 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.050415643 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 68, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=68)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    This paper reviews several knowledge organization techniques used in Computer Science, in areas such as Artificial Intelligence, Databases and Software Engineering. Some of these computational mechanisms may assist in the organization and management of immense digital information resources. At the same time, the paper notes an increasing need for computer-based information systems to operate in open networked environments. This need requires knowledge organization principles, which are flexible and can be used with informally expressed knowledge. We expect to find such knowledge organization techniques in Library and Information Sciences, and hope to integrate them with the computational techniques described in this paper
    Date
    30.12.2001 17:22:15
    Series
    Advances in knowledge organization; vol.6
    Source
    Structures and relations in knowledge organization: Proceedings of the 5th International ISKO-Conference, Lille, 25.-29.8.1998. Ed.: W. Mustafa el Hadi et al
  5. Tibbo, H.R.: Abstracting across the disciplines : a content analysis of abstracts for the natural sciences, the social sciences, and the humanities with implications for abstracting standards and online information retrieval (1992) 0.10
    0.09822942 = product of:
      0.19645885 = sum of:
        0.019420752 = weight(_text_:information in 2536) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019420752 = score(doc=2536,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.21943474 = fieldWeight in 2536, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2536)
        0.17703809 = weight(_text_:standards in 2536) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.17703809 = score(doc=2536,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.22470023 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.78788567 = fieldWeight in 2536, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2536)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Reports on a comparison of the "content categories" listed in the ANSI/ISO abstracting standards to actual content found in abstracts from the sciences, social sciences, and the humanities. The preliminary findings question the fundamental concept underlying these standards, namely, that any one set of standards and generalized instructions can describe and elicit the optimal configuration for abstracts from all subject areas
    Source
    Library and information science research. 14(1992) no.1, S.31-56
  6. Massil, S.W.: Standards for character sets and bibliographic records (1991) 0.10
    0.09822942 = product of:
      0.19645885 = sum of:
        0.019420752 = weight(_text_:information in 7895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019420752 = score(doc=7895,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.21943474 = fieldWeight in 7895, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7895)
        0.17703809 = weight(_text_:standards in 7895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.17703809 = score(doc=7895,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.22470023 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.78788567 = fieldWeight in 7895, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7895)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Reviews the current state of provision for computerized bibliographic records in non-roman characters. Transliteration of non-roman materials has up to now been the most common approach. Describes the standards been developed and the organizations involved in developing multiscript standards and processing. Reports on current systems which deal with non-roman character sets
    Source
    Standards for the international exchange of bibliographic information: papers presented at a course held at the School of Library, Archive and Information Studies, University College, London, 3-18 August 1990. Ed.: I.C. McIlwaine
  7. Aitchison, J.: Subject control : Thesaurus construction standards (1991) 0.10
    0.09822942 = product of:
      0.19645885 = sum of:
        0.019420752 = weight(_text_:information in 7930) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019420752 = score(doc=7930,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.21943474 = fieldWeight in 7930, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7930)
        0.17703809 = weight(_text_:standards in 7930) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.17703809 = score(doc=7930,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.22470023 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.78788567 = fieldWeight in 7930, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7930)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Gives an overview of recommendations given in the International and British Standards for construction of thesauri. Details: vocabulary control of monolingual thesauri, form and chooice of terms, homographs and polysemes, scope notes and definitions, compound terms, displaying and distinguishing basic relationships linking terms, multilingual aspects, thesaurus displays, and construction techniques. Outlines the future of the thesaurus and thesaurus standards
    Source
    Standards for the international exchange of bibliographic information: papers presented at a course held at the School of Library, Archive and Information Studies, University College, London, 3-18 August 1990. Ed.: I.C. McIlwaine
  8. Guenther, R.S.: ¬The USMARC Format for Classification Data : development and implementation (1992) 0.10
    0.09793079 = product of:
      0.13057439 = sum of:
        0.013732546 = weight(_text_:information in 2996) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013732546 = score(doc=2996,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 2996, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2996)
        0.088519044 = weight(_text_:standards in 2996) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.088519044 = score(doc=2996,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22470023 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.39394283 = fieldWeight in 2996, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2996)
        0.028322803 = product of:
          0.056645606 = sum of:
            0.056645606 = weight(_text_:organization in 2996) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.056645606 = score(doc=2996,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17974974 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050415643 = queryNorm
                0.31513596 = fieldWeight in 2996, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2996)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.75 = coord(3/4)
    
    Abstract
    This paper discusses the newly developed USMARC Format for Classification Data. It reviews its potential uses within an online system and its development as one of the USMARC standards for representing bibliographic and related information in machine-readable form. It provides a summary of the fields in the format, and considers the prospects for its implementation.
    Source
    Classification research for knowledge representation and organization. Proc. 5th Int. Study Conf. on Classification Research, Toronto, Canada, 24.-28.6.1991. Ed. by N.J. Williamson u. M. Hudon
  9. Bower, J.M.: Vocabulary control and the virtual database (1993) 0.10
    0.09793079 = product of:
      0.13057439 = sum of:
        0.013732546 = weight(_text_:information in 3219) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013732546 = score(doc=3219,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 3219, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3219)
        0.088519044 = weight(_text_:standards in 3219) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.088519044 = score(doc=3219,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22470023 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.39394283 = fieldWeight in 3219, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3219)
        0.028322803 = product of:
          0.056645606 = sum of:
            0.056645606 = weight(_text_:organization in 3219) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.056645606 = score(doc=3219,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17974974 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050415643 = queryNorm
                0.31513596 = fieldWeight in 3219, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3219)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.75 = coord(3/4)
    
    Abstract
    Efforts to build 'virtual museums' have focussed predominantly on solving problems of rapidity changing interface technology. Insufficient effort has been spent on planning for the 'virtual databases' on which these multimedia environments depend, particularly from the viewpoint of scholarly research. The Getty Art History Information Program has developed vocabularies that encourage consistency among scholarly documentation projects - regardless of their technical implementations - through terminology standards. Two vocabularies intended for control of terminology at the point of data capture are described, and scenarios are proposed for their further utility in navigating the complex databases that underlie the virtual museum
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 20(1993) no.1, S.4-7
  10. Gaebler, J.: Are we cataloguing for information storage ... or information retrieval (1995) 0.10
    0.09743234 = product of:
      0.19486468 = sum of:
        0.038383633 = weight(_text_:information in 5757) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.038383633 = score(doc=5757,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.43369597 = fieldWeight in 5757, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5757)
        0.15648104 = weight(_text_:standards in 5757) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15648104 = score(doc=5757,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.22470023 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.69639915 = fieldWeight in 5757, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5757)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Discusses the need to marry information retrieval standards with cataloguing standards to ensure the library profession maximises the hold it currently has on the information industry. There needs to be more interaction between cataloguers and the various stakeholders of the library profession for a better understanding of how information is used
  11. Hendley, T.: Digital mass storage options (1993) 0.10
    0.09718057 = product of:
      0.12957409 = sum of:
        0.013732546 = weight(_text_:information in 5080) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013732546 = score(doc=5080,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 5080, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5080)
        0.088519044 = weight(_text_:standards in 5080) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.088519044 = score(doc=5080,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22470023 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.39394283 = fieldWeight in 5080, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5080)
        0.027322493 = product of:
          0.054644987 = sum of:
            0.054644987 = weight(_text_:22 in 5080) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054644987 = score(doc=5080,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17654699 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050415643 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5080, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5080)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.75 = coord(3/4)
    
    Abstract
    Examines the options currently available for mass storage of digital media, technical and standards issues and how to compare them. Lists criteria for grouping storage media. Examines: seminconductor storage, hard magnetic discs, diskette/flexible disc storage, costs of mastering read-only discs, WORM optical dics storage, rewritable optical disc storage, optical tape storage, optical card storage. Reviews mass storage systems and describes optical disc jukeboxes
    Source
    Information management and technology. 26(1993) no.1, S.22-32
  12. Harmon, J.C.: ¬The death of quality cataloging : does it make a difference for library users? (1996) 0.10
    0.09718057 = product of:
      0.12957409 = sum of:
        0.013732546 = weight(_text_:information in 6435) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013732546 = score(doc=6435,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 6435, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6435)
        0.088519044 = weight(_text_:standards in 6435) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.088519044 = score(doc=6435,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22470023 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.39394283 = fieldWeight in 6435, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6435)
        0.027322493 = product of:
          0.054644987 = sum of:
            0.054644987 = weight(_text_:22 in 6435) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054644987 = score(doc=6435,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17654699 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050415643 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6435, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6435)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.75 = coord(3/4)
    
    Abstract
    Defends the role of quality cataloguing. It is only with adequate records that users will be able to find the information they require. It is a prerequisite for efficient machine retrieval and integrated services. Quality MARC records and the intellectual structure of cataloguing are essential is standards of service are to be maintained
    Source
    Journal of academic librarianship. 22(1996) no.4, S.306-307
  13. Lunau, C.D.: Z39.50: a critical component of the Canadian resource sharing infrastructure : implementation activities and results achieved (1997) 0.10
    0.09718057 = product of:
      0.12957409 = sum of:
        0.013732546 = weight(_text_:information in 3193) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013732546 = score(doc=3193,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 3193, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3193)
        0.088519044 = weight(_text_:standards in 3193) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.088519044 = score(doc=3193,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22470023 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.39394283 = fieldWeight in 3193, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3193)
        0.027322493 = product of:
          0.054644987 = sum of:
            0.054644987 = weight(_text_:22 in 3193) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054644987 = score(doc=3193,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17654699 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050415643 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3193, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3193)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.75 = coord(3/4)
    
    Abstract
    A decentralized resource sharing environment has been a key strategic initiative of the National Library of Canada for many years. The use of open system communication and ISO standards is one of the cornerstones of this vision of the Canadian library service. Summarizes Canadian Z39.50 implementation activities and the major role played by the National Library of Canada. Highlights the achievements and findings of the virtual Canadian union catalogue (vCuc) pilot project
    Date
    3. 3.1999 17:22:57
    Source
    New review of information networking. 1997, no.3, S.77-92
  14. Mason, J.D.: SGML and related standards : new directions as the second decade begins (1997) 0.10
    0.09700253 = product of:
      0.19400506 = sum of:
        0.020812286 = weight(_text_:information in 384) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020812286 = score(doc=384,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.23515764 = fieldWeight in 384, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=384)
        0.17319277 = weight(_text_:standards in 384) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.17319277 = score(doc=384,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.22470023 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.7707726 = fieldWeight in 384, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=384)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    In 1995 and early 1996, the ISO standards process that includes SGML and related standards has seen a remarkable coalescence of efforts. DSSSL and HyTime are developing a sheared approach to tree strcutures and query languages. A consequence of this may be the development of a set of general facilities that can be shared among all SGML-based standards and that, when incorporated into products, will make documents easier to work with and more powerful in their ability to deliver information
    Footnote
    Contribution to a special topic issue devoted to structured information / standards for document architecture
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 48(1997) no.7, S.593-596
  15. Parer, D.; Parrott, K.: Management practices in the electronic records environment (1994) 0.10
    0.09635921 = product of:
      0.19271842 = sum of:
        0.02427594 = weight(_text_:information in 1000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02427594 = score(doc=1000,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.27429342 = fieldWeight in 1000, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1000)
        0.16844247 = sum of:
          0.100136235 = weight(_text_:organization in 1000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.100136235 = score(doc=1000,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.17974974 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                0.050415643 = queryNorm
              0.55708694 = fieldWeight in 1000, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1000)
          0.06830624 = weight(_text_:22 in 1000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.06830624 = score(doc=1000,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17654699 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.050415643 = queryNorm
              0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 1000, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1000)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Describes 3 records management approaches to electronic records and assesses the archival interests involved in each. Suggests utilizing the Information Management methodology to devise an organization wide Information Management Plan, incorporating records management and archival requirements, to facilitate the identification of records of value to the organization to be managed as any other corporate asset
    Source
    Archives and manuscripts. 22(1994) no.1, S.106-122
  16. Tuck, B.: Protocols and standards for networking (1993) 0.10
    0.095406204 = product of:
      0.19081241 = sum of:
        0.034331363 = weight(_text_:information in 6555) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.034331363 = score(doc=6555,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.38790947 = fieldWeight in 6555, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6555)
        0.15648104 = weight(_text_:standards in 6555) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15648104 = score(doc=6555,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.22470023 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.69639915 = fieldWeight in 6555, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6555)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Differentiates between protocols and standards applied to computer networks and discusses Open Systems Interconnection (OSI), information network applications of the OSI protocols (interloans, information searching and retrieval), and document delivery and electronic publishing
    Source
    Information networking 93: using the network. Proceedings of the 1st Annual Conference on Information Networking, London, May 1993
  17. Williams, B.: Text and images converge in the library and information sector (1994) 0.10
    0.095406204 = product of:
      0.19081241 = sum of:
        0.034331363 = weight(_text_:information in 7465) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.034331363 = score(doc=7465,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.38790947 = fieldWeight in 7465, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=7465)
        0.15648104 = weight(_text_:standards in 7465) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15648104 = score(doc=7465,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.22470023 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.69639915 = fieldWeight in 7465, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=7465)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Topics: the major requirements of text and document management, documentation and quality standards, standards and users, publishers and electrocopying, optical media, differences between information use of scientists and businessan, the value of information, problems of using databases, compression techniques, text search packages searching techniques, and neural networks
    Source
    Information management and technology. 27(1994) no.1, S.25-26
  18. Cataloging and classification standards and rules (1996) 0.10
    0.095107555 = product of:
      0.19021511 = sum of:
        0.014565565 = weight(_text_:information in 57) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014565565 = score(doc=57,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.16457605 = fieldWeight in 57, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=57)
        0.17564954 = weight(_text_:standards in 57) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.17564954 = score(doc=57,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.22470023 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.7817061 = fieldWeight in 57, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=57)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Issue devoted to the theme: cataloguing and classification standards and rules
    Content
    Enthält die Beiträge: McCALLUM, S.: What makes a standard?; HOLLEY, R.P.: IFLA and international standards in the area of bibliographical control; STERN, B.: Internationalizing the rules in AACR2: adopting and translating AACR2 for use in non-Anglo-American and non-English-speaking cataloging environments; GUILES, K., R. EWALD u. B. TILLETT: The evolution of LCRIs: from de facto standards to ?; SPICHER, K.M.: The development of the MARC format; THOMAS, S.E.: The core bibliographic record and the program for cooperative cataloging; PALOWITCH, C. u. L. HOROWITZ: Meta-information structures for networked information resources; KUHAGEN, J.A.: Standards for name and series authority records; WILLIAMSON, N.: Standards and rules for subject access; GUENTHER, R.S.: Automating the Library of Congress Classification Scheme: implementation of the USMARC Format for Classification Data; LEAZER, G.H.: Recent research on the sequential bibliographical relationship and its implications for standards and the library catalog: an examination of serials
  19. Anderson, J.D.: Indexing standards : Are they possible? What good are they? Why bother? (1993) 0.10
    0.09509297 = product of:
      0.19018593 = sum of:
        0.01699316 = weight(_text_:information in 8087) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01699316 = score(doc=8087,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.1920054 = fieldWeight in 8087, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=8087)
        0.17319277 = weight(_text_:standards in 8087) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.17319277 = score(doc=8087,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.22470023 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.7707726 = fieldWeight in 8087, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=8087)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Discusses the nature of standards as tools to promote compatibility and improve practice, the role of research versus expert opinion in the creation of standards, the changing scope of standards for indexes in the face of the changing indexing environment, with the increasing use of automatic indexing, electronic displays, and electronic searching of non-displayed indexes. Describes the current draft of the NISO American Standard Guidelines for indexes in information retrieval (Z39.4) in terms of 3 fundamental requirements: syntax, vocabulary management and comprehensive planning and design. Concludes with comments about the nebulous concept of good and accurate indexing and whether and how standards can be used advantageously
    Source
    Indexing, providing access to information: looking back, looking ahead. Proceedings of the 25th Annual Meeting of the American Society of Indexers. Ed.: N.C. Mulvany
  20. MacMorrow, N.: Cracking the code : multimedia standards and what they mean (1993) 0.09
    0.09444732 = product of:
      0.18889464 = sum of:
        0.03398632 = weight(_text_:information in 7114) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03398632 = score(doc=7114,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.3840108 = fieldWeight in 7114, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7114)
        0.15490833 = weight(_text_:standards in 7114) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15490833 = score(doc=7114,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22470023 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.68939996 = fieldWeight in 7114, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7114)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Imprint
    Oxford : Learned Information
    Source
    Online information 93: 17th International Online Meeting Proceedings, London, 7.-9.12.1993. Ed. by D.I. Raitt et al

Authors

Types

  • a 6519
  • m 511
  • s 405
  • r 85
  • el 78
  • i 33
  • b 23
  • n 21
  • ? 8
  • p 7
  • d 4
  • h 2
  • pat 1
  • x 1
  • z 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications