-
Kleineberg, M.: Context analysis and context indexing : formal pragmatics in knowledge organization (2014)
0.16
0.16412814 = product of:
0.41032034 = sum of:
0.102580085 = product of:
0.30774024 = sum of:
0.30774024 = weight(_text_:3a in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.30774024 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
0.32853773 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.038751747 = queryNorm
0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.30774024 = weight(_text_:2f in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.30774024 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
0.32853773 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.038751747 = queryNorm
0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Source
- http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=5&ved=0CDQQFjAE&url=http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F3131107&ei=HzFWVYvGMsiNsgGTyoFI&usg=AFQjCNE2FHUeR9oQTQlNC4TPedv4Mo3DaQ&sig2=Rlzpr7a3BLZZkqZCXXN_IA&bvm=bv.93564037,d.bGg&cad=rja
-
Zeng, Q.; Yu, M.; Yu, W.; Xiong, J.; Shi, Y.; Jiang, M.: Faceted hierarchy : a new graph type to organize scientific concepts and a construction method (2019)
0.10
0.09847688 = product of:
0.24619219 = sum of:
0.061548047 = product of:
0.18464413 = sum of:
0.18464413 = weight(_text_:3a in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.18464413 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
0.32853773 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.038751747 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.18464413 = weight(_text_:2f in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.18464413 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
0.32853773 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.038751747 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Content
- Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Faclanthology.org%2FD19-5317.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0ZZFyq5wWTtNTvNkrvjlGA.
-
Xiong, C.: Knowledge based text representations for information retrieval (2016)
0.09
0.08604648 = product of:
0.21511619 = sum of:
0.04103203 = product of:
0.12309609 = sum of:
0.12309609 = weight(_text_:3a in 5820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12309609 = score(doc=5820,freq=2.0), product of:
0.32853773 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.038751747 = queryNorm
0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 5820, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5820)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.17408416 = weight(_text_:2f in 5820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.17408416 = score(doc=5820,freq=4.0), product of:
0.32853773 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.038751747 = queryNorm
0.5298757 = fieldWeight in 5820, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5820)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Content
- Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Language and Information Technologies. Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Fwww.cs.cmu.edu%2F~cx%2Fpapers%2Fknowledge_based_text_representation.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0SaTSvhWLTh__Uz_HtOtl3.
-
Farazi, M.: Faceted lightweight ontologies : a formalization and some experiments (2010)
0.08
0.08206407 = product of:
0.20516017 = sum of:
0.051290043 = product of:
0.15387012 = sum of:
0.15387012 = weight(_text_:3a in 4997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.15387012 = score(doc=4997,freq=2.0), product of:
0.32853773 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.038751747 = queryNorm
0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4997, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4997)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.15387012 = weight(_text_:2f in 4997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.15387012 = score(doc=4997,freq=2.0), product of:
0.32853773 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.038751747 = queryNorm
0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4997, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4997)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Content
- PhD Dissertation at International Doctorate School in Information and Communication Technology. Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Fcore.ac.uk%2Fdownload%2Fpdf%2F150083013.pdf&usg=AOvVaw2n-qisNagpyT0lli_6QbAQ.
-
Huo, W.: Automatic multi-word term extraction and its application to Web-page summarization (2012)
0.08
0.078057915 = product of:
0.19514479 = sum of:
0.18464413 = weight(_text_:2f in 563) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.18464413 = score(doc=563,freq=2.0), product of:
0.32853773 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.038751747 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 563, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=563)
0.010500654 = product of:
0.03150196 = sum of:
0.03150196 = weight(_text_:22 in 563) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03150196 = score(doc=563,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13570201 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.038751747 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 563, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=563)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Content
- A Thesis presented to The University of Guelph In partial fulfilment of requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Computer Science. Vgl. Unter: http://www.inf.ufrgs.br%2F~ceramisch%2Fdownload_files%2Fpublications%2F2009%2Fp01.pdf.
- Date
- 10. 1.2013 19:22:47
-
Jervis, M.; Masoodian, M.: How do people attempt to integrate the management of their paper and electronic documents? (2014)
0.03
0.029239297 = product of:
0.07309824 = sum of:
0.0643477 = weight(_text_:management in 1632) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0643477 = score(doc=1632,freq=14.0), product of:
0.13061713 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.038751747 = queryNorm
0.49264365 = fieldWeight in 1632, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1632)
0.008750545 = product of:
0.026251635 = sum of:
0.026251635 = weight(_text_:22 in 1632) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026251635 = score(doc=1632,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13570201 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.038751747 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1632, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1632)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- Purpose - This article aims to describe how people manage to integrate their use of paper and electronic documents in modern office work environments. Design/methodology/approach - An observational interview type study of 14 participants from 11 offices in eight organizations was conducted. Recorded data were analysed using a thematic analysis method. This involved reading and annotation of interview transcripts, categorizing, linking and connecting, corroborating, and producing an account of the study. Findings - The findings of the study can be categorized into four groups: the roles paper and electronic documents serve in today's offices, the ways in which these documents are managed, the problems associated with their management, and the types of fragmentation that exist in terms of their management and how these are dealt with. Practical implications - The study has identified the need for better integrated management of paper and electronic documents in present-day offices. The findings of the study have then been used to propose a set of guidelines for the development of integrated paper and electronic document management systems. Originality/value - Although similar studies of offices have been conducted in the past, almost all of these studies are prior to the widespread use of mobile and network-based shared technologies in office environments. Furthermore, previous studies have generally failed to identify and propose guidelines for integration of paper and electronic document management systems.
- Date
- 20. 1.2015 18:30:22
- Source
- Aslib journal of information management. 66(2014) no.2, S.134-155
-
Huang, M.-H.; Huang, W.-T.; Chang, C.-C.; Chen, D. Z.; Lin, C.-P.: The greater scattering phenomenon beyond Bradford's law in patent citation (2014)
0.03
0.02855145 = product of:
0.071378626 = sum of:
0.02918537 = weight(_text_:management in 1352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02918537 = score(doc=1352,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13061713 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.038751747 = queryNorm
0.22344214 = fieldWeight in 1352, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1352)
0.042193256 = product of:
0.06328988 = sum of:
0.031787917 = weight(_text_:29 in 1352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031787917 = score(doc=1352,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13631654 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.038751747 = queryNorm
0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 1352, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1352)
0.03150196 = weight(_text_:22 in 1352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03150196 = score(doc=1352,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13570201 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.038751747 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1352, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1352)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- Patent analysis has become important for management as it offers timely and valuable information to evaluate R&D performance and identify the prospects of patents. This study explores the scattering patterns of patent impact based on citations in 3 distinct technological areas, the liquid crystal, semiconductor, and drug technological areas, to identify the core patents in each area. The research follows the approach from Bradford's law, which equally divides total citations into 3 zones. While the result suggests that the scattering of patent citations corresponded with features of Bradford's law, the proportion of patents in the 3 zones did not match the proportion as proposed by the law. As a result, the study shows that the distributions of citations in all 3 areas were more concentrated than what Bradford's law proposed. The Groos (1967) droop was also presented by the scattering of patent citations, and the growth rate of cumulative citation decreased in the third zone.
- Date
- 22. 8.2014 17:11:29
-
Benoit, G.; Hussey, L.: Repurposing digital objects : case studies across the publishing industry (2011)
0.03
0.028490562 = product of:
0.0712264 = sum of:
0.05897564 = weight(_text_:management in 4198) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05897564 = score(doc=4198,freq=6.0), product of:
0.13061713 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.038751747 = queryNorm
0.45151538 = fieldWeight in 4198, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4198)
0.012250762 = product of:
0.036752287 = sum of:
0.036752287 = weight(_text_:22 in 4198) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036752287 = score(doc=4198,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13570201 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.038751747 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4198, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4198)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- Large, data-rich organizations have tremendously large collections of digital objects to be "repurposed," to respond quickly and economically to publishing, marketing, and information needs. Some management typically assume that a content management system, or some other technique such as OWL and RDF, will automatically address the workflow and technical issues associated with this reuse. Four case studies show that the sources of some roadblocks to agile repurposing are as much managerial and organizational as they are technical in nature. The review concludes with suggestions on how digital object repurposing can be integrated given these organizations' structures.
- Date
- 22. 1.2011 14:23:07
- Theme
- Content Management System
-
Ronda-Pupo, G.A.; Katz, J.S.: ¬The power-law relationship between citation-based performance and collaboration in articles in management journals : a scale-independent approach scale-independent approach (2016)
0.03
0.027586684 = product of:
0.06896671 = sum of:
0.05837074 = weight(_text_:management in 3127) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05837074 = score(doc=3127,freq=8.0), product of:
0.13061713 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.038751747 = queryNorm
0.44688427 = fieldWeight in 3127, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3127)
0.010595973 = product of:
0.031787917 = sum of:
0.031787917 = weight(_text_:29 in 3127) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031787917 = score(doc=3127,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13631654 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.038751747 = queryNorm
0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 3127, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3127)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- The objective of this article is to determine if academic collaboration is associated with the citation-based performance of articles that are published in management journals. We analyzed 127,812 articles published between 1988 and 2013 in 173 journals on the ISI Web of Science in the "management" category. Collaboration occurred in approximately 60% of all articles. A power-law relationship was found between citation-based performance and journal size and collaboration patterns. The number of citations expected by collaborative articles increases 21.89 or 3.7 times when the number of collaborative articles published in a journal doubles. The number of citations expected by noncollaborative articles only increases 21.35 or 2.55 times if a journal publishes double the number of noncollaborative articles. The Matthew effect is stronger for collaborative than for noncollaborative articles. Scale-independent indicators increase the confidence in the evaluation of the impact of the articles published in management journals.
- Date
- 20. 9.2016 21:29:27
-
Mizrachi, D.; Bates, M.J.: Undergraduates' personal academic information management and the consideration of time and task-urgency (2013)
0.03
0.027329972 = product of:
0.06832493 = sum of:
0.059574388 = weight(_text_:management in 1003) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.059574388 = score(doc=1003,freq=12.0), product of:
0.13061713 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.038751747 = queryNorm
0.45609936 = fieldWeight in 1003, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1003)
0.008750545 = product of:
0.026251635 = sum of:
0.026251635 = weight(_text_:22 in 1003) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026251635 = score(doc=1003,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13570201 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.038751747 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1003, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1003)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- Young undergraduate college students are often described as "digital natives," presumed to prefer living and working in completely digital information environments. In reality, their world is part-paper/part-digital, in constant transition among successive forms of digital storage and communication devices. Studying for a degree is the daily work of these young people, and effective management of paper and digital academic materials and resources contributes crucially to their success in life. Students must also constantly manage their work against deadlines to meet their course and university requirements. This study, following the "Personal Information Management" (PIM) paradigm, examines student academic information management under these various constraints and pressures. A total of 41 18- to 22-year-old students were interviewed and observed regarding the content, structure, and uses of their immediate working environment within their dormitory rooms. Students exhibited remarkable creativity and variety in the mixture of automated and manual resources and devices used to support their academic work. The demands of a yearlong procession of assignments, papers, projects, and examinations increase the importance of time management activities and influence much of their behavior. Results provide insights on student use of various kinds of information technology and their overall planning and management of information associated with their studies.
-
Paul-Hus, A.; Desrochers, N.; Rijcke, S.de; Rushforth, A.D.: ¬The reward system of science (2017)
0.03
0.026457349 = product of:
0.06614337 = sum of:
0.04864228 = weight(_text_:management in 3304) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04864228 = score(doc=3304,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13061713 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.038751747 = queryNorm
0.37240356 = fieldWeight in 3304, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3304)
0.01750109 = product of:
0.05250327 = sum of:
0.05250327 = weight(_text_:22 in 3304) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05250327 = score(doc=3304,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13570201 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.038751747 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3304, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3304)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Date
- 20. 1.2015 18:30:22
- Source
- Aslib journal of information management. 69(2017) no.5, S.478-485
-
Mingers, J.; Macri, F.; Petrovici, D.: Using the h-index to measure the quality of journals in the field of business and management (2012)
0.02
0.024458608 = product of:
0.06114652 = sum of:
0.050550546 = weight(_text_:management in 2741) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.050550546 = score(doc=2741,freq=6.0), product of:
0.13061713 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.038751747 = queryNorm
0.38701317 = fieldWeight in 2741, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2741)
0.010595973 = product of:
0.031787917 = sum of:
0.031787917 = weight(_text_:29 in 2741) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031787917 = score(doc=2741,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13631654 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.038751747 = queryNorm
0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 2741, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2741)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- This paper considers the use of the h-index as a measure of a journal's research quality and contribution. We study a sample of 455 journals in business and management all of which are included in the ISI Web of Science (WoS) and the Association of Business School's peer review journal ranking list. The h-index is compared with both the traditional impact factors, and with the peer review judgements. We also consider two sources of citation data - the WoS itself and Google Scholar. The conclusions are that the h-index is preferable to the impact factor for a variety of reasons, especially the selective coverage of the impact factor and the fact that it disadvantages journals that publish many papers. Google Scholar is also preferred to WoS as a data source. However, the paper notes that it is not sufficient to use any single metric to properly evaluate research achievements.
- Date
- 29. 1.2016 19:00:16
- Source
- Information processing and management. 48(2012) no.2, S.234-241
-
Taylor, A.: User relevance criteria choices and the information search process (2012)
0.02
0.023792876 = product of:
0.059482187 = sum of:
0.02432114 = weight(_text_:management in 2745) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02432114 = score(doc=2745,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13061713 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.038751747 = queryNorm
0.18620178 = fieldWeight in 2745, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2745)
0.035161044 = product of:
0.052741565 = sum of:
0.02648993 = weight(_text_:29 in 2745) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02648993 = score(doc=2745,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13631654 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.038751747 = queryNorm
0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 2745, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2745)
0.026251635 = weight(_text_:22 in 2745) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026251635 = score(doc=2745,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13570201 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.038751747 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2745, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2745)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Date
- 29. 1.2016 19:22:14
- Source
- Information processing and management. 48(2012) no.1, S.136-153
-
Alqahtani, F.H.: ¬The acceptance of corporate wiki use for knowledge diffusion purposes (2017)
0.02
0.022957131 = product of:
0.05739283 = sum of:
0.04864228 = weight(_text_:management in 4055) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04864228 = score(doc=4055,freq=8.0), product of:
0.13061713 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.038751747 = queryNorm
0.37240356 = fieldWeight in 4055, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4055)
0.008750545 = product of:
0.026251635 = sum of:
0.026251635 = weight(_text_:22 in 4055) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026251635 = score(doc=4055,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13570201 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.038751747 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4055, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4055)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- Purpose Scholars and practitioners alike view knowledge as a crucial organisational asset. Over the past decade, several knowledge management (KM) technologies have emerged, such as wikis. A wiki is a web-based hypertext application that supports a collaborative and conversational approach to KM. While wikis are generally simple to use, their adoption for managing organisational knowledge sometimes meets resistance from employees. The purpose of this paper is to investigate the factors affecting the user acceptance of organisational wikis as a means of knowledge creation and diffusion. Design/methodology/approach Building on the existing research on KM and information technology adoption, this study identified the following factors: the relevance of top management support for and complexity of enterprise wikis as well as technical support and knowledge-sharing self-efficacy. A cross-sectional survey was employed to examine the influence of these factors on employees' acceptance of corporate wikis. Overall, 102 employees participated in the online survey, and the data collected were analysed using the partial least squares method. Findings The research model developed demonstrates that top management support, technical support and knowledge-sharing self-efficacy have a positive significant effect on employees' willingness to use wikis for knowledge-creation purposes within organisations. Originality/value The findings of this study contribute to the existing literature on the implementation of wikis as a KM technology by developing a theoretical model explaining employees' acceptance of this technology. Organisations could use this model to guide and facilitate wiki initiatives.
- Date
- 20. 1.2015 18:30:22
- Source
- Aslib journal of information management. 69(2017) no.6, S.642-659
-
Huvila, I.: Situational appropriation of information (2015)
0.02
0.021863978 = product of:
0.054659944 = sum of:
0.04765951 = weight(_text_:management in 2596) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04765951 = score(doc=2596,freq=12.0), product of:
0.13061713 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.038751747 = queryNorm
0.3648795 = fieldWeight in 2596, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2596)
0.007000436 = product of:
0.021001307 = sum of:
0.021001307 = weight(_text_:22 in 2596) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021001307 = score(doc=2596,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13570201 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.038751747 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2596, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2596)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- Purpose In contrast to the interest of describing and managing the social processes of knowing, information science and information and knowledge management research have put less emphasis on discussing how particular information becomes usable and how it is used in different contexts and situations. The purpose of this paper is to address this major gap, and introduce and discuss the applicability of the notion of situational appropriation of information for shedding light on this particular process in the context of daily information work practices of professionals. Design/methodology/approach The study is based on the analysis of 25 qualitative interviews of archives, library and museum professionals conducted in two Nordic countries. Findings The study presents examples of how individuals appropriate different tangible and intangible assets as information on the basis of the situation in hand. Research limitations/implications The study proposes a new conceptual tool for articulating and conducting research on the process how information becomes useful in the situation in hand. Practical implications The situational appropriation of information perspective redefines the role of information management to incorporate a comprehensive awareness of the situations when information is useful and is being used. A better understanding how information becomes useful in diverse situations helps to discern the active role of contextual and situational effects and to exploit and take them into account as a part of the management of information and knowledge processes. Originality/value In contrast to orthodoxies of information science and information and knowledge management research, the notion of situational appropriation of information represents an alternative approach to the conceptualisation of information utilisation. It helps to frame particular types of instances of information use that are not necessarily addressed within the objectivistic, information seeker or learning oriented paradigms of information and knowledge management.
- Date
- 20. 1.2015 18:30:22
- Source
- Aslib journal of information management. 67(2015) no.5, S.492-504
-
Metadata and semantics research : 7th Research Conference, MTSR 2013 Thessaloniki, Greece, November 19-22, 2013. Proceedings (2013)
0.02
0.021505548 = product of:
0.053763866 = sum of:
0.024076702 = weight(_text_:management in 1155) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024076702 = score(doc=1155,freq=4.0), product of:
0.13061713 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.038751747 = queryNorm
0.18433036 = fieldWeight in 1155, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1155)
0.029687162 = product of:
0.044530742 = sum of:
0.018542951 = weight(_text_:29 in 1155) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018542951 = score(doc=1155,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13631654 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.038751747 = queryNorm
0.13602862 = fieldWeight in 1155, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1155)
0.025987793 = weight(_text_:22 in 1155) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025987793 = score(doc=1155,freq=4.0), product of:
0.13570201 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.038751747 = queryNorm
0.19150631 = fieldWeight in 1155, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1155)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- The MTSR 2013 program and the contents of these proceedings show a rich diversity of research and practices, drawing on problems from metadata and semantically focused tools and technologies, linked data, cross-language semantics, ontologies, metadata models, and semantic system and metadata standards. The general session of the conference included 18 papers covering a broad spectrum of topics, proving the interdisciplinary field of metadata, and was divided into three main themes: platforms for research data sets, system architecture and data management; metadata and ontology validation, evaluation, mapping and interoperability; and content management. Metadata as a research topic is maturing, and the conference also supported the following five tracks: Metadata and Semantics for Open Repositories, Research Information Systems and Data Infrastructures; Metadata and Semantics for Cultural Collections and Applications; Metadata and Semantics for Agriculture, Food and Environment; Big Data and Digital Libraries in Health, Science and Technology; and European and National Projects, and Project Networking. Each track had a rich selection of papers, giving broader diversity to MTSR, and enabling deeper exploration of significant topics.
All the papers underwent a thorough and rigorous peer-review process. The review and selection this year was highly competitive and only papers containing significant research results, innovative methods, or novel and best practices were accepted for publication. Only 29 of 89 submissions were accepted as full papers, representing 32.5% of the total number of submissions. Additional contributions covering noteworthy and important results in special tracks or project reports were accepted, totaling 42 accepted contributions. This year's conference included two outstanding keynote speakers. Dr. Stefan Gradmann, a professor arts department of KU Leuven (Belgium) and director of university library, addressed semantic research drawing from his work with Europeana. The title of his presentation was, "Towards a Semantic Research Library: Digital Humanities Research, Europeana and the Linked Data Paradigm". Dr. Michail Salampasis, associate professor from our conference host institution, the Department of Informatics of the Alexander TEI of Thessaloniki, presented new potential, intersecting search and linked data. The title of his talk was, "Rethinking the Search Experience: What Could Professional Search Systems Do Better?"
- Date
- 17.12.2013 12:51:22
-
Niu, J.: Evolving landscape in name authority control (2013)
0.02
0.021216717 = product of:
0.05304179 = sum of:
0.038913827 = weight(_text_:management in 1901) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038913827 = score(doc=1901,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13061713 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.038751747 = queryNorm
0.29792285 = fieldWeight in 1901, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1901)
0.014127962 = product of:
0.042383887 = sum of:
0.042383887 = weight(_text_:29 in 1901) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042383887 = score(doc=1901,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13631654 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.038751747 = queryNorm
0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 1901, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1901)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- This article presents a conceptual framework for library name authority control, including methods for disambiguating agents that share the same name and for collocating works of agents who use multiple names. It then discusses the identifier solutions tried or proposed in the library community for name authority control, analyzes the various identity management systems emerging outside of the library community, and envisions future trends in name authority control.
- Date
- 29. 5.2015 13:20:17
-
Troitino Rodriguez, S.; Fujita, M.; Neves, D.A.B.: Indexing in records management (2016)
0.02
0.021216717 = product of:
0.05304179 = sum of:
0.038913827 = weight(_text_:management in 4911) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038913827 = score(doc=4911,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13061713 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.038751747 = queryNorm
0.29792285 = fieldWeight in 4911, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4911)
0.014127962 = product of:
0.042383887 = sum of:
0.042383887 = weight(_text_:29 in 4911) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042383887 = score(doc=4911,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13631654 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.038751747 = queryNorm
0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 4911, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4911)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Source
- Knowledge organization for a sustainable world: challenges and perspectives for cultural, scientific, and technological sharing in a connected society : proceedings of the Fourteenth International ISKO Conference 27-29 September 2016, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil / organized by International Society for Knowledge Organization (ISKO), ISKO-Brazil, São Paulo State University ; edited by José Augusto Chaves Guimarães, Suellen Oliveira Milani, Vera Dodebei
-
Can, O.; Yilmazer, D.: ¬A privacy-aware semantic model for provenance management (2014)
0.02
0.02074813 = product of:
0.051870324 = sum of:
0.04127435 = weight(_text_:management in 1580) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04127435 = score(doc=1580,freq=4.0), product of:
0.13061713 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.038751747 = queryNorm
0.31599492 = fieldWeight in 1580, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1580)
0.010595973 = product of:
0.031787917 = sum of:
0.031787917 = weight(_text_:29 in 1580) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031787917 = score(doc=1580,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13631654 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.038751747 = queryNorm
0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 1580, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1580)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- The history of data has a crucial importance almost in every scientific application. In order to trust the correctness of data, the ability to determine the origin of data becomes an important issue. Provenance information summarizes the origin of items, the history of the ownership of items and the actions performed on them. Ensuring that data is kept safe from corruption or illegal accesses and detecting privacy breaches on data should be achieved by integrating provenance concepts with security concepts. Information such as an individual's infectious disease history is highly sensitive and should not be revealed to an unauthorized user. This historical data needs privacy. We propose a privacy-aware provenance management model by creating policies and querying provenance data to detect policy violations. We illustrate our proposed model by integrating it with infectious disease and vaccination domains.
- Source
- Metadata and semantics research: 8th Research Conference, MTSR 2014, Karlsruhe, Germany, November 27-29, 2014, Proceedings. Eds.: S. Closs et al
-
Tamani, N.; Mosse, P.; Croitoru, M.; Buche, P.; Guillard, V.: ¬A food packaging use case for argumentation (2014)
0.02
0.02074813 = product of:
0.051870324 = sum of:
0.04127435 = weight(_text_:management in 1595) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04127435 = score(doc=1595,freq=4.0), product of:
0.13061713 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.038751747 = queryNorm
0.31599492 = fieldWeight in 1595, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1595)
0.010595973 = product of:
0.031787917 = sum of:
0.031787917 = weight(_text_:29 in 1595) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031787917 = score(doc=1595,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13631654 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.038751747 = queryNorm
0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 1595, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1595)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- Within the framework of the European project EcoBioCap (ECOefficient BIOdegradable Composite Advanced Packaging), aiming at conceiving the next generation of food packagings, we introduce an argumentation-based tool for management of conflicting viewpoints between preferences expressed by the involved parties (food and packaging industries, health and waste management authorities, consumers, etc.). In this paper we recall briefly the principles underlying the reasoning process, and we detail the main functionalities and the architecture of the argumentation tool covering the overall reasoning steps starting from formal representation of text arguments and ending by extraction of justified preferences. Finally, we detail its operational functioning through a real life case study to determine the justifiable choices between recyclable, compostable and biodegradable packaging materials based on stakeholders' arguments.
- Source
- Metadata and semantics research: 8th Research Conference, MTSR 2014, Karlsruhe, Germany, November 27-29, 2014, Proceedings. Eds.: S. Closs et al
