Search (4187 results, page 1 of 210)

  • × language_ss:"e"
  1. Ackermann, E.: Piaget's constructivism, Papert's constructionism : what's the difference? (2001) 0.13
    0.1322616 = product of:
      0.2645232 = sum of:
        0.2645232 = product of:
          0.5290464 = sum of:
            0.20643905 = weight(_text_:3a in 692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.20643905 = score(doc=692,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.44078097 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051991083 = queryNorm
                0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 692, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=692)
            0.32260734 = weight(_text_:2c in 692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.32260734 = score(doc=692,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.5510158 = queryWeight, product of:
                  10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051991083 = queryNorm
                0.5854775 = fieldWeight in 692, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=692)
          0.5 = coord(2/4)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Piaget-%E2%80%99-s-Constructivism-%2C-Papert-%E2%80%99-s-%3A-What-%E2%80%99-s-Ackermann/89cbcc1e740a4591443ff4765a6ae8df0fdf5554. Darunter weitere Hinweise auf verwandte Beiträge. Auch unter: Learning Group Publication 5(2001) no.3, S.438.
  2. Crestani, F.; Du, H.: Written versus spoken queries : a qualitative and quantitative comparative analysis (2006) 0.11
    0.11492534 = sum of:
      0.01790725 = product of:
        0.071629 = sum of:
          0.071629 = weight(_text_:authors in 5047) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.071629 = score(doc=5047,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.23701768 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051991083 = queryNorm
              0.30220953 = fieldWeight in 5047, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5047)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.09701809 = sum of:
        0.05475365 = weight(_text_:f in 5047) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05475365 = score(doc=5047,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20722532 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051991083 = queryNorm
            0.26422277 = fieldWeight in 5047, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5047)
        0.042264443 = weight(_text_:22 in 5047) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042264443 = score(doc=5047,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1820639 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051991083 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5047, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5047)
    
    Abstract
    The authors report on an experimental study on the differences between spoken and written queries. A set of written and spontaneous spoken queries are generated by users from written topics. These two sets of queries are compared in qualitative terms and in terms of their retrieval effectiveness. Written and spoken queries are compared in terms of length, duration, and part of speech. In addition, assuming perfect transcription of the spoken queries, written and spoken queries are compared in terms of their aptitude to describe relevant documents. The retrieval effectiveness of spoken and written queries is compared using three different information retrieval models. The results show that using speech to formulate one's information need provides a way to express it more naturally and encourages the formulation of longer queries. Despite that, longer spoken queries do not seem to significantly improve retrieval effectiveness compared with written queries.
    Date
    5. 6.2006 11:22:23
  3. Weinberg, B.H.: Book indexes in France : medieval specimens and modern practices (2000) 0.11
    0.113187775 = product of:
      0.22637555 = sum of:
        0.22637555 = sum of:
          0.12775852 = weight(_text_:f in 486) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.12775852 = score(doc=486,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.20722532 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051991083 = queryNorm
              0.6165198 = fieldWeight in 486, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
                0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=486)
          0.09861703 = weight(_text_:22 in 486) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.09861703 = score(doc=486,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1820639 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051991083 = queryNorm
              0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 486, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=486)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Location
    F
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.2-13
  4. Carter, J.A.: PASSPORT/PRISM: authors and titles and MARC : oh my! (1993) 0.10
    0.10410525 = sum of:
      0.047752663 = product of:
        0.19101065 = sum of:
          0.19101065 = weight(_text_:authors in 527) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.19101065 = score(doc=527,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.23701768 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051991083 = queryNorm
              0.80589205 = fieldWeight in 527, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=527)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.05635259 = product of:
        0.11270518 = sum of:
          0.11270518 = weight(_text_:22 in 527) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.11270518 = score(doc=527,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1820639 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051991083 = queryNorm
              0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 527, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=527)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    OCLC systems and services. 9(1993) no.3, S.20-22
  5. Burghardt, M.; Hertlein, F.; Hinterleitner, B.; Lehenmeier, C.; Spröd, T.: ¬A crowdsourced approach for the documentation and transcription of graffiti in public restrooms (2015) 0.10
    0.099748164 = product of:
      0.19949633 = sum of:
        0.19949633 = sum of:
          0.12905559 = weight(_text_:f in 2991) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.12905559 = score(doc=2991,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.20722532 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051991083 = queryNorm
              0.6227791 = fieldWeight in 2991, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2991)
          0.07044074 = weight(_text_:22 in 2991) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.07044074 = score(doc=2991,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1820639 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051991083 = queryNorm
              0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2991, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2991)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    6. 6.2016 18:42:22
    Source
    Re:inventing information science in the networked society: Proceedings of the 14th International Symposium on Information Science, Zadar/Croatia, 19th-21st May 2015. Eds.: F. Pehar, C. Schloegl u. C. Wolff
  6. Bourdon, F.: Functional requirements and numbering of authority records (FRANAR) : to what extent can authority control be supported by technical means? (2002) 0.10
    0.09701809 = product of:
      0.19403619 = sum of:
        0.19403619 = sum of:
          0.1095073 = weight(_text_:f in 3929) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.1095073 = score(doc=3929,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.20722532 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051991083 = queryNorm
              0.52844554 = fieldWeight in 3929, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3929)
          0.084528886 = weight(_text_:22 in 3929) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.084528886 = score(doc=3929,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1820639 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051991083 = queryNorm
              0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3929, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3929)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    30. 8.2005 9:22:54
  7. Boteram, F.; Hubrich, J.: Towards a comprehensive international Knowledge Organization System (2008) 0.10
    0.09701809 = product of:
      0.19403619 = sum of:
        0.19403619 = sum of:
          0.1095073 = weight(_text_:f in 4786) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.1095073 = score(doc=4786,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.20722532 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051991083 = queryNorm
              0.52844554 = fieldWeight in 4786, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4786)
          0.084528886 = weight(_text_:22 in 4786) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.084528886 = score(doc=4786,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1820639 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051991083 = queryNorm
              0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4786, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4786)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 9.2008 19:30:41
  8. Su, Y.; Han, L.-F.: ¬A new literature growth model : variable exponential growth law of literature (1998) 0.10
    0.09543716 = product of:
      0.19087432 = sum of:
        0.19087432 = sum of:
          0.09125608 = weight(_text_:f in 3690) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.09125608 = score(doc=3690,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.20722532 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051991083 = queryNorm
              0.4403713 = fieldWeight in 3690, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3690)
          0.09961824 = weight(_text_:22 in 3690) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.09961824 = score(doc=3690,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.1820639 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051991083 = queryNorm
              0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3690, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3690)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 5.1999 19:22:35
  9. Hotho, A.; Bloehdorn, S.: Data Mining 2004 : Text classification by boosting weak learners based on terms and concepts (2004) 0.08
    0.08306394 = sum of:
      0.061931714 = product of:
        0.24772686 = sum of:
          0.24772686 = weight(_text_:3a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.24772686 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.44078097 = queryWeight, product of:
                8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051991083 = queryNorm
              0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.021132221 = product of:
        0.042264443 = sum of:
          0.042264443 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.042264443 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1820639 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051991083 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CEAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.91.4940%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&ei=dOXrUMeIDYHDtQahsIGACg&usg=AFQjCNHFWVh6gNPvnOrOS9R3rkrXCNVD-A&sig2=5I2F5evRfMnsttSgFF9g7Q&bvm=bv.1357316858,d.Yms.
    Date
    8. 1.2013 10:22:32
  10. Herrero-Solana, V.; Moya Anegón, F. de: Graphical Table of Contents (GTOC) for library collections : the application of UDC codes for the subject maps (2003) 0.08
    0.08156185 = sum of:
      0.016883118 = product of:
        0.06753247 = sum of:
          0.06753247 = weight(_text_:authors in 2758) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.06753247 = score(doc=2758,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.23701768 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051991083 = queryNorm
              0.28492588 = fieldWeight in 2758, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2758)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.06467873 = sum of:
        0.036502432 = weight(_text_:f in 2758) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.036502432 = score(doc=2758,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20722532 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051991083 = queryNorm
            0.17614852 = fieldWeight in 2758, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2758)
        0.028176295 = weight(_text_:22 in 2758) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028176295 = score(doc=2758,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1820639 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051991083 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2758, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2758)
    
    Abstract
    The representation of information contents by graphical maps is an extended ongoing research topic. In this paper we introduce the application of UDC codes for the subject maps development. We use the following graphic representation methodologies: 1) Multidimensional scaling (MDS), 2) Cluster analysis, 3) Neural networks (Self Organizing Map - SOM). Finally, we conclude about the application viability of every kind of map. 1. Introduction Advanced techniques for Information Retrieval (IR) currently make up one of the most active areas for research in the field of library and information science. New models representing document content are replacing the classic systems in which the search terms supplied by the user were compared against the indexing terms existing in the inverted files of a database. One of the topics most often studied in the last years is bibliographic browsing, a good complement to querying strategies. Since the 80's, many authors have treated this topic. For example, Ellis establishes that browsing is based an three different types of tasks: identification, familiarization and differentiation (Ellis, 1989). On the other hand, Cove indicates three different browsing types: searching browsing, general purpose browsing and serendipity browsing (Cove, 1988). Marcia Bates presents six different types (Bates, 1989), although the classification of Bawden is the one that really interests us: 1) similarity comparison, 2) structure driven, 3) global vision (Bawden, 1993). The global vision browsing implies the use of graphic representations, which we will call map displays, that allow the user to get a global idea of the nature and structure of the information in the database. In the 90's, several authors worked an this research line, developing different types of maps. One of the most active was Xia Lin what introduced the concept of Graphical Table of Contents (GTOC), comparing the maps to true table of contents based an graphic representations (Lin 1996). Lin applies the algorithm SOM to his own personal bibliography, analyzed in function of the words of the title and abstract fields, and represented in a two-dimensional map (Lin 1997). Later on, Lin applied this type of maps to create websites GTOCs, through a Java application.
    Date
    12. 9.2004 14:31:22
  11. Guidi, F.; Sacerdoti Coen, C.: ¬A survey on retrieval of mathematical knowledge (2015) 0.08
    0.08084841 = product of:
      0.16169682 = sum of:
        0.16169682 = sum of:
          0.09125608 = weight(_text_:f in 5865) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.09125608 = score(doc=5865,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.20722532 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051991083 = queryNorm
              0.4403713 = fieldWeight in 5865, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5865)
          0.07044074 = weight(_text_:22 in 5865) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.07044074 = score(doc=5865,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1820639 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051991083 = queryNorm
              0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5865, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5865)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 2.2017 12:51:57
  12. Golland, L.; Sigmund, K.: Exact thought in a demented time : Karl Menger and his Viennese Mathematical Colloquium (2000) 0.08
    0.08084841 = product of:
      0.16169682 = sum of:
        0.16169682 = sum of:
          0.09125608 = weight(_text_:f in 5645) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.09125608 = score(doc=5645,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.20722532 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051991083 = queryNorm
              0.4403713 = fieldWeight in 5645, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5645)
          0.07044074 = weight(_text_:22 in 5645) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.07044074 = score(doc=5645,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1820639 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051991083 = queryNorm
              0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5645, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5645)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Biographed
    Alt, F.
    Source
    Mathematical intelligencer. 22(2000) no.1, S.34-45
  13. Akkermans, H.; Ygge, F.; Gustavsson, R.: HOMEBOTS : Intelligent decentralized services for energy management (1996) 0.08
    0.08084841 = product of:
      0.16169682 = sum of:
        0.16169682 = sum of:
          0.09125608 = weight(_text_:f in 888) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.09125608 = score(doc=888,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.20722532 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051991083 = queryNorm
              0.4403713 = fieldWeight in 888, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=888)
          0.07044074 = weight(_text_:22 in 888) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.07044074 = score(doc=888,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1820639 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051991083 = queryNorm
              0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 888, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=888)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Knowledge management: organization competence and methodolgy. Proceedings of the Fourth International ISMICK Symposium, 21-22 October 1996, Netherlands. Ed.: J.F. Schreinemakers
  14. Su, M.-F.: On cataloging and classifying chinese history (1983) 0.08
    0.08084841 = product of:
      0.16169682 = sum of:
        0.16169682 = sum of:
          0.09125608 = weight(_text_:f in 322) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.09125608 = score(doc=322,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.20722532 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051991083 = queryNorm
              0.4403713 = fieldWeight in 322, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=322)
          0.07044074 = weight(_text_:22 in 322) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.07044074 = score(doc=322,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1820639 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051991083 = queryNorm
              0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 322, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=322)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    6. 1.2007 19:22:14
  15. Saracevic, T.: On a method for studying the structure and nature of requests in information retrieval (1983) 0.08
    0.08084841 = product of:
      0.16169682 = sum of:
        0.16169682 = sum of:
          0.09125608 = weight(_text_:f in 2417) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.09125608 = score(doc=2417,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.20722532 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051991083 = queryNorm
              0.4403713 = fieldWeight in 2417, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2417)
          0.07044074 = weight(_text_:22 in 2417) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.07044074 = score(doc=2417,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1820639 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051991083 = queryNorm
              0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2417, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2417)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Pages
    S.22-25
    Source
    Productivity in the information age : proceedings of the 46th ASIS annual meeting, 1983. Ed.: Raymond F Vondra
  16. Celli, F. et al.: Enabling multilingual search through controlled vocabularies : the AGRIS approach (2016) 0.08
    0.08084841 = product of:
      0.16169682 = sum of:
        0.16169682 = sum of:
          0.09125608 = weight(_text_:f in 3278) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.09125608 = score(doc=3278,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.20722532 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051991083 = queryNorm
              0.4403713 = fieldWeight in 3278, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3278)
          0.07044074 = weight(_text_:22 in 3278) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.07044074 = score(doc=3278,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1820639 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051991083 = queryNorm
              0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3278, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3278)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Metadata and semantics research: 10th International Conference, MTSR 2016, Göttingen, Germany, November 22-25, 2016, Proceedings. Eds.: E. Garoufallou
  17. Plassard, M.-F.: Workshop on UNIMARC with CDS/ISIS Budapest, 21-22 June 1993 (1993) 0.08
    0.076349735 = product of:
      0.15269947 = sum of:
        0.15269947 = sum of:
          0.073004864 = weight(_text_:f in 7892) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.073004864 = score(doc=7892,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.20722532 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051991083 = queryNorm
              0.35229704 = fieldWeight in 7892, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7892)
          0.0796946 = weight(_text_:22 in 7892) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0796946 = score(doc=7892,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.1820639 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051991083 = queryNorm
              0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 7892, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7892)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    International cataloguing and bibliographic control. 22(1993) no.4, S.59-60
  18. Egghe, L.: ¬A universal method of information retrieval evaluation : the "missing" link M and the universal IR surface (2004) 0.07
    0.06855028 = product of:
      0.13710056 = sum of:
        0.13710056 = sum of:
          0.094836116 = weight(_text_:f in 2558) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.094836116 = score(doc=2558,freq=6.0), product of:
              0.20722532 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051991083 = queryNorm
              0.45764732 = fieldWeight in 2558, product of:
                2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                  6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2558)
          0.042264443 = weight(_text_:22 in 2558) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.042264443 = score(doc=2558,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1820639 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051991083 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2558, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2558)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The paper shows that the present evaluation methods in information retrieval (basically recall R and precision P and in some cases fallout F ) lack universal comparability in the sense that their values depend on the generality of the IR problem. A solution is given by using all "parts" of the database, including the non-relevant documents and also the not-retrieved documents. It turns out that the solution is given by introducing the measure M being the fraction of the not-retrieved documents that are relevant (hence the "miss" measure). We prove that - independent of the IR problem or of the IR action - the quadruple (P,R,F,M) belongs to a universal IR surface, being the same for all IR-activities. This universality is then exploited by defining a new measure for evaluation in IR allowing for unbiased comparisons of all IR results. We also show that only using one, two or even three measures from the set {P,R,F,M} necessary leads to evaluation measures that are non-universal and hence not capable of comparing different IR situations.
    Date
    14. 8.2004 19:17:22
  19. Siddiqui, M.A.: ¬A bibliometric study of authorship characteristics in four international information science journals (1997) 0.06
    0.06499585 = sum of:
      0.043863624 = product of:
        0.1754545 = sum of:
          0.1754545 = weight(_text_:authors in 853) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.1754545 = score(doc=853,freq=12.0), product of:
              0.23701768 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051991083 = queryNorm
              0.7402591 = fieldWeight in 853, product of:
                3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                  12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=853)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.021132221 = product of:
        0.042264443 = sum of:
          0.042264443 = weight(_text_:22 in 853) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.042264443 = score(doc=853,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1820639 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051991083 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 853, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=853)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Reports results of a bibliometric study of the authorship characteristics of articles published in 4 major information science periodicals: JASIS, Information technology and libraries, Journal of information science, and Program. The aim was to determine the details of their authors, such as: sex, occupation, affiliation, geographic distribution, and institutional affiliation. A total of 163 articles published in 1993 and written by 294 authors were analyzed. Results indicate that: men (206 or 70%) publish 3.0 times more articles than women (69 or 23,5%). Schools of library and information science contributed the most authors. The majority of authors came from the USA (148 or 50,3%), with the Midwest region claiming the largest share (110 or 25,0%). Academic libraries (110 or 37,4%) account for the major share of library publication. 12 schools of library and information science, in the USA, contributed 32 authors (50,0%) and assistant professors (25 or 39,1%) publish the most in these library schools. Male school of library and information science authors publish 1,6 times more than their female counterparts
    Source
    International forum on information and documentation. 22(1997) no.3, S.3-23
  20. Vogt, F.; Wille, R.: TOSCANA - a graphical tool for analyzing and exploring data (1995) 0.06
    0.06467873 = product of:
      0.12935746 = sum of:
        0.12935746 = sum of:
          0.073004864 = weight(_text_:f in 1901) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.073004864 = score(doc=1901,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.20722532 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051991083 = queryNorm
              0.35229704 = fieldWeight in 1901, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1901)
          0.05635259 = weight(_text_:22 in 1901) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05635259 = score(doc=1901,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1820639 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.051991083 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1901, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1901)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 22(1995) no.2, S.78-81

Authors

Languages

Types

  • a 3646
  • m 315
  • s 187
  • el 171
  • b 34
  • p 19
  • r 19
  • x 10
  • n 6
  • i 4
  • ? 1
  • ag 1
  • d 1
  • h 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications