-
Frâncu, V.; Sabo, C.-N.: Implementation of a UDC-based multilingual thesaurus in a library catalogue : the case of BiblioPhil (2010)
0.15
0.14781967 = sum of:
0.025060384 = product of:
0.100241534 = sum of:
0.100241534 = weight(_text_:authors in 3697) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.100241534 = score(doc=3697,freq=4.0), product of:
0.23454411 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.051448494 = queryNorm
0.42738882 = fieldWeight in 3697, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3697)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.12275928 = sum of:
0.08093592 = weight(_text_:v in 3697) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08093592 = score(doc=3697,freq=2.0), product of:
0.25062758 = queryWeight, product of:
4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
0.051448494 = queryNorm
0.32293302 = fieldWeight in 3697, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3697)
0.04182336 = weight(_text_:22 in 3697) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04182336 = score(doc=3697,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18016386 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051448494 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3697, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3697)
- Abstract
- In order to enhance the use of Universal Decimal Classification (UDC) numbers in information retrieval, the authors have represented classification with multilingual thesaurus descriptors and implemented this solution in an automated way. The authors illustrate a solution implemented in a BiblioPhil library system. The standard formats used are UNIMARC for subject authority records (i.e. the UDC-based multilingual thesaurus) and MARC XML support for data transfer. The multilingual thesaurus was built according to existing standards, the constituent parts of the classification notations being used as the basis for search terms in the multilingual information retrieval. The verbal equivalents, descriptors and non-descriptors, are used to expand the number of concepts and are given in Romanian, English and French. This approach saves the time of the indexer and provides more user-friendly and easier access to the bibliographic information. The multilingual aspect of the thesaurus enhances information access for a greater number of online users
- Date
- 22. 7.2010 20:40:56
-
Diodato, V.: Dictionary of bibliometrics (1994)
0.14
0.14321917 = product of:
0.28643835 = sum of:
0.28643835 = sum of:
0.18885049 = weight(_text_:v in 5666) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.18885049 = score(doc=5666,freq=2.0), product of:
0.25062758 = queryWeight, product of:
4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
0.051448494 = queryNorm
0.7535104 = fieldWeight in 5666, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5666)
0.097587846 = weight(_text_:22 in 5666) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.097587846 = score(doc=5666,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18016386 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051448494 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 5666, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5666)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Footnote
- Rez. in: Journal of library and information science 22(1996) no.2, S.116-117 (L.C. Smith)
-
Liu, V.: Cooperative Online Resource Catalog (CORC) : a community college's experience (2000)
0.14
0.14321917 = product of:
0.28643835 = sum of:
0.28643835 = sum of:
0.18885049 = weight(_text_:v in 3819) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.18885049 = score(doc=3819,freq=2.0), product of:
0.25062758 = queryWeight, product of:
4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
0.051448494 = queryNorm
0.7535104 = fieldWeight in 3819, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3819)
0.097587846 = weight(_text_:22 in 3819) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.097587846 = score(doc=3819,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18016386 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051448494 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 3819, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3819)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Community and junior college libraries. 9(2000) no.3, S.5-22
-
He, L.; Nahar, V.: Reuse of scientific data in academic publications : an investigation of Dryad Digital Repository (2016)
0.14
0.14047965 = sum of:
0.017720366 = product of:
0.07088146 = sum of:
0.07088146 = weight(_text_:authors in 3072) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07088146 = score(doc=3072,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23454411 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.051448494 = queryNorm
0.30220953 = fieldWeight in 3072, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3072)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.12275928 = sum of:
0.08093592 = weight(_text_:v in 3072) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08093592 = score(doc=3072,freq=2.0), product of:
0.25062758 = queryWeight, product of:
4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
0.051448494 = queryNorm
0.32293302 = fieldWeight in 3072, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3072)
0.04182336 = weight(_text_:22 in 3072) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04182336 = score(doc=3072,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18016386 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051448494 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3072, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3072)
- Abstract
- Purpose - In recent years, a large number of data repositories have been built and used. However, the extent to which scientific data are re-used in academic publications is still unknown. The purpose of this paper is to explore the functions of re-used scientific data in scholarly publication in different fields. Design/methodology/approach - To address these questions, the authors identified 827 publications citing resources in the Dryad Digital Repository indexed by Scopus from 2010 to 2015. Findings - The results show that: the number of citations to scientific data increases sharply over the years, but mainly from data-intensive disciplines, such as agricultural, biology science, environment science and medicine; the majority of citations are from the originating articles; and researchers tend to reuse data produced by their own research groups. Research limitations/implications - Dryad data may be re-used without being formally cited. Originality/value - The conservatism in data sharing suggests that more should be done to encourage researchers to re-use other's data.
- Date
- 20. 1.2015 18:30:22
-
Ackermann, E.: Piaget's constructivism, Papert's constructionism : what's the difference? (2001)
0.13
0.1308813 = product of:
0.2617626 = sum of:
0.2617626 = product of:
0.5235252 = sum of:
0.20428462 = weight(_text_:3a in 692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.20428462 = score(doc=692,freq=2.0), product of:
0.43618092 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.051448494 = queryNorm
0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 692, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=692)
0.31924057 = weight(_text_:2c in 692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.31924057 = score(doc=692,freq=2.0), product of:
0.5452653 = queryWeight, product of:
10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
0.051448494 = queryNorm
0.5854775 = fieldWeight in 692, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=692)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Content
- Vgl.: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Piaget-%E2%80%99-s-Constructivism-%2C-Papert-%E2%80%99-s-%3A-What-%E2%80%99-s-Ackermann/89cbcc1e740a4591443ff4765a6ae8df0fdf5554. Darunter weitere Hinweise auf verwandte Beiträge. Auch unter: Learning Group Publication 5(2001) no.3, S.438.
-
Barden, B.R.; Denison, B.: Guide to the SLA loan collection of classification schemes and subject heading lists on deposit at Western Reserve Univ. as of March 20, 1961 (1961)
0.12
0.12275928 = product of:
0.24551857 = sum of:
0.24551857 = sum of:
0.16187184 = weight(_text_:v in 6157) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.16187184 = score(doc=6157,freq=2.0), product of:
0.25062758 = queryWeight, product of:
4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
0.051448494 = queryNorm
0.64586604 = fieldWeight in 6157, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6157)
0.08364672 = weight(_text_:22 in 6157) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08364672 = score(doc=6157,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18016386 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051448494 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6157, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6157)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Footnote
- Rez. in: College and research libraries 22(1961) no.6, S.483-484 (A.R. Lindsay)
- Pages
- V,97 S
-
Broughton, V.: Automatic metadata generation : Digital resource description without human intervention (2007)
0.12
0.12275928 = product of:
0.24551857 = sum of:
0.24551857 = sum of:
0.16187184 = weight(_text_:v in 6048) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.16187184 = score(doc=6048,freq=2.0), product of:
0.25062758 = queryWeight, product of:
4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
0.051448494 = queryNorm
0.64586604 = fieldWeight in 6048, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6048)
0.08364672 = weight(_text_:22 in 6048) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08364672 = score(doc=6048,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18016386 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051448494 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6048, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6048)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 9.2007 15:41:14
-
Dodebei, V.; Orrico, E. Goyannes Dill: Knowledge in social memory : empirical experiment for a domain conceptual-discursive mapping (2014)
0.12
0.11706638 = sum of:
0.0147669725 = product of:
0.05906789 = sum of:
0.05906789 = weight(_text_:authors in 1405) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05906789 = score(doc=1405,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23454411 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.051448494 = queryNorm
0.25184128 = fieldWeight in 1405, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1405)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.10229941 = sum of:
0.067446604 = weight(_text_:v in 1405) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.067446604 = score(doc=1405,freq=2.0), product of:
0.25062758 = queryWeight, product of:
4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
0.051448494 = queryNorm
0.26911086 = fieldWeight in 1405, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1405)
0.034852803 = weight(_text_:22 in 1405) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034852803 = score(doc=1405,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18016386 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051448494 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1405, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1405)
- Abstract
- Mapping a knowledge domain in the interdisciplinary field of Social Memory is discussed, considering the linguistic materiality and the conceptual relations that are most appropriate to its representation. Theoretical instruments for knowledge organization in the field of information as well as of memory are both central in contemporary social studies and they must help a clear representation of a domain, especially when it lies in disciplinary frontiers. Two perspectives were used as methodological procedures: the conceptual analysis regarding the categorization of the authors' intellectual production selected from syllabus of the discipline Social Memory and Institution; and discursive fragments selected from Paul Ricour's text memory and imagination . As main results, data analysis from the first corpus pointed out six main facets that organize the memory context; and the second corpus, related to discursive materiality, organizes Ricour's ideas of memory from some philosophical points of view. As conclusions, we consider that mapping key concepts and discourses towards the main categories (ontological) and towards a group of relations derived from the discursive analysis process has enabled a possible framework for social memory indexing/searching studies. Even though this proposal is specific to a topic in a teaching program, it indicates a promising path for upcoming studies in Knowledge Organization.
- Source
- Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
-
Osinska, V.; Kowalska, M.; Osinski, Z.: ¬The role of visualization in the shaping and exploration of the individual information space : part 1 (2018)
0.12
0.11706638 = sum of:
0.0147669725 = product of:
0.05906789 = sum of:
0.05906789 = weight(_text_:authors in 4641) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05906789 = score(doc=4641,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23454411 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.051448494 = queryNorm
0.25184128 = fieldWeight in 4641, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4641)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.10229941 = sum of:
0.067446604 = weight(_text_:v in 4641) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.067446604 = score(doc=4641,freq=2.0), product of:
0.25062758 = queryWeight, product of:
4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
0.051448494 = queryNorm
0.26911086 = fieldWeight in 4641, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4641)
0.034852803 = weight(_text_:22 in 4641) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034852803 = score(doc=4641,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18016386 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051448494 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4641, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4641)
- Abstract
- Studies on the state and structure of digital knowledge concerning science generally relate to macro and meso scales. Supported by visualizations, these studies can deliver knowledge about emerging scientific fields or collaboration between countries, scientific centers, or groups of researchers. Analyses of individual activities or single scientific career paths are rarely presented and discussed. The authors decided to fill this gap and developed a web application for visualizing the scientific output of particular researchers. This free software based on bibliographic data from local databases, provides six layouts for analysis. Researchers can see the dynamic characteristics of their own writing activity, the time and place of publication, and the thematic scope of research problems. They can also identify cooperation networks, and consequently, study the dependencies and regularities in their own scientific activity. The current article presents the results of a study of the application's usability and functionality as well as attempts to define different user groups. A survey about the interface was sent to select researchers employed at Nicolaus Copernicus University. The results were used to answer the question as to whether such a specialized visualization tool can significantly augment the individual information space of the contemporary researcher.
- Date
- 21.12.2018 17:22:13
-
Barité, M.; Parentelli, V.; Rodríguez Casaballe, N.; Suárez, M.V.: Interdisciplinarity and postgraduate teaching of knowledge organization (KO) : elements for a necessary dialogue (2023)
0.12
0.11706638 = sum of:
0.0147669725 = product of:
0.05906789 = sum of:
0.05906789 = weight(_text_:authors in 1125) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05906789 = score(doc=1125,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23454411 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.051448494 = queryNorm
0.25184128 = fieldWeight in 1125, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1125)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.10229941 = sum of:
0.067446604 = weight(_text_:v in 1125) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.067446604 = score(doc=1125,freq=2.0), product of:
0.25062758 = queryWeight, product of:
4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
0.051448494 = queryNorm
0.26911086 = fieldWeight in 1125, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1125)
0.034852803 = weight(_text_:22 in 1125) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034852803 = score(doc=1125,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18016386 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051448494 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1125, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1125)
- Abstract
- Interdisciplinarity implies the previous existence of disciplinary fields and not their dissolution. As a general objective, we propose to establish an initial approach to the emphasis given to interdisciplinarity in the teaching of KO, through the teaching staff responsible for postgraduate courses focused on -or related to the KO, in Ibero-American universities. For conducting the research, the framework and distribution of a survey addressed to teachers is proposed, based on four lines of action: 1. The way teachers manage the concept of interdisciplinarity. 2. The place that teachers give to interdisciplinarity in KO. 3. Assessment of interdisciplinary content that teachers incorporate into their postgraduate courses. 4. Set of teaching strategies and resources used by teachers to include interdisciplinarity in the teaching of KO. The study analyzed 22 responses. Preliminary results show that KO teachers recognize the influence of other disciplines in concepts, theories, methods, and applications, but no consensus has been reached regarding which disciplines and authors are the ones who build interdisciplinary bridges. Among other conclusions, the study strongly suggests that environmental and social tensions are reflected in subject representation, especially in the construction of friendly knowledge organization systems with interdisciplinary visions, and in the expressions through which information is sought.
-
Carter, J.A.: PASSPORT/PRISM: authors and titles and MARC : oh my! (1993)
0.10
0.10301879 = sum of:
0.04725431 = product of:
0.18901724 = sum of:
0.18901724 = weight(_text_:authors in 527) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.18901724 = score(doc=527,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23454411 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.051448494 = queryNorm
0.80589205 = fieldWeight in 527, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=527)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.055764485 = product of:
0.11152897 = sum of:
0.11152897 = weight(_text_:22 in 527) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11152897 = score(doc=527,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18016386 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051448494 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 527, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=527)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- OCLC systems and services. 9(1993) no.3, S.20-22
-
Herrero-Solana, V.; Moya Anegón, F. de: Graphical Table of Contents (GTOC) for library collections : the application of UDC codes for the subject maps (2003)
0.10
0.098546445 = sum of:
0.016706921 = product of:
0.066827685 = sum of:
0.066827685 = weight(_text_:authors in 2758) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.066827685 = score(doc=2758,freq=4.0), product of:
0.23454411 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.051448494 = queryNorm
0.28492588 = fieldWeight in 2758, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2758)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.081839524 = sum of:
0.05395728 = weight(_text_:v in 2758) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05395728 = score(doc=2758,freq=2.0), product of:
0.25062758 = queryWeight, product of:
4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
0.051448494 = queryNorm
0.21528868 = fieldWeight in 2758, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2758)
0.027882243 = weight(_text_:22 in 2758) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027882243 = score(doc=2758,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18016386 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051448494 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2758, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2758)
- Abstract
- The representation of information contents by graphical maps is an extended ongoing research topic. In this paper we introduce the application of UDC codes for the subject maps development. We use the following graphic representation methodologies: 1) Multidimensional scaling (MDS), 2) Cluster analysis, 3) Neural networks (Self Organizing Map - SOM). Finally, we conclude about the application viability of every kind of map. 1. Introduction Advanced techniques for Information Retrieval (IR) currently make up one of the most active areas for research in the field of library and information science. New models representing document content are replacing the classic systems in which the search terms supplied by the user were compared against the indexing terms existing in the inverted files of a database. One of the topics most often studied in the last years is bibliographic browsing, a good complement to querying strategies. Since the 80's, many authors have treated this topic. For example, Ellis establishes that browsing is based an three different types of tasks: identification, familiarization and differentiation (Ellis, 1989). On the other hand, Cove indicates three different browsing types: searching browsing, general purpose browsing and serendipity browsing (Cove, 1988). Marcia Bates presents six different types (Bates, 1989), although the classification of Bawden is the one that really interests us: 1) similarity comparison, 2) structure driven, 3) global vision (Bawden, 1993). The global vision browsing implies the use of graphic representations, which we will call map displays, that allow the user to get a global idea of the nature and structure of the information in the database. In the 90's, several authors worked an this research line, developing different types of maps. One of the most active was Xia Lin what introduced the concept of Graphical Table of Contents (GTOC), comparing the maps to true table of contents based an graphic representations (Lin 1996). Lin applies the algorithm SOM to his own personal bibliography, analyzed in function of the words of the title and abstract fields, and represented in a two-dimensional map (Lin 1997). Later on, Lin applied this type of maps to create websites GTOCs, through a Java application.
- Date
- 12. 9.2004 14:31:22
-
Angegon, M.; Herrero Solana, V.; Guerrero-Bote, V.: Virtual reality interface for accessing electronic information (1998)
0.09
0.0911657 = product of:
0.1823314 = sum of:
0.1823314 = sum of:
0.13353747 = weight(_text_:v in 3534) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13353747 = score(doc=3534,freq=4.0), product of:
0.25062758 = queryWeight, product of:
4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
0.051448494 = queryNorm
0.53281236 = fieldWeight in 3534, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3534)
0.048793923 = weight(_text_:22 in 3534) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048793923 = score(doc=3534,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18016386 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051448494 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3534, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3534)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Library and information research news. 22(1998) no.71, S.34-39
-
Hotho, A.; Bloehdorn, S.: Data Mining 2004 : Text classification by boosting weak learners based on terms and concepts (2004)
0.08
0.08219707 = sum of:
0.061285388 = product of:
0.24514155 = sum of:
0.24514155 = weight(_text_:3a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.24514155 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
0.43618092 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.051448494 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.02091168 = product of:
0.04182336 = sum of:
0.04182336 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04182336 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18016386 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051448494 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Content
- Vgl.: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CEAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.91.4940%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&ei=dOXrUMeIDYHDtQahsIGACg&usg=AFQjCNHFWVh6gNPvnOrOS9R3rkrXCNVD-A&sig2=5I2F5evRfMnsttSgFF9g7Q&bvm=bv.1357316858,d.Yms.
- Date
- 8. 1.2013 10:22:32
-
Saving the time of the library user through subject access innovation : Papers in honor of Pauline Atherton Cochrane (2000)
0.08
0.08194647 = sum of:
0.010336881 = product of:
0.041347522 = sum of:
0.041347522 = weight(_text_:authors in 1429) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041347522 = score(doc=1429,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23454411 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.051448494 = queryNorm
0.17628889 = fieldWeight in 1429, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1429)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.07160959 = sum of:
0.047212623 = weight(_text_:v in 1429) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047212623 = score(doc=1429,freq=2.0), product of:
0.25062758 = queryWeight, product of:
4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
0.051448494 = queryNorm
0.1883776 = fieldWeight in 1429, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1429)
0.024396962 = weight(_text_:22 in 1429) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024396962 = score(doc=1429,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18016386 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051448494 = queryNorm
0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 1429, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1429)
- Abstract
- Pauline Atherton Cochrane has been contributing to library and information science for fifty years. Think of it-from mid-century to the millennium, from ENIAC (practically) to Internet 11 (almost here). What a time to be in our field! Her work an indexing, subject access, and the user-oriented approach had immediate and sustained impact, and she continues to be one of our most heavily cited authors (see, JASIS, 49[4], 327-55) and most beloved personages. This introduction includes a few words about my own experiences with Pauline as well as a short summary of the contributions that make up this tribute. A review of the curriculum vita provided at the end of this publication Shows that Pauline Cochrane has been involved in a wide variety of work. As Marcia Bates points out in her note (See below), Pauline was (and is) a role model, but I will always think of her as simply the best teacher 1 ever had. In 1997, I entered the University of Illinois Graduate School of Library and Information Science as a returning mid-life student; my previous doctorate had not led to a full-time job and I was re-tooling. I was not sure what 1 would find in library school, and the introductory course attended by more than 100 students from widely varied backgrounds had not yet convinced me I was in the right place. Then, one day, Pauline gave a guest lecture an the digital library in my introductory class. I still remember it. She put up some notes-a few words clustered an the blackboard with some circles and directional arrows-and then she gave a free, seemingly extemporaneous, but riveting narrative. She set out a vision for ideal information exchange in the digital environment but noted a host of practical concerns, issues, and potential problems that required (demanded!) continued human intervention. The lecture brought that class and the entire semester's work into focus; it created tremendous excitement for the future of librarianship. 1 saw that librarians and libraries would play an active role. I was in the right place.
- Content
- Enthält Beiträge von: FUGMANN, R.: Obstacles to progress in mechanized subject access and the necessity of a paradigm change; TELL, B.: On MARC and natural text searching: a review of Pauline Cochrane's inspirational thinking grafted onto a Swedish spy on library matters; KING, D.W.: Blazing new trails: in celebration of an audacious career; FIDEL, R.: The user-centered approach; SMITH, L.: Subject access in interdisciplinary research; DRABENSTOTT, K.M.: Web search strategies; LAM, V.-T.: Enhancing subject access to monographs in Online Public Access Catalogs: table of contents added to bibliographic records; JOHNSON, E.H.: Objects for distributed heterogeneous information retrieval
- Date
- 22. 9.1997 19:16:05
-
Khoo, C.S.G.; Wan, K.-W.: ¬A simple relevancy-ranking strategy for an interface to Boolean OPACs (2004)
0.08
0.08194647 = sum of:
0.010336881 = product of:
0.041347522 = sum of:
0.041347522 = weight(_text_:authors in 2509) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041347522 = score(doc=2509,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23454411 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.051448494 = queryNorm
0.17628889 = fieldWeight in 2509, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=2509)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.07160959 = sum of:
0.047212623 = weight(_text_:v in 2509) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047212623 = score(doc=2509,freq=2.0), product of:
0.25062758 = queryWeight, product of:
4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
0.051448494 = queryNorm
0.1883776 = fieldWeight in 2509, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=2509)
0.024396962 = weight(_text_:22 in 2509) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024396962 = score(doc=2509,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18016386 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051448494 = queryNorm
0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 2509, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=2509)
- Abstract
- A relevancy-ranking algorithm for a natural language interface to Boolean online public access catalogs (OPACs) was formulated and compared with that currently used in a knowledge-based search interface called the E-Referencer, being developed by the authors. The algorithm makes use of seven weIl-known ranking criteria: breadth of match, section weighting, proximity of query words, variant word forms (stemming), document frequency, term frequency and document length. The algorithm converts a natural language query into a series of increasingly broader Boolean search statements. In a small experiment with ten subjects in which the algorithm was simulated by hand, the algorithm obtained good results with a mean overall precision of 0.42 and mean average precision of 0.62, representing a 27 percent improvement in precision and 41 percent improvement in average precision compared to the E-Referencer. The usefulness of each step in the algorithm was analyzed and suggestions are made for improving the algorithm.
- Content
- "Most Web search engines accept natural language queries, perform some kind of fuzzy matching and produce ranked output, displaying first the documents that are most likely to be relevant. On the other hand, most library online public access catalogs (OPACs) an the Web are still Boolean retrieval systems that perform exact matching, and require users to express their search requests precisely in a Boolean search language and to refine their search statements to improve the search results. It is well-documented that users have difficulty searching Boolean OPACs effectively (e.g. Borgman, 1996; Ensor, 1992; Wallace, 1993). One approach to making OPACs easier to use is to develop a natural language search interface that acts as a middleware between the user's Web browser and the OPAC system. The search interface can accept a natural language query from the user and reformulate it as a series of Boolean search statements that are then submitted to the OPAC. The records retrieved by the OPAC are ranked by the search interface before forwarding them to the user's Web browser. The user, then, does not need to interact directly with the Boolean OPAC but with the natural language search interface or search intermediary. The search interface interacts with the OPAC system an the user's behalf. The advantage of this approach is that no modification to the OPAC or library system is required. Furthermore, the search interface can access multiple OPACs, acting as a meta search engine, and integrate search results from various OPACs before sending them to the user. The search interface needs to incorporate a method for converting the user's natural language query into a series of Boolean search statements, and for ranking the OPAC records retrieved. The purpose of this study was to develop a relevancyranking algorithm for a search interface to Boolean OPAC systems. This is part of an on-going effort to develop a knowledge-based search interface to OPACs called the E-Referencer (Khoo et al., 1998, 1999; Poo et al., 2000). E-Referencer v. 2 that has been implemented applies a repertoire of initial search strategies and reformulation strategies to retrieve records from OPACs using the Z39.50 protocol, and also assists users in mapping query keywords to the Library of Congress subject headings."
- Source
- Electronic library. 22(2004) no.2, S.112-120
-
Friman, M.; Jansson, P.; Suominen, V.: Chaos or order? : Aby Warburg's library of cultural history and its classification (1995)
0.08
0.081839524 = product of:
0.16367905 = sum of:
0.16367905 = sum of:
0.10791456 = weight(_text_:v in 1089) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10791456 = score(doc=1089,freq=2.0), product of:
0.25062758 = queryWeight, product of:
4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
0.051448494 = queryNorm
0.43057737 = fieldWeight in 1089, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1089)
0.055764485 = weight(_text_:22 in 1089) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.055764485 = score(doc=1089,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18016386 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051448494 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1089, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1089)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Knowledge organization. 22(1995) no.1, S.23-29
-
Diodato, V.: Duplicate entries versus see cross references in back-of-the book indexes (1994)
0.08
0.081839524 = product of:
0.16367905 = sum of:
0.16367905 = sum of:
0.10791456 = weight(_text_:v in 1427) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10791456 = score(doc=1427,freq=2.0), product of:
0.25062758 = queryWeight, product of:
4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
0.051448494 = queryNorm
0.43057737 = fieldWeight in 1427, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1427)
0.055764485 = weight(_text_:22 in 1427) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.055764485 = score(doc=1427,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18016386 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051448494 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1427, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1427)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Considers whether, when there is a choice, a back-of-book indexer should use a duplicate entry or a see reference. Guidelines suggest that it is preferable to use the duplicate entry if it would not add to the length or complexity of the index. Studies 1.100 see references in 202 back-of-book indexes and concludes that 22% of the see references should have been replaced by duplicate entries. Failure to select a duplicate entry instead of a see reference occurs most frequently in science and techology books and in indexes with no subheadings
-
Heijst, A.L.M. v.: Records management : the art of making choices (1995)
0.08
0.081839524 = product of:
0.16367905 = sum of:
0.16367905 = sum of:
0.10791456 = weight(_text_:v in 3355) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10791456 = score(doc=3355,freq=2.0), product of:
0.25062758 = queryWeight, product of:
4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
0.051448494 = queryNorm
0.43057737 = fieldWeight in 3355, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3355)
0.055764485 = weight(_text_:22 in 3355) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.055764485 = score(doc=3355,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18016386 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051448494 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3355, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3355)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 2.1996 9:30:18
-
Porter, M.; Galpin, V.: Relevance feedback in a public access catalogue for a research library : Muscat at the Scott Polar Research Institute (1988)
0.08
0.081839524 = product of:
0.16367905 = sum of:
0.16367905 = sum of:
0.10791456 = weight(_text_:v in 4165) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10791456 = score(doc=4165,freq=2.0), product of:
0.25062758 = queryWeight, product of:
4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
0.051448494 = queryNorm
0.43057737 = fieldWeight in 4165, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.871427 = idf(docFreq=920, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4165)
0.055764485 = weight(_text_:22 in 4165) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.055764485 = score(doc=4165,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18016386 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051448494 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4165, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4165)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Program. 22(1988), S.1-20
