-
Jascó, P.: Searching for images by similarity online (1998)
0.14
0.1396623 = product of:
0.2793246 = sum of:
0.2793246 = sum of:
0.11929417 = weight(_text_:p in 393) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11929417 = score(doc=393,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18768665 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.052200247 = queryNorm
0.63560283 = fieldWeight in 393, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=393)
0.16003044 = weight(_text_:22 in 393) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.16003044 = score(doc=393,freq=4.0), product of:
0.18279637 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052200247 = queryNorm
0.8754574 = fieldWeight in 393, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=393)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 29.11.2004 13:03:22
- Source
- Online. 22(1998) no.6, S.99-102
-
Ackermann, E.: Piaget's constructivism, Papert's constructionism : what's the difference? (2001)
0.13
0.1327937 = product of:
0.2655874 = sum of:
0.2655874 = product of:
0.5311748 = sum of:
0.20726958 = weight(_text_:3a in 692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.20726958 = score(doc=692,freq=2.0), product of:
0.44255427 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.052200247 = queryNorm
0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 692, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=692)
0.3239052 = weight(_text_:2c in 692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.3239052 = score(doc=692,freq=2.0), product of:
0.55323255 = queryWeight, product of:
10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
0.052200247 = queryNorm
0.5854775 = fieldWeight in 692, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=692)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Content
- Vgl.: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Piaget-%E2%80%99-s-Constructivism-%2C-Papert-%E2%80%99-s-%3A-What-%E2%80%99-s-Ackermann/89cbcc1e740a4591443ff4765a6ae8df0fdf5554. Darunter weitere Hinweise auf verwandte Beiträge. Auch unter: Learning Group Publication 5(2001) no.3, S.438.
-
Gilster, P.: Digital literacy (1997)
0.12
0.12331639 = product of:
0.24663278 = sum of:
0.24663278 = sum of:
0.14761901 = weight(_text_:p in 3340) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14761901 = score(doc=3340,freq=4.0), product of:
0.18768665 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.052200247 = queryNorm
0.7865184 = fieldWeight in 3340, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3340)
0.09901378 = weight(_text_:22 in 3340) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09901378 = score(doc=3340,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18279637 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052200247 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 3340, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3340)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Footnote
- Rez. in: Online and CD-ROM review 22(1998) no.5, S.350-351 (P. Bradley)
-
Jones, M.; Buchanan, G.; Cheng, T.-C.; Jain, P.: Changing the pace of search : supporting background information seeking (2006)
0.12
0.12267393 = sum of:
0.020975841 = product of:
0.083903365 = sum of:
0.083903365 = weight(_text_:authors in 5287) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.083903365 = score(doc=5287,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23797122 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.052200247 = queryNorm
0.35257778 = fieldWeight in 5287, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5287)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.101698086 = sum of:
0.052191198 = weight(_text_:p in 5287) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.052191198 = score(doc=5287,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18768665 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.052200247 = queryNorm
0.27807623 = fieldWeight in 5287, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5287)
0.04950689 = weight(_text_:22 in 5287) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04950689 = score(doc=5287,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18279637 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052200247 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5287, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5287)
- Abstract
- Almost all Web searches are carried out while the user is sitting at a conventional desktop computer connected to the Internet. Although online, handheld, mobile search offers new possibilities, the fast-paced, focused style of interaction may not be appropriate for all user search needs. The authors explore an alternative, relaxed style for Web searching that asynchronously combines an offline handheld computer and an online desktop personal computer. They discuss the role and utility of such an approach, present a tool to meet these user needs, and discuss its relation to other systems.
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 18:37:49
-
Leuser, P.: SGML-Einsatz bei Duden und Brockhaus : ein Verlag auf neuem Weg (1993)
0.12
0.11622639 = product of:
0.23245278 = sum of:
0.23245278 = sum of:
0.11929417 = weight(_text_:p in 5919) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11929417 = score(doc=5919,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18768665 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.052200247 = queryNorm
0.63560283 = fieldWeight in 5919, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5919)
0.113158606 = weight(_text_:22 in 5919) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.113158606 = score(doc=5919,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18279637 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052200247 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 5919, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5919)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Infodoc. 19(1993) H.3, S.20-22
-
Barker, P.: Electronic libraries of the future (1997)
0.12
0.11622639 = product of:
0.23245278 = sum of:
0.23245278 = sum of:
0.11929417 = weight(_text_:p in 7201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11929417 = score(doc=7201,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18768665 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.052200247 = queryNorm
0.63560283 = fieldWeight in 7201, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=7201)
0.113158606 = weight(_text_:22 in 7201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.113158606 = score(doc=7201,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18279637 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052200247 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 7201, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=7201)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Encyclopedia of library and information science. Vol.59, [=Suppl.22]
-
McClain, P.: 1997 top 100 monographs in WorldCat (1998)
0.12
0.11622639 = product of:
0.23245278 = sum of:
0.23245278 = sum of:
0.11929417 = weight(_text_:p in 1106) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11929417 = score(doc=1106,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18768665 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.052200247 = queryNorm
0.63560283 = fieldWeight in 1106, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1106)
0.113158606 = weight(_text_:22 in 1106) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.113158606 = score(doc=1106,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18279637 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052200247 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 1106, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1106)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- OCLC newsletter. 1998, no.232, Mar./Apr., S.22-24
-
Carter, J.A.: PASSPORT/PRISM: authors and titles and MARC : oh my! (1993)
0.10
0.104524076 = sum of:
0.047944777 = product of:
0.1917791 = sum of:
0.1917791 = weight(_text_:authors in 527) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1917791 = score(doc=527,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23797122 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.052200247 = queryNorm
0.80589205 = fieldWeight in 527, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=527)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.056579303 = product of:
0.113158606 = sum of:
0.113158606 = weight(_text_:22 in 527) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.113158606 = score(doc=527,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18279637 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052200247 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 527, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=527)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- OCLC systems and services. 9(1993) no.3, S.20-22
-
Gratch, B.; Settel, B.; Atherton, P.: Characteristics of book indexes for subject retrieval in the humanities and social sciences (1978)
0.10
0.101698086 = product of:
0.20339617 = sum of:
0.20339617 = sum of:
0.104382396 = weight(_text_:p in 1061) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.104382396 = score(doc=1061,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18768665 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.052200247 = queryNorm
0.55615246 = fieldWeight in 1061, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1061)
0.09901378 = weight(_text_:22 in 1061) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09901378 = score(doc=1061,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18279637 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052200247 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 1061, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1061)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Indexer. 11(1978), S.14-22
-
Garrod, P.: Use of the UNESCO Thesaurus for archival subject indexing at UK NDAD (2000)
0.10
0.101698086 = product of:
0.20339617 = sum of:
0.20339617 = sum of:
0.104382396 = weight(_text_:p in 3406) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.104382396 = score(doc=3406,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18768665 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.052200247 = queryNorm
0.55615246 = fieldWeight in 3406, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3406)
0.09901378 = weight(_text_:22 in 3406) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09901378 = score(doc=3406,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18279637 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052200247 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 3406, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3406)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 4. 8.2001 15:22:42
-
Ingwersen, P.; Wormell, I.: Modern indexing and retrieval techniques matching different types of information needs (1989)
0.10
0.101698086 = product of:
0.20339617 = sum of:
0.20339617 = sum of:
0.104382396 = weight(_text_:p in 7322) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.104382396 = score(doc=7322,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18768665 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.052200247 = queryNorm
0.55615246 = fieldWeight in 7322, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7322)
0.09901378 = weight(_text_:22 in 7322) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09901378 = score(doc=7322,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18279637 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052200247 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 7322, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7322)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- International forum on information and documentation. 14(1989), S.17-22
-
Hirons, J.; Hawkins, L.; French, P.: AACR2 and you : revisiting AACR2 to accomodate seriality (2000)
0.10
0.101698086 = product of:
0.20339617 = sum of:
0.20339617 = sum of:
0.104382396 = weight(_text_:p in 6339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.104382396 = score(doc=6339,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18768665 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.052200247 = queryNorm
0.55615246 = fieldWeight in 6339, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6339)
0.09901378 = weight(_text_:22 in 6339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09901378 = score(doc=6339,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18279637 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052200247 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6339, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6339)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 18. 8.2002 17:22:13
-
Mauer, P.: Embedded indexing : pros and cons for the indexer (2000)
0.10
0.101698086 = product of:
0.20339617 = sum of:
0.20339617 = sum of:
0.104382396 = weight(_text_:p in 488) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.104382396 = score(doc=488,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18768665 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.052200247 = queryNorm
0.55615246 = fieldWeight in 488, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=488)
0.09901378 = weight(_text_:22 in 488) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09901378 = score(doc=488,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18279637 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052200247 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 488, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=488)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.27-28
-
Olivares-Rodríguez, C.; Guenaga, M.; Garaizar, P.: Using children's search patterns to predict the quality of their creative problem solving (2018)
0.09
0.09383029 = sum of:
0.0211888 = product of:
0.0847552 = sum of:
0.0847552 = weight(_text_:authors in 4635) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0847552 = score(doc=4635,freq=4.0), product of:
0.23797122 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.052200247 = queryNorm
0.35615736 = fieldWeight in 4635, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4635)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.07264149 = sum of:
0.037279427 = weight(_text_:p in 4635) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037279427 = score(doc=4635,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18768665 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.052200247 = queryNorm
0.19862589 = fieldWeight in 4635, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4635)
0.035362065 = weight(_text_:22 in 4635) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035362065 = score(doc=4635,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18279637 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052200247 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4635, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4635)
- Abstract
- Purpose The purpose of this paper is to propose a computational model that implicitly predict the children's creative quality of solutions by analyzing the query pattern on a problem-solving-based lesson. Design/methodology/approach A search task related to the competencies acquired in the classroom was applied to automatically measure children' creativity. A blind review process of the creative quality was developed of 255 primary school students' solutions. Findings While there are many creativity training programs that have proven effective, many of these programs require measuring creativity previously which involves time-consuming tasks conducted by experienced reviewers, i.e. far from primary school classroom dynamics. The authors have developed a model that predicts the creative quality of the given solution using the search queries pattern as input. This model has been used to predict the creative quality of 255 primary school students' solutions with 80 percent sensitivity. Research limitations/implications Although the research was conducted with just one search task, participants come from two different countries. Therefore, the authors hope that this model provides detection of non-creative solutions to enable prompt intervention and improve the creative quality of solutions. Originality/value This is the first implicit classification model of query pattern in order to predict the children' creative quality of solutions. This model is based on a conceptual relation between the concept association of creative thinking and query chain model of information search.
- Date
- 20. 1.2015 18:30:22
-
Houston, R.D.; Harmon, E.G.: Re-envisioning the information concept : systematic definitions (2002)
0.09
0.09117597 = product of:
0.18235195 = sum of:
0.18235195 = sum of:
0.084353715 = weight(_text_:p in 136) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.084353715 = score(doc=136,freq=4.0), product of:
0.18768665 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.052200247 = queryNorm
0.44943908 = fieldWeight in 136, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=136)
0.09799823 = weight(_text_:22 in 136) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09799823 = score(doc=136,freq=6.0), product of:
0.18279637 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052200247 = queryNorm
0.536106 = fieldWeight in 136, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=136)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 2.2007 18:56:23
22. 2.2007 19:22:13
- Source
- Emerging frameworks and methods: Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on the Conceptions of Library and Information Science (CoLIS4), Seattle, WA, July 21 - 25, 2002. Eds.: Fidel, R., H. Bruce, P. Ingwersen u. P. Vakkari
-
Heneberg, P.: Supposedly uncited articles of Nobel laureates and Fields medalists can be prevalently attributed to the errors of omission and commission (2013)
0.09
0.08762424 = sum of:
0.014982744 = product of:
0.059930976 = sum of:
0.059930976 = weight(_text_:authors in 660) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.059930976 = score(doc=660,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23797122 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.052200247 = queryNorm
0.25184128 = fieldWeight in 660, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=660)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.07264149 = sum of:
0.037279427 = weight(_text_:p in 660) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037279427 = score(doc=660,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18768665 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.052200247 = queryNorm
0.19862589 = fieldWeight in 660, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=660)
0.035362065 = weight(_text_:22 in 660) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035362065 = score(doc=660,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18279637 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052200247 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 660, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=660)
- Abstract
- Several independent authors reported a high share of uncited publications, which include those produced by top scientists. This share was repeatedly reported to exceed 10% of the total papers produced, without any explanation of this phenomenon and the lack of difference in uncitedness between average and successful researchers. In this report, we analyze the uncitedness among two independent groups of highly visible scientists (mathematicians represented by Fields medalists, and researchers in physiology or medicine represented by Nobel Prize laureates in the respective field). Analysis of both groups led to the identical conclusion: over 90% of the uncited database records of highly visible scientists can be explained by the inclusion of editorial materials progress reports presented at international meetings (meeting abstracts), discussion items (letters to the editor, discussion), personalia (biographic items), and by errors of omission and commission of the Web of Science (WoS) database and of the citing documents. Only a marginal amount of original articles and reviews were found to be uncited (0.9 and 0.3%, respectively), which is in strong contrast with the previously reported data, which never addressed the document types among the uncited records.
- Date
- 22. 3.2013 19:21:46
-
Thelwall, M.; Kousha, K.; Abdoli, M.; Stuart, E.; Makita, M.; Wilson, P.; Levitt, J.: Why are coauthored academic articles more cited : higher quality or larger audience? (2023)
0.09
0.08762424 = sum of:
0.014982744 = product of:
0.059930976 = sum of:
0.059930976 = weight(_text_:authors in 995) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.059930976 = score(doc=995,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23797122 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.052200247 = queryNorm
0.25184128 = fieldWeight in 995, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=995)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.07264149 = sum of:
0.037279427 = weight(_text_:p in 995) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037279427 = score(doc=995,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18768665 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.052200247 = queryNorm
0.19862589 = fieldWeight in 995, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=995)
0.035362065 = weight(_text_:22 in 995) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035362065 = score(doc=995,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18279637 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052200247 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 995, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=995)
- Abstract
- Collaboration is encouraged because it is believed to improve academic research, supported by indirect evidence in the form of more coauthored articles being more cited. Nevertheless, this might not reflect quality but increased self-citations or the "audience effect": citations from increased awareness through multiple author networks. We address this with the first science wide investigation into whether author numbers associate with journal article quality, using expert peer quality judgments for 122,331 articles from the 2014-20 UK national assessment. Spearman correlations between author numbers and quality scores show moderately strong positive associations (0.2-0.4) in the health, life, and physical sciences, but weak or no positive associations in engineering and social sciences, with weak negative/positive or no associations in various arts and humanities, and a possible negative association for decision sciences. This gives the first systematic evidence that greater numbers of authors associates with higher quality journal articles in the majority of academia outside the arts and humanities, at least for the UK. Positive associations between team size and citation counts in areas with little association between team size and quality also show that audience effects or other nonquality factors account for the higher citation rates of coauthored articles in some fields.
- Date
- 22. 6.2023 18:11:50
-
Vakkari, P.; Järvelin, K.; Chang, Y.-W.: ¬The association of disciplinary background with the evolution of topics and methods in Library and Information Science research 1995-2015 (2023)
0.09
0.08762424 = sum of:
0.014982744 = product of:
0.059930976 = sum of:
0.059930976 = weight(_text_:authors in 998) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.059930976 = score(doc=998,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23797122 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.052200247 = queryNorm
0.25184128 = fieldWeight in 998, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=998)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.07264149 = sum of:
0.037279427 = weight(_text_:p in 998) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037279427 = score(doc=998,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18768665 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.052200247 = queryNorm
0.19862589 = fieldWeight in 998, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=998)
0.035362065 = weight(_text_:22 in 998) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035362065 = score(doc=998,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18279637 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052200247 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 998, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=998)
- Abstract
- The paper reports a longitudinal analysis of the topical and methodological development of Library and Information Science (LIS). Its focus is on the effects of researchers' disciplines on these developments. The study extends an earlier cross-sectional study (Vakkari et al., Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2022a, 73, 1706-1722) by a coordinated dataset representing a content analysis of articles published in 31 scholarly LIS journals in 1995, 2005, and 2015. It is novel in its coverage of authors' disciplines, topical and methodological aspects in a coordinated dataset spanning two decades thus allowing trend analysis. The findings include a shrinking trend in the share of LIS from 67 to 36% while Computer Science, and Business and Economics increase their share from 9 and 6% to 21 and 16%, respectively. The earlier cross-sectional study (Vakkari et al., Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2022a, 73, 1706-1722) for the year 2015 identified three topical clusters of LIS research, focusing on topical subfields, methodologies, and contributing disciplines. Correspondence analysis confirms their existence already in 1995 and traces their development through the decades. The contributing disciplines infuse their concepts, research questions, and approaches to LIS and may also subsume vital parts of LIS in their own structures of knowledge production.
- Date
- 22. 6.2023 18:15:06
-
Dhyani, P.: Universe of subjects and DDC engineering (1987)
0.09
0.08716979 = product of:
0.17433958 = sum of:
0.17433958 = sum of:
0.089470625 = weight(_text_:p in 825) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.089470625 = score(doc=825,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18768665 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.052200247 = queryNorm
0.47670212 = fieldWeight in 825, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=825)
0.08486895 = weight(_text_:22 in 825) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08486895 = score(doc=825,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18279637 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052200247 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 825, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=825)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- International classification. 14(1987), S.19-22
-
Elliott, P.: Reporting LIS research : a review article (1990)
0.09
0.08716979 = product of:
0.17433958 = sum of:
0.17433958 = sum of:
0.089470625 = weight(_text_:p in 5882) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.089470625 = score(doc=5882,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18768665 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.052200247 = queryNorm
0.47670212 = fieldWeight in 5882, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5882)
0.08486895 = weight(_text_:22 in 5882) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08486895 = score(doc=5882,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18279637 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052200247 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 5882, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5882)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Librarianship. 22(1990), no.4, S.257-264
