-
Ackermann, E.: Piaget's constructivism, Papert's constructionism : what's the difference? (2001)
0.13
0.13451236 = product of:
0.26902473 = sum of:
0.26902473 = product of:
0.53804946 = sum of:
0.20995213 = weight(_text_:3a in 692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.20995213 = score(doc=692,freq=2.0), product of:
0.44828197 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.052875843 = queryNorm
0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 692, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=692)
0.3280973 = weight(_text_:2c in 692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.3280973 = score(doc=692,freq=2.0), product of:
0.56039274 = queryWeight, product of:
10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
0.052875843 = queryNorm
0.5854775 = fieldWeight in 692, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=692)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Content
- Vgl.: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Piaget-%E2%80%99-s-Constructivism-%2C-Papert-%E2%80%99-s-%3A-What-%E2%80%99-s-Ackermann/89cbcc1e740a4591443ff4765a6ae8df0fdf5554. Darunter weitere Hinweise auf verwandte Beiträge. Auch unter: Learning Group Publication 5(2001) no.3, S.438.
-
Soergel, D.: Knowledge organization for learning (2014)
0.11
0.106927544 = sum of:
0.021247318 = product of:
0.08498927 = sum of:
0.08498927 = weight(_text_:authors in 1400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08498927 = score(doc=1400,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24105114 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.052875843 = queryNorm
0.35257778 = fieldWeight in 1400, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1400)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.085680224 = sum of:
0.01476077 = weight(_text_:d in 1400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01476077 = score(doc=1400,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10045733 = queryWeight, product of:
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.052875843 = queryNorm
0.14693572 = fieldWeight in 1400, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1400)
0.070919454 = weight(_text_:22 in 1400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.070919454 = score(doc=1400,freq=4.0), product of:
0.18516219 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052875843 = queryNorm
0.38301262 = fieldWeight in 1400, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1400)
- Abstract
- This paper discusses and illustrates through examples how meaningful or deep learning can be supported through well-structured presentation of material, through giving learners schemas they can use to organize knowledge in their minds, and through helping learners to understand knowledge organization principles they can use to construct their own schemas. It is a call to all authors, educators and information designers to pay attention to meaningful presentation that expresses the internal structure of the domain and facilitates the learner's assimilation of concepts and their relationships.
- Pages
- S.22-32
- Source
- Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
-
Carter, J.A.: PASSPORT/PRISM: authors and titles and MARC : oh my! (1993)
0.11
0.10587687 = sum of:
0.0485653 = product of:
0.1942612 = sum of:
0.1942612 = weight(_text_:authors in 527) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1942612 = score(doc=527,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24105114 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.052875843 = queryNorm
0.80589205 = fieldWeight in 527, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=527)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.057311572 = product of:
0.114623144 = sum of:
0.114623144 = weight(_text_:22 in 527) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.114623144 = score(doc=527,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18516219 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052875843 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 527, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=527)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- OCLC systems and services. 9(1993) no.3, S.20-22
-
CannCasciato, D.: ¬The OLUC from a NACO point of view : eliminating derived search keys (1994)
0.10
0.09846367 = sum of:
0.02428265 = product of:
0.0971306 = sum of:
0.0971306 = weight(_text_:authors in 6575) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0971306 = score(doc=6575,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24105114 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.052875843 = queryNorm
0.40294603 = fieldWeight in 6575, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6575)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.07418102 = sum of:
0.016869452 = weight(_text_:d in 6575) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016869452 = score(doc=6575,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10045733 = queryWeight, product of:
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.052875843 = queryNorm
0.16792654 = fieldWeight in 6575, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6575)
0.057311572 = weight(_text_:22 in 6575) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.057311572 = score(doc=6575,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18516219 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052875843 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6575, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6575)
- Abstract
- Explains how the current resurgence of cooperative cataloguing initiatives require that OCLC Online Union Catalog (OLUC) search keys evolve to allow more precise searching. Describes the results achieved by searching personal and corporate authors by word and phrase to obtain guidance on deciding about heading formation and necessary references. Concludes that phrase searching needs to be brought into existence in OLUC search mechanisms as quickly as possible to speed up cataloguing, and that OCLC needs to take note of these requirements by eliminating limitations on searching
- Source
- OCLC systems and services. 10(1994) no.4, S.22-25
-
Hawking, D.; Robertson, S.: On collection size and retrieval effectiveness (2003)
0.10
0.097920254 = product of:
0.19584051 = sum of:
0.19584051 = sum of:
0.033738904 = weight(_text_:d in 4109) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033738904 = score(doc=4109,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10045733 = queryWeight, product of:
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.052875843 = queryNorm
0.33585307 = fieldWeight in 4109, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4109)
0.16210161 = weight(_text_:22 in 4109) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.16210161 = score(doc=4109,freq=4.0), product of:
0.18516219 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052875843 = queryNorm
0.8754574 = fieldWeight in 4109, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4109)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 14. 8.2005 14:22:22
-
Castanha, R.C.G.; Wolfram, D.: ¬The domain of knowledge organization : a bibliometric analysis of prolific authors and their intellectual space (2018)
0.09
0.0892892 = sum of:
0.04292607 = product of:
0.17170428 = sum of:
0.17170428 = weight(_text_:authors in 4150) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.17170428 = score(doc=4150,freq=16.0), product of:
0.24105114 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.052875843 = queryNorm
0.7123147 = fieldWeight in 4150, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4150)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.046363138 = sum of:
0.010543408 = weight(_text_:d in 4150) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010543408 = score(doc=4150,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10045733 = queryWeight, product of:
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.052875843 = queryNorm
0.104954086 = fieldWeight in 4150, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4150)
0.03581973 = weight(_text_:22 in 4150) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03581973 = score(doc=4150,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18516219 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052875843 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4150, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4150)
- Abstract
- The domain of knowledge organization (KO) represents a foundational area of information science. One way to better understand the intellectual structure of the KO domain is to apply bibliometric methods to key contributors to the literature. This study analyzes the most prolific contributing authors to the journal Knowledge Organization, the sources they cite and the citations they receive for the period 1993 to 2016. The analyses were conducted using visualization outcomes of citation, co-citation and author bibliographic coupling analysis to reveal theoretical points of reference among authors and the most prominent research themes that constitute this scientific community. Birger Hjørland was the most cited author, and was situated at or near the middle of each of the maps based on different citation relationships. The proximities between authors resulting from the different citation relationships demonstrate how authors situate themselves intellectually through the citations they give and how other authors situate them through the citations received. There is a consistent core of theoretical references as well among the most productive authors. We observed a close network of scholarly communication between the authors cited in this core, which indicates the actual role of the journal Knowledge Organization as a space for knowledge construction in the area of knowledge organization.
- Source
- Knowledge organization. 45(2018) no.1, S.13-22
-
Ajiferuke, I.; Lu, K.; Wolfram, D.: ¬A comparison of citer and citation-based measure outcomes for multiple disciplines (2010)
0.09
0.087179855 = sum of:
0.03154409 = product of:
0.12617636 = sum of:
0.12617636 = weight(_text_:authors in 4000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12617636 = score(doc=4000,freq=6.0), product of:
0.24105114 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.052875843 = queryNorm
0.52344227 = fieldWeight in 4000, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4000)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.055635765 = sum of:
0.012652089 = weight(_text_:d in 4000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012652089 = score(doc=4000,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10045733 = queryWeight, product of:
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.052875843 = queryNorm
0.1259449 = fieldWeight in 4000, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4000)
0.042983677 = weight(_text_:22 in 4000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042983677 = score(doc=4000,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18516219 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052875843 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4000, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4000)
- Abstract
- Author research impact was examined based on citer analysis (the number of citers as opposed to the number of citations) for 90 highly cited authors grouped into three broad subject areas. Citer-based outcome measures were also compared with more traditional citation-based measures for levels of association. The authors found that there are significant differences in citer-based outcomes among the three broad subject areas examined and that there is a high degree of correlation between citer and citation-based measures for all measures compared, except for two outcomes calculated for the social sciences. Citer-based measures do produce slightly different rankings of authors based on citer counts when compared to more traditional citation counts. Examples are provided. Citation measures may not adequately address the influence, or reach, of an author because citations usually do not address the origin of the citation beyond self-citations.
- Date
- 28. 9.2010 12:54:22
-
Capps, M.; Ladd, B.; Stotts, D.: Enhanced graph models in the Web : multi-client, multi-head, multi-tail browsing (1996)
0.09
0.08615572 = sum of:
0.021247318 = product of:
0.08498927 = sum of:
0.08498927 = weight(_text_:authors in 5860) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08498927 = score(doc=5860,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24105114 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.052875843 = queryNorm
0.35257778 = fieldWeight in 5860, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5860)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.0649084 = sum of:
0.01476077 = weight(_text_:d in 5860) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01476077 = score(doc=5860,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10045733 = queryWeight, product of:
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.052875843 = queryNorm
0.14693572 = fieldWeight in 5860, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5860)
0.050147627 = weight(_text_:22 in 5860) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.050147627 = score(doc=5860,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18516219 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052875843 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5860, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5860)
- Abstract
- Richer graph models permit authors to 'program' the browsing behaviour they want WWW readers to see by turning the hypertext into a hyperprogram with specific semantics. Multiple browsing streams can be started under the author's control and then kept in step through the synchronization mechanisms provided by the graph model. Adds a Semantic Web Graph Layer (SWGL) which allows dynamic interpretation of link and node structures according to graph models. Details the SWGL and its architecture, some sample protocol implementations, and the latest extensions to MHTML
- Date
- 1. 8.1996 22:08:06
-
Hotho, A.; Bloehdorn, S.: Data Mining 2004 : Text classification by boosting weak learners based on terms and concepts (2004)
0.08
0.08447748 = sum of:
0.06298564 = product of:
0.25194255 = sum of:
0.25194255 = weight(_text_:3a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.25194255 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
0.44828197 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.052875843 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.021491839 = product of:
0.042983677 = sum of:
0.042983677 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042983677 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18516219 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052875843 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Content
- Vgl.: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CEAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.91.4940%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&ei=dOXrUMeIDYHDtQahsIGACg&usg=AFQjCNHFWVh6gNPvnOrOS9R3rkrXCNVD-A&sig2=5I2F5evRfMnsttSgFF9g7Q&bvm=bv.1357316858,d.Yms.
- Date
- 8. 1.2013 10:22:32
-
Lewandowski, D.; Sünkler, S.: What does Google recommend when you want to compare insurance offerings? (2019)
0.08
0.07671645 = sum of:
0.030353313 = product of:
0.12141325 = sum of:
0.12141325 = weight(_text_:authors in 5288) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12141325 = score(doc=5288,freq=8.0), product of:
0.24105114 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.052875843 = queryNorm
0.50368255 = fieldWeight in 5288, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5288)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.046363138 = sum of:
0.010543408 = weight(_text_:d in 5288) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010543408 = score(doc=5288,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10045733 = queryWeight, product of:
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.052875843 = queryNorm
0.104954086 = fieldWeight in 5288, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5288)
0.03581973 = weight(_text_:22 in 5288) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03581973 = score(doc=5288,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18516219 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052875843 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5288, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5288)
- Abstract
- Purpose The purpose of this paper is to describe a new method to improve the analysis of search engine results by considering the provider level as well as the domain level. This approach is tested by conducting a study using queries on the topic of insurance comparisons. Design/methodology/approach The authors conducted an empirical study that analyses the results of search queries aimed at comparing insurance companies. The authors used a self-developed software system that automatically queries commercial search engines and automatically extracts the content of the returned result pages for further data analysis. The data analysis was carried out using the KNIME Analytics Platform. Findings Google's top search results are served by only a few providers that frequently appear in these results. The authors show that some providers operate several domains on the same topic and that these domains appear for the same queries in the result lists. Research limitations/implications The authors demonstrate the feasibility of this approach and draw conclusions for further investigations from the empirical study. However, the study is a limited use case based on a limited number of search queries. Originality/value The proposed method allows large-scale analysis of the composition of the top results from commercial search engines. It allows using valid empirical data to determine what users actually see on the search engine result pages.
- Date
- 20. 1.2015 18:30:22
-
Fallis, D.: Social epistemology and information science (2006)
0.07
0.07418102 = product of:
0.14836204 = sum of:
0.14836204 = sum of:
0.033738904 = weight(_text_:d in 4368) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033738904 = score(doc=4368,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10045733 = queryWeight, product of:
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.052875843 = queryNorm
0.33585307 = fieldWeight in 4368, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4368)
0.114623144 = weight(_text_:22 in 4368) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.114623144 = score(doc=4368,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18516219 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052875843 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4368, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4368)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 13. 7.2008 19:22:28
-
Guedj, D.: Nicholas Bourbaki, collective mathematician : an interview with Clause Chevalley (1985)
0.07
0.07418102 = product of:
0.14836204 = sum of:
0.14836204 = sum of:
0.033738904 = weight(_text_:d in 6075) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033738904 = score(doc=6075,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10045733 = queryWeight, product of:
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.052875843 = queryNorm
0.33585307 = fieldWeight in 6075, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6075)
0.114623144 = weight(_text_:22 in 6075) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.114623144 = score(doc=6075,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18516219 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052875843 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6075, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6075)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Mathematical intelligencer. 7(1985), S.18-22
-
Crystal, D.: Quote index unquote (2000)
0.07
0.07418102 = product of:
0.14836204 = sum of:
0.14836204 = sum of:
0.033738904 = weight(_text_:d in 487) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033738904 = score(doc=487,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10045733 = queryWeight, product of:
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.052875843 = queryNorm
0.33585307 = fieldWeight in 487, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=487)
0.114623144 = weight(_text_:22 in 487) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.114623144 = score(doc=487,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18516219 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052875843 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 487, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=487)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.14-20
-
Matthews, D.: Indexing published letters (2001)
0.07
0.07418102 = product of:
0.14836204 = sum of:
0.14836204 = sum of:
0.033738904 = weight(_text_:d in 4160) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033738904 = score(doc=4160,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10045733 = queryWeight, product of:
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.052875843 = queryNorm
0.33585307 = fieldWeight in 4160, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4160)
0.114623144 = weight(_text_:22 in 4160) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.114623144 = score(doc=4160,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18516219 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052875843 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4160, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4160)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2001) no.3, S.135-141
-
Duff, A.S.; Craig, D.; McNeill, D.A.: ¬A note on the origins of the 'information society' (1996)
0.07
0.073847756 = sum of:
0.018211987 = product of:
0.07284795 = sum of:
0.07284795 = weight(_text_:authors in 4894) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07284795 = score(doc=4894,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24105114 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.052875843 = queryNorm
0.30220953 = fieldWeight in 4894, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4894)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.055635765 = sum of:
0.012652089 = weight(_text_:d in 4894) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012652089 = score(doc=4894,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10045733 = queryWeight, product of:
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.052875843 = queryNorm
0.1259449 = fieldWeight in 4894, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4894)
0.042983677 = weight(_text_:22 in 4894) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042983677 = score(doc=4894,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18516219 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052875843 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4894, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4894)
- Abstract
- Attempts to trace the origins of what is becoming known as the 'information society' by assembling and evaluating the available data with a view to providing clarification of the provenance of a now widely used and influencial concept. Examines the 2 main accounts that have appeared: Machlup's 1962 monograph 'The production and distribution of knowledge in the United States'; and the claims by the Japanes, citing articles in the proadcasting periodical, Hoso Asahi. Discusses the various equivocations and confusions, such as the tendency in both accounts to conflate the 'information society' with the concept of an 'information industry'. Concludes that the second, Japanese, claim emerges as the stronger. However, argues (perhaps controversially) that ultimate credit for the invention of the 'information society' belongs not to the authors of the articles published in Hoso Asahi, but to that periodical's staff
- Source
- Journal of information science. 22(1996) no.2, S.117-122
-
Kurth, M.; Ruddy, D.; Rupp, N.: Repurposing MARC metadata : using digital project experience to develop a metadata management design (2004)
0.07
0.073847756 = sum of:
0.018211987 = product of:
0.07284795 = sum of:
0.07284795 = weight(_text_:authors in 4748) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07284795 = score(doc=4748,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24105114 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.052875843 = queryNorm
0.30220953 = fieldWeight in 4748, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4748)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.055635765 = sum of:
0.012652089 = weight(_text_:d in 4748) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012652089 = score(doc=4748,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10045733 = queryWeight, product of:
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.052875843 = queryNorm
0.1259449 = fieldWeight in 4748, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4748)
0.042983677 = weight(_text_:22 in 4748) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042983677 = score(doc=4748,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18516219 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052875843 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4748, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4748)
- Abstract
- Metadata and information technology staff in libraries that are building digital collections typically extract and manipulate MARC metadata sets to provide access to digital content via non-MARC schemes. Metadata processing in these libraries involves defining the relationships between metadata schemes, moving metadata between schemes, and coordinating the intellectual activity and physical resources required to create and manipulate metadata. Actively managing the non-MARC metadata resources used to build digital collections is something most of these libraries have only begun to do. This article proposes strategies for managing MARC metadata repurposing efforts as the first step in a coordinated approach to library metadata management. Guided by lessons learned from Cornell University library mapping and transformation activities, the authors apply the literature of data resource management to library metadata management and propose a model for managing MARC metadata repurposing processes through the implementation of a metadata management design.
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.144-152
-
Komlodi, A.; Soergel, D.; Marchionini, G.: Search histories for user support in user interfaces (2006)
0.07
0.073847756 = sum of:
0.018211987 = product of:
0.07284795 = sum of:
0.07284795 = weight(_text_:authors in 5298) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07284795 = score(doc=5298,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24105114 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.052875843 = queryNorm
0.30220953 = fieldWeight in 5298, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5298)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.055635765 = sum of:
0.012652089 = weight(_text_:d in 5298) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012652089 = score(doc=5298,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10045733 = queryWeight, product of:
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.052875843 = queryNorm
0.1259449 = fieldWeight in 5298, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5298)
0.042983677 = weight(_text_:22 in 5298) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042983677 = score(doc=5298,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18516219 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052875843 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5298, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5298)
- Abstract
- The authors describe user interface tools based on search histories to support legal information seekers. The design of the tools was informed by the results of a user study (Komlodi, 2002a) that examined the use of human memory, external memory aids, and search histories in legal information seeking and derived interface design recommendations for information storage and retrieval systems. The data collected were analyzed to identify potential task areas where search histories can support information seeking and use. The results show that many information-seeking tasks can take advantage of automatically and manually recorded history information. These findings encouraged the design of user interface tools building on search history information: direct search history displays, history-enabled scratchpad facilities, and organized results collection tools.
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 18:04:19
-
Noever, D.; Ciolino, M.: ¬The Turing deception (2022)
0.07
0.06931168 = sum of:
0.06298564 = product of:
0.25194255 = sum of:
0.25194255 = weight(_text_:3a in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.25194255 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
0.44828197 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.052875843 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.0063260444 = product of:
0.012652089 = sum of:
0.012652089 = weight(_text_:d in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012652089 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10045733 = queryWeight, product of:
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.052875843 = queryNorm
0.1259449 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- https%3A%2F%2Farxiv.org%2Fabs%2F2212.06721&usg=AOvVaw3i_9pZm9y_dQWoHi6uv0EN
-
Pinto, M.; Sales, D.: INFOLITRANS: a model for the development of information competence for translators (2008)
0.07
0.067826174 = sum of:
0.021463035 = product of:
0.08585214 = sum of:
0.08585214 = weight(_text_:authors in 1897) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08585214 = score(doc=1897,freq=4.0), product of:
0.24105114 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.052875843 = queryNorm
0.35615736 = fieldWeight in 1897, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1897)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.046363138 = sum of:
0.010543408 = weight(_text_:d in 1897) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010543408 = score(doc=1897,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10045733 = queryWeight, product of:
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.052875843 = queryNorm
0.104954086 = fieldWeight in 1897, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1897)
0.03581973 = weight(_text_:22 in 1897) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03581973 = score(doc=1897,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18516219 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052875843 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1897, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1897)
- Abstract
- Purpose - Since every community of practice generates, seeks, retrieves and uses information resources and sources related to the cognitive structure being researched or studied and the tasks being performed, the need arises to undertake studies focused on real user communities, which in the case of this paper is the group of translators. This paper aims to investigate this issue. Design/methodology/approach - In this arena of application, it is important to remember that translators are not only information users, but also information processors and producers. Thus, their documentary competence has to evolve in three dimensions: the informational, the methodological and the strategic. The conceptual model proposed in the paper is based on information literacy (INFOLIT) standards and also the authors' knowledge of translation practice and the competencies it demands, where INFOLIT plays a starring role. This paper is part of a broader research currently in progress, whose main goal is to provide translators and interpreters with a solid instruction in information literacy. Findings - The paper introduces a model for information literacy specifically intended to develop the information competence of this community of users, it reveals that the model is a gathering of skills, competences, knowledge and values, and it is based on the cooperation between the authors' expert knowledge of information science and professional translation practice. Originality/value - This paper puts forward the first proposal for information literacy applied to translation training.
- Date
- 7. 6.2008 16:18:22
-
Belabbes, M.A.; Ruthven, I.; Moshfeghi, Y.; Rasmussen Pennington, D.: Information overload : a concept analysis (2023)
0.07
0.067826174 = sum of:
0.021463035 = product of:
0.08585214 = sum of:
0.08585214 = weight(_text_:authors in 950) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08585214 = score(doc=950,freq=4.0), product of:
0.24105114 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.052875843 = queryNorm
0.35615736 = fieldWeight in 950, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=950)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.046363138 = sum of:
0.010543408 = weight(_text_:d in 950) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010543408 = score(doc=950,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10045733 = queryWeight, product of:
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.052875843 = queryNorm
0.104954086 = fieldWeight in 950, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=950)
0.03581973 = weight(_text_:22 in 950) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03581973 = score(doc=950,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18516219 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052875843 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 950, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=950)
- Abstract
- Purpose With the shift to an information-based society and to the de-centralisation of information, information overload has attracted a growing interest in the computer and information science research communities. However, there is no clear understanding of the meaning of the term, and while there have been many proposed definitions, there is no consensus. The goal of this work was to define the concept of "information overload". In order to do so, a concept analysis using Rodgers' approach was performed. Design/methodology/approach A concept analysis using Rodgers' approach based on a corpus of documents published between 2010 and September 2020 was conducted. One surrogate for "information overload", which is "cognitive overload" was identified. The corpus of documents consisted of 151 documents for information overload and ten for cognitive overload. All documents were from the fields of computer science and information science, and were retrieved from three databases: Association for Computing Machinery (ACM) Digital Library, SCOPUS and Library and Information Science Abstracts (LISA). Findings The themes identified from the authors' concept analysis allowed us to extract the triggers, manifestations and consequences of information overload. They found triggers related to information characteristics, information need, the working environment, the cognitive abilities of individuals and the information environment. In terms of manifestations, they found that information overload manifests itself both emotionally and cognitively. The consequences of information overload were both internal and external. These findings allowed them to provide a definition of information overload. Originality/value Through the authors' concept analysis, they were able to clarify the components of information overload and provide a definition of the concept.
- Date
- 22. 4.2023 19:27:56
