-
Hotho, A.; Bloehdorn, S.: Data Mining 2004 : Text classification by boosting weak learners based on terms and concepts (2004)
0.16
0.15776142 = sum of:
0.061962504 = product of:
0.24785002 = sum of:
0.24785002 = weight(_text_:3a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.24785002 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
0.4410001 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.05201693 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.09579892 = sum of:
0.053513464 = weight(_text_:t in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.053513464 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20491594 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
0.05201693 = queryNorm
0.26114836 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
0.042285454 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042285454 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18215442 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05201693 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
- Content
- Vgl.: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CEAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.91.4940%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&ei=dOXrUMeIDYHDtQahsIGACg&usg=AFQjCNHFWVh6gNPvnOrOS9R3rkrXCNVD-A&sig2=5I2F5evRfMnsttSgFF9g7Q&bvm=bv.1357316858,d.Yms.
- Date
- 8. 1.2013 10:22:32
-
Kleineberg, M.: Context analysis and context indexing : formal pragmatics in knowledge organization (2014)
0.15
0.1478654 = sum of:
0.10327084 = product of:
0.41308337 = sum of:
0.41308337 = weight(_text_:3a in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.41308337 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
0.4410001 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.05201693 = queryNorm
0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.044594552 = product of:
0.089189105 = sum of:
0.089189105 = weight(_text_:t in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.089189105 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20491594 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
0.05201693 = queryNorm
0.43524727 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=5&ved=0CDQQFjAE&url=http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F3131107&ei=HzFWVYvGMsiNsgGTyoFI&usg=AFQjCNE2FHUeR9oQTQlNC4TPedv4Mo3DaQ&sig2=Rlzpr7a3BLZZkqZCXXN_IA&bvm=bv.93564037,d.bGg&cad=rja
-
Hatakama, H.; Terano, T.: ¬A multi-agent model of organizational intellectual activities for knowledge management (1996)
0.13
0.13266757 = sum of:
0.020902177 = product of:
0.08360871 = sum of:
0.08360871 = weight(_text_:authors in 910) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08360871 = score(doc=910,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2371355 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.05201693 = queryNorm
0.35257778 = fieldWeight in 910, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=910)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.1117654 = sum of:
0.06243237 = weight(_text_:t in 910) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06243237 = score(doc=910,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20491594 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
0.05201693 = queryNorm
0.30467308 = fieldWeight in 910, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=910)
0.04933303 = weight(_text_:22 in 910) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04933303 = score(doc=910,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18215442 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05201693 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 910, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=910)
- Abstract
- In this paper, authors propose a computational model of cooperative intellectual activities in an organization using the concepts of distributed artificial intelligence. In this model, we assume incomplete communication of knowledge among agents, and examine methods for pragmatic cooperative decision making and learning. We have implemented two typical variations of the model, the Specialists-Model and the Generalists-Model. Using the two variations, we carry out the simulation of dynamic activities of decision making and learning. Then, based an the model and these simulations, we systematically examine methods of knowledge management for effective augmentation of organizational intelligence.
- Source
- Knowledge management: organization competence and methodolgy. Proceedings of the Fourth International ISMICK Symposium, 21-22 October 1996, Netherlands. Ed.: J.F. Schreinemakers
-
Jones, M.; Buchanan, G.; Cheng, T.-C.; Jain, P.: Changing the pace of search : supporting background information seeking (2006)
0.13
0.13266757 = sum of:
0.020902177 = product of:
0.08360871 = sum of:
0.08360871 = weight(_text_:authors in 5287) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08360871 = score(doc=5287,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2371355 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.05201693 = queryNorm
0.35257778 = fieldWeight in 5287, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5287)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.1117654 = sum of:
0.06243237 = weight(_text_:t in 5287) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06243237 = score(doc=5287,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20491594 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
0.05201693 = queryNorm
0.30467308 = fieldWeight in 5287, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5287)
0.04933303 = weight(_text_:22 in 5287) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04933303 = score(doc=5287,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18215442 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05201693 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5287, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5287)
- Abstract
- Almost all Web searches are carried out while the user is sitting at a conventional desktop computer connected to the Internet. Although online, handheld, mobile search offers new possibilities, the fast-paced, focused style of interaction may not be appropriate for all user search needs. The authors explore an alternative, relaxed style for Web searching that asynchronously combines an offline handheld computer and an online desktop personal computer. They discuss the role and utility of such an approach, present a tool to meet these user needs, and discuss its relation to other systems.
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 18:37:49
-
Feinberg, M.: Classificationist as author : the case of the Prelinger Library (2008)
0.13
0.13266757 = sum of:
0.020902177 = product of:
0.08360871 = sum of:
0.08360871 = weight(_text_:authors in 2237) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08360871 = score(doc=2237,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2371355 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.05201693 = queryNorm
0.35257778 = fieldWeight in 2237, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2237)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.1117654 = sum of:
0.06243237 = weight(_text_:t in 2237) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06243237 = score(doc=2237,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20491594 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
0.05201693 = queryNorm
0.30467308 = fieldWeight in 2237, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2237)
0.04933303 = weight(_text_:22 in 2237) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04933303 = score(doc=2237,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18215442 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05201693 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2237, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2237)
- Content
- Within information science, neutrality and objectivity have been standard design goals for knowledge organization schemes; designers have seen themselves as compilers, rather than as authors or creators. The organization of resources in the Prelinger Library in San Francisco, however, shows a distinct authorial voice, or unique sense of expression and vision. This voice, in turn, works as a persuasive mechanism, facilitating a rhetorical purpose for the collection.
- Pages
- S.22-28
- Source
- Culture and identity in knowledge organization: Proceedings of the Tenth International ISKO Conference 5-8 August 2008, Montreal, Canada. Ed. by Clément Arsenault and Joseph T. Tennis
-
Ackermann, E.: Piaget's constructivism, Papert's constructionism : what's the difference? (2001)
0.13
0.13232735 = product of:
0.2646547 = sum of:
0.2646547 = product of:
0.5293094 = sum of:
0.20654169 = weight(_text_:3a in 692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.20654169 = score(doc=692,freq=2.0), product of:
0.4410001 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.05201693 = queryNorm
0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 692, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=692)
0.32276773 = weight(_text_:2c in 692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.32276773 = score(doc=692,freq=2.0), product of:
0.55128974 = queryWeight, product of:
10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
0.05201693 = queryNorm
0.5854775 = fieldWeight in 692, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=692)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Content
- Vgl.: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Piaget-%E2%80%99-s-Constructivism-%2C-Papert-%E2%80%99-s-%3A-What-%E2%80%99-s-Ackermann/89cbcc1e740a4591443ff4765a6ae8df0fdf5554. Darunter weitere Hinweise auf verwandte Beiträge. Auch unter: Learning Group Publication 5(2001) no.3, S.438.
-
Swartzberg, T.: Identifying and spreading expertise : The knowledge manager's brief: to disseminate a company's data and the know-how of its staff (1999)
0.11
0.11331413 = product of:
0.22662826 = sum of:
0.22662826 = sum of:
0.10702693 = weight(_text_:t in 4179) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10702693 = score(doc=4179,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20491594 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
0.05201693 = queryNorm
0.5222967 = fieldWeight in 4179, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4179)
0.11960133 = weight(_text_:22 in 4179) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11960133 = score(doc=4179,freq=4.0), product of:
0.18215442 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05201693 = queryNorm
0.6565931 = fieldWeight in 4179, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4179)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 29.11.1999 12:18:22
- Source
- International Herald Tribune. 15. Nov. 1999, S.22
-
Carter, J.A.: PASSPORT/PRISM: authors and titles and MARC : oh my! (1993)
0.10
0.10415701 = sum of:
0.047776405 = product of:
0.19110562 = sum of:
0.19110562 = weight(_text_:authors in 527) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.19110562 = score(doc=527,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2371355 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.05201693 = queryNorm
0.80589205 = fieldWeight in 527, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=527)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.056380603 = product of:
0.11276121 = sum of:
0.11276121 = weight(_text_:22 in 527) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11276121 = score(doc=527,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18215442 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05201693 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 527, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=527)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- OCLC systems and services. 9(1993) no.3, S.20-22
-
Zhang, L.; Pan, Y.; Zhang, T.: Focused named entity recognition using machine learning (2004)
0.10
0.09579892 = product of:
0.19159783 = sum of:
0.19159783 = sum of:
0.10702693 = weight(_text_:t in 4086) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10702693 = score(doc=4086,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20491594 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
0.05201693 = queryNorm
0.5222967 = fieldWeight in 4086, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4086)
0.08457091 = weight(_text_:22 in 4086) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08457091 = score(doc=4086,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18215442 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05201693 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4086, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4086)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 15.10.2005 19:57:22
-
Open MIND (2015)
0.09
0.09476256 = sum of:
0.014930127 = product of:
0.05972051 = sum of:
0.05972051 = weight(_text_:authors in 1648) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05972051 = score(doc=1648,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2371355 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.05201693 = queryNorm
0.25184128 = fieldWeight in 1648, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1648)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.079832435 = sum of:
0.044594552 = weight(_text_:t in 1648) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.044594552 = score(doc=1648,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20491594 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
0.05201693 = queryNorm
0.21762364 = fieldWeight in 1648, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1648)
0.03523788 = weight(_text_:22 in 1648) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03523788 = score(doc=1648,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18215442 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05201693 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1648, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1648)
- Abstract
- This is an edited collection of 39 original papers and as many commentaries and replies. The target papers and replies were written by senior members of the MIND Group, while all commentaries were written by junior group members. All papers and commentaries have undergone a rigorous process of anonymous peer review, during which the junior members of the MIND Group acted as reviewers. The final versions of all the target articles, commentaries and replies have undergone additional editorial review. Besides offering a cross-section of ongoing, cutting-edge research in philosophy and cognitive science, this collection is also intended to be a free electronic resource for teaching. It therefore also contains a selection of online supporting materials, pointers to video and audio files and to additional free material supplied by the 92 authors represented in this volume. We will add more multimedia material, a searchable literature database, and tools to work with the online version in the future. All contributions to this collection are strictly open access. They can be downloaded, printed, and reproduced by anyone.
- Date
- 27. 1.2015 11:48:22
- Editor
- Metzinger, T. u.. J.M. Windt
-
Wu, K.-C.; Hsieh, T.-Y.: Affective choosing of clustering and categorization representations in e-book interfaces (2016)
0.09
0.09476256 = sum of:
0.014930127 = product of:
0.05972051 = sum of:
0.05972051 = weight(_text_:authors in 3070) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05972051 = score(doc=3070,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2371355 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.05201693 = queryNorm
0.25184128 = fieldWeight in 3070, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3070)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.079832435 = sum of:
0.044594552 = weight(_text_:t in 3070) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.044594552 = score(doc=3070,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20491594 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
0.05201693 = queryNorm
0.21762364 = fieldWeight in 3070, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3070)
0.03523788 = weight(_text_:22 in 3070) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03523788 = score(doc=3070,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18215442 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05201693 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3070, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3070)
- Abstract
- Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to investigate user experiences with a touch-wall interface featuring both clustering and categorization representations of available e-books in a public library to understand human information interactions under work-focused and recreational contexts. Design/methodology/approach - Researchers collected questionnaires from 251 New Taipei City Library visitors who used the touch-wall interface to search for new titles. The authors applied structural equation modelling to examine relationships among hedonic/utilitarian needs, clustering and categorization representations, perceived ease of use (EU) and the extent to which users experienced anxiety and uncertainty (AU) while interacting with the interface. Findings - Utilitarian users who have an explicit idea of what they intend to find tend to prefer the categorization interface. A hedonic-oriented user tends to prefer clustering interfaces. Users reported EU regardless of which interface they engaged with. Results revealed that use of the clustering interface had a negative correlation with AU. Users that seek to satisfy utilitarian needs tended to emphasize the importance of perceived EU, whilst pleasure-seeking users were a little more tolerant of anxiety or uncertainty. Originality/value - The Online Public Access Catalogue (OPAC) encourages library visitors to borrow digital books through the implementation of an information visualization system. This situation poses an opportunity to validate uses and gratification theory. People with hedonic/utilitarian needs displayed different risk-control attitudes and affected uncertainty using the interface. Knowledge about user interaction with such interfaces is vital when launching the development of a new OPAC.
- Date
- 20. 1.2015 18:30:22
-
Bergman, O.; Israeli, T.; Whittaker, S.: Factors hindering shared files retrieval (2020)
0.09
0.09476256 = sum of:
0.014930127 = product of:
0.05972051 = sum of:
0.05972051 = weight(_text_:authors in 5843) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05972051 = score(doc=5843,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2371355 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.05201693 = queryNorm
0.25184128 = fieldWeight in 5843, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5843)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.079832435 = sum of:
0.044594552 = weight(_text_:t in 5843) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.044594552 = score(doc=5843,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20491594 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
0.05201693 = queryNorm
0.21762364 = fieldWeight in 5843, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5843)
0.03523788 = weight(_text_:22 in 5843) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03523788 = score(doc=5843,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18215442 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05201693 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5843, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5843)
- Abstract
- Purpose Personal information management (PIM) is an activity in which people store information items in order to retrieve them later. The purpose of this paper is to test and quantify the effect of factors related to collection size, file properties and workload on file retrieval success and efficiency. Design/methodology/approach In the study, 289 participants retrieved 1,557 of their shared files in a naturalistic setting. The study used specially developed software designed to collect shared files' names and present them as targets for the retrieval task. The dependent variables were retrieval success, retrieval time and misstep/s. Findings Various factors compromise shared files retrieval including: collection size (large number of files), file properties (multiple versions, size of team sharing the file, time since most recent retrieval and folder depth) and workload (daily e-mails sent and received). The authors discuss theoretical reasons for these negative effects and suggest possible ways to overcome them. Originality/value Retrieval is the main reason people manage personal information. It is essential for retrieval to be successful and efficient, as information cannot be used unless it can be re-accessed. Prior PIM research has assumed that factors related to collection size, file properties and workload affect file retrieval. However, this is the first study to systematically quantify the negative effects of these factors. As each of these factors is expected to be exacerbated in the future, this study is a necessary first step toward addressing these problems.
- Date
- 20. 1.2015 18:30:22
-
Shaw, D.; Lind, S.M.: ASIS&T Thesaurus descriptors chosen by JASIST submitting authors and peer reviewers (2010)
0.09
0.08934577 = sum of:
0.035832305 = product of:
0.14332922 = sum of:
0.14332922 = weight(_text_:authors in 3978) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14332922 = score(doc=3978,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2371355 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.05201693 = queryNorm
0.60441905 = fieldWeight in 3978, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3978)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.053513464 = product of:
0.10702693 = sum of:
0.10702693 = weight(_text_:t in 3978) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10702693 = score(doc=3978,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20491594 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
0.05201693 = queryNorm
0.5222967 = fieldWeight in 3978, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3978)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Marchant, T.: Score-based bibliometric rankings of authors (2009)
0.08
0.083452046 = sum of:
0.047776405 = product of:
0.19110562 = sum of:
0.19110562 = weight(_text_:authors in 2849) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.19110562 = score(doc=2849,freq=8.0), product of:
0.2371355 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.05201693 = queryNorm
0.80589205 = fieldWeight in 2849, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2849)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.03567564 = product of:
0.07135128 = sum of:
0.07135128 = weight(_text_:t in 2849) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07135128 = score(doc=2849,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20491594 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
0.05201693 = queryNorm
0.34819782 = fieldWeight in 2849, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2849)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Scoring rules (or score-based rankings or summation-based rankings) form a family of bibliometric rankings of authors such that authors are ranked according to the sum over all their publications of some partial scores. Many of these rankings are widely used (e.g., number of publications, weighted or not by the impact factor, by the number of authors, or by the number of citations). We present an axiomatic analysis of the family of all scoring rules and of some particular cases within this family.
-
Koltay, T.: ¬A hypertext tutorial on abstracting for library science students (1995)
0.08
0.079832435 = product of:
0.15966487 = sum of:
0.15966487 = sum of:
0.089189105 = weight(_text_:t in 3061) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.089189105 = score(doc=3061,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20491594 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
0.05201693 = queryNorm
0.43524727 = fieldWeight in 3061, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3061)
0.07047576 = weight(_text_:22 in 3061) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07047576 = score(doc=3061,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18215442 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05201693 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3061, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3061)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 27. 1.1996 18:22:06
-
Seminario FRBR : Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records: reguisiti funzionali per record bibliografici, Florence, 27-28 January 2000, Proceedings (2000)
0.08
0.079832435 = product of:
0.15966487 = sum of:
0.15966487 = sum of:
0.089189105 = weight(_text_:t in 3948) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.089189105 = score(doc=3948,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20491594 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
0.05201693 = queryNorm
0.43524727 = fieldWeight in 3948, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3948)
0.07047576 = weight(_text_:22 in 3948) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07047576 = score(doc=3948,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18215442 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05201693 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3948, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3948)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Content
- Enthält u.a.: Grimaldi, T.: The object of cataloguing; Byrum, J.D., O.M.A. Madison: Reflections an the goals, concepts and recommendations of the IFLA study an Functional Requirements of Bibliographic Records;
- Date
- 29. 8.2005 12:54:22
-
Saracevic, T.: On a method for studying the structure and nature of requests in information retrieval (1983)
0.08
0.079832435 = product of:
0.15966487 = sum of:
0.15966487 = sum of:
0.089189105 = weight(_text_:t in 2417) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.089189105 = score(doc=2417,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20491594 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
0.05201693 = queryNorm
0.43524727 = fieldWeight in 2417, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2417)
0.07047576 = weight(_text_:22 in 2417) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07047576 = score(doc=2417,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18215442 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05201693 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2417, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2417)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Pages
- S.22-25
-
Burghardt, M.; Hertlein, F.; Hinterleitner, B.; Lehenmeier, C.; Spröd, T.: ¬A crowdsourced approach for the documentation and transcription of graffiti in public restrooms (2015)
0.08
0.079832435 = product of:
0.15966487 = sum of:
0.15966487 = sum of:
0.089189105 = weight(_text_:t in 2991) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.089189105 = score(doc=2991,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20491594 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
0.05201693 = queryNorm
0.43524727 = fieldWeight in 2991, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2991)
0.07047576 = weight(_text_:22 in 2991) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07047576 = score(doc=2991,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18215442 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05201693 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2991, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2991)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 6. 6.2016 18:42:22
-
Burrell, Q.L.: Predicting future citation behavior (2003)
0.07
0.06881286 = product of:
0.13762572 = sum of:
0.13762572 = sum of:
0.0882927 = weight(_text_:t in 3837) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0882927 = score(doc=3837,freq=4.0), product of:
0.20491594 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
0.05201693 = queryNorm
0.4308728 = fieldWeight in 3837, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3837)
0.04933303 = weight(_text_:22 in 3837) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04933303 = score(doc=3837,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18215442 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05201693 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3837, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3837)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- In this article we further develop the theory for a stochastic model for the citation process in the presence of obsolescence to predict the future citation pattern of individual papers in a collection. More precisely, we investigate the conditional distribution-and its mean- of the number of citations to a paper after time t, given the number of citations it has received up to time t. In an important parametric case it is shown that the expected number of future citations is a linear function of the current number, this being interpretable as an example of a success-breeds-success phenomenon.
- Date
- 29. 3.2003 19:22:48
-
Saving the time of the library user through subject access innovation : Papers in honor of Pauline Atherton Cochrane (2000)
0.07
0.066333786 = sum of:
0.010451089 = product of:
0.041804355 = sum of:
0.041804355 = weight(_text_:authors in 1429) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041804355 = score(doc=1429,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2371355 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.05201693 = queryNorm
0.17628889 = fieldWeight in 1429, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1429)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.0558827 = sum of:
0.031216186 = weight(_text_:t in 1429) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031216186 = score(doc=1429,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20491594 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
0.05201693 = queryNorm
0.15233654 = fieldWeight in 1429, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1429)
0.024666514 = weight(_text_:22 in 1429) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024666514 = score(doc=1429,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18215442 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05201693 = queryNorm
0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 1429, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1429)
- Abstract
- Pauline Atherton Cochrane has been contributing to library and information science for fifty years. Think of it-from mid-century to the millennium, from ENIAC (practically) to Internet 11 (almost here). What a time to be in our field! Her work an indexing, subject access, and the user-oriented approach had immediate and sustained impact, and she continues to be one of our most heavily cited authors (see, JASIS, 49[4], 327-55) and most beloved personages. This introduction includes a few words about my own experiences with Pauline as well as a short summary of the contributions that make up this tribute. A review of the curriculum vita provided at the end of this publication Shows that Pauline Cochrane has been involved in a wide variety of work. As Marcia Bates points out in her note (See below), Pauline was (and is) a role model, but I will always think of her as simply the best teacher 1 ever had. In 1997, I entered the University of Illinois Graduate School of Library and Information Science as a returning mid-life student; my previous doctorate had not led to a full-time job and I was re-tooling. I was not sure what 1 would find in library school, and the introductory course attended by more than 100 students from widely varied backgrounds had not yet convinced me I was in the right place. Then, one day, Pauline gave a guest lecture an the digital library in my introductory class. I still remember it. She put up some notes-a few words clustered an the blackboard with some circles and directional arrows-and then she gave a free, seemingly extemporaneous, but riveting narrative. She set out a vision for ideal information exchange in the digital environment but noted a host of practical concerns, issues, and potential problems that required (demanded!) continued human intervention. The lecture brought that class and the entire semester's work into focus; it created tremendous excitement for the future of librarianship. 1 saw that librarians and libraries would play an active role. I was in the right place.
- Content
- Enthält Beiträge von: FUGMANN, R.: Obstacles to progress in mechanized subject access and the necessity of a paradigm change; TELL, B.: On MARC and natural text searching: a review of Pauline Cochrane's inspirational thinking grafted onto a Swedish spy on library matters; KING, D.W.: Blazing new trails: in celebration of an audacious career; FIDEL, R.: The user-centered approach; SMITH, L.: Subject access in interdisciplinary research; DRABENSTOTT, K.M.: Web search strategies; LAM, V.-T.: Enhancing subject access to monographs in Online Public Access Catalogs: table of contents added to bibliographic records; JOHNSON, E.H.: Objects for distributed heterogeneous information retrieval
- Date
- 22. 9.1997 19:16:05
