Search (4088 results, page 1 of 205)

  • × language_ss:"e"
  1. Ackermann, E.: Piaget's constructivism, Papert's constructionism : what's the difference? (2001) 0.13
    0.13250613 = product of:
      0.26501226 = sum of:
        0.26501226 = product of:
          0.5300245 = sum of:
            0.20682074 = weight(_text_:3a in 692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.20682074 = score(doc=692,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.44159594 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05208721 = queryNorm
                0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 692, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=692)
            0.3232038 = weight(_text_:2c in 692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.3232038 = score(doc=692,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.55203456 = queryWeight, product of:
                  10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05208721 = queryNorm
                0.5854775 = fieldWeight in 692, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=692)
          0.5 = coord(2/4)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Piaget-%E2%80%99-s-Constructivism-%2C-Papert-%E2%80%99-s-%3A-What-%E2%80%99-s-Ackermann/89cbcc1e740a4591443ff4765a6ae8df0fdf5554. Darunter weitere Hinweise auf verwandte Beiträge. Auch unter: Learning Group Publication 5(2001) no.3, S.438.
  2. Chan, H.C.; Kim, H.-W.; Tan, W.C.: Information systems citation patterns from International Conference on Information Systems articles (2006) 0.11
    0.11042718 = sum of:
      0.01794036 = product of:
        0.07176144 = sum of:
          0.07176144 = weight(_text_:authors in 201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.07176144 = score(doc=201,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.2374559 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05208721 = queryNorm
              0.30220953 = fieldWeight in 201, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=201)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.09248682 = sum of:
        0.050144233 = weight(_text_:w in 201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.050144233 = score(doc=201,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19849424 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05208721 = queryNorm
            0.2526231 = fieldWeight in 201, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=201)
        0.04234259 = weight(_text_:22 in 201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04234259 = score(doc=201,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18240054 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05208721 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 201, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=201)
    
    Abstract
    Research patterns could enhance understanding of the Information Systems (IS) field. Citation analysis is the methodology commonly used to determine such research patterns. In this study, the citation methodology is applied to one of the top-ranked Information Systems conferences - International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS). Information is extracted from papers in the proceedings of ICIS 2000 to 2002. A total of 145 base articles and 4,226 citations are used. Research patterns are obtained using total citations, citations per journal or conference, and overlapping citations. We then provide the citation ranking of journals and conferences. We also examine the difference between the citation ranking in this study and the ranking of IS journals and IS conferences in other studies. Based on the comparison, we confirm that IS research is a multidisciplinary research area. We also identify the most cited papers and authors in the IS research area, and the organizations most active in producing papers in the top-rated IS conference. We discuss the findings and implications of the study.
    Date
    3. 1.2007 17:22:03
  3. Vukadin, A.; Slavic, A.: Challenges of facet analysis and concept placement in Universal Classifications : the example of architecture in UDC (2014) 0.11
    0.11042718 = sum of:
      0.01794036 = product of:
        0.07176144 = sum of:
          0.07176144 = weight(_text_:authors in 1428) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.07176144 = score(doc=1428,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.2374559 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05208721 = queryNorm
              0.30220953 = fieldWeight in 1428, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1428)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.09248682 = sum of:
        0.050144233 = weight(_text_:w in 1428) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.050144233 = score(doc=1428,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19849424 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05208721 = queryNorm
            0.2526231 = fieldWeight in 1428, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1428)
        0.04234259 = weight(_text_:22 in 1428) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04234259 = score(doc=1428,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18240054 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05208721 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1428, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1428)
    
    Abstract
    The paper discusses the challenges of faceted vocabulary organization in universal classifications which treat the universe of knowledge as a coherent whole and in which the concepts and subjects in different disciplines are shared, related and combined. The authors illustrate the challenges of the facet analytical approach using, as an example, the revision of class 72 in UDC. The paper reports on the research undertaken in 2013 as preparation for the revision. This consisted of analysis of concept organization in the UDC schedules in comparison with the Art & Architecture Thesaurus and class W of the Bliss Bibliographic Classification. The paper illustrates how such research can contribute to a better understanding of the field and may lead to improvements in the facet structure of this segment of the UDC vocabulary.
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
  4. Carter, J.A.: PASSPORT/PRISM: authors and titles and MARC : oh my! (1993) 0.10
    0.10429774 = sum of:
      0.047840957 = product of:
        0.19136383 = sum of:
          0.19136383 = weight(_text_:authors in 527) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.19136383 = score(doc=527,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.2374559 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05208721 = queryNorm
              0.80589205 = fieldWeight in 527, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=527)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.056456786 = product of:
        0.11291357 = sum of:
          0.11291357 = weight(_text_:22 in 527) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.11291357 = score(doc=527,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18240054 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05208721 = queryNorm
              0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 527, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=527)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    OCLC systems and services. 9(1993) no.3, S.20-22
  5. Chang, Y.-W.; Huang, M.-H.: ¬A study of the evolution of interdisciplinarity in library and information science : using three bibliometric methods (2012) 0.10
    0.09821527 = sum of:
      0.021142917 = product of:
        0.08457167 = sum of:
          0.08457167 = weight(_text_:authors in 4959) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.08457167 = score(doc=4959,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.2374559 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05208721 = queryNorm
              0.35615736 = fieldWeight in 4959, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4959)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.07707235 = sum of:
        0.04178686 = weight(_text_:w in 4959) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04178686 = score(doc=4959,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19849424 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05208721 = queryNorm
            0.21051927 = fieldWeight in 4959, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4959)
        0.03528549 = weight(_text_:22 in 4959) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03528549 = score(doc=4959,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18240054 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05208721 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4959, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4959)
    
    Abstract
    This study uses three bibliometric methods: direct citation, bibliographic coupling, and co-authorship analysis, to investigate interdisciplinary changes in library and information science (LIS) from 1978 to 2007. The results reveal that LIS researchers most frequently cite publications in their own discipline. In addition, half of all co-authors of LIS articles are affiliated with LIS-related institutes. The results confirm that the degree of interdisciplinarity within LIS has increased, particularly co-authorship. However, the study found sources of direct citations in LIS articles are widely distributed across 30 disciplines, but co-authors of LIS articles are distributed across only 25 disciplines. The degree of interdisciplinarity was found ranging from 0.61 to 0.82 with citation to references in all articles being the highest and that of co-authorship being the lowest. Percentages of contribution attributable to LIS show a decreasing tendency based on the results of direct citation and co-authorship analysis, but an increasing tendency based on those of bibliographic coupling analysis. Such differences indicate each of the three bibliometric methods has its strength and provides insights respectively for viewing various aspects of interdisciplinarity, suggesting the use of no single bibliometric method can reveal all aspects of interdisciplinarity due to its multifaceted nature.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 63(2012) no.1, S.22-33
  6. Soulier, L.; Jabeur, L.B.; Tamine, L.; Bahsoun, W.: On ranking relevant entities in heterogeneous networks using a language-based model (2013) 0.10
    0.09821527 = sum of:
      0.021142917 = product of:
        0.08457167 = sum of:
          0.08457167 = weight(_text_:authors in 664) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.08457167 = score(doc=664,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.2374559 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05208721 = queryNorm
              0.35615736 = fieldWeight in 664, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=664)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.07707235 = sum of:
        0.04178686 = weight(_text_:w in 664) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04178686 = score(doc=664,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19849424 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05208721 = queryNorm
            0.21051927 = fieldWeight in 664, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=664)
        0.03528549 = weight(_text_:22 in 664) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03528549 = score(doc=664,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18240054 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05208721 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 664, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=664)
    
    Abstract
    A new challenge, accessing multiple relevant entities, arises from the availability of linked heterogeneous data. In this article, we address more specifically the problem of accessing relevant entities, such as publications and authors within a bibliographic network, given an information need. We propose a novel algorithm, called BibRank, that estimates a joint relevance of documents and authors within a bibliographic network. This model ranks each type of entity using a score propagation algorithm with respect to the query topic and the structure of the underlying bi-type information entity network. Evidence sources, namely content-based and network-based scores, are both used to estimate the topical similarity between connected entities. For this purpose, authorship relationships are analyzed through a language model-based score on the one hand and on the other hand, non topically related entities of the same type are detected through marginal citations. The article reports the results of experiments using the Bibrank algorithm for an information retrieval task. The CiteSeerX bibliographic data set forms the basis for the topical query automatic generation and evaluation. We show that a statistically significant improvement over closely related ranking models is achieved.
    Date
    22. 3.2013 19:34:49
  7. Zhang, L.; Lu, W.; Yang, J.: LAGOS-AND : a large gold standard dataset for scholarly author name disambiguation (2023) 0.10
    0.09821527 = sum of:
      0.021142917 = product of:
        0.08457167 = sum of:
          0.08457167 = weight(_text_:authors in 883) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.08457167 = score(doc=883,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.2374559 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05208721 = queryNorm
              0.35615736 = fieldWeight in 883, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=883)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.07707235 = sum of:
        0.04178686 = weight(_text_:w in 883) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04178686 = score(doc=883,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19849424 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05208721 = queryNorm
            0.21051927 = fieldWeight in 883, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=883)
        0.03528549 = weight(_text_:22 in 883) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03528549 = score(doc=883,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18240054 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05208721 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 883, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=883)
    
    Abstract
    In this article, we present a method to automatically build large labeled datasets for the author ambiguity problem in the academic world by leveraging the authoritative academic resources, ORCID and DOI. Using the method, we built LAGOS-AND, two large, gold-standard sub-datasets for author name disambiguation (AND), of which LAGOS-AND-BLOCK is created for clustering-based AND research and LAGOS-AND-PAIRWISE is created for classification-based AND research. Our LAGOS-AND datasets are substantially different from the existing ones. The initial versions of the datasets (v1.0, released in February 2021) include 7.5 M citations authored by 798 K unique authors (LAGOS-AND-BLOCK) and close to 1 M instances (LAGOS-AND-PAIRWISE). And both datasets show close similarities to the whole Microsoft Academic Graph (MAG) across validations of six facets. In building the datasets, we reveal the variation degrees of last names in three literature databases, PubMed, MAG, and Semantic Scholar, by comparing author names hosted to the authors' official last names shown on the ORCID pages. Furthermore, we evaluate several baseline disambiguation methods as well as the MAG's author IDs system on our datasets, and the evaluation helps identify several interesting findings. We hope the datasets and findings will bring new insights for future studies. The code and datasets are publicly available.
    Date
    22. 1.2023 18:40:36
  8. Information and management : utilization of technology - structural and cultural impact (1998) 0.09
    0.09248682 = product of:
      0.18497364 = sum of:
        0.18497364 = sum of:
          0.100288466 = weight(_text_:w in 3873) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.100288466 = score(doc=3873,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.19849424 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05208721 = queryNorm
              0.5052462 = fieldWeight in 3873, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3873)
          0.08468518 = weight(_text_:22 in 3873) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.08468518 = score(doc=3873,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18240054 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05208721 = queryNorm
              0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3873, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3873)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    7. 7.1999 12:22:42
    Footnote
    Rez. in: nfd 50(1999) H.4, S.204 (W. Ratzek)
  9. Marx, W.; Bornmann, L.: On the problems of dealing with bibliometric data (2014) 0.09
    0.09248682 = product of:
      0.18497364 = sum of:
        0.18497364 = sum of:
          0.100288466 = weight(_text_:w in 1239) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.100288466 = score(doc=1239,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.19849424 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05208721 = queryNorm
              0.5052462 = fieldWeight in 1239, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1239)
          0.08468518 = weight(_text_:22 in 1239) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.08468518 = score(doc=1239,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18240054 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05208721 = queryNorm
              0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 1239, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1239)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    18. 3.2014 19:13:22
  10. Knowledge organization in the 21st century : between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland (2014) 0.09
    0.09248682 = product of:
      0.18497364 = sum of:
        0.18497364 = sum of:
          0.100288466 = weight(_text_:w in 4693) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.100288466 = score(doc=4693,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.19849424 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05208721 = queryNorm
              0.5052462 = fieldWeight in 4693, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4693)
          0.08468518 = weight(_text_:22 in 4693) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.08468518 = score(doc=4693,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18240054 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05208721 = queryNorm
              0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4693, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4693)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Editor
    Babik, W.
  11. Vakkari, P.; Järvelin, K.; Chang, Y.-W.: ¬The association of disciplinary background with the evolution of topics and methods in Library and Information Science research 1995-2015 (2023) 0.09
    0.09202265 = sum of:
      0.0149503 = product of:
        0.0598012 = sum of:
          0.0598012 = weight(_text_:authors in 998) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0598012 = score(doc=998,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.2374559 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05208721 = queryNorm
              0.25184128 = fieldWeight in 998, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=998)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.07707235 = sum of:
        0.04178686 = weight(_text_:w in 998) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04178686 = score(doc=998,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19849424 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05208721 = queryNorm
            0.21051927 = fieldWeight in 998, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=998)
        0.03528549 = weight(_text_:22 in 998) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03528549 = score(doc=998,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18240054 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05208721 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 998, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=998)
    
    Abstract
    The paper reports a longitudinal analysis of the topical and methodological development of Library and Information Science (LIS). Its focus is on the effects of researchers' disciplines on these developments. The study extends an earlier cross-sectional study (Vakkari et al., Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2022a, 73, 1706-1722) by a coordinated dataset representing a content analysis of articles published in 31 scholarly LIS journals in 1995, 2005, and 2015. It is novel in its coverage of authors' disciplines, topical and methodological aspects in a coordinated dataset spanning two decades thus allowing trend analysis. The findings include a shrinking trend in the share of LIS from 67 to 36% while Computer Science, and Business and Economics increase their share from 9 and 6% to 21 and 16%, respectively. The earlier cross-sectional study (Vakkari et al., Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2022a, 73, 1706-1722) for the year 2015 identified three topical clusters of LIS research, focusing on topical subfields, methodologies, and contributing disciplines. Correspondence analysis confirms their existence already in 1995 and traces their development through the decades. The contributing disciplines infuse their concepts, research questions, and approaches to LIS and may also subsume vital parts of LIS in their own structures of knowledge production.
    Date
    22. 6.2023 18:15:06
  12. Li, L.; Shang, Y.; Zhang, W.: Improvement of HITS-based algorithms on Web documents 0.09
    0.08711834 = sum of:
      0.062046222 = product of:
        0.24818489 = sum of:
          0.24818489 = weight(_text_:3a in 2514) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.24818489 = score(doc=2514,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.44159594 = queryWeight, product of:
                8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05208721 = queryNorm
              0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2514, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2514)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.025072116 = product of:
        0.050144233 = sum of:
          0.050144233 = weight(_text_:w in 2514) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.050144233 = score(doc=2514,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.19849424 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05208721 = queryNorm
              0.2526231 = fieldWeight in 2514, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2514)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fdelab.csd.auth.gr%2F~dimitris%2Fcourses%2Fir_spring06%2Fpage_rank_computing%2Fp527-li.pdf. Vgl. auch: http://www2002.org/CDROM/refereed/643/.
  13. Zeng, Q.; Yu, M.; Yu, W.; Xiong, J.; Shi, Y.; Jiang, M.: Faceted hierarchy : a new graph type to organize scientific concepts and a construction method (2019) 0.09
    0.08711834 = sum of:
      0.062046222 = product of:
        0.24818489 = sum of:
          0.24818489 = weight(_text_:3a in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.24818489 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.44159594 = queryWeight, product of:
                8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05208721 = queryNorm
              0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.025072116 = product of:
        0.050144233 = sum of:
          0.050144233 = weight(_text_:w in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.050144233 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.19849424 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05208721 = queryNorm
              0.2526231 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Faclanthology.org%2FD19-5317.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0ZZFyq5wWTtNTvNkrvjlGA.
  14. Hotho, A.; Bloehdorn, S.: Data Mining 2004 : Text classification by boosting weak learners based on terms and concepts (2004) 0.08
    0.08321752 = sum of:
      0.062046222 = product of:
        0.24818489 = sum of:
          0.24818489 = weight(_text_:3a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.24818489 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.44159594 = queryWeight, product of:
                8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05208721 = queryNorm
              0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.021171294 = product of:
        0.04234259 = sum of:
          0.04234259 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04234259 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18240054 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05208721 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CEAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.91.4940%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&ei=dOXrUMeIDYHDtQahsIGACg&usg=AFQjCNHFWVh6gNPvnOrOS9R3rkrXCNVD-A&sig2=5I2F5evRfMnsttSgFF9g7Q&bvm=bv.1357316858,d.Yms.
    Date
    8. 1.2013 10:22:32
  15. Schmitz-Esser, W.: Language of general communication and concept compatibility (1996) 0.08
    0.07707235 = product of:
      0.1541447 = sum of:
        0.1541447 = sum of:
          0.08357372 = weight(_text_:w in 6089) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.08357372 = score(doc=6089,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.19849424 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05208721 = queryNorm
              0.42103854 = fieldWeight in 6089, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6089)
          0.07057098 = weight(_text_:22 in 6089) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.07057098 = score(doc=6089,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18240054 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05208721 = queryNorm
              0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 6089, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6089)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Pages
    S.11-22
  16. Saffady, W.: ¬The bibliographic utilities in 1993 : a survey of cataloging support and other services; OCLC (1993) 0.08
    0.07707235 = product of:
      0.1541447 = sum of:
        0.1541447 = sum of:
          0.08357372 = weight(_text_:w in 3090) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.08357372 = score(doc=3090,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.19849424 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05208721 = queryNorm
              0.42103854 = fieldWeight in 3090, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3090)
          0.07057098 = weight(_text_:22 in 3090) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.07057098 = score(doc=3090,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18240054 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05208721 = queryNorm
              0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3090, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3090)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    30.11.1995 20:53:22
  17. Saffady, W.: ¬The bibliographic utilities in 1993 : a survey of cataloging support and other services; AGILE 3 (1993) 0.08
    0.07707235 = product of:
      0.1541447 = sum of:
        0.1541447 = sum of:
          0.08357372 = weight(_text_:w in 3091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.08357372 = score(doc=3091,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.19849424 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05208721 = queryNorm
              0.42103854 = fieldWeight in 3091, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3091)
          0.07057098 = weight(_text_:22 in 3091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.07057098 = score(doc=3091,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18240054 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05208721 = queryNorm
              0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3091, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3091)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    30.11.1995 20:53:22
  18. Saffady, W.: ¬The bibliographic utilities in 1993 : a survey of cataloging support and other services; Interactive Access System (1993) 0.08
    0.07707235 = product of:
      0.1541447 = sum of:
        0.1541447 = sum of:
          0.08357372 = weight(_text_:w in 3092) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.08357372 = score(doc=3092,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.19849424 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05208721 = queryNorm
              0.42103854 = fieldWeight in 3092, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3092)
          0.07057098 = weight(_text_:22 in 3092) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.07057098 = score(doc=3092,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18240054 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05208721 = queryNorm
              0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3092, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3092)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    30.11.1995 20:53:22
  19. Saffady, W.: ¬The bibliographic utilities in 1993 : a survey of cataloging support and other services; Open DRANET (1993) 0.08
    0.07707235 = product of:
      0.1541447 = sum of:
        0.1541447 = sum of:
          0.08357372 = weight(_text_:w in 3093) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.08357372 = score(doc=3093,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.19849424 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05208721 = queryNorm
              0.42103854 = fieldWeight in 3093, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3093)
          0.07057098 = weight(_text_:22 in 3093) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.07057098 = score(doc=3093,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18240054 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05208721 = queryNorm
              0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3093, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3093)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    30.11.1995 20:53:22
  20. Saffady, W.: ¬The bibliographic utilities in 1993 : a survey of cataloging support and other services; RLIN (1993) 0.08
    0.07707235 = product of:
      0.1541447 = sum of:
        0.1541447 = sum of:
          0.08357372 = weight(_text_:w in 3094) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.08357372 = score(doc=3094,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.19849424 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05208721 = queryNorm
              0.42103854 = fieldWeight in 3094, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.8108058 = idf(docFreq=2659, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3094)
          0.07057098 = weight(_text_:22 in 3094) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.07057098 = score(doc=3094,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18240054 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05208721 = queryNorm
              0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3094, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3094)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    30.11.1995 20:53:22

Types

  • a 3542
  • m 341
  • s 195
  • el 152
  • b 34
  • r 16
  • x 10
  • i 9
  • p 4
  • n 3
  • ? 1
  • ag 1
  • d 1
  • h 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications