Search (3330 results, page 1 of 167)

  • × language_ss:"e"
  1. Chaves Guimarães, J.A.; Tennis, J.T.: Constant pioneers : the citation frontiers of indexing theory in the ISKO international proceedings (2012) 0.15
    0.15004618 = sum of:
      0.032155484 = product of:
        0.12862194 = sum of:
          0.12862194 = weight(_text_:authors in 818) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.12862194 = score(doc=818,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.22571123 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.049510952 = queryNorm
              0.56985176 = fieldWeight in 818, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=818)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.1178907 = product of:
        0.2357814 = sum of:
          0.2357814 = weight(_text_:j.t in 818) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.2357814 = score(doc=818,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.36341923 = queryWeight, product of:
                7.3401785 = idf(docFreq=77, maxDocs=44218)
                0.049510952 = queryNorm
              0.64878625 = fieldWeight in 818, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                7.3401785 = idf(docFreq=77, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=818)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Presents a citation analysis of indexing research in the ISKO Proceedings. Understanding that there are different traditions of research into indexing, we look for evidence of this in the citing and cited authors. Three areas of cited and citing authors surface, after applying Price's elitism analysis, each roughly corresponding to geographic distributions.
  2. Tennis, J.T.: Ethos and ideology of knowledge organization : toward precepts for an engaged knowledge organization (2013) 0.14
    0.14472291 = product of:
      0.28944582 = sum of:
        0.28944582 = sum of:
          0.2357814 = weight(_text_:j.t in 637) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.2357814 = score(doc=637,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.36341923 = queryWeight, product of:
                7.3401785 = idf(docFreq=77, maxDocs=44218)
                0.049510952 = queryNorm
              0.64878625 = fieldWeight in 637, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                7.3401785 = idf(docFreq=77, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=637)
          0.0536644 = weight(_text_:22 in 637) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0536644 = score(doc=637,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17337891 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.049510952 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 637, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=637)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 2.2013 11:54:49
  3. Tennis, J.T.: Facets and fugit tempus : considering time's effect on faceted classification schemes (2012) 0.14
    0.14472291 = product of:
      0.28944582 = sum of:
        0.28944582 = sum of:
          0.2357814 = weight(_text_:j.t in 826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.2357814 = score(doc=826,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.36341923 = queryWeight, product of:
                7.3401785 = idf(docFreq=77, maxDocs=44218)
                0.049510952 = queryNorm
              0.64878625 = fieldWeight in 826, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                7.3401785 = idf(docFreq=77, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=826)
          0.0536644 = weight(_text_:22 in 826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0536644 = score(doc=826,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17337891 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.049510952 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 826, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=826)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    2. 6.2013 18:33:22
  4. Tennis, J.T.: Load Bearing or Levittown? : the edifice metaphor in conceptualizing the ethos of classification work (2014) 0.13
    0.12663254 = product of:
      0.25326508 = sum of:
        0.25326508 = sum of:
          0.20630874 = weight(_text_:j.t in 1426) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.20630874 = score(doc=1426,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.36341923 = queryWeight, product of:
                7.3401785 = idf(docFreq=77, maxDocs=44218)
                0.049510952 = queryNorm
              0.567688 = fieldWeight in 1426, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                7.3401785 = idf(docFreq=77, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1426)
          0.046956353 = weight(_text_:22 in 1426) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.046956353 = score(doc=1426,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17337891 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.049510952 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1426, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1426)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
  5. Ackermann, E.: Piaget's constructivism, Papert's constructionism : what's the difference? (2001) 0.13
    0.12595232 = product of:
      0.25190464 = sum of:
        0.25190464 = product of:
          0.5038093 = sum of:
            0.1965913 = weight(_text_:3a in 692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.1965913 = score(doc=692,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.41975442 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049510952 = queryNorm
                0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 692, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=692)
            0.307218 = weight(_text_:2c in 692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.307218 = score(doc=692,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.5247307 = queryWeight, product of:
                  10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049510952 = queryNorm
                0.5854775 = fieldWeight in 692, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=692)
          0.5 = coord(2/4)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Piaget-%E2%80%99-s-Constructivism-%2C-Papert-%E2%80%99-s-%3A-What-%E2%80%99-s-Ackermann/89cbcc1e740a4591443ff4765a6ae8df0fdf5554. Darunter weitere Hinweise auf verwandte Beiträge. Auch unter: Learning Group Publication 5(2001) no.3, S.438.
  6. Pope, J.T.; Holley, R.P.: Google Book Search and metadata (2011) 0.12
    0.12304956 = sum of:
      0.01989519 = product of:
        0.07958076 = sum of:
          0.07958076 = weight(_text_:authors in 1887) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.07958076 = score(doc=1887,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.22571123 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.049510952 = queryNorm
              0.35257778 = fieldWeight in 1887, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1887)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.10315437 = product of:
        0.20630874 = sum of:
          0.20630874 = weight(_text_:j.t in 1887) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.20630874 = score(doc=1887,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.36341923 = queryWeight, product of:
                7.3401785 = idf(docFreq=77, maxDocs=44218)
                0.049510952 = queryNorm
              0.567688 = fieldWeight in 1887, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                7.3401785 = idf(docFreq=77, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1887)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This article summarizes published documents on metadata provided by Google for books scanned as part of the Google Book Search (GBS) project and provides suggestions for improvement. The faulty, misleading, and confusing metadata in current Google records can pose potentially serious problems for users of GBS. Google admits that it took data, which proved to be inaccurate, from many sources and is attempting to correct errors. Some argue that metadata is not needed with keyword searching; but optical character recognition (OCR) errors, synonym control, and materials in foreign languages make reliable metadata a requirement for academic researchers. The authors recommend that users should be able to submit error reports to Google to correct faulty metadata.
  7. Hicks, J.T.: Computer assisted instruction in library orientation and services (1976) 0.12
    0.1178907 = product of:
      0.2357814 = sum of:
        0.2357814 = product of:
          0.4715628 = sum of:
            0.4715628 = weight(_text_:j.t in 8392) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.4715628 = score(doc=8392,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.36341923 = queryWeight, product of:
                  7.3401785 = idf(docFreq=77, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049510952 = queryNorm
                1.2975725 = fieldWeight in 8392, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  7.3401785 = idf(docFreq=77, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=8392)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  8. Guthrie, J.T.: Locating information in documents : examination of a cognitive model (1988) 0.12
    0.1178907 = product of:
      0.2357814 = sum of:
        0.2357814 = product of:
          0.4715628 = sum of:
            0.4715628 = weight(_text_:j.t in 6509) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.4715628 = score(doc=6509,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.36341923 = queryWeight, product of:
                  7.3401785 = idf(docFreq=77, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049510952 = queryNorm
                1.2975725 = fieldWeight in 6509, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  7.3401785 = idf(docFreq=77, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6509)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  9. Maccaferri, J.T.: Ottoman Turkish cataloging : romanization (1985) 0.12
    0.1178907 = product of:
      0.2357814 = sum of:
        0.2357814 = product of:
          0.4715628 = sum of:
            0.4715628 = weight(_text_:j.t in 347) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.4715628 = score(doc=347,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.36341923 = queryWeight, product of:
                  7.3401785 = idf(docFreq=77, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049510952 = queryNorm
                1.2975725 = fieldWeight in 347, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  7.3401785 = idf(docFreq=77, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=347)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  10. Ho, S.M.; Hancock, J.T.; Booth, C.: Ethical dilemma : deception dynamics in computer-mediated group communication (2017) 0.11
    0.108542174 = product of:
      0.21708435 = sum of:
        0.21708435 = sum of:
          0.17683604 = weight(_text_:j.t in 3821) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.17683604 = score(doc=3821,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.36341923 = queryWeight, product of:
                7.3401785 = idf(docFreq=77, maxDocs=44218)
                0.049510952 = queryNorm
              0.48658967 = fieldWeight in 3821, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                7.3401785 = idf(docFreq=77, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3821)
          0.0402483 = weight(_text_:22 in 3821) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0402483 = score(doc=3821,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17337891 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.049510952 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3821, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3821)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    16.11.2017 13:02:22
  11. Adler, M.; Tennis, J.T.: Toward a taxonomy of harm in knowledge organization systems (2013) 0.11
    0.105471045 = sum of:
      0.017053021 = product of:
        0.068212084 = sum of:
          0.068212084 = weight(_text_:authors in 1068) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.068212084 = score(doc=1068,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.22571123 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.049510952 = queryNorm
              0.30220953 = fieldWeight in 1068, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1068)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.08841802 = product of:
        0.17683604 = sum of:
          0.17683604 = weight(_text_:j.t in 1068) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.17683604 = score(doc=1068,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.36341923 = queryWeight, product of:
                7.3401785 = idf(docFreq=77, maxDocs=44218)
                0.049510952 = queryNorm
              0.48658967 = fieldWeight in 1068, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                7.3401785 = idf(docFreq=77, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1068)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    A starting point for contributing to the greater good is to examine and interrogate existing knowledge organization practices that do harm, whether that harm is intentional or accidental, or an inherent and unavoidable evil. As part of the transition movement, the authors propose to inventory the manifestations and implications of the production of suffering by knowledge organization systems through constructing a taxonomy of harm. Theoretical underpinnings guide ontological commitment, as well as the recognition of the problem of harm in knowledge organization systems. The taxonomy of harm will be organized around three main questions: what happens?, who participates?, and who is affected and how? The aim is to heighten awareness of the violence that classifications and naming practices carry, to unearth some of the social conditions and motivations that contribute to and are reinforced by knowledge organization systems, and to advocate for intentional and ethical knowledge organization practices to achieve a minimal level of harm.
  12. Horng, J.T.; Yeh, C.C.: Applying genetic algorithms to query optimization in document retrieval (2000) 0.10
    0.10315437 = product of:
      0.20630874 = sum of:
        0.20630874 = product of:
          0.41261747 = sum of:
            0.41261747 = weight(_text_:j.t in 3045) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.41261747 = score(doc=3045,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.36341923 = queryWeight, product of:
                  7.3401785 = idf(docFreq=77, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049510952 = queryNorm
                1.135376 = fieldWeight in 3045, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  7.3401785 = idf(docFreq=77, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3045)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  13. Carter, J.A.: PASSPORT/PRISM: authors and titles and MARC : oh my! (1993) 0.10
    0.099139124 = sum of:
      0.04547472 = product of:
        0.18189888 = sum of:
          0.18189888 = weight(_text_:authors in 527) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.18189888 = score(doc=527,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.22571123 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.049510952 = queryNorm
              0.80589205 = fieldWeight in 527, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=527)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.0536644 = product of:
        0.1073288 = sum of:
          0.1073288 = weight(_text_:22 in 527) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.1073288 = score(doc=527,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17337891 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.049510952 = queryNorm
              0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 527, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=527)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    OCLC systems and services. 9(1993) no.3, S.20-22
  14. Du, J.T.: ¬The information journey of marketing professionals : incorporating work task-driven information seeking, information judgments, information use, and information sharing (2014) 0.09
    0.090451814 = product of:
      0.18090363 = sum of:
        0.18090363 = sum of:
          0.14736338 = weight(_text_:j.t in 1346) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.14736338 = score(doc=1346,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.36341923 = queryWeight, product of:
                7.3401785 = idf(docFreq=77, maxDocs=44218)
                0.049510952 = queryNorm
              0.4054914 = fieldWeight in 1346, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                7.3401785 = idf(docFreq=77, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1346)
          0.033540253 = weight(_text_:22 in 1346) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.033540253 = score(doc=1346,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17337891 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.049510952 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1346, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1346)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 8.2014 16:57:34
  15. Perkins, J.T.: ¬The first mile down Internet I : development, training, and reference issues in the use of an X Windows interface for Internet access (1994) 0.09
    0.08841802 = product of:
      0.17683604 = sum of:
        0.17683604 = product of:
          0.3536721 = sum of:
            0.3536721 = weight(_text_:j.t in 161) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.3536721 = score(doc=161,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.36341923 = queryWeight, product of:
                  7.3401785 = idf(docFreq=77, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049510952 = queryNorm
                0.97317934 = fieldWeight in 161, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  7.3401785 = idf(docFreq=77, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=161)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  16. Hackos, J.T.; Redish, J.C.: User and task analysis for interface design (1998) 0.09
    0.08841802 = product of:
      0.17683604 = sum of:
        0.17683604 = product of:
          0.3536721 = sum of:
            0.3536721 = weight(_text_:j.t in 2330) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.3536721 = score(doc=2330,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.36341923 = queryWeight, product of:
                  7.3401785 = idf(docFreq=77, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049510952 = queryNorm
                0.97317934 = fieldWeight in 2330, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  7.3401785 = idf(docFreq=77, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2330)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  17. Tennis, J.T.: 6th Annual Open Forum on Metadata Registries : Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA, Jan 20-24, 2003 (2002) 0.09
    0.08841802 = product of:
      0.17683604 = sum of:
        0.17683604 = product of:
          0.3536721 = sum of:
            0.3536721 = weight(_text_:j.t in 1856) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.3536721 = score(doc=1856,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.36341923 = queryWeight, product of:
                  7.3401785 = idf(docFreq=77, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049510952 = queryNorm
                0.97317934 = fieldWeight in 1856, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  7.3401785 = idf(docFreq=77, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1856)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  18. Tennis, J.T.: Social tagging and the next steps for indexing (2006) 0.09
    0.08841802 = product of:
      0.17683604 = sum of:
        0.17683604 = product of:
          0.3536721 = sum of:
            0.3536721 = weight(_text_:j.t in 570) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.3536721 = score(doc=570,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.36341923 = queryWeight, product of:
                  7.3401785 = idf(docFreq=77, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.049510952 = queryNorm
                0.97317934 = fieldWeight in 570, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  7.3401785 = idf(docFreq=77, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=570)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  19. Hauser, E.; Tennis, J.T.: Episemantics: aboutness as aroundness (2019) 0.09
    0.08789254 = sum of:
      0.014210851 = product of:
        0.056843404 = sum of:
          0.056843404 = weight(_text_:authors in 5640) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.056843404 = score(doc=5640,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.22571123 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.049510952 = queryNorm
              0.25184128 = fieldWeight in 5640, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5640)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.07368169 = product of:
        0.14736338 = sum of:
          0.14736338 = weight(_text_:j.t in 5640) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.14736338 = score(doc=5640,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.36341923 = queryWeight, product of:
                7.3401785 = idf(docFreq=77, maxDocs=44218)
                0.049510952 = queryNorm
              0.4054914 = fieldWeight in 5640, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                7.3401785 = idf(docFreq=77, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5640)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Aboutness ranks amongst our field's greatest bugbears. What is a work about? How can this be known? This mirrors debates within the philosophy of language, where the concept of representation has similarly evaded satisfactory definition. This paper proposes that we abandon the strong sense of the word aboutness, which seems to promise some inherent relationship between work and subject, or, in philosophical terms, between word and world. Instead, we seek an etymological reset to the older sense of aboutness as "in the vicinity, nearby; in some place or various places nearby; all over a surface." To distinguish this sense in the context of information studies, we introduce the term episemantics. The authors have each independently applied this term in slightly different contexts and scales (Hauser 2018a; Tennis 2016), and this article presents a unified definition of the term and guidelines for applying it at the scale of both words and works. The resulting weak concept of aboutness is pragmatic, in Star's sense of a focus on consequences over antecedents, while reserving space for the critique and improvement of aboutness determinations within various contexts and research programs. The paper finishes with a discussion of the implication of the concept of episemantics and methodological possibilities it offers for knowledge organization research and practice. We draw inspiration from Melvil Dewey's use of physical aroundness in his first classification system and ask how aroundness might be more effectively operationalized in digital environments.
  20. Hotho, A.; Bloehdorn, S.: Data Mining 2004 : Text classification by boosting weak learners based on terms and concepts (2004) 0.08
    0.07910154 = sum of:
      0.058977388 = product of:
        0.23590955 = sum of:
          0.23590955 = weight(_text_:3a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.23590955 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.41975442 = queryWeight, product of:
                8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                0.049510952 = queryNorm
              0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.02012415 = product of:
        0.0402483 = sum of:
          0.0402483 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0402483 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17337891 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.049510952 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CEAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.91.4940%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&ei=dOXrUMeIDYHDtQahsIGACg&usg=AFQjCNHFWVh6gNPvnOrOS9R3rkrXCNVD-A&sig2=5I2F5evRfMnsttSgFF9g7Q&bvm=bv.1357316858,d.Yms.
    Date
    8. 1.2013 10:22:32

Types

  • a 2930
  • m 250
  • s 143
  • el 114
  • b 32
  • r 14
  • x 10
  • i 4
  • n 3
  • p 2
  • ag 1
  • d 1
  • h 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications