-
Ackermann, E.: Piaget's constructivism, Papert's constructionism : what's the difference? (2001)
0.13
0.13282707 = product of:
0.26565415 = sum of:
0.26565415 = product of:
0.5313083 = sum of:
0.20732166 = weight(_text_:3a in 692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.20732166 = score(doc=692,freq=2.0), product of:
0.4426655 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.052213363 = queryNorm
0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 692, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=692)
0.32398662 = weight(_text_:2c in 692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.32398662 = score(doc=692,freq=2.0), product of:
0.5533716 = queryWeight, product of:
10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
0.052213363 = queryNorm
0.5854775 = fieldWeight in 692, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=692)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Content
- Vgl.: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Piaget-%E2%80%99-s-Constructivism-%2C-Papert-%E2%80%99-s-%3A-What-%E2%80%99-s-Ackermann/89cbcc1e740a4591443ff4765a6ae8df0fdf5554. Darunter weitere Hinweise auf verwandte Beiträge. Auch unter: Learning Group Publication 5(2001) no.3, S.438.
-
Chen, C.: Top Ten Problems in Visual Interfaces to Digital Libraries (2002)
0.12
0.12240505 = product of:
0.2448101 = sum of:
0.2448101 = sum of:
0.12475712 = weight(_text_:k in 4840) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12475712 = score(doc=4840,freq=4.0), product of:
0.18639012 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.052213363 = queryNorm
0.66933334 = fieldWeight in 4840, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4840)
0.120052986 = weight(_text_:22 in 4840) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.120052986 = score(doc=4840,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1828423 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052213363 = queryNorm
0.6565931 = fieldWeight in 4840, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4840)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 2.2003 17:25:39
22. 2.2003 18:13:11
- Editor
- Börner, K.
- Source
- Visual Interfaces to Digital Libraries. Eds.: Börner, K. u. C. Chen
-
Börner, K.; Chen, C.: Visual Interfaces to Digital Libraries : Motivation, Utilization, and Socio-technical Challenges (2002)
0.12
0.12240505 = product of:
0.2448101 = sum of:
0.2448101 = sum of:
0.12475712 = weight(_text_:k in 1359) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12475712 = score(doc=1359,freq=4.0), product of:
0.18639012 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.052213363 = queryNorm
0.66933334 = fieldWeight in 1359, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1359)
0.120052986 = weight(_text_:22 in 1359) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.120052986 = score(doc=1359,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1828423 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052213363 = queryNorm
0.6565931 = fieldWeight in 1359, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1359)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 2.2003 17:25:39
22. 2.2003 18:20:07
- Source
- Visual Interfaces to Digital Libraries. Eds.: Börner, K. u. C. Chen
-
Ajiferuke, I.; Lu, K.; Wolfram, D.: ¬A comparison of citer and citation-based measure outcomes for multiple disciplines (2010)
0.12
0.11770231 = sum of:
0.031148873 = product of:
0.12459549 = sum of:
0.12459549 = weight(_text_:authors in 4000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12459549 = score(doc=4000,freq=6.0), product of:
0.23803101 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.052213363 = queryNorm
0.52344227 = fieldWeight in 4000, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4000)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.08655344 = sum of:
0.044108305 = weight(_text_:k in 4000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.044108305 = score(doc=4000,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18639012 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.052213363 = queryNorm
0.23664509 = fieldWeight in 4000, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4000)
0.042445138 = weight(_text_:22 in 4000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042445138 = score(doc=4000,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1828423 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052213363 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4000, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4000)
- Abstract
- Author research impact was examined based on citer analysis (the number of citers as opposed to the number of citations) for 90 highly cited authors grouped into three broad subject areas. Citer-based outcome measures were also compared with more traditional citation-based measures for levels of association. The authors found that there are significant differences in citer-based outcomes among the three broad subject areas examined and that there is a high degree of correlation between citer and citation-based measures for all measures compared, except for two outcomes calculated for the social sciences. Citer-based measures do produce slightly different rankings of authors based on citer counts when compared to more traditional citation counts. Examples are provided. Citation measures may not adequately address the influence, or reach, of an author because citations usually do not address the origin of the citation beyond self-citations.
- Date
- 28. 9.2010 12:54:22
-
Buzydlowski, J.W.; White, H.D.; Lin, X.: Term Co-occurrence Analysis as an Interface for Digital Libraries (2002)
0.12
0.117625445 = product of:
0.23525089 = sum of:
0.23525089 = sum of:
0.08821661 = weight(_text_:k in 1339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08821661 = score(doc=1339,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18639012 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.052213363 = queryNorm
0.47329018 = fieldWeight in 1339, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1339)
0.14703427 = weight(_text_:22 in 1339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14703427 = score(doc=1339,freq=6.0), product of:
0.1828423 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052213363 = queryNorm
0.804159 = fieldWeight in 1339, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1339)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 2.2003 17:25:39
22. 2.2003 18:16:22
- Source
- Visual Interfaces to Digital Libraries. Eds.: Börner, K. u. C. Chen
-
Døsen, K.: One more reference on self-reference (1992)
0.12
0.11540459 = product of:
0.23080918 = sum of:
0.23080918 = sum of:
0.117622145 = weight(_text_:k in 4604) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.117622145 = score(doc=4604,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18639012 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.052213363 = queryNorm
0.63105357 = fieldWeight in 4604, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4604)
0.11318704 = weight(_text_:22 in 4604) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11318704 = score(doc=4604,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1828423 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052213363 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4604, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4604)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 7. 2.2005 14:10:22
-
Golland, L.; Sigmund, K.: Exact thought in a demented time : Karl Menger and his Viennese Mathematical Colloquium (2000)
0.11
0.1088848 = product of:
0.2177696 = sum of:
0.2177696 = sum of:
0.14702769 = weight(_text_:k in 5645) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14702769 = score(doc=5645,freq=8.0), product of:
0.18639012 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.052213363 = queryNorm
0.7888169 = fieldWeight in 5645, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5645)
0.0707419 = weight(_text_:22 in 5645) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0707419 = score(doc=5645,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1828423 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052213363 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5645, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5645)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Biographed
- Menger, K.
Gödel, K.
Popper, K.
- Source
- Mathematical intelligencer. 22(2000) no.1, S.34-45
-
Carter, J.A.: PASSPORT/PRISM: authors and titles and MARC : oh my! (1993)
0.10
0.10455035 = sum of:
0.047956824 = product of:
0.1918273 = sum of:
0.1918273 = weight(_text_:authors in 527) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1918273 = score(doc=527,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23803101 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.052213363 = queryNorm
0.80589205 = fieldWeight in 527, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=527)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.05659352 = product of:
0.11318704 = sum of:
0.11318704 = weight(_text_:22 in 527) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11318704 = score(doc=527,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1828423 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052213363 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 527, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=527)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- OCLC systems and services. 9(1993) no.3, S.20-22
-
Shen, R.; Wang, J.; Fox, E.A.: ¬A Lightweight Protocol between Digital Libraries and Visualization Systems (2002)
0.10
0.1041348 = product of:
0.2082696 = sum of:
0.2082696 = sum of:
0.08821661 = weight(_text_:k in 666) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08821661 = score(doc=666,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18639012 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.052213363 = queryNorm
0.47329018 = fieldWeight in 666, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=666)
0.120052986 = weight(_text_:22 in 666) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.120052986 = score(doc=666,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1828423 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052213363 = queryNorm
0.6565931 = fieldWeight in 666, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=666)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 2.2003 17:25:39
22. 2.2003 18:15:14
- Source
- Visual Interfaces to Digital Libraries. Eds.: Börner, K. u. C. Chen
-
Christoffel, M.; Schmitt, B.: Accessing Libraries as Easy as a Game (2002)
0.10
0.1041348 = product of:
0.2082696 = sum of:
0.2082696 = sum of:
0.08821661 = weight(_text_:k in 1361) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08821661 = score(doc=1361,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18639012 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.052213363 = queryNorm
0.47329018 = fieldWeight in 1361, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1361)
0.120052986 = weight(_text_:22 in 1361) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.120052986 = score(doc=1361,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1828423 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052213363 = queryNorm
0.6565931 = fieldWeight in 1361, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1361)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 2.2003 17:25:39
22. 2.2003 18:19:01
- Source
- Visual Interfaces to Digital Libraries. Eds.: Börner, K. u. C. Chen
-
Denda, K.: Beyond subject headings : a structured information retrieval tool for interdisciplinary fields (2005)
0.10
0.100979015 = product of:
0.20195803 = sum of:
0.20195803 = sum of:
0.102919385 = weight(_text_:k in 1038) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.102919385 = score(doc=1038,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18639012 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.052213363 = queryNorm
0.5521719 = fieldWeight in 1038, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1038)
0.09903865 = weight(_text_:22 in 1038) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09903865 = score(doc=1038,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1828423 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052213363 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 1038, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1038)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Burgess, C.; Swigger, K.: ¬A graphical database interface for casual naive users (1986)
0.10
0.100979015 = product of:
0.20195803 = sum of:
0.20195803 = sum of:
0.102919385 = weight(_text_:k in 6496) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.102919385 = score(doc=6496,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18639012 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.052213363 = queryNorm
0.5521719 = fieldWeight in 6496, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6496)
0.09903865 = weight(_text_:22 in 6496) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09903865 = score(doc=6496,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1828423 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052213363 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6496, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6496)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Information processing and management. 22(1986) no.6, S.511-521
-
Zhang, L.; Lu, W.; Yang, J.: LAGOS-AND : a large gold standard dataset for scholarly author name disambiguation (2023)
0.09
0.093321994 = sum of:
0.021194125 = product of:
0.0847765 = sum of:
0.0847765 = weight(_text_:authors in 883) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0847765 = score(doc=883,freq=4.0), product of:
0.23803101 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.052213363 = queryNorm
0.35615736 = fieldWeight in 883, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=883)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.07212787 = sum of:
0.03675692 = weight(_text_:k in 883) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03675692 = score(doc=883,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18639012 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.052213363 = queryNorm
0.19720423 = fieldWeight in 883, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=883)
0.03537095 = weight(_text_:22 in 883) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03537095 = score(doc=883,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1828423 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052213363 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 883, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=883)
- Abstract
- In this article, we present a method to automatically build large labeled datasets for the author ambiguity problem in the academic world by leveraging the authoritative academic resources, ORCID and DOI. Using the method, we built LAGOS-AND, two large, gold-standard sub-datasets for author name disambiguation (AND), of which LAGOS-AND-BLOCK is created for clustering-based AND research and LAGOS-AND-PAIRWISE is created for classification-based AND research. Our LAGOS-AND datasets are substantially different from the existing ones. The initial versions of the datasets (v1.0, released in February 2021) include 7.5 M citations authored by 798 K unique authors (LAGOS-AND-BLOCK) and close to 1 M instances (LAGOS-AND-PAIRWISE). And both datasets show close similarities to the whole Microsoft Academic Graph (MAG) across validations of six facets. In building the datasets, we reveal the variation degrees of last names in three literature databases, PubMed, MAG, and Semantic Scholar, by comparing author names hosted to the authors' official last names shown on the ORCID pages. Furthermore, we evaluate several baseline disambiguation methods as well as the MAG's author IDs system on our datasets, and the evaluation helps identify several interesting findings. We hope the datasets and findings will bring new insights for future studies. The code and datasets are publicly available.
- Date
- 22. 1.2023 18:40:36
-
Conner-Sax, K.; Krol, E.: ¬The whole Internet : the next generation (1999)
0.09
0.09121785 = sum of:
0.011989206 = product of:
0.047956824 = sum of:
0.047956824 = weight(_text_:authors in 1448) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047956824 = score(doc=1448,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23803101 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.052213363 = queryNorm
0.20147301 = fieldWeight in 1448, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1448)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.07922865 = sum of:
0.050931886 = weight(_text_:k in 1448) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.050931886 = score(doc=1448,freq=6.0), product of:
0.18639012 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.052213363 = queryNorm
0.27325422 = fieldWeight in 1448, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1448)
0.02829676 = weight(_text_:22 in 1448) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02829676 = score(doc=1448,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1828423 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052213363 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 1448, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1448)
- Abstract
- For a snapshot of something that is mutating as quickly as the Internet, The Whole Internet: The Next Generation exhibits remarkable comprehensiveness and accuracy. It's a good panoramic shot of Web sites, Usenet newsgroups, e-mail, mailing lists, chat software, electronic commerce, and the communities that have begun to emerge around all of these. This is the book to buy if you have a handle on certain aspects of the Internet experience--e-mail and Web surfing, for example--but want to learn what else the global network has to offer--say, Web banking or mailing-list management. The authors clearly have seen a thing or two online and are able to share their experiences entertainingly and with clarity. However, they commit the mistake of misidentifying an Amazon.com book review as a publisher's synopsis of a book. Aside from that transgression, The Whole Internet presents detailed information on much of the Internet. In most cases, coverage explains what something (online stock trading, free homepage sites, whatever) is all about and then provides you with enough how-to information to let you start exploring on your own. Coverage ranges from the super-basic (how to surf) to the fairly complex (sharing an Internet connection among several home computers on a network). Along the way, readers get insight into buying, selling, meeting, relating, and doing most everything else on the Internet. While other books explain the first steps into the Internet community with more graphics, this one will remain useful to the newcomer long after he or she has become comfortable using the Internet.
- Classification
- BBK (FH K)
- Footnote
- Rez. in: Internet Professionell. 2000, H.2, S.22
- GHBS
- BBK (FH K)
-
Chung, Y.-K.: Bradford distribution and core authors in classification systems literature (1994)
0.09
0.08954254 = sum of:
0.047956824 = product of:
0.1918273 = sum of:
0.1918273 = weight(_text_:authors in 5066) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1918273 = score(doc=5066,freq=8.0), product of:
0.23803101 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.052213363 = queryNorm
0.80589205 = fieldWeight in 5066, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5066)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.04158571 = product of:
0.08317142 = sum of:
0.08317142 = weight(_text_:k in 5066) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08317142 = score(doc=5066,freq=4.0), product of:
0.18639012 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.052213363 = queryNorm
0.44622225 = fieldWeight in 5066, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5066)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Bradford's law of scatter was applied to the analysis of the authors of source documents on the subject of classification schemes, published in core periodicals over the period 1981-1990. Results indicated that: core authors of the international classification system literature are Library of Congress, M. Dewey, S. Ranganathan, J. Comaroni, A. Neelameghan, L. Chan and K. Markey; the highly cited authors are linked either to the developers of the classification schemes or to a research centre, or else they authored the most frequently cited books; and the data conforms to Bradford's Law of Scatter
-
Kutschekmanesch, S.; Lutes, B.; Moelle, K.; Thiel, U.; Tzeras, K.: Automated multilingual indexing : a synthesis of rule-based and thesaurus-based methods (1998)
0.09
0.08735309 = product of:
0.17470618 = sum of:
0.17470618 = sum of:
0.10396428 = weight(_text_:k in 4157) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10396428 = score(doc=4157,freq=4.0), product of:
0.18639012 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.052213363 = queryNorm
0.5577778 = fieldWeight in 4157, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4157)
0.0707419 = weight(_text_:22 in 4157) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0707419 = score(doc=4157,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1828423 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052213363 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4157, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4157)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Information und Märkte: 50. Deutscher Dokumentartag 1998, Kongreß der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Dokumentation e.V. (DGD), Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn, 22.-24. September 1998. Hrsg. von Marlies Ockenfeld u. Gerhard J. Mantwill
-
Wu, K.-C.; Hsieh, T.-Y.: Affective choosing of clustering and categorization representations in e-book interfaces (2016)
0.09
0.08711438 = sum of:
0.0149865085 = product of:
0.059946034 = sum of:
0.059946034 = weight(_text_:authors in 3070) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.059946034 = score(doc=3070,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23803101 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.052213363 = queryNorm
0.25184128 = fieldWeight in 3070, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3070)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.07212787 = sum of:
0.03675692 = weight(_text_:k in 3070) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03675692 = score(doc=3070,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18639012 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.052213363 = queryNorm
0.19720423 = fieldWeight in 3070, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3070)
0.03537095 = weight(_text_:22 in 3070) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03537095 = score(doc=3070,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1828423 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052213363 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3070, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3070)
- Abstract
- Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to investigate user experiences with a touch-wall interface featuring both clustering and categorization representations of available e-books in a public library to understand human information interactions under work-focused and recreational contexts. Design/methodology/approach - Researchers collected questionnaires from 251 New Taipei City Library visitors who used the touch-wall interface to search for new titles. The authors applied structural equation modelling to examine relationships among hedonic/utilitarian needs, clustering and categorization representations, perceived ease of use (EU) and the extent to which users experienced anxiety and uncertainty (AU) while interacting with the interface. Findings - Utilitarian users who have an explicit idea of what they intend to find tend to prefer the categorization interface. A hedonic-oriented user tends to prefer clustering interfaces. Users reported EU regardless of which interface they engaged with. Results revealed that use of the clustering interface had a negative correlation with AU. Users that seek to satisfy utilitarian needs tended to emphasize the importance of perceived EU, whilst pleasure-seeking users were a little more tolerant of anxiety or uncertainty. Originality/value - The Online Public Access Catalogue (OPAC) encourages library visitors to borrow digital books through the implementation of an information visualization system. This situation poses an opportunity to validate uses and gratification theory. People with hedonic/utilitarian needs displayed different risk-control attitudes and affected uncertainty using the interface. Knowledge about user interaction with such interfaces is vital when launching the development of a new OPAC.
- Date
- 20. 1.2015 18:30:22
-
Thelwall, M.; Kousha, K.; Abdoli, M.; Stuart, E.; Makita, M.; Wilson, P.; Levitt, J.: Why are coauthored academic articles more cited : higher quality or larger audience? (2023)
0.09
0.08711438 = sum of:
0.0149865085 = product of:
0.059946034 = sum of:
0.059946034 = weight(_text_:authors in 995) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.059946034 = score(doc=995,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23803101 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.052213363 = queryNorm
0.25184128 = fieldWeight in 995, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=995)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.07212787 = sum of:
0.03675692 = weight(_text_:k in 995) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03675692 = score(doc=995,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18639012 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.052213363 = queryNorm
0.19720423 = fieldWeight in 995, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=995)
0.03537095 = weight(_text_:22 in 995) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03537095 = score(doc=995,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1828423 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052213363 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 995, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=995)
- Abstract
- Collaboration is encouraged because it is believed to improve academic research, supported by indirect evidence in the form of more coauthored articles being more cited. Nevertheless, this might not reflect quality but increased self-citations or the "audience effect": citations from increased awareness through multiple author networks. We address this with the first science wide investigation into whether author numbers associate with journal article quality, using expert peer quality judgments for 122,331 articles from the 2014-20 UK national assessment. Spearman correlations between author numbers and quality scores show moderately strong positive associations (0.2-0.4) in the health, life, and physical sciences, but weak or no positive associations in engineering and social sciences, with weak negative/positive or no associations in various arts and humanities, and a possible negative association for decision sciences. This gives the first systematic evidence that greater numbers of authors associates with higher quality journal articles in the majority of academia outside the arts and humanities, at least for the UK. Positive associations between team size and citation counts in areas with little association between team size and quality also show that audience effects or other nonquality factors account for the higher citation rates of coauthored articles in some fields.
- Date
- 22. 6.2023 18:11:50
-
Vakkari, P.; Järvelin, K.; Chang, Y.-W.: ¬The association of disciplinary background with the evolution of topics and methods in Library and Information Science research 1995-2015 (2023)
0.09
0.08711438 = sum of:
0.0149865085 = product of:
0.059946034 = sum of:
0.059946034 = weight(_text_:authors in 998) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.059946034 = score(doc=998,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23803101 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.052213363 = queryNorm
0.25184128 = fieldWeight in 998, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=998)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.07212787 = sum of:
0.03675692 = weight(_text_:k in 998) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03675692 = score(doc=998,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18639012 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.052213363 = queryNorm
0.19720423 = fieldWeight in 998, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=998)
0.03537095 = weight(_text_:22 in 998) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03537095 = score(doc=998,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1828423 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052213363 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 998, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=998)
- Abstract
- The paper reports a longitudinal analysis of the topical and methodological development of Library and Information Science (LIS). Its focus is on the effects of researchers' disciplines on these developments. The study extends an earlier cross-sectional study (Vakkari et al., Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2022a, 73, 1706-1722) by a coordinated dataset representing a content analysis of articles published in 31 scholarly LIS journals in 1995, 2005, and 2015. It is novel in its coverage of authors' disciplines, topical and methodological aspects in a coordinated dataset spanning two decades thus allowing trend analysis. The findings include a shrinking trend in the share of LIS from 67 to 36% while Computer Science, and Business and Economics increase their share from 9 and 6% to 21 and 16%, respectively. The earlier cross-sectional study (Vakkari et al., Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2022a, 73, 1706-1722) for the year 2015 identified three topical clusters of LIS research, focusing on topical subfields, methodologies, and contributing disciplines. Correspondence analysis confirms their existence already in 1995 and traces their development through the decades. The contributing disciplines infuse their concepts, research questions, and approaches to LIS and may also subsume vital parts of LIS in their own structures of knowledge production.
- Date
- 22. 6.2023 18:15:06
-
Boyack, K.W.; Wylie,B.N.; Davidson, G.S.: Information Visualization, Human-Computer Interaction, and Cognitive Psychology : Domain Visualizations (2002)
0.09
0.086779 = product of:
0.173558 = sum of:
0.173558 = sum of:
0.07351384 = weight(_text_:k in 1352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07351384 = score(doc=1352,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18639012 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.052213363 = queryNorm
0.39440846 = fieldWeight in 1352, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1352)
0.10004415 = weight(_text_:22 in 1352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10004415 = score(doc=1352,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1828423 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052213363 = queryNorm
0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 1352, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1352)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 2.2003 17:25:39
22. 2.2003 18:17:40
- Source
- Visual Interfaces to Digital Libraries. Eds.: Börner, K. u. C. Chen
