Search (2199 results, page 1 of 110)

  • × language_ss:"e"
  1. Hotho, A.; Bloehdorn, S.: Data Mining 2004 : Text classification by boosting weak learners based on terms and concepts (2004) 0.16 
    0.15612929 = product of:
  0.31225857 = sum of:
    0.26674882 = weight(_text_:3a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.26674882 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.47462678 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.055983268 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
    0.04550976 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04550976 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19604386 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.055983268 = queryNorm
        0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Content
    Vgl.: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CEAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.91.4940%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&ei=dOXrUMeIDYHDtQahsIGACg&usg=AFQjCNHFWVh6gNPvnOrOS9R3rkrXCNVD-A&sig2=5I2F5evRfMnsttSgFF9g7Q&bvm=bv.1357316858,d.Yms.
    Date
    8. 1.2013 10:22:32
  2. Kleineberg, M.: Context analysis and context indexing : formal pragmatics in knowledge organization (2014) 0.11 
    0.11114534 = product of:
  0.44458136 = sum of:
    0.44458136 = weight(_text_:3a in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.44458136 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.47462678 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.055983268 = queryNorm
        0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=5&ved=0CDQQFjAE&url=http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F3131107&ei=HzFWVYvGMsiNsgGTyoFI&usg=AFQjCNE2FHUeR9oQTQlNC4TPedv4Mo3DaQ&sig2=Rlzpr7a3BLZZkqZCXXN_IA&bvm=bv.93564037,d.bGg&cad=rja
  3. Dobreski, B.; Snow, K.; Moulaison-Sandy, H.: On overlap and otherness : a comparison of three vocabularies' approaches to LGBTQ+ identity (2022) 0.11 
    0.10619924 = product of:
  0.42479697 = sum of:
    0.42479697 = weight(_text_:lcsh's in 1141) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.42479697 = score(doc=1141,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.5545214 = queryWeight, product of:
          9.905128 = idf(docFreq=5, maxDocs=44218)
          0.055983268 = queryNorm
        0.7660606 = fieldWeight in 1141, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          9.905128 = idf(docFreq=5, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1141)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Bibliographic records can include information from controlled vocabularies to capture identities about individuals, especially about authors or intended audiences; personal name authority records can also contain information about identity. Employing a systematic analysis of the overlap of the Homosaurus, Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH), and Library of Congress Demographic Group Terms (LCDGT), this article explores the extent to which LGBTQ+ identities are represented in the three vocabularies. Despite LCSH's long, iterative history of development and the faceted, post-coordinate nature of LCDGT, neither vocabulary was found to be adequate in covering the complex, LGBTQ+ identities represented in the Homosaurus.
  4. Dean, R.J.: FAST: development of simplified headings for metadata (2004) 0.09 
    0.09102792 = product of:
  0.3641117 = sum of:
    0.3641117 = weight(_text_:lcsh's in 5682) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.3641117 = score(doc=5682,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.5545214 = queryWeight, product of:
          9.905128 = idf(docFreq=5, maxDocs=44218)
          0.055983268 = queryNorm
        0.65662336 = fieldWeight in 5682, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          9.905128 = idf(docFreq=5, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5682)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    The Library of Congress Subject Headings schema (LCSH) is the most commonly used and widely accepted subject vocabulary for general application. It is the de facto universal controlled vocabulary and has been a model for developing subject heading systems by many countries. However, LCSH's complex syntax and rules for constructing headings restrict its application by requiring highly skilled personnel and limit the effectiveness of automated authority control. Recent trends, driven to a large extent by the rapid growth of the Web, are forcing changes in bibliographic control systems to make them easier to use, understand, and apply, and subject headings are no exception. The purpose of adapting the LCSH with a simplified syntax to create FAST (Faceted Application of Subject Terminology) headings is to retain the very rich vocabulary of LCSH while making the schema easier to understand, control, apply, and use. The schema maintains compatibility with LCSH--any valid Library of Congress subject heading can be converted to FAST headings.
  5. Popper, K.R.: Three worlds : the Tanner lecture on human values. Deliverd at the University of Michigan, April 7, 1978 (1978) 0.09 
    0.08891627 = product of:
  0.3556651 = sum of:
    0.3556651 = weight(_text_:3a in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.3556651 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.47462678 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.055983268 = queryNorm
        0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    https%3A%2F%2Ftannerlectures.utah.edu%2F_documents%2Fa-to-z%2Fp%2Fpopper80.pdf&usg=AOvVaw3f4QRTEH-OEBmoYr2J_c7H
  6. Vetere, G.; Lenzerini, M.: Models for semantic interoperability in service-oriented architectures (2005) 0.08 
    0.07780174 = product of:
  0.31120697 = sum of:
    0.31120697 = weight(_text_:3a in 306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.31120697 = score(doc=306,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.47462678 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.055983268 = queryNorm
        0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 306, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=306)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Content
    Vgl.: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/login.jsp?tp=&arnumber=5386707&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fxpls%2Fabs_all.jsp%3Farnumber%3D5386707.
  7. O'Neill, E.T.; Childress, E.; Dean, R.; Kammerer, K.; Vizine-Goetz, D.; Chan, L.M.; El-Hoshy, L.: FAST: faceted application of subject terminology (2003) 0.08 
    0.0758566 = product of:
  0.3034264 = sum of:
    0.3034264 = weight(_text_:lcsh's in 3816) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.3034264 = score(doc=3816,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.5545214 = queryWeight, product of:
          9.905128 = idf(docFreq=5, maxDocs=44218)
          0.055983268 = queryNorm
        0.54718614 = fieldWeight in 3816, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          9.905128 = idf(docFreq=5, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3816)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    The Library of Congress Subject Headings schema (LCSH) is by far the most commonly used and widely accepted subject vocabulary for general application. It is the de facto universal controlled vocabulary and has been a model for developing subject heading systems by many countries. However, LCSH's complex syntax and rules for constructing headings restrict its application by requiring highly skilled personnel and limit the effectiveness of automated authority control. Recent trends, driven to a large extent by the rapid growth of the Web, are forcing changes in bibliographic control systems to make them easier to use, understand, and apply, and subject headings are no exception. The purpose of adapting the LCSH with a simplified syntax to create FAST is to retain the very rich vocabulary of LCSH while making the schema easier to understand, control, apply, and use. The schema maintains upward compatibility with LCSH, and any valid set of LC subject headings can be converted to FAST headings.
  8. Mas, S.; Marleau, Y.: Proposition of a faceted classification model to support corporate information organization and digital records management (2009) 0.07 
    0.066687204 = product of:
  0.26674882 = sum of:
    0.26674882 = weight(_text_:3a in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.26674882 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.47462678 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.055983268 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Footnote
    Vgl.: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/Xplore/login.jsp?reload=true&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fiel5%2F4755313%2F4755314%2F04755480.pdf%3Farnumber%3D4755480&authDecision=-203.
  9. Li, L.; Shang, Y.; Zhang, W.: Improvement of HITS-based algorithms on Web documents 0.07 
    0.066687204 = product of:
  0.26674882 = sum of:
    0.26674882 = weight(_text_:3a in 2514) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.26674882 = score(doc=2514,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.47462678 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.055983268 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2514, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2514)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Content
    Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fdelab.csd.auth.gr%2F~dimitris%2Fcourses%2Fir_spring06%2Fpage_rank_computing%2Fp527-li.pdf. Vgl. auch: http://www2002.org/CDROM/refereed/643/.
  10. Zeng, Q.; Yu, M.; Yu, W.; Xiong, J.; Shi, Y.; Jiang, M.: Faceted hierarchy : a new graph type to organize scientific concepts and a construction method (2019) 0.07 
    0.066687204 = product of:
  0.26674882 = sum of:
    0.26674882 = weight(_text_:3a in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.26674882 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.47462678 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.055983268 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Content
    Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Faclanthology.org%2FD19-5317.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0ZZFyq5wWTtNTvNkrvjlGA.
  11. Noever, D.; Ciolino, M.: ¬The Turing deception (2022) 0.07 
    0.066687204 = product of:
  0.26674882 = sum of:
    0.26674882 = weight(_text_:3a in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.26674882 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.47462678 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.055983268 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    https%3A%2F%2Farxiv.org%2Fabs%2F2212.06721&usg=AOvVaw3i_9pZm9y_dQWoHi6uv0EN
  12. Rolland-Thomas, P.: Thesaural codes : an appraisal of their use in the Library of Congress Subject Headings (1993) 0.06 
    0.06068528 = product of:
  0.24274112 = sum of:
    0.24274112 = weight(_text_:lcsh's in 549) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.24274112 = score(doc=549,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.5545214 = queryWeight, product of:
          9.905128 = idf(docFreq=5, maxDocs=44218)
          0.055983268 = queryNorm
        0.4377489 = fieldWeight in 549, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          9.905128 = idf(docFreq=5, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=549)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    LCSH is known as such since 1975. It always has created headings to serve the LC collections instead of a theoretical basis. It started to replace cross reference codes by thesaural codes in 1986, in a mechanical fashion. It was in no way transformed into a thesaurus. Its encyclopedic coverage, its pre-coordinate concepts make it substantially distinct, considering that thesauri usually map a restricted field of knowledge and use uniterms. The questions raised are whether the new symbols comply with thesaurus standards and if they are true to one or to several models. Explanations and definitions from other lists of subject headings and thesauri, literature in the field of classification and subject indexing will provide some answers. For instance, see refers from a subject heading not used to another or others used. Exceptionally it will lead from a specific term to a more general one. Some equate a see reference with the equivalence relationship. Such relationships are pointed by USE in LCSH. See also references are made from the broader subject to narrower parts of it and also between associated subjects. They suggest lateral or vertical connexions as well as reciprocal relationships. They serve a coordination purpose for some, lay down a methodical search itinerary for others. Since their inception in the 1950's thesauri have been devised for indexing and retrieving information in the fields of science and technology. Eventually they attended to a number of social sciences and humanities. Research derived from thesauri was voluminous. Numerous guidelines are designed. They did not discriminate between the "hard" sciences and the social sciences. RT relationships are widely but diversely used in numerous controlled vocabularies. LCSH's aim is to achieve a list almost free of RT and SA references. It thus restricts relationships to BT/NT, USE and UF. This raises the question as to whether all fields of knowledge can "fit" in the Procrustean bed of RT/NT, i.e., genus/species relationships. Standard codes were devised. It was soon realized that BT/NT, well suited to the genus/species couple could not signal a whole-part relationship. In LCSH, BT and NT function as reciprocals, the whole-part relationship is taken into account by ISO. It is amply elaborated upon by authors. The part-whole connexion is sometimes studied apart. The decision to replace cross reference codes was an improvement. Relations can now be distinguished through the distinct needs of numerous fields of knowledge are not attended to. Topic inclusion, and topic-subtopic, could provide the missing link where genus/species or whole/part are inadequate. Distinct codes, BT/NT and whole/part, should be provided. Sorting relationships with mechanical means can only lead to confusion.
  13. Farazi, M.: Faceted lightweight ontologies : a formalization and some experiments (2010) 0.06 
    0.05557267 = product of:
  0.22229068 = sum of:
    0.22229068 = weight(_text_:3a in 4997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.22229068 = score(doc=4997,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.47462678 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.055983268 = queryNorm
        0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4997, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4997)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Content
    PhD Dissertation at International Doctorate School in Information and Communication Technology. Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Fcore.ac.uk%2Fdownload%2Fpdf%2F150083013.pdf&usg=AOvVaw2n-qisNagpyT0lli_6QbAQ.
  14. Malsburg, C. von der: ¬The correlation theory of brain function (1981) 0.06 
    0.05557267 = product of:
  0.22229068 = sum of:
    0.22229068 = weight(_text_:3a in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.22229068 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.47462678 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.055983268 = queryNorm
        0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    http%3A%2F%2Fcogprints.org%2F1380%2F1%2FvdM_correlation.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0g7DvZbQPb2U7dYb49b9v_
  15. Ackermann, E.: Piaget's constructivism, Papert's constructionism : what's the difference? (2001) 0.06 
    0.05557267 = product of:
  0.22229068 = sum of:
    0.22229068 = weight(_text_:3a in 692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.22229068 = score(doc=692,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.47462678 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.055983268 = queryNorm
        0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 692, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=692)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Content
    Vgl.: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Piaget-%E2%80%99-s-Constructivism-%2C-Papert-%E2%80%99-s-%3A-What-%E2%80%99-s-Ackermann/89cbcc1e740a4591443ff4765a6ae8df0fdf5554. Darunter weitere Hinweise auf verwandte Beiträge. Auch unter: Learning Group Publication 5(2001) no.3, S.438.
  16. Stojanovic, N.: Ontology-based Information Retrieval : methods and tools for cooperative query answering (2005) 0.04 
    0.044458136 = product of:
  0.17783254 = sum of:
    0.17783254 = weight(_text_:3a in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.17783254 = score(doc=701,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.47462678 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.055983268 = queryNorm
        0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Content
    Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F1627&ei=tAtYUYrBNoHKtQb3l4GYBw&usg=AFQjCNHeaxKkKU3-u54LWxMNYGXaaDLCGw&sig2=8WykXWQoDKjDSdGtAakH2Q&bvm=bv.44442042,d.Yms.
  17. Xiong, C.: Knowledge based text representations for information retrieval (2016) 0.04 
    0.044458136 = product of:
  0.17783254 = sum of:
    0.17783254 = weight(_text_:3a in 5820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.17783254 = score(doc=5820,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.47462678 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.055983268 = queryNorm
        0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 5820, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5820)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Content
    Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Language and Information Technologies. Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Fwww.cs.cmu.edu%2F~cx%2Fpapers%2Fknowledge_based_text_representation.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0SaTSvhWLTh__Uz_HtOtl3.
  18. Jascó, P.: Searching for images by similarity online (1998) 0.04 
    0.042907014 = product of:
  0.17162806 = sum of:
    0.17162806 = weight(_text_:22 in 393) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.17162806 = score(doc=393,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.19604386 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.055983268 = queryNorm
        0.8754574 = fieldWeight in 393, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=393)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    29.11.2004 13:03:22
    Source
    Online. 22(1998) no.6, S.99-102
  19. Hawking, D.; Robertson, S.: On collection size and retrieval effectiveness (2003) 0.04 
    0.042907014 = product of:
  0.17162806 = sum of:
    0.17162806 = weight(_text_:22 in 4109) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.17162806 = score(doc=4109,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.19604386 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.055983268 = queryNorm
        0.8754574 = fieldWeight in 4109, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4109)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    14. 8.2005 14:22:22
  20. Buzydlowski, J.W.; White, H.D.; Lin, X.: Term Co-occurrence Analysis as an Interface for Digital Libraries (2002) 0.04 
    0.03941261 = product of:
  0.15765044 = sum of:
    0.15765044 = weight(_text_:22 in 1339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.15765044 = score(doc=1339,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.19604386 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.055983268 = queryNorm
        0.804159 = fieldWeight in 1339, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1339)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    22. 2.2003 17:25:39
    22. 2.2003 18:16:22

Authors

Years

Types

  • a 1932
  • m 151
  • s 97
  • el 69
  • b 31
  • r 10
  • x 8
  • i 3
  • n 2
  • p 2
  • h 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications