-
Walker, S.: Improving subject access painlessly : recent work on the Okapi online catalogue projects (1988)
0.12
0.124735504 = product of:
0.24947101 = sum of:
0.24947101 = sum of:
0.13059531 = weight(_text_:work in 7403) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13059531 = score(doc=7403,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20127523 = queryWeight, product of:
3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
0.054837555 = queryNorm
0.6488395 = fieldWeight in 7403, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=7403)
0.118875705 = weight(_text_:22 in 7403) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.118875705 = score(doc=7403,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19203177 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.054837555 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 7403, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=7403)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Program. 22(1988), S.21-31
-
Noever, D.; Ciolino, M.: ¬The Turing deception (2022)
0.12
0.12172589 = sum of:
0.08709657 = product of:
0.26128972 = sum of:
0.26128972 = weight(_text_:3a in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.26128972 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
0.4649134 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.054837555 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.03462931 = product of:
0.06925862 = sum of:
0.06925862 = weight(_text_:work in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06925862 = score(doc=862,freq=4.0), product of:
0.20127523 = queryWeight, product of:
3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
0.054837555 = queryNorm
0.3440991 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This research revisits the classic Turing test and compares recent large language models such as ChatGPT for their abilities to reproduce human-level comprehension and compelling text generation. Two task challenges- summary and question answering- prompt ChatGPT to produce original content (98-99%) from a single text entry and sequential questions initially posed by Turing in 1950. We score the original and generated content against the OpenAI GPT-2 Output Detector from 2019, and establish multiple cases where the generated content proves original and undetectable (98%). The question of a machine fooling a human judge recedes in this work relative to the question of "how would one prove it?" The original contribution of the work presents a metric and simple grammatical set for understanding the writing mechanics of chatbots in evaluating their readability and statistical clarity, engagement, delivery, overall quality, and plagiarism risks. While Turing's original prose scores at least 14% below the machine-generated output, whether an algorithm displays hints of Turing's true initial thoughts (the "Lovelace 2.0" test) remains unanswerable.
- Source
- https%3A%2F%2Farxiv.org%2Fabs%2F2212.06721&usg=AOvVaw3i_9pZm9y_dQWoHi6uv0EN
-
Zeng, Q.; Yu, M.; Yu, W.; Xiong, J.; Shi, Y.; Jiang, M.: Faceted hierarchy : a new graph type to organize scientific concepts and a construction method (2019)
0.11
0.111583196 = sum of:
0.08709657 = product of:
0.26128972 = sum of:
0.26128972 = weight(_text_:3a in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.26128972 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
0.4649134 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.054837555 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.024486622 = product of:
0.048973244 = sum of:
0.048973244 = weight(_text_:work in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048973244 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20127523 = queryWeight, product of:
3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
0.054837555 = queryNorm
0.2433148 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- On a scientific concept hierarchy, a parent concept may have a few attributes, each of which has multiple values being a group of child concepts. We call these attributes facets: classification has a few facets such as application (e.g., face recognition), model (e.g., svm, knn), and metric (e.g., precision). In this work, we aim at building faceted concept hierarchies from scientific literature. Hierarchy construction methods heavily rely on hypernym detection, however, the faceted relations are parent-to-child links but the hypernym relation is a multi-hop, i.e., ancestor-to-descendent link with a specific facet "type-of". We use information extraction techniques to find synonyms, sibling concepts, and ancestor-descendent relations from a data science corpus. And we propose a hierarchy growth algorithm to infer the parent-child links from the three types of relationships. It resolves conflicts by maintaining the acyclic structure of a hierarchy.
- Content
- Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Faclanthology.org%2FD19-5317.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0ZZFyq5wWTtNTvNkrvjlGA.
-
Hotho, A.; Bloehdorn, S.: Data Mining 2004 : Text classification by boosting weak learners based on terms and concepts (2004)
0.11
0.109385766 = sum of:
0.08709657 = product of:
0.26128972 = sum of:
0.26128972 = weight(_text_:3a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.26128972 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
0.4649134 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.054837555 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.022289194 = product of:
0.04457839 = sum of:
0.04457839 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04457839 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19203177 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.054837555 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Content
- Vgl.: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CEAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.91.4940%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&ei=dOXrUMeIDYHDtQahsIGACg&usg=AFQjCNHFWVh6gNPvnOrOS9R3rkrXCNVD-A&sig2=5I2F5evRfMnsttSgFF9g7Q&bvm=bv.1357316858,d.Yms.
- Date
- 8. 1.2013 10:22:32
-
Davis, M.: Building a global legal index : a work in progress (2001)
0.11
0.10914357 = product of:
0.21828714 = sum of:
0.21828714 = sum of:
0.1142709 = weight(_text_:work in 6443) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1142709 = score(doc=6443,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20127523 = queryWeight, product of:
3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
0.054837555 = queryNorm
0.56773454 = fieldWeight in 6443, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6443)
0.10401624 = weight(_text_:22 in 6443) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10401624 = score(doc=6443,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19203177 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.054837555 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6443, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6443)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Indexer. 22(2001) no.3, S.123-127
-
Malan, C.: Personal strategies in reference work (1992)
0.11
0.10783544 = product of:
0.21567088 = sum of:
0.21567088 = sum of:
0.14137357 = weight(_text_:work in 5689) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14137357 = score(doc=5689,freq=6.0), product of:
0.20127523 = queryWeight, product of:
3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
0.054837555 = queryNorm
0.70238936 = fieldWeight in 5689, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5689)
0.07429732 = weight(_text_:22 in 5689) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07429732 = score(doc=5689,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19203177 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.054837555 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5689, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5689)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Most of the skills required in reference work can be learnt or developed over a period of time. Examines the following: skills and knowledge pertaining to stock, reference tools and the communities served in South Africa; and interpersonal skiills in traditional reference work and in a computerized library
- Source
- Cape librarian. 36(1992) no.10, S.22-23
-
Coates, E.J.: CRG proposals for a new general classification (1969)
0.09
0.093551636 = product of:
0.18710327 = sum of:
0.18710327 = sum of:
0.09794649 = weight(_text_:work in 1283) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09794649 = score(doc=1283,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20127523 = queryWeight, product of:
3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
0.054837555 = queryNorm
0.4866296 = fieldWeight in 1283, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1283)
0.08915678 = weight(_text_:22 in 1283) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08915678 = score(doc=1283,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19203177 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.054837555 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 1283, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1283)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Pages
- S.19-22
- Source
- Classification and information control. Papers representing the work of the Classification Research Group during 1960-1968
-
Davis, C.: Some experiences of an Internet researcher (1996)
0.09
0.093551636 = product of:
0.18710327 = sum of:
0.18710327 = sum of:
0.09794649 = weight(_text_:work in 4830) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09794649 = score(doc=4830,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20127523 = queryWeight, product of:
3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
0.054837555 = queryNorm
0.4866296 = fieldWeight in 4830, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4830)
0.08915678 = weight(_text_:22 in 4830) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08915678 = score(doc=4830,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19203177 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.054837555 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4830, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4830)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Reports work as an independent Internet researcher in the field of library research in the USA
- Source
- Audiovisual librarian. 22(1996) no.2, A.112-113
-
Lewison, G.: ¬The work of the Bibliometrics Research Group (City University) and associates (2005)
0.09
0.093551636 = product of:
0.18710327 = sum of:
0.18710327 = sum of:
0.09794649 = weight(_text_:work in 4890) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09794649 = score(doc=4890,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20127523 = queryWeight, product of:
3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
0.054837555 = queryNorm
0.4866296 = fieldWeight in 4890, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4890)
0.08915678 = weight(_text_:22 in 4890) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08915678 = score(doc=4890,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19203177 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.054837555 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4890, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4890)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 20. 1.2007 17:02:22
-
Szostak, R.: Speaking truth to power in classification : response to Fox's review of my work; KO 39:4, 300 (2013)
0.09
0.093551636 = product of:
0.18710327 = sum of:
0.18710327 = sum of:
0.09794649 = weight(_text_:work in 591) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09794649 = score(doc=591,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20127523 = queryWeight, product of:
3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
0.054837555 = queryNorm
0.4866296 = fieldWeight in 591, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=591)
0.08915678 = weight(_text_:22 in 591) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08915678 = score(doc=591,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19203177 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.054837555 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 591, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=591)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 2.2013 12:35:05
-
Yee, M.M.: What is a work? : part 3: the Anglo-American cataloging codes (1995)
0.09
0.09154782 = product of:
0.18309563 = sum of:
0.18309563 = sum of:
0.13851725 = weight(_text_:work in 4503) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13851725 = score(doc=4503,freq=16.0), product of:
0.20127523 = queryWeight, product of:
3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
0.054837555 = queryNorm
0.6881982 = fieldWeight in 4503, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4503)
0.04457839 = weight(_text_:22 in 4503) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04457839 = score(doc=4503,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19203177 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.054837555 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4503, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4503)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Anglo-American codes are examined to determine the implicit or acting concept of work in each, in order to trace the development of our current implicit concept of work, as embodied in AACR2R. The following conditions are examined, using comparison tables. (1) same work with different appendages (illustrated works, music with text, texts with commentary and/or biographical/critical material, scholia); (2) separately published parts of a work produced by the exercise of several different functions; (3) appendages to a work published separately (commentaries without text, concordances, continuations, indexes, sequels, supplements); (4) change in title of a work. A trend away from the collocation of the editions of a work called for by the second objective of the catalog is identified. It is suggested that this tendency stems from failure to take advantage of newer technologies for building catalogs
- Footnote
- Vgl. auch: Pt.1: Cataloging and classification quarterly. 19(1994) no.1, S.9-28; Pt.2: Cataloging and classification quarterly. 19(1994) no.2, S.5-22; Pt.4: Cataloging and classification quarterly. 20(1995) no.2, S.3-24
-
Weinberg, B.H.: ¬The body of a reference work in relation to its index : an analysis of wordsmanship (1996)
0.09
0.08820133 = product of:
0.17640266 = sum of:
0.17640266 = sum of:
0.092344835 = weight(_text_:work in 6940) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.092344835 = score(doc=6940,freq=4.0), product of:
0.20127523 = queryWeight, product of:
3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
0.054837555 = queryNorm
0.4587988 = fieldWeight in 6940, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6940)
0.084057815 = weight(_text_:22 in 6940) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.084057815 = score(doc=6940,freq=4.0), product of:
0.19203177 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.054837555 = queryNorm
0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 6940, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6940)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Wordmanship is a humorous dictionary cum index. Analyzing its structure, considers general aspects of the design of a reference work in relation to its index. Indexers should be consulted at the design stage of reference books, as they may suggest reversal of the primary entries, and the index entries; refine the cross-reference-structure; revise locator notation; and select appropriate typography
- Date
- 8. 3.1997 20:22:25
- Source
- Indexer. 20(1996) no.1, S.18-22
-
Tolis, C.: Business modelling for understanding and change : a conceptual framework of model work (1996)
0.09
0.087074704 = product of:
0.17414941 = sum of:
0.17414941 = sum of:
0.12957102 = weight(_text_:work in 660) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12957102 = score(doc=660,freq=14.0), product of:
0.20127523 = queryWeight, product of:
3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
0.054837555 = queryNorm
0.6437505 = fieldWeight in 660, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=660)
0.04457839 = weight(_text_:22 in 660) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04457839 = score(doc=660,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19203177 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.054837555 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 660, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=660)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- In companies, people often work together in order to understand and change the business. Some of this is explicitly considered development work, with a focus an working for tomorrow. A common element of much development work - whether implicit or explicit - is the use of various types of models. In model work, there are a number of differences that affect the process and outcome of co-operative development work. Drawing an theories of signs, learning, and knowledge, this paper develops a conceptual framework of model work. The framework examines differences and alternatives within three areas: models, activities, and basic assumptions. Recognition and exploration of a larger part of the framework are suggested as important means to utilising the differences to facilitate understanding and change within the company.
- Source
- Knowledge management: organization competence and methodolgy. Proceedings of the Fourth International ISMICK Symposium, 21-22 October 1996, Netherlands. Ed.: J.F. Schreinemakers
-
Thomas, A.R.: ¬The Work-Wide Web : a cataloging career for every librarian? (1997)
0.09
0.08626836 = product of:
0.17253672 = sum of:
0.17253672 = sum of:
0.11309886 = weight(_text_:work in 5118) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11309886 = score(doc=5118,freq=6.0), product of:
0.20127523 = queryWeight, product of:
3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
0.054837555 = queryNorm
0.56191146 = fieldWeight in 5118, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5118)
0.059437852 = weight(_text_:22 in 5118) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.059437852 = score(doc=5118,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19203177 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.054837555 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5118, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5118)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Reviews the consequences of the traditional division of library staff into Technical Services and Reader Services and if decreased interest in cataloguing by library managers. Notes ways in which non cataloguers have had limited involvement in cataloguing. Describes different forms of a holistic approach to library practice and suggests advantages of a holistic work plan. Considers problems of a holistic work plan, advances some solutions and identifies implications for education in cataloguing in library schools
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 24(1997) nos.1/2, S.5-22
-
Yee, M.M.: What is a work? : part 1: the user and the objects of the catalog (1994)
0.08
0.08313951 = product of:
0.16627902 = sum of:
0.16627902 = sum of:
0.1142709 = weight(_text_:work in 735) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1142709 = score(doc=735,freq=8.0), product of:
0.20127523 = queryWeight, product of:
3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
0.054837555 = queryNorm
0.56773454 = fieldWeight in 735, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=735)
0.05200812 = weight(_text_:22 in 735) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05200812 = score(doc=735,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19203177 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.054837555 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 735, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=735)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Part 1 of a series of articles, exploring the concept of 'the work' in cataloguing practice, which attempts to construct a definition of the term based on AACR theory and practice. The study begins with a consideration of the objects of the catalogue, their history and the evidence that bears on the question of the degree to which the user needs access to the work, as opposed to a particular edition of the work
- Footnote
- Vgl. auch: Pt.2: Cataloging and classification quarterly. 19(1994) no.2, S.5-22; Pt.3: Cataloging and classification quarterly. 20(1995) no.1, S.25-46; Pt.4: Cataloging and classification quarterly. 20(1995) no.2, S.3-24
-
Mey, E.S.A.: ¬The item, the work and the object of cataloguing (1998)
0.08
0.08313951 = product of:
0.16627902 = sum of:
0.16627902 = sum of:
0.1142709 = weight(_text_:work in 5618) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1142709 = score(doc=5618,freq=8.0), product of:
0.20127523 = queryWeight, product of:
3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
0.054837555 = queryNorm
0.56773454 = fieldWeight in 5618, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5618)
0.05200812 = weight(_text_:22 in 5618) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05200812 = score(doc=5618,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19203177 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.054837555 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5618, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5618)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Discusses the basic concepts of 'the item', 'the work' and the 'object' in cataloguing. Cataloguing is defined and viewed as a part of the communication process developed by library professionals to assist the various users of libraries. Cataloguing comproses 3 parts, each with specific definitions and function. The use of main access points has led to misleading concepts of items and work. The work may be presented by the item in different manners. Cataloguing has variables, which should establish the basis for it. Items and works are related through cataloguing, as identified by bibliographical relationships. Cataloguing must have some defined characteristics, for the better understanding of its connotative codes
- Date
- 20. 2.1999 19:16:22
-
Russell, B.M.; Spillane, J.L.: Using the Web for name authority work (2001)
0.08
0.08313951 = product of:
0.16627902 = sum of:
0.16627902 = sum of:
0.1142709 = weight(_text_:work in 167) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1142709 = score(doc=167,freq=8.0), product of:
0.20127523 = queryWeight, product of:
3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
0.054837555 = queryNorm
0.56773454 = fieldWeight in 167, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=167)
0.05200812 = weight(_text_:22 in 167) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05200812 = score(doc=167,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19203177 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.054837555 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 167, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=167)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- While many catalogers are using the Web to find the information they need to perform authority work quickly and accurately, the full potential of the Web to assist catalogers in name authority work has yet to be realized. The ever-growing nature of the Web means that available information for creating personal name, corporate name, and other types of headings will increase. In this article, we examine ways in which simple and effective Web searching can save catalogers time and money in the process of authority work. In addition, questions involving evaluating authority information found on the Web are explored.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Antelman, K.: Identifying the serial work as a bibliographic entity (2004)
0.08
0.08226892 = product of:
0.16453785 = sum of:
0.16453785 = sum of:
0.11995945 = weight(_text_:work in 130) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11995945 = score(doc=130,freq=12.0), product of:
0.20127523 = queryWeight, product of:
3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
0.054837555 = queryNorm
0.5959971 = fieldWeight in 130, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=130)
0.04457839 = weight(_text_:22 in 130) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04457839 = score(doc=130,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19203177 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.054837555 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 130, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=130)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- A solid theoretical foundation has been built over the years exploring the bibliographic work and developing cataloging rules and practices to describe the work in the traditional catalog. With the increasing prevalence of multiple manifestations of serial titles, as well as tools that automate discovery and retrieval, bibliographic control of serials at a higher level of abstraction is more necessary than ever before. At the same time, models such as the International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions' Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records offer new opportunities to control all bibliographic entities at this higher level and build more useful catalog displays. The bibliographic mechanisms that control the work for monographs - author, title, and uniform title - are weak identifiers for serials. New identifiers being adopted by the content industry are built on models and practices that are fundamentally different from those underlying the new bibliographic models. What is needed is a work identifier for serials that is both congruent with the new models and can enable us to meet the objective of providing work-level access to all resources in our catalogs.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Yee, M.M.: What is a work? : part 4: cataloging theorists and a definition abstract (1995)
0.08
0.08226892 = product of:
0.16453785 = sum of:
0.16453785 = sum of:
0.11995945 = weight(_text_:work in 595) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11995945 = score(doc=595,freq=12.0), product of:
0.20127523 = queryWeight, product of:
3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
0.054837555 = queryNorm
0.5959971 = fieldWeight in 595, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=595)
0.04457839 = weight(_text_:22 in 595) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04457839 = score(doc=595,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19203177 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.054837555 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 595, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=595)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- 4th in a series of articles dealing with the concept and application of 'work' in cataloguing. Discusses the general concept of 'work' regardless of format, based on the writings of cataloguing theorists. Identifies a number of different criteris used to define the concept of work including criteria to do with creativity and/or single personal authorship, content, text or symbol strings, medium, identity and representation, and interchangeability, as well as the concept of work as product. Proposes a number of functions to be carried out by the ideal definition of work, and concludes by offering a definition
- Footnote
- Vgl. auch: Pt.1: Cataloging and classification quarterly. 19(1994) no.1, S.9-28; Pt.2: Cataloging and classification quarterly. 19(1994) no.2, S.5-22; Pt.3: Cataloging and classification quarterly. 20(1995) no.1, S.25-46.
-
Cooke, N.A.; Kitzie, V.L.: Outsiders-within-Library and Information Science : reprioritizing the marginalized in critical sociocultural work (2021)
0.08
0.08226892 = product of:
0.16453785 = sum of:
0.16453785 = sum of:
0.11995945 = weight(_text_:work in 351) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11995945 = score(doc=351,freq=12.0), product of:
0.20127523 = queryWeight, product of:
3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
0.054837555 = queryNorm
0.5959971 = fieldWeight in 351, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
3.6703904 = idf(docFreq=3060, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=351)
0.04457839 = weight(_text_:22 in 351) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04457839 = score(doc=351,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19203177 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.054837555 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 351, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=351)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- While there are calls for new paradigms within the profession, there are also existing subgenres that fit this bill if they would be fully acknowledged. This essay argues that underrepresented and otherwise marginalized scholars have already produced significant work within social, cultural, and community-oriented paradigms; social justice and advocacy; and, diversity, equity, and inclusion. This work has not been sufficiently valued or promoted. Furthermore, the surrounding structural conditions have resulted in the dismissal, violently reviewed and rejected, and erased work of underrepresented scholars, and the stigmatization and delegitimization of their work. These scholars are "outsiders-within-LIS." By identifying the outsiders-within-LIS through the frame of standpoint theories, the authors are suggesting that a new paradigm does not need to be created; rather, an existing paradigm needs to be recognized and reprioritized. This reprioritized paradigm of critical sociocultural work has and will continue to creatively enrich and expand the field and decolonize LIS curricula.
- Date
- 18. 9.2021 13:22:27
