Search (2717 results, page 1 of 136)

0.2105569 = product of:
  0.4211138 = sum of:
    0.4211138 = sum of:
      0.36075822 = weight(_text_:worm in 5080) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.36075822 = score(doc=5080,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.47673473 = queryWeight, product of:
            8.561393 = idf(docFreq=22, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05568425 = queryNorm
          0.75672734 = fieldWeight in 5080, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            8.561393 = idf(docFreq=22, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5080)
      0.060355578 = weight(_text_:22 in 5080) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.060355578 = score(doc=5080,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.19499676 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05568425 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5080, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5080)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Examines the options currently available for mass storage of digital media, technical and standards issues and how to compare them. Lists criteria for grouping storage media. Examines: seminconductor storage, hard magnetic discs, diskette/flexible disc storage, costs of mastering read-only discs, WORM optical dics storage, rewritable optical disc storage, optical tape storage, optical card storage. Reviews mass storage systems and describes optical disc jukeboxes

Source

Information management and technology. 26(1993) no.1, S.22-32

0.15943411 = product of:
  0.31886822 = sum of:
    0.31886822 = product of:
      0.63773644 = sum of:
        0.63773644 = weight(_text_:worm in 1976) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.63773644 = score(doc=1976,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.47673473 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.561393 = idf(docFreq=22, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05568425 = queryNorm
            1.3377177 = fieldWeight in 1976, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              8.561393 = idf(docFreq=22, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1976)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Reviews the range of specialist browsing tools available to beginners for navigating the WWW. Pays particular attention to Jumpstation 2; the Webcrawler; Lycos; World Wide Web Worm; RBSE; and CUI W3

Object

WWW Worm

0.13528433 = product of:
  0.27056867 = sum of:
    0.27056867 = product of:
      0.54113734 = sum of:
        0.54113734 = weight(_text_:worm in 3164) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.54113734 = score(doc=3164,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.47673473 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.561393 = idf(docFreq=22, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05568425 = queryNorm
            1.1350911 = fieldWeight in 3164, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.561393 = idf(docFreq=22, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3164)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Object

WWW Worm

0.13528433 = product of:
  0.27056867 = sum of:
    0.27056867 = product of:
      0.54113734 = sum of:
        0.54113734 = weight(_text_:worm in 3168) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.54113734 = score(doc=3168,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.47673473 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.561393 = idf(docFreq=22, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05568425 = queryNorm
            1.1350911 = fieldWeight in 3168, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.561393 = idf(docFreq=22, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3168)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Object

WWW Worm

0.13528433 = product of:
  0.27056867 = sum of:
    0.27056867 = product of:
      0.54113734 = sum of:
        0.54113734 = weight(_text_:worm in 3169) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.54113734 = score(doc=3169,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.47673473 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.561393 = idf(docFreq=22, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05568425 = queryNorm
            1.1350911 = fieldWeight in 3169, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.561393 = idf(docFreq=22, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3169)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Object

WWW Worm

0.13528433 = product of:
  0.27056867 = sum of:
    0.27056867 = product of:
      0.54113734 = sum of:
        0.54113734 = weight(_text_:worm in 3229) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.54113734 = score(doc=3229,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.47673473 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.561393 = idf(docFreq=22, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05568425 = queryNorm
            1.1350911 = fieldWeight in 3229, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.561393 = idf(docFreq=22, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3229)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Object

WWW Worm

0.13528433 = product of:
  0.27056867 = sum of:
    0.27056867 = product of:
      0.54113734 = sum of:
        0.54113734 = weight(_text_:worm in 894) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.54113734 = score(doc=894,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.47673473 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.561393 = idf(docFreq=22, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05568425 = queryNorm
            1.1350911 = fieldWeight in 894, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.561393 = idf(docFreq=22, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=894)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Object

WWW Worm

0.1275473 = product of:
  0.2550946 = sum of:
    0.2550946 = product of:
      0.5101892 = sum of:
        0.5101892 = weight(_text_:worm in 5597) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.5101892 = score(doc=5597,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.47673473 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.561393 = idf(docFreq=22, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05568425 = queryNorm
            1.0701741 = fieldWeight in 5597, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              8.561393 = idf(docFreq=22, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5597)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

The Reference Expert is a computerised file containing reference problem questions and answers that can be used by staff on the reference desk. The data base was installed by the Reference Division of Texas A&M University's Sterling C. Evans Library to act as a collective memory for reference staff to find answers to infrequently asked difficult questions. The Reference Expert was built using INMAGIC version 7.1 free text indexing software and employs a worm disc for storage. Describes the file structure of records in the system, staff response, and problems encountered

0.1275473 = product of:
  0.2550946 = sum of:
    0.2550946 = product of:
      0.5101892 = sum of:
        0.5101892 = weight(_text_:worm in 3387) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.5101892 = score(doc=3387,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.47673473 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.561393 = idf(docFreq=22, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05568425 = queryNorm
            1.0701741 = fieldWeight in 3387, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              8.561393 = idf(docFreq=22, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3387)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Lists and describes sites that attempt to aid Internet searchers by helping them locate sites, files or information. Gives an overview of the methods used. Covers the following sides: Aliweb, ArchiPlex Archie Gateway, CUI W3, Clearing House for Subject Oriented Internet Resource Guide, InfoSeek, JumpStation, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratories List of Lists, Lycos WWW Search Engine, Mother of all BBSs, NIKOS, Plant Earth Home Page, Standford Newnews Filtering Service, WWW Home Page Harvest Browser, WWW virtual Library, WWW Wanderer Index, WWW Worm, Web Crawler, Whole Internet Catalog, and Yahoo Index to the Internet

Object

WWW Worm

0.1275473 = product of:
  0.2550946 = sum of:
    0.2550946 = product of:
      0.5101892 = sum of:
        0.5101892 = weight(_text_:worm in 4724) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.5101892 = score(doc=4724,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.47673473 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.561393 = idf(docFreq=22, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05568425 = queryNorm
            1.0701741 = fieldWeight in 4724, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              8.561393 = idf(docFreq=22, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4724)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

WWW robots are programs that attempt to gather and index WWW resources. They reside on a host computer and retrieve information from sites on the WWW using standrad protocols. Gives an overview of robots, and robot generated databases. Covers: WWW Worm; Lycos, WebCrawler; AliWeb; Harvest; Jumpstation II, and Open Text Index. Also discusses Yahoo and Trade Wave which are comparable tools for resource discovery

Object

WWW Worm

0.1275473 = product of:
  0.2550946 = sum of:
    0.2550946 = product of:
      0.5101892 = sum of:
        0.5101892 = weight(_text_:worm in 2122) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.5101892 = score(doc=2122,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.47673473 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.561393 = idf(docFreq=22, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05568425 = queryNorm
            1.0701741 = fieldWeight in 2122, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              8.561393 = idf(docFreq=22, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2122)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Reviews the keyword indexes available for searching the WWW. Discusses: Lycos, WebCrawler, WWW Worm, Harvest Broker, and CUI. Yahoo is available for keyword searching of subject listings. The CUSI (Configurable Unified Search Engine) is a front end that provides 1 form for searching a number of indexes. A commercial service, InfoSeek, is being developed to search indexes

Object

WWW Worm

0.12604374 = product of:
  0.25208747 = sum of:
    0.25208747 = product of:
      0.50417495 = sum of:
        0.50417495 = weight(_text_:worm in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.50417495 = score(doc=2918,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.47673473 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.561393 = idf(docFreq=22, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05568425 = queryNorm
            1.0575587 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              8.561393 = idf(docFreq=22, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Reports an algorithmic approach to the automatic generation of thesauri for electronic community systems. The techniques used included terms filtering, automatic indexing, and cluster analysis. The testbed for the research was the Worm Community System, which contains a comprehensive library of specialized community data and literature, currently in use by molecular biologists who study the nematode worm. The resulting worm thesaurus included 2709 researchers' names, 798 gene names, 20 experimental methods, and 4302 subject descriptors. On average, each term had about 90 weighted neighbouring terms indicating relevant concepts. The thesaurus was developed as an online search aide. Tests the worm thesaurus in an experiment with 6 worm researchers of varying degrees of expertise and background. The experiment showed that the thesaurus was an excellent 'memory jogging' device and that it supported learning and serendipitous browsing. Despite some occurrences of obvious noise, the system was useful in suggesting relevant concepts for the researchers' queries and it helped improve concept recall. With a simple browsing interface, an automatic thesaurus can become a useful tool for online search and can assist researchers in exploring and traversing a dynamic and complex electronic community system

0.11273693 = product of:
  0.22547387 = sum of:
    0.22547387 = product of:
      0.45094773 = sum of:
        0.45094773 = weight(_text_:worm in 3165) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.45094773 = score(doc=3165,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.47673473 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.561393 = idf(docFreq=22, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05568425 = queryNorm
            0.94590914 = fieldWeight in 3165, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.561393 = idf(docFreq=22, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3165)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Object

WWW Worm

0.11273693 = product of:
  0.22547387 = sum of:
    0.22547387 = product of:
      0.45094773 = sum of:
        0.45094773 = weight(_text_:worm in 3205) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.45094773 = score(doc=3205,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.47673473 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.561393 = idf(docFreq=22, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05568425 = queryNorm
            0.94590914 = fieldWeight in 3205, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.561393 = idf(docFreq=22, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3205)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Object

WWW Worm

0.11273693 = product of:
  0.22547387 = sum of:
    0.22547387 = product of:
      0.45094773 = sum of:
        0.45094773 = weight(_text_:worm in 6492) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.45094773 = score(doc=6492,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.47673473 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.561393 = idf(docFreq=22, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05568425 = queryNorm
            0.94590914 = fieldWeight in 6492, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              8.561393 = idf(docFreq=22, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6492)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

This research presents an algorithmic approach to addressing the vocabulary problem in scientific information retrieval and information sharing, using the molecular biology domain as an example. We first present a literature review of cognitive studies related to the vocabulary problem and vocabulary-based search aids (thesauri) and then discuss techniques for building robust and domain-specific thesauri to assist in cross-domain scientific information retrieval. Using a variation of the automatic thesaurus generation techniques, which we refer to as the concept space approach, we recently conducted an experiment in the molecular biology domain in which we created a C. elegans worm thesaurus of 7.657 worm-specific terms and a Drosophila fly thesaurus of 15.626 terms. About 30% of these terms overlapped, which created vocabulary paths from one subject domain to the other. Based on a cognitve study of term association involving 4 biologists, we found that a large percentage (59,6-85,6%) of the terms suggested by the subjects were identified in the cojoined fly-worm thesaurus. However, we found only a small percentage (8,4-18,1%) of the associations suggested by the subjects in the thesaurus

0.1110747 = sum of:
  0.08844136 = product of:
    0.26532406 = sum of:
      0.26532406 = weight(_text_:3a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.26532406 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.4720917 = queryWeight, product of:
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05568425 = queryNorm
          0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.02263334 = product of:
    0.04526668 = sum of:
      0.04526668 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04526668 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.19499676 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05568425 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Content

Vgl.: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CEAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.91.4940%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&ei=dOXrUMeIDYHDtQahsIGACg&usg=AFQjCNHFWVh6gNPvnOrOS9R3rkrXCNVD-A&sig2=5I2F5evRfMnsttSgFF9g7Q&bvm=bv.1357316858,d.Yms.

Date

8. 1.2013 10:22:32

0.107513316 = sum of:
  0.08110775 = product of:
    0.24332324 = sum of:
      0.24332324 = weight(_text_:objects in 5455) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.24332324 = score(doc=5455,freq=8.0), product of:
          0.29596576 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05568425 = queryNorm
          0.82213306 = fieldWeight in 5455, product of:
            2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
              8.0 = termFreq=8.0
            5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5455)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.026405565 = product of:
    0.05281113 = sum of:
      0.05281113 = weight(_text_:22 in 5455) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.05281113 = score(doc=5455,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.19499676 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05568425 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5455, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5455)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Although classification has been an important aspect of astronomy since stellar spectroscopy in the late nineteenth century, to date no comprehensive classification system has existed for all classes of objects in the universe. Here we present such a system, and lay out its foundational definitions and principles. The system consists of the "Three Kingdoms" of planets, stars and galaxies, eighteen families, and eighty-two classes of objects. Gravitation is the defining organizing principle for the families and classes, and the physical nature of the objects is the defining characteristic of the classes. The system should prove useful for both scientific and pedagogical purposes.

Date

21.11.2019 18:46:22

0.10266819 = product of:
  0.20533638 = sum of:
    0.20533638 = product of:
      0.30800456 = sum of:
        0.086901166 = weight(_text_:objects in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.086901166 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.29596576 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05568425 = queryNorm
            0.29361898 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
        0.22110339 = weight(_text_:3a in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.22110339 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.4720917 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05568425 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

A summary of brain theory is given so far as it is contained within the framework of Localization Theory. Difficulties of this "conventional theory" are traced back to a specific deficiency: there is no way to express relations between active cells (as for instance their representing parts of the same object). A new theory is proposed to cure this deficiency. It introduces a new kind of dynamical control, termed synaptic modulation, according to which synapses switch between a conducting and a non- conducting state. The dynamics of this variable is controlled on a fast time scale by correlations in the temporal fine structure of cellular signals. Furthermore, conventional synaptic plasticity is replaced by a refined version. Synaptic modulation and plasticity form the basis for short-term and long-term memory, respectively. Signal correlations, shaped by the variable network, express structure and relationships within objects. In particular, the figure-ground problem may be solved in this way. Synaptic modulation introduces exibility into cerebral networks which is necessary to solve the invariance problem. Since momentarily useless connections are deactivated, interference between di erent memory traces can be reduced, and memory capacity increased, in comparison with conventional associative memory

Source

http%3A%2F%2Fcogprints.org%2F1380%2F1%2FvdM_correlation.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0g7DvZbQPb2U7dYb49b9v_

0.09572275 = sum of:
  0.06554496 = product of:
    0.19663489 = sum of:
      0.19663489 = weight(_text_:objects in 767) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.19663489 = score(doc=767,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.29596576 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05568425 = queryNorm
          0.6643839 = fieldWeight in 767, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=767)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.030177789 = product of:
    0.060355578 = sum of:
      0.060355578 = weight(_text_:22 in 767) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.060355578 = score(doc=767,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.19499676 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05568425 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 767, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=767)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

RLG has used METS for a particular application, that is as a wrapper for structural metadata. When RLG cultural materials was launched, there was no single way to deal with "complex digital objects". METS provides a standard means of encoding metadata regarding the digital objects represented in RCM, and METS has now been fully integrated into the workflow for this service.

Source

Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.65-68

0.09572275 = sum of:
  0.06554496 = product of:
    0.19663489 = sum of:
      0.19663489 = weight(_text_:objects in 2341) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.19663489 = score(doc=2341,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.29596576 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05568425 = queryNorm
          0.6643839 = fieldWeight in 2341, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2341)
    0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.030177789 = product of:
    0.060355578 = sum of:
      0.060355578 = weight(_text_:22 in 2341) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.060355578 = score(doc=2341,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.19499676 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05568425 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2341, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2341)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

IODyone is an Internet client program that allows one to retriev information from servers by dynamically combining information objects. Information objects are abstract representations of bibliographic data, typically titles (or title keywords), author names, subject and classification identifiers, and full-text search terms

Date

22. 9.1997 19:16:05