-
Chianese, A.; Cantone, F.; Caropreso, M.; Moscato, V.: ARCHAEOLOGY 2.0 : Cultural E-Learning tools and distributed repositories supported by SEMANTICA, a System for Learning Object Retrieval and Adaptive Courseware Generation for e-learning environments. (2010)
0.29
0.292189 = sum of:
0.030931344 = product of:
0.09279403 = sum of:
0.09279403 = weight(_text_:objects in 3733) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09279403 = score(doc=3733,freq=2.0), product of:
0.31603554 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.059460267 = queryNorm
0.29361898 = fieldWeight in 3733, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3733)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.26125765 = sum of:
0.22097743 = weight(_text_:2.0 in 3733) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.22097743 = score(doc=3733,freq=8.0), product of:
0.3448537 = queryWeight, product of:
5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
0.059460267 = queryNorm
0.640786 = fieldWeight in 3733, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3733)
0.040280227 = weight(_text_:22 in 3733) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040280227 = score(doc=3733,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20821972 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.059460267 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3733, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3733)
- Abstract
- The focus of the present research has been the development and the application to Virtual Archaeology of a Web-Based framework for Learning Objects indexing and retrieval. The paper presents the main outcomes of a experimentation carried out by an interdisciplinary group of Federico II University of Naples. Our equipe is composed by researchers both in ICT and in Humanities disciplines, in particular in the domain of Virtual Archaeology and Cultural Heritage Informatics in order to develop specific ICT methodological approaches to Virtual Archaeology. The methodological background is the progressive diffusion of Web 2.0 technologies and the attempt to analyze their impact and perspectives in the Cultural Heritage field. In particular, we approached the specific requirements of the so called Learning 2.0, and the possibility to improve the automation of modular courseware generation in Virtual Archaeology Didactics. The developed framework was called SEMANTICA, and it was applied to Virtual Archaeology Domain Ontologies in order to generate a didactic course in a semi-automated way. The main results of this test and the first students feedback on the course fruition will be presented and discussed..
- Object
- ARCHAEOLOGY 2.0
- Source
- Wissensspeicher in digitalen Räumen: Nachhaltigkeit - Verfügbarkeit - semantische Interoperabilität. Proceedings der 11. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation, Konstanz, 20. bis 22. Februar 2008. Hrsg.: J. Sieglerschmidt u. H.P.Ohly
-
Srinivasan, R.; Boast, R.; Becvar, K.M.; Furner, J.: Blobgects : digital museum catalogs and diverse user communities (2009)
0.27
0.26569945 = sum of:
0.06916459 = product of:
0.20749377 = sum of:
0.20749377 = weight(_text_:objects in 2754) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.20749377 = score(doc=2754,freq=10.0), product of:
0.31603554 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.059460267 = queryNorm
0.656552 = fieldWeight in 2754, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2754)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.19653486 = sum of:
0.15625463 = weight(_text_:2.0 in 2754) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.15625463 = score(doc=2754,freq=4.0), product of:
0.3448537 = queryWeight, product of:
5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
0.059460267 = queryNorm
0.45310414 = fieldWeight in 2754, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2754)
0.040280227 = weight(_text_:22 in 2754) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040280227 = score(doc=2754,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20821972 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.059460267 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2754, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2754)
- Abstract
- This article presents an exploratory study of Blobgects, an experimental interface for an online museum catalog that enables social tagging and blogging activity around a set of cultural heritage objects held by a preeminent museum of anthropology and archaeology. This study attempts to understand not just whether social tagging and commenting about these objects is useful but rather whose tags and voices matter in presenting different expert perspectives around digital museum objects. Based on an empirical comparison between two different user groups (Canadian Inuit high-school students and museum studies students in the United States), we found that merely adding the ability to tag and comment to the museum's catalog does not sufficiently allow users to learn about or engage with the objects represented by catalog entries. Rather, the specialist language of the catalog provides too little contextualization for users to enter into the sort of dialog that proponents of Web 2.0 technologies promise. Overall, we propose a more nuanced application of Web 2.0 technologies within museums - one which provides a contextual basis that gives users a starting point for engagement and permits users to make sense of objects in relation to their own needs, uses, and understandings.
- Date
- 22. 3.2009 18:52:32
-
Strobel, S.: ¬The complete Linux kit : fully configured LINUX system kernel (1997)
0.24
0.23584186 = product of:
0.4716837 = sum of:
0.4716837 = sum of:
0.37501118 = weight(_text_:2.0 in 8959) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.37501118 = score(doc=8959,freq=4.0), product of:
0.3448537 = queryWeight, product of:
5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
0.059460267 = queryNorm
1.08745 = fieldWeight in 8959, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=8959)
0.09667254 = weight(_text_:22 in 8959) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09667254 = score(doc=8959,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20821972 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.059460267 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 8959, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=8959)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 16. 7.2002 20:22:55
- RSWK
- LINUX 2.0
- Subject
- LINUX 2.0
-
Noever, D.; Ciolino, M.: ¬The Turing deception (2022)
0.16
0.16073188 = sum of:
0.094438665 = product of:
0.283316 = sum of:
0.283316 = weight(_text_:3a in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.283316 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
0.5041048 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.059460267 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.066293225 = product of:
0.13258645 = sum of:
0.13258645 = weight(_text_:2.0 in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13258645 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
0.3448537 = queryWeight, product of:
5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
0.059460267 = queryNorm
0.3844716 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This research revisits the classic Turing test and compares recent large language models such as ChatGPT for their abilities to reproduce human-level comprehension and compelling text generation. Two task challenges- summary and question answering- prompt ChatGPT to produce original content (98-99%) from a single text entry and sequential questions initially posed by Turing in 1950. We score the original and generated content against the OpenAI GPT-2 Output Detector from 2019, and establish multiple cases where the generated content proves original and undetectable (98%). The question of a machine fooling a human judge recedes in this work relative to the question of "how would one prove it?" The original contribution of the work presents a metric and simple grammatical set for understanding the writing mechanics of chatbots in evaluating their readability and statistical clarity, engagement, delivery, overall quality, and plagiarism risks. While Turing's original prose scores at least 14% below the machine-generated output, whether an algorithm displays hints of Turing's true initial thoughts (the "Lovelace 2.0" test) remains unanswerable.
- Source
- https%3A%2F%2Farxiv.org%2Fabs%2F2212.06721&usg=AOvVaw3i_9pZm9y_dQWoHi6uv0EN
-
Shoffner, M.; Greenberg, J.; Kramer-Duffield, J.; Woodbury, D.: Web 2.0 semantic systems : collaborative learning in science (2008)
0.13
0.13304237 = product of:
0.26608473 = sum of:
0.26608473 = sum of:
0.23386054 = weight(_text_:2.0 in 2661) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.23386054 = score(doc=2661,freq=14.0), product of:
0.3448537 = queryWeight, product of:
5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
0.059460267 = queryNorm
0.6781442 = fieldWeight in 2661, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2661)
0.032224182 = weight(_text_:22 in 2661) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032224182 = score(doc=2661,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20821972 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.059460267 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2661, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2661)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The basic goal of education within a discipline is to transform a novice into an expert. This entails moving the novice toward the "semantic space" that the expert inhabits-the space of concepts, meanings, vocabularies, and other intellectual constructs that comprise the discipline. Metadata is significant to this goal in digitally mediated education environments. Encoding the experts' semantic space not only enables the sharing of semantics among discipline scientists, but also creates an environment that bridges the semantic gap between the common vocabulary of the novice and the granular descriptive language of the seasoned scientist (Greenberg, et al, 2005). Developments underlying the Semantic Web, where vocabularies are formalized in the Web Ontology Language (OWL), and Web 2.0 approaches of user-generated folksonomies provide an infrastructure for linking vocabulary systems and promoting group learning via metadata literacy. Group learning is a pedagogical approach to teaching that harnesses the phenomenon of "collective intelligence" to increase learning by means of collaboration. Learning a new semantic system can be daunting for a novice, and yet it is integral to advance one's knowledge in a discipline and retain interest. These ideas are key to the "BOT 2.0: Botany through Web 2.0, the Memex and Social Learning" project (Bot 2.0).72 Bot 2.0 is a collaboration involving the North Carolina Botanical Garden, the UNC SILS Metadata Research center, and the Renaissance Computing Institute (RENCI). Bot 2.0 presents a curriculum utilizing a memex as a way for students to link and share digital information, working asynchronously in an environment beyond the traditional classroom. Our conception of a memex is not a centralized black box but rather a flexible, distributed framework that uses the most salient and easiest-to-use collaborative platforms (e.g., Facebook, Flickr, wiki and blog technology) for personal information management. By meeting students "where they live" digitally, we hope to attract students to the study of botanical science. A key aspect is to teach students scientific terminology and about the value of metadata, an inherent function in several of the technologies and in the instructional approach we are utilizing. This poster will report on a study examining the value of both folksonomies and taxonomies for post-secondary college students learning plant identification. Our data is drawn from a curriculum involving a virtual independent learning portion and a "BotCamp" weekend at UNC, where students work with digital plan specimens that they have captured. Results provide some insight into the importance of collaboration and shared vocabulary for gaining confidence and for student progression from novice to expert in botany.
- Source
- Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
-
Joint, N.: Web 2.0 and the library : a transformational technology? (2010)
0.13
0.13304237 = product of:
0.26608473 = sum of:
0.26608473 = sum of:
0.23386054 = weight(_text_:2.0 in 4202) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.23386054 = score(doc=4202,freq=14.0), product of:
0.3448537 = queryWeight, product of:
5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
0.059460267 = queryNorm
0.6781442 = fieldWeight in 4202, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4202)
0.032224182 = weight(_text_:22 in 4202) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032224182 = score(doc=4202,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20821972 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.059460267 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 4202, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4202)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Purpose - This paper is the final one in a series which has tried to give an overview of so-called transformational areas of digital library technology. The aim has been to assess how much real transformation these applications can bring about, in terms of creating genuine user benefit and also changing everyday library practice. Design/methodology/approach - The paper provides a summary of some of the legal and ethical issues associated with web 2.0 applications in libraries, associated with a brief retrospective view of some relevant literature. Findings - Although web 2.0 innovations have had a massive impact on the larger World Wide Web, the practical impact on library service delivery has been limited to date. What probably can be termed transformational in the effect of web 2.0 developments on library and information work is their effect on some underlying principles of professional practice. Research limitations/implications - The legal and ethical challenges of incorporating web 2.0 platforms into mainstream institutional service delivery need to be subject to further research, so that the risks associated with these innovations are better understood at the strategic and policy-making level. Practical implications - This paper makes some recommendations about new principles of library and information practice which will help practitioners make better sense of these innovations in their overall information environment. Social implications - The paper puts in context some of the more problematic social impacts of web 2.0 innovations, without denying the undeniable positive contribution of social networking to the sphere of human interactivity. Originality/value - This paper raises some cautionary points about web 2.0 applications without adopting a precautionary approach of total prohibition. However, none of the suggestions or analysis in this piece should be considered to constitute legal advice. If such advice is required, the reader should consult appropriate legal professionals.
- Date
- 22. 1.2011 17:54:04
-
Danowski, P.: Authority files and Web 2.0 : Wikipedia and the PND. An Example (2007)
0.13
0.13062882 = product of:
0.26125765 = sum of:
0.26125765 = sum of:
0.22097743 = weight(_text_:2.0 in 1291) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.22097743 = score(doc=1291,freq=8.0), product of:
0.3448537 = queryWeight, product of:
5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
0.059460267 = queryNorm
0.640786 = fieldWeight in 1291, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1291)
0.040280227 = weight(_text_:22 in 1291) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040280227 = score(doc=1291,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20821972 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.059460267 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1291, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1291)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- More and more users index everything on their own in the web 2.0. There are services for links, videos, pictures, books, encyclopaedic articles and scientific articles. All these services are library independent. But must that really be? Can't libraries help with their experience and tools to make user indexing better? On the experience of a project from German language Wikipedia together with the German person authority files (Personen Namen Datei - PND) located at German National Library (Deutsche Nationalbibliothek) I would like to show what is possible. How users can and will use the authority files, if we let them. We will take a look how the project worked and what we can learn for future projects. Conclusions - Authority files can have a role in the web 2.0 - there must be an open interface/ service for retrieval - everything that is indexed on the net with authority files can be easy integrated in a federated search - O'Reilly: You have to found ways that your data get more important that more it will be used
- Content
- Vortrag anlässlich des Workshops: "Extending the multilingual capacity of The European Library in the EDL project Stockholm, Swedish National Library, 22-23 November 2007".
- Object
- Web 2.0
-
Wusteman, J.: Whither HTML? (2004)
0.12
0.120615155 = product of:
0.24123031 = sum of:
0.24123031 = sum of:
0.17678194 = weight(_text_:2.0 in 1001) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.17678194 = score(doc=1001,freq=2.0), product of:
0.3448537 = queryWeight, product of:
5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
0.059460267 = queryNorm
0.5126288 = fieldWeight in 1001, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1001)
0.064448364 = weight(_text_:22 in 1001) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.064448364 = score(doc=1001,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20821972 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.059460267 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1001, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1001)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- HTML has reinvented itself as an XML application. The working draft of the latest version, XHTML 2.0, is causing controversy due to its lack of backward compatibility and the deprecation - and in some cases disappearance - of some popular tags. But is this commotion distracting us from the big picture of what XHTML has to offer? Where is HTML going? And is it taking the Web community with it?
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.99-105
-
Hotho, A.; Bloehdorn, S.: Data Mining 2004 : Text classification by boosting weak learners based on terms and concepts (2004)
0.12
0.1186068 = sum of:
0.094438665 = product of:
0.283316 = sum of:
0.283316 = weight(_text_:3a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.283316 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
0.5041048 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.059460267 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.024168136 = product of:
0.04833627 = sum of:
0.04833627 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04833627 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20821972 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.059460267 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Content
- Vgl.: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CEAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.91.4940%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&ei=dOXrUMeIDYHDtQahsIGACg&usg=AFQjCNHFWVh6gNPvnOrOS9R3rkrXCNVD-A&sig2=5I2F5evRfMnsttSgFF9g7Q&bvm=bv.1357316858,d.Yms.
- Date
- 8. 1.2013 10:22:32
-
Dick, S.J.: Astronomy's Three Kingdom System : a comprehensive classification system of celestial objects (2019)
0.11
0.11480391 = sum of:
0.086607754 = product of:
0.25982326 = sum of:
0.25982326 = weight(_text_:objects in 5455) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.25982326 = score(doc=5455,freq=8.0), product of:
0.31603554 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.059460267 = queryNorm
0.82213306 = fieldWeight in 5455, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5455)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.028196158 = product of:
0.056392316 = sum of:
0.056392316 = weight(_text_:22 in 5455) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056392316 = score(doc=5455,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20821972 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.059460267 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5455, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5455)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Although classification has been an important aspect of astronomy since stellar spectroscopy in the late nineteenth century, to date no comprehensive classification system has existed for all classes of objects in the universe. Here we present such a system, and lay out its foundational definitions and principles. The system consists of the "Three Kingdoms" of planets, stars and galaxies, eighteen families, and eighty-two classes of objects. Gravitation is the defining organizing principle for the families and classes, and the physical nature of the objects is the defining characteristic of the classes. The system should prove useful for both scientific and pedagogical purposes.
- Date
- 21.11.2019 18:46:22
-
Malsburg, C. von der: ¬The correlation theory of brain function (1981)
0.11
0.10963023 = product of:
0.21926045 = sum of:
0.21926045 = product of:
0.32889068 = sum of:
0.09279403 = weight(_text_:objects in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09279403 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
0.31603554 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.059460267 = queryNorm
0.29361898 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
0.23609667 = weight(_text_:3a in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.23609667 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
0.5041048 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.059460267 = queryNorm
0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- A summary of brain theory is given so far as it is contained within the framework of Localization Theory. Difficulties of this "conventional theory" are traced back to a specific deficiency: there is no way to express relations between active cells (as for instance their representing parts of the same object). A new theory is proposed to cure this deficiency. It introduces a new kind of dynamical control, termed synaptic modulation, according to which synapses switch between a conducting and a non- conducting state. The dynamics of this variable is controlled on a fast time scale by correlations in the temporal fine structure of cellular signals. Furthermore, conventional synaptic plasticity is replaced by a refined version. Synaptic modulation and plasticity form the basis for short-term and long-term memory, respectively. Signal correlations, shaped by the variable network, express structure and relationships within objects. In particular, the figure-ground problem may be solved in this way. Synaptic modulation introduces exibility into cerebral networks which is necessary to solve the invariance problem. Since momentarily useless connections are deactivated, interference between di erent memory traces can be reduced, and memory capacity increased, in comparison with conventional associative memory
- Source
- http%3A%2F%2Fcogprints.org%2F1380%2F1%2FvdM_correlation.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0g7DvZbQPb2U7dYb49b9v_
-
Warr, W.A.: Social software : fun and games, or business tools? (2009)
0.11
0.10553826 = product of:
0.21107651 = sum of:
0.21107651 = sum of:
0.1546842 = weight(_text_:2.0 in 3663) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1546842 = score(doc=3663,freq=2.0), product of:
0.3448537 = queryWeight, product of:
5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
0.059460267 = queryNorm
0.4485502 = fieldWeight in 3663, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3663)
0.056392316 = weight(_text_:22 in 3663) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056392316 = score(doc=3663,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20821972 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.059460267 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3663, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3663)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This is the era of social networking, collective intelligence, participation, collaborative creation, and borderless distribution. Every day we are bombarded with more publicity about collaborative environments, news feeds, blogs, wikis, podcasting, webcasting, folksonomies, social bookmarking, social citations, collaborative filtering, recommender systems, media sharing, massive multiplayer online games, virtual worlds, and mash-ups. This sort of anarchic environment appeals to the digital natives, but which of these so-called 'Web 2.0' technologies are going to have a real business impact? This paper addresses the impact that issues such as quality control, security, privacy and bandwidth may have on the implementation of social networking in hide-bound, large organizations.
- Date
- 8. 7.2010 19:24:22
-
Rogers, R.: Digital methods (2013)
0.11
0.10536158 = sum of:
0.04285973 = product of:
0.12857918 = sum of:
0.12857918 = weight(_text_:objects in 2354) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12857918 = score(doc=2354,freq=6.0), product of:
0.31603554 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.059460267 = queryNorm
0.4068504 = fieldWeight in 2354, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2354)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.062501855 = product of:
0.12500371 = sum of:
0.12500371 = weight(_text_:2.0 in 2354) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12500371 = score(doc=2354,freq=4.0), product of:
0.3448537 = queryWeight, product of:
5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
0.059460267 = queryNorm
0.36248332 = fieldWeight in 2354, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2354)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- In Digital Methods, Richard Rogers proposes a methodological outlook for social and cultural scholarly research on the Web that seeks to move Internet research beyond the study of online culture. It is not a toolkit for Internet research, or operating instructions for a software package; it deals with broader questions. How can we study social media to learn something about society rather than about social media use? How can hyperlinks reveal not just the value of a Web site but the politics of association? Rogers proposes repurposing Web-native techniques for research into cultural change and societal conditions. We can learn to reapply such "methods of the medium" as crawling and crowd sourcing, PageRank and similar algorithms, tag clouds and other visualizations; we can learn how they handle hits, likes, tags, date stamps, and other Web-native objects. By "thinking along" with devices and the objects they handle, digital research methods can follow the evolving methods of the medium. Rogers uses this new methodological outlook to examine the findings of inquiries into 9/11 search results, the recognition of climate change skeptics by climate-change-related Web sites, the events surrounding the Srebrenica massacre according to Dutch, Serbian, Bosnian, and Croatian Wikipedias, presidential candidates' social media "friends," and the censorship of the Iranian Web. With Digital Methods, Rogers introduces a new vision and method for Internet research and at the same time applies them to the Web's objects of study, from tiny particles (hyperlinks) to large masses (social media).
- RSWK
- Internet / Recherche / World Wide Web 2.0
- Subject
- Internet / Recherche / World Wide Web 2.0
-
Proffitt, M.: Pulling it all together : use of METS in RLG cultural materials service (2004)
0.10
0.10221383 = sum of:
0.069989644 = product of:
0.20996892 = sum of:
0.20996892 = weight(_text_:objects in 767) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.20996892 = score(doc=767,freq=4.0), product of:
0.31603554 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.059460267 = queryNorm
0.6643839 = fieldWeight in 767, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=767)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.032224182 = product of:
0.064448364 = sum of:
0.064448364 = weight(_text_:22 in 767) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.064448364 = score(doc=767,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20821972 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.059460267 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 767, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=767)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- RLG has used METS for a particular application, that is as a wrapper for structural metadata. When RLG cultural materials was launched, there was no single way to deal with "complex digital objects". METS provides a standard means of encoding metadata regarding the digital objects represented in RCM, and METS has now been fully integrated into the workflow for this service.
- Source
- Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.65-68
-
Johnson, E.H.: Using IODyne : Illustrations and examples (1998)
0.10
0.10221383 = sum of:
0.069989644 = product of:
0.20996892 = sum of:
0.20996892 = weight(_text_:objects in 2341) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.20996892 = score(doc=2341,freq=4.0), product of:
0.31603554 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.059460267 = queryNorm
0.6643839 = fieldWeight in 2341, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2341)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.032224182 = product of:
0.064448364 = sum of:
0.064448364 = weight(_text_:22 in 2341) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.064448364 = score(doc=2341,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20821972 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.059460267 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2341, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2341)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- IODyone is an Internet client program that allows one to retriev information from servers by dynamically combining information objects. Information objects are abstract representations of bibliographic data, typically titles (or title keywords), author names, subject and classification identifiers, and full-text search terms
- Date
- 22. 9.1997 19:16:05
-
Holetschek, J. et al.: Natural history in Europeana : accessing scientific collection objects via LOD (2016)
0.10
0.102142915 = sum of:
0.06186269 = product of:
0.18558806 = sum of:
0.18558806 = weight(_text_:objects in 3277) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.18558806 = score(doc=3277,freq=2.0), product of:
0.31603554 = queryWeight, product of:
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.059460267 = queryNorm
0.58723795 = fieldWeight in 3277, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3277)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.040280227 = product of:
0.08056045 = sum of:
0.08056045 = weight(_text_:22 in 3277) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08056045 = score(doc=3277,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20821972 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.059460267 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3277, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3277)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Metadata and semantics research: 10th International Conference, MTSR 2016, Göttingen, Germany, November 22-25, 2016, Proceedings. Eds.: E. Garoufallou
-
Tang, K.-H.; Tsai, L.-C.; Hwang, S.-L.: ¬The development and validation of a one-bit comparison for evaluating the maturity of tag distributions in a Web 2.0 environment (2016)
0.10
0.09826743 = product of:
0.19653486 = sum of:
0.19653486 = sum of:
0.15625463 = weight(_text_:2.0 in 2934) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.15625463 = score(doc=2934,freq=4.0), product of:
0.3448537 = queryWeight, product of:
5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
0.059460267 = queryNorm
0.45310414 = fieldWeight in 2934, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2934)
0.040280227 = weight(_text_:22 in 2934) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040280227 = score(doc=2934,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20821972 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.059460267 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2934, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2934)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Tags generated by domain experts reaching a consensus under social influence reflect the core concepts of the tagged resource. Such tags can act as navigational cues that enable users to discover meaningful and relevant information in a Web 2.0 environment. This is particularly critical for nonexperts for understanding formal academic or scientific resources, also known as hard content. The goal of this study was to develop a novel one-bit comparison (OBC) metric and to assess in what circumstances a set of tags describing a hard-content resource is mature and representative. We compared OBC with the conventional Shannon entropy approach to determine performance when distinguishing tags generated by domain experts and nonexperts in the early and later stages under social influence. The results indicated that OBC can accurately distinguish mature tags generated by a strong expert consensus from other tags, and outperform Shannon entropy. The findings support tag-based learning, and provide insights and tools for the design of applications involving tags, such as tag recommendation and tag-based organization.
- Date
- 7. 5.2016 20:13:22
-
Dalip, D.H.; Gonçalves, M.A.; Cristo, M.; Calado, P.: ¬A general multiview framework for assessing the quality of collaboratively created content on web 2.0 (2017)
0.10
0.09826743 = product of:
0.19653486 = sum of:
0.19653486 = sum of:
0.15625463 = weight(_text_:2.0 in 3343) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.15625463 = score(doc=3343,freq=4.0), product of:
0.3448537 = queryWeight, product of:
5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
0.059460267 = queryNorm
0.45310414 = fieldWeight in 3343, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3343)
0.040280227 = weight(_text_:22 in 3343) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040280227 = score(doc=3343,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20821972 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.059460267 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3343, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3343)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 16.11.2017 13:04:22
- Object
- Web 2.0
-
DIALOG announces DialogSelect 2.0 (1998)
0.09
0.093752794 = product of:
0.18750559 = sum of:
0.18750559 = product of:
0.37501118 = sum of:
0.37501118 = weight(_text_:2.0 in 25) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.37501118 = score(doc=25,freq=4.0), product of:
0.3448537 = queryWeight, product of:
5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
0.059460267 = queryNorm
1.08745 = fieldWeight in 25, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=25)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The DIALOG Coorporation, CA, have annonced DialogSelect 2.0, a WWW based, guided search service with access to over 300 of the most popular DIALOG databases
-
Joint, N.: ¬The Web 2.0 challenge to libraries (2009)
0.09
0.09161241 = product of:
0.18322483 = sum of:
0.18322483 = product of:
0.36644965 = sum of:
0.36644965 = weight(_text_:2.0 in 2959) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.36644965 = score(doc=2959,freq=22.0), product of:
0.3448537 = queryWeight, product of:
5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
0.059460267 = queryNorm
1.0626235 = fieldWeight in 2959, product of:
4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
22.0 = termFreq=22.0
5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2959)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to illustrate issues surrounding Web 2.0 technologies and their relevance to libraries by general discussion and examples from library practice. Design/methodology/approach - A broad narrative account of Web 2.0 developments combined with illustrations of how one library in particular reacted to these developments. Findings - It was found that all libraries need to evolve a Web 2.0 strategy to promote this aspect of their services, but that they will need to devise solutions to specific problems as part of this strategy. These include the range of Web 2.0 platforms that are on offer and the authentication and workload issues associated with this diversity. A single, unified library system-based approach to Web 2.0 is offered as a viable alternative to using disparate external services. Research limitations/implications - This paper does not resolve the difference between a multi-platform Web 2.0 strategy and the single, unified library system-based approach, although a preference for the systems-based approach is suggested. The relative strengths and weaknesses of these two approaches is worthy of further research. Practical implications - At the level of practice, this viewpoint article offers two alternative Web 2.0 strategies which can be applied quite readily in everyday library work. Originality/value - This paper tries to offer a clear range of options for librarians interested in pursuing Web 2.0 services, facilitating successful service enhancement in the working library.
- Footnote
- Beitrag in einem Special Issue: Web 2.0 and gaming in libraries
- Object
- Web 2.0
