Search (2712 results, page 1 of 136)

0.48878115 = product of:
  0.9775623 = sum of:
    0.87925583 = weight(_text_:22nd in 4594) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.87925583 = score(doc=4594,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.6389857 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.806516 = idf(docFreq=17, maxDocs=44218)
          0.072558284 = queryNorm
        1.376018 = fieldWeight in 4594, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          8.806516 = idf(docFreq=17, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4594)
    0.098306455 = weight(_text_:22 in 4594) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.098306455 = score(doc=4594,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.25408673 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.072558284 = queryNorm
        0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4594, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4594)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

This work has been fully updated for the 22nd edition of DDC, and is used as reference for the application of Dewey coding or as a course text in the Dewey System

Object

DDC-22

0.21760471 = product of:
  0.87041885 = sum of:
    0.87041885 = weight(_text_:22nd in 5738) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.87041885 = score(doc=5738,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.6389857 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.806516 = idf(docFreq=17, maxDocs=44218)
          0.072558284 = queryNorm
        1.3621883 = fieldWeight in 5738, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.806516 = idf(docFreq=17, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5738)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Source

The Bowker annual of library and book trade information. 22nd ed

0.21601026 = product of:
  0.43202052 = sum of:
    0.37303665 = weight(_text_:22nd in 4652) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.37303665 = score(doc=4652,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.6389857 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.806516 = idf(docFreq=17, maxDocs=44218)
          0.072558284 = queryNorm
        0.583795 = fieldWeight in 4652, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.806516 = idf(docFreq=17, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4652)
    0.05898387 = weight(_text_:22 in 4652) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05898387 = score(doc=4652,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.25408673 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.072558284 = queryNorm
        0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4652, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4652)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Date

21.12.2018 18:22:12

Footnote

Introduction und Rez. in: Knowledge Organization 45(2018) no.8, S.712-714. u.d.T. "Satija, M. P. 2018: "The 22nd edition (2018) of the Sears List of Subject Headings: A brief introduction." (DOI:10.5771/0943-7444-2018-8-712).

0.20235461 = product of:
  0.40470922 = sum of:
    0.34572536 = weight(_text_:3a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.34572536 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.6151499 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.072558284 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
    0.05898387 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05898387 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.25408673 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.072558284 = queryNorm
        0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Content

Vgl.: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CEAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.91.4940%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&ei=dOXrUMeIDYHDtQahsIGACg&usg=AFQjCNHFWVh6gNPvnOrOS9R3rkrXCNVD-A&sig2=5I2F5evRfMnsttSgFF9g7Q&bvm=bv.1357316858,d.Yms.

Date

8. 1.2013 10:22:32

0.20066968 = product of:
  0.40133935 = sum of:
    0.11323487 = weight(_text_:objects in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.11323487 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.38565242 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.072558284 = queryNorm
        0.29361898 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
    0.28810447 = weight(_text_:3a in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.28810447 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.6151499 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.072558284 = queryNorm
        0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

A summary of brain theory is given so far as it is contained within the framework of Localization Theory. Difficulties of this "conventional theory" are traced back to a specific deficiency: there is no way to express relations between active cells (as for instance their representing parts of the same object). A new theory is proposed to cure this deficiency. It introduces a new kind of dynamical control, termed synaptic modulation, according to which synapses switch between a conducting and a non- conducting state. The dynamics of this variable is controlled on a fast time scale by correlations in the temporal fine structure of cellular signals. Furthermore, conventional synaptic plasticity is replaced by a refined version. Synaptic modulation and plasticity form the basis for short-term and long-term memory, respectively. Signal correlations, shaped by the variable network, express structure and relationships within objects. In particular, the figure-ground problem may be solved in this way. Synaptic modulation introduces exibility into cerebral networks which is necessary to solve the invariance problem. Since momentarily useless connections are deactivated, interference between di erent memory traces can be reduced, and memory capacity increased, in comparison with conventional associative memory

Source

http%3A%2F%2Fcogprints.org%2F1380%2F1%2FvdM_correlation.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0g7DvZbQPb2U7dYb49b9v_

0.19293606 = product of:
  0.38587213 = sum of:
    0.3170576 = weight(_text_:objects in 5455) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.3170576 = score(doc=5455,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.38565242 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.072558284 = queryNorm
        0.82213306 = fieldWeight in 5455, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5455)
    0.068814516 = weight(_text_:22 in 5455) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.068814516 = score(doc=5455,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.25408673 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.072558284 = queryNorm
        0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5455, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5455)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

Although classification has been an important aspect of astronomy since stellar spectroscopy in the late nineteenth century, to date no comprehensive classification system has existed for all classes of objects in the universe. Here we present such a system, and lay out its foundational definitions and principles. The system consists of the "Three Kingdoms" of planets, stars and galaxies, eighteen families, and eighty-two classes of objects. Gravitation is the defining organizing principle for the families and classes, and the physical nature of the objects is the defining characteristic of the classes. The system should prove useful for both scientific and pedagogical purposes.

Date

21.11.2019 18:46:22

0.18651833 = product of:
  0.7460733 = sum of:
    0.7460733 = weight(_text_:22nd in 7764) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.7460733 = score(doc=7764,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.6389857 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.806516 = idf(docFreq=17, maxDocs=44218)
          0.072558284 = queryNorm
        1.16759 = fieldWeight in 7764, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.806516 = idf(docFreq=17, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7764)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Source

Indexing tradition and innovation: proceedings of the 22nd Annual Conference of the American Society of Indexers

0.18651833 = product of:
  0.7460733 = sum of:
    0.7460733 = weight(_text_:22nd in 7767) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.7460733 = score(doc=7767,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.6389857 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.806516 = idf(docFreq=17, maxDocs=44218)
          0.072558284 = queryNorm
        1.16759 = fieldWeight in 7767, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.806516 = idf(docFreq=17, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7767)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Source

Indexing tradition and innovation: proceedings of the 22nd Annual Conference of the American Society of Indexers

0.17636444 = product of:
  0.35272887 = sum of:
    0.2486911 = weight(_text_:22nd in 1842) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.2486911 = score(doc=1842,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.6389857 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.806516 = idf(docFreq=17, maxDocs=44218)
          0.072558284 = queryNorm
        0.38919666 = fieldWeight in 1842, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.806516 = idf(docFreq=17, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1842)
    0.10403777 = weight(_text_:22 in 1842) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.10403777 = score(doc=1842,freq=14.0), product of:
        0.25408673 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.072558284 = queryNorm
        0.4094577 = fieldWeight in 1842, product of:
          3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
            14.0 = termFreq=14.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1842)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

A system of library classification that flashed across the inquiring mind of young Melvil Louis Kossuth Dewey (known as Melvil Dewey) in 1873 is still the most popular classification scheme.. The modern library classification begins with Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC). Melvil Dewey devised DDC in 1876. DDC has is credit of 128 years of boudless success. The DDC is being taught as a practical subject throughout the world and it is being used in majority of libraries in about 150 countries. This is the result of continuous revision that 22nd Edition of DDC has been published in July 2003. No other classification scheme has published so many editions. Some welcome changes have been made in DDC 22. To reduce the Christian bias in 200 religion, the numbers 201 to 209 have been devoted to specific aspects of religion. In the previous editions these numbers were devoted to Christianity. to enhance the classifier's efficiency, Table 7 has been removed from DDC 22 and the provision of adding group of persons is made by direct use of notation already available in schedules and in notation -08 from Table 1 Standard Subdivision. The present book is an attempt to explain, with suitable examples, the salient provisions of DDC 22. The book is written in simple language so that the students may not face any difficulty in understanding what is being explained. The examples in the book are explained in a step-by-step procedure. It is hoped that this book will prove of great help and use to the library professionals in general and library and information science students in particular.

Content

1. Introduction to DDC 22 2. Major changes in DDC 22 3. Introduction to the schedules 4. Use of Table 1 : Standard Subdivisions 5. Use of Table 2 : Areas 6. Use of Table 3 : Subdivisions for the arts, for individual literatures, for specific literary forms 7. Use to Table 4 : Subdivisions of individual languages and language families 8. Use of Table 5 : Ethic and National groups 9. Use of Table 6 : Languages 10. Treatment of Groups of Persons

Object

DDC-22

0.16743322 = product of:
  0.33486643 = sum of:
    0.25622126 = weight(_text_:objects in 767) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.25622126 = score(doc=767,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.38565242 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.072558284 = queryNorm
        0.6643839 = fieldWeight in 767, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=767)
    0.07864516 = weight(_text_:22 in 767) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07864516 = score(doc=767,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.25408673 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.072558284 = queryNorm
        0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 767, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=767)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

RLG has used METS for a particular application, that is as a wrapper for structural metadata. When RLG cultural materials was launched, there was no single way to deal with "complex digital objects". METS provides a standard means of encoding metadata regarding the digital objects represented in RCM, and METS has now been fully integrated into the workflow for this service.

Source

Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.65-68

0.16743322 = product of:
  0.33486643 = sum of:
    0.25622126 = weight(_text_:objects in 2341) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.25622126 = score(doc=2341,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.38565242 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.072558284 = queryNorm
        0.6643839 = fieldWeight in 2341, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2341)
    0.07864516 = weight(_text_:22 in 2341) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07864516 = score(doc=2341,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.25408673 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.072558284 = queryNorm
        0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2341, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2341)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

IODyone is an Internet client program that allows one to retriev information from servers by dynamically combining information objects. Information objects are abstract representations of bibliographic data, typically titles (or title keywords), author names, subject and classification identifiers, and full-text search terms

Date

22. 9.1997 19:16:05

0.1623881 = product of:
  0.3247762 = sum of:
    0.22646974 = weight(_text_:objects in 3277) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.22646974 = score(doc=3277,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.38565242 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.072558284 = queryNorm
        0.58723795 = fieldWeight in 3277, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3277)
    0.098306455 = weight(_text_:22 in 3277) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.098306455 = score(doc=3277,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.25408673 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.072558284 = queryNorm
        0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3277, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3277)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Source

Metadata and semantics research: 10th International Conference, MTSR 2016, Göttingen, Germany, November 22-25, 2016, Proceedings. Eds.: E. Garoufallou

0.15589198 = product of:
  0.31178397 = sum of:
    0.26921603 = weight(_text_:22nd in 129) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.26921603 = score(doc=129,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.6389857 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.806516 = idf(docFreq=17, maxDocs=44218)
          0.072558284 = queryNorm
        0.4213178 = fieldWeight in 129, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          8.806516 = idf(docFreq=17, maxDocs=44218)
          0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=129)
    0.042567946 = weight(_text_:22 in 129) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.042567946 = score(doc=129,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.25408673 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.072558284 = queryNorm
        0.16753313 = fieldWeight in 129, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=129)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Footnote

Rez. in: Knowledge organization 31(2004) no.2, S.112-114 (M.P. Satija) : "With nearly 130 years of eventful and checkered history, the Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC) is the oldest living yet thriving modern library classification. Having undergone 21 revisions, it is the most applied library classification structure all over the world. Apart from its use in libraries in more than 135 countries across six continents, many national and trade bibliographies use it for content organization. Furthermore, it is now making successful forays into the world of electronic documents and networked information. The print version of the 22nd edition was released in September 2003, two months later than the scheduled time of July 2003, and two months after the release of the electronic version, WebDewey. The period between print editions now seems settled to seven years as a matter of policy. As WebDewey, an the other hand, is updated an a quarterly basis, what really constitutes a new edition is problematic; edition is rolling, always in a flux without much fixity. The last half century, and more specifically the tenure of Benjamin A. Custer as editor (1956-1980; Editions 16-19), has been an era of structural changes in the DDC, backed by professional management and organizational planning. Custer was instrumental in not only resuscitating the system, but also in putting DDC back an the path of progress. His able successor, Dr. John P. Comaromi, edited the 20`h edition (1989) and ushered in a period of simplification and consolidation. Following the acquisition of Forest Press by OCLC in 1988, much more research has gone into making new editions of the DDC. The OCLC Office of Research has involved itself in classification research, especially in the harmonization of various knowledge classification systems and mapping of DDC numbers to subject headings, above all to make DDC capable of organizing electronic information of every sort. The acquisition of DDC by OCLC has also inaugurated an era of new products and services, along with organized marketing. DDC21 (1996) was a product of high IT, and the 22nd edition can safely be termed a child of network technology. It is indeed the first edition produced in the web environment. To stay abreast of current developments an knowledge practices, the editors relied an the Internet and electronic databases for new topics and terms. Editors and policy makes got constant feedback and suggestions via the Internet to add new features and to achieve accuracy and efficiency. In addition to the feedback and expert advice, this edition, as usual, is based an actual classification of three quarters of a million current books in the Decimal Classification Division of the Library of Congress since 1996.
Changes DDC22 is the second edition prepared by Joan S. Mitchell who took over as editor in 1993. It carries forward the policies and improvements started in DDC21, especially the onslaught an the Christian and western cultural blas in the schedules and tables. The plan for reducing Christian blas in 200 Religion, initiated in DDC21, has now been completed, with some additional provisions in 296 and 297. An outstanding change has been the abrogation of Table 7 Persons. The functions of Table 7 are now filled by using T1-08 and whatever notation is appropriate from 011-999. There are at least six places in the tables and 12 places in the schedules where the use of T7 was prescribed; what good the abolition of T7 has produced is not clear. In fact, it does make number building in some cases a bit circuitous, especially while using Table 3C. It has also resulted in the reuse of many DDC 21 numbers with new meanings. However, some numbers remain the same e.g., Social customs of artists 390.47 (both in DDC21 and DDC22). A few numbers have also become shorter in length. In compliance with the recommendations of D'Elia's survey, all works relating to directories of travel facilities such as hotels, lodges, Motels, inns, have been shifted to 910.46 and to 913/919 whereas 647.94 continues to be in place for general information about hotels. A common practice in previous editions, that is full class or extensive revisions (phoenix schedules), appear to have been discontinued in the preparation of DDC22. But minor changes are numerous. There are more than one thousand relocations and discontiuations of class numbers. Some 40 numbers have been reused. ... However, all these changes are not those projected as slated changes for DDC22 in the DDC21 (1996), namely in 520 Astronomy, 355-359 Military science, 636-639 Animal husbandry and 690 Buildings. Obviously the switch over to the DDC 22 will put less strain an libraries. There has been considerable improvement in the manual, now shifted to volume 1 of the print edition (pp. 1-182). Notes in the manual have been shortened by removing redundant information and by dividing them into smaller sections. Some information from the manual has been transferred to the schedules and tables, in the form of notes. The manual is now clearer and easier to read. Flow Charts, built-in numbers, and see also references should help classifiers achieve greater consistency. The relative index has been beefed up. With its 928 pages, it is 333 pages longer than the previous one, including new built-in numbers and many additional terms. The entry vocabulary is wide-based and current. DDC 22, the first edition of this millennium, has kept pace with the fast changing information environment to map and organize it squarely. To quote our friends at OCLC: knowledge is a big world, and they have organized it."

Issue

22nd ed.

Object

DDC-22

0.15117706 = product of:
  0.30235413 = sum of:
    0.2532009 = weight(_text_:objects in 2754) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.2532009 = score(doc=2754,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.38565242 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.072558284 = queryNorm
        0.656552 = fieldWeight in 2754, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2754)
    0.049153227 = weight(_text_:22 in 2754) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.049153227 = score(doc=2754,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.25408673 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.072558284 = queryNorm
        0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2754, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2754)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

This article presents an exploratory study of Blobgects, an experimental interface for an online museum catalog that enables social tagging and blogging activity around a set of cultural heritage objects held by a preeminent museum of anthropology and archaeology. This study attempts to understand not just whether social tagging and commenting about these objects is useful but rather whose tags and voices matter in presenting different expert perspectives around digital museum objects. Based on an empirical comparison between two different user groups (Canadian Inuit high-school students and museum studies students in the United States), we found that merely adding the ability to tag and comment to the museum's catalog does not sufficiently allow users to learn about or engage with the objects represented by catalog entries. Rather, the specialist language of the catalog provides too little contextualization for users to enter into the sort of dialog that proponents of Web 2.0 technologies promise. Overall, we propose a more nuanced application of Web 2.0 technologies within museums - one which provides a contextual basis that gives users a starting point for engagement and permits users to make sense of objects in relation to their own needs, uses, and understandings.

Date

22. 3.2009 18:52:32

0.14716907 = product of:
  0.29433814 = sum of:
    0.23535427 = weight(_text_:objects in 3968) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.23535427 = score(doc=3968,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.38565242 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.072558284 = queryNorm
        0.6102756 = fieldWeight in 3968, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3968)
    0.05898387 = weight(_text_:22 in 3968) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05898387 = score(doc=3968,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.25408673 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.072558284 = queryNorm
        0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3968, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3968)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

We present a declarative language for the construction of hypertext views on databases. The language is based on an object-oriented data model and a simple hypertext model with reference and inclusion links. A hypertext view specification consists in a collection of parameterized node schemes which specify how to construct node and links instances from the database contents. We show how this language can express different issues in hypertext view design. These include: the direct mapping of objects to nodes; the construction of complex nodes based on sets of objects; the representation of polymorphic sets of objects; and the representation of tree and graph structures. We have defined sublanguages corresponding to particular database models (relational, semantic, object-oriented) and implemented tools to generate Web views for these database models

Date

21.10.2000 15:01:22

0.14650406 = product of:
  0.29300812 = sum of:
    0.2241936 = weight(_text_:objects in 735) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.2241936 = score(doc=735,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.38565242 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.072558284 = queryNorm
        0.5813359 = fieldWeight in 735, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=735)
    0.068814516 = weight(_text_:22 in 735) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.068814516 = score(doc=735,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.25408673 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.072558284 = queryNorm
        0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 735, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=735)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

Part 1 of a series of articles, exploring the concept of 'the work' in cataloguing practice, which attempts to construct a definition of the term based on AACR theory and practice. The study begins with a consideration of the objects of the catalogue, their history and the evidence that bears on the question of the degree to which the user needs access to the work, as opposed to a particular edition of the work

Footnote

Vgl. auch: Pt.2: Cataloging and classification quarterly. 19(1994) no.2, S.5-22; Pt.3: Cataloging and classification quarterly. 20(1995) no.1, S.25-46; Pt.4: Cataloging and classification quarterly. 20(1995) no.2, S.3-24

0.14650406 = product of:
  0.29300812 = sum of:
    0.2241936 = weight(_text_:objects in 4198) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.2241936 = score(doc=4198,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.38565242 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.072558284 = queryNorm
        0.5813359 = fieldWeight in 4198, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4198)
    0.068814516 = weight(_text_:22 in 4198) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.068814516 = score(doc=4198,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.25408673 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.072558284 = queryNorm
        0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4198, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4198)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

Large, data-rich organizations have tremendously large collections of digital objects to be "repurposed," to respond quickly and economically to publishing, marketing, and information needs. Some management typically assume that a content management system, or some other technique such as OWL and RDF, will automatically address the workflow and technical issues associated with this reuse. Four case studies show that the sources of some roadblocks to agile repurposing are as much managerial and organizational as they are technical in nature. The review concludes with suggestions on how digital object repurposing can be integrated given these organizations' structures.

Date

22. 1.2011 14:23:07

0.14405224 = product of:
  0.57620895 = sum of:
    0.57620895 = weight(_text_:3a in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.57620895 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.6151499 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.072558284 = queryNorm
        0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Source

http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=5&ved=0CDQQFjAE&url=http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F3131107&ei=HzFWVYvGMsiNsgGTyoFI&usg=AFQjCNE2FHUeR9oQTQlNC4TPedv4Mo3DaQ&sig2=Rlzpr7a3BLZZkqZCXXN_IA&bvm=bv.93564037,d.bGg&cad=rja

0.13779087 = product of:
  0.27558175 = sum of:
    0.19216594 = weight(_text_:objects in 763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.19216594 = score(doc=763,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.38565242 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.072558284 = queryNorm
        0.49828792 = fieldWeight in 763, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=763)
    0.0834158 = weight(_text_:22 in 763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0834158 = score(doc=763,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.25408673 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.072558284 = queryNorm
        0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 763, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=763)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

Describes an approach to the problem of object recognition structured around a sequence of increasingly specialised grouping activities that assemble coherent regions of images that can be sown to satisfy increasingly stringent conditions. The recognition system is designed to cope with: colour and texture; the ability to deal with general objects in uncontrolled configurations and contexts; and a satisfactory notion of classification. These properties are illustrated using 3 case studies, demonstrating: the use of descriptions that fuse colour and spatial properties; the use of fusion of texture and geometric properties to describes trees; and the use of a recognition system to determine accurately whether an image contains people and animals

Date

22. 9.1997 19:16:05
3. 1.1999 12:21:22

0.12991047 = product of:
  0.25982094 = sum of:
    0.18117578 = weight(_text_:objects in 2686) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.18117578 = score(doc=2686,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.38565242 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.072558284 = queryNorm
        0.46979034 = fieldWeight in 2686, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2686)
    0.07864516 = weight(_text_:22 in 2686) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07864516 = score(doc=2686,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.25408673 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.072558284 = queryNorm
        0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2686, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2686)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

Metadata (structured information about an object or collection of objects) is increasingly important to libraries, archives, and museums. And although librarians are familiar with a number of issues that apply to creating and using metadata (e.g., authority control, controlled vocabularies, etc.), the world of metadata is nonetheless different than library cataloging, with its own set of challenges. Therefore, whether you are new to these concepts or quite experienced with classic cataloging, this short (20 pages) introductory paper on metadata can be helpful

Date

10. 9.2004 10:22:40