Search (3 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × language_ss:"i"
  • × theme_ss:"Formalerschließung"
  1. Nistico, R.: Studio e indicizzazione delle dediche librarie (1998) 0.03
    0.032826416 = sum of:
      0.011850095 = product of:
        0.07110057 = sum of:
          0.07110057 = weight(_text_:authors in 2823) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.07110057 = score(doc=2823,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.20165925 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.044235025 = queryNorm
              0.35257778 = fieldWeight in 2823, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2823)
        0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
      0.020976322 = product of:
        0.041952644 = sum of:
          0.041952644 = weight(_text_:22 in 2823) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.041952644 = score(doc=2823,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15490352 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.044235025 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2823, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2823)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Book dedications by authors, often in verse form and appearing just before the title page, are one of the 6 elements describes by the French scholar Genette as paratextual. For some reasons dedications have failed to interest librarians, yet books containing them can be a valid object of bibliographic study, for the reasons that they carry special markings: are an example of a specific literary or semantic class; and reveal linguistic/stylistic features. Examines the history of literary dedications, citing examples by well-known writers, and suggests that cataloguing software should have a special field to record dedication
    Date
    22. 2.1999 20:41:06
  2. Visintin, G.: Passaggi (1998) 0.01
    0.01198647 = product of:
      0.02397294 = sum of:
        0.02397294 = product of:
          0.04794588 = sum of:
            0.04794588 = weight(_text_:22 in 3053) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04794588 = score(doc=3053,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15490352 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044235025 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3053, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3053)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 2.1999 20:40:57
  3. Dumontet, C.: Cataloghi a strisce (1995) 0.01
    0.011630267 = product of:
      0.023260534 = sum of:
        0.023260534 = product of:
          0.046521068 = sum of:
            0.046521068 = weight(_text_:c in 4425) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.046521068 = score(doc=4425,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15258452 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044235025 = queryNorm
                0.3048872 = fieldWeight in 4425, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4425)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)