Santoro, M.: Ripensare la CDU (1995)
0.01
0.011666008 = product of:
0.08166205 = sum of:
0.040831026 = weight(_text_:classification in 4940) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040831026 = score(doc=4940,freq=6.0), product of:
0.09570996 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03005299 = queryNorm
0.42661208 = fieldWeight in 4940, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4940)
0.040831026 = weight(_text_:classification in 4940) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040831026 = score(doc=4940,freq=6.0), product of:
0.09570996 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.03005299 = queryNorm
0.42661208 = fieldWeight in 4940, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4940)
0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
- Abstract
- A detailed examination of the UDC's history, function and future prospects. Among topics discussed are: the early pioneering work of P. Otlet and H. LaFontaine; the development of Colon Classification; the 'UDC versus switching language' debate in the 1970s; the FID standard reference code project; and the recent scheme by Williamson and McIlwaine to restructure UDC completely, converting it into a Colon Classification and also creating a thesaurus drawn from the same classification. Comments that UDC, far from being a 'prehistoric monster', is becoming a sort of test laboratory for developing new and interesting documentation structures