Santoro, M.: Ripensare la CDU (1995)
0.01
0.0065799593 = product of:
0.039479755 = sum of:
0.007347313 = product of:
0.02204194 = sum of:
0.02204194 = weight(_text_:p in 4940) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02204194 = score(doc=4940,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07926582 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.022045763 = queryNorm
0.27807623 = fieldWeight in 4940, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4940)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.0130758695 = weight(_text_:des in 4940) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0130758695 = score(doc=4940,freq=2.0), product of:
0.0610515 = queryWeight, product of:
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.022045763 = queryNorm
0.2141777 = fieldWeight in 4940, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.7693076 = idf(docFreq=7536, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4940)
0.008507538 = weight(_text_:der in 4940) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008507538 = score(doc=4940,freq=2.0), product of:
0.049245093 = queryWeight, product of:
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.022045763 = queryNorm
0.17275909 = fieldWeight in 4940, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4940)
0.010549033 = product of:
0.021098066 = sum of:
0.021098066 = weight(_text_:29 in 4940) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021098066 = score(doc=4940,freq=2.0), product of:
0.0775501 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.022045763 = queryNorm
0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 4940, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4940)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.16666667 = coord(4/24)
- Abstract
- A detailed examination of the UDC's history, function and future prospects. Among topics discussed are: the early pioneering work of P. Otlet and H. LaFontaine; the development of Colon Classification; the 'UDC versus switching language' debate in the 1970s; the FID standard reference code project; and the recent scheme by Williamson and McIlwaine to restructure UDC completely, converting it into a Colon Classification and also creating a thesaurus drawn from the same classification. Comments that UDC, far from being a 'prehistoric monster', is becoming a sort of test laboratory for developing new and interesting documentation structures
- Date
- 29. 1.1996 17:18:10
- Footnote
- Übers. des Titels: Rethinking UDC
- Theme
- Geschichte der Klassifikationssysteme