Bergen, C. van; Mastenbroek, O.: Wat wil de gebruiker? : onderwerpsontsluiting bij de Universiteitsbibliotheek Utrecht (1995)
0.05
0.0479017 = product of:
0.07185255 = sum of:
0.012155253 = weight(_text_:a in 1605) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012155253 = score(doc=1605,freq=8.0), product of:
0.05963374 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.051718395 = queryNorm
0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 1605, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1605)
0.059697293 = product of:
0.119394585 = sum of:
0.119394585 = weight(_text_:de in 1605) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.119394585 = score(doc=1605,freq=4.0), product of:
0.22225924 = queryWeight, product of:
4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
0.051718395 = queryNorm
0.53718615 = fieldWeight in 1605, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.297489 = idf(docFreq=1634, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1605)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- A survey of catalogue use in 1993 at Utrecht University in the Netherlands showed considerable dissatisfaction with the online catalogue's subject search facilities. Of those who used subject searching 64% preferred subject headings against only 2% who chose classification schedules. Library users make little use of the existing facilities for assistance and leaflets which are available in the library. It has, therefore, been decided to provide a programme of instruction in library use and to move towards a unified system of subject access to the library's catalogue
- Type
- a
Stokmans, M.; Oomens, A.: Meer grasduinen door genreplaatsing? : genre- of alfabetische plaatsing: onderzoek naar verschillen in gebruikersgedrag (1997)
0.03
0.025729902 = product of:
0.038594853 = sum of:
0.014069905 = weight(_text_:a in 883) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014069905 = score(doc=883,freq=14.0), product of:
0.05963374 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.051718395 = queryNorm
0.23593865 = fieldWeight in 883, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=883)
0.02452495 = product of:
0.0490499 = sum of:
0.0490499 = weight(_text_:22 in 883) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0490499 = score(doc=883,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18110901 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051718395 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 883, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=883)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- As part of her doctoral dissertation at Brabant Catholic University in the Netherlands A. Oomens recently held a survey to determine the relative merits of author and subject arrangements for non fiction collections. Although users browsing through the collections were more likely to find material of interest via a subject arrangement, those looking for a particular title were best served by an author arrangement. All users interviewed preferred the arrangement with which they were familiar
- Footnote
- Übers. d. Titels: Subject arrangement assists browsing?: subject versus alphabetical arrangement: a study in differences in user behavious
- Source
- BibliotheekBlad. 1(1997) no.21, S.22-23
- Type
- a