Search (1 results, page 1 of 1)
- Did you mean:
- rvk_ss%3a%2000 80852 allgemeines %2f buch- und bibliothekswesen%2c informationswissenschaft %2f bibliothekswesen %2f bibliothekswesen in einzelnen L%c3%aendern und einzelne bibliotheken %2f einzelnen deutsche bibliotheken %2f bibliotheken S %2f stuttgart %2f university%c3%A4tsbibliothek hohenheim%22 1
- rvk_ss%3a%2200 80852 allgemeinen %2f buch- und bibliothekswesen%2c informationswissenschaft %2f bibliothekswesen %2f bibliothekswesen in einzelnen L%c3%aendern und einzelne bibliotheken %2f einzelnen deutsche bibliotheken %2f bibliotheken S %2f stuttgart %2f university%c3%A4tsbibliothek hohenheim%22 1
- rvk_ss%3a%2200 80852 allgemeines %2f buch- und bibliothekswesen%2c informationswissenschaft %2f bibliothekswesen %2f bibliothekswesen in einzelnen L%c3%aendern und einzelne bibliotheken %2f einzelnen deutsche bibliotheken %2f bibliotheken S %2f stutttgart %2f university%c3%A4tsbibliothek hohenheim%22 1
- rvk_ss%3a%2200 80852 allgemeines %2f buch- und bibliothekswesen%2c informationswissenschaft %2f bibliothekswesen %2f bibliothekswesen in einzelnen L%c3%aendern und einzelnen bibliotheken %2f einzelnen deutsche bibliotheken %2f bibliotheken S %2f stuttgart %2f university%c3%A4tsbibliothek hohenheim%22 1
- rvk_ss%3a%2200 8852 allgemeines %2f buch- und bibliothekswesen%2c informationswissenschaft %2f bibliothekswesen %2f bibliothekswesen in einzelnen L%c3%aendern und einzelne bibliotheken %2f einzelnen deutsche bibliotheken %2f bibliotheken S %2f stuttgart %2f university%c3%A4tsbibliothek hohenheim%22 1
-
Petek, M.: Vrednotenje knjiznicnih katalogov s stalisca uporabnikov (1998)
0.00
4.7051604E-4 = product of: 0.0070577404 = sum of: 0.0037077887 = weight(_text_:in in 6396) [ClassicSimilarity], result of: 0.0037077887 = score(doc=6396,freq=2.0), product of: 0.030838965 = queryWeight, product of: 1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218) 0.022671467 = queryNorm 0.120230645 = fieldWeight in 6396, product of: 1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of: 2.0 = termFreq=2.0 1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218) 0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6396) 0.003349952 = weight(_text_:s in 6396) [ClassicSimilarity], result of: 0.003349952 = score(doc=6396,freq=4.0), product of: 0.024649272 = queryWeight, product of: 1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218) 0.022671467 = queryNorm 0.1359047 = fieldWeight in 6396, product of: 2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of: 4.0 = termFreq=4.0 1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218) 0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6396) 0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
- Abstract
- Library catalogues have existed for centuries, but only in recent times have attempts been made to evaluate their effectiveness as finding tools. Librarians want to know how well the catalogue performs, how it is used and with what success, and its major problems and limitations. Discusses evaluation of library catalogues from the users' point of view and describes the functions of the catalogue, methods for evaluation and their characteristics
- Source
- Knjiznica. 42(1998) no.4, S.127-147