Search (2 results, page 1 of 1)
- Did you mean:
- bloss%3a%2281.68 computereinsatz in unterricht und ausbildung%22 2
- bross%3a%2181.68 computereinsatz in unterricht und ausbildung%22 2
- bross%3a%2281.68 computereinsatz in unterrichts und ausbildung%22 2
- bross%3a%2281.68 computereinsatzes in unterricht und ausbildung%22 2
- bross%3a%2281.68 computereinsatz in unterrichte und ausbildung%22 2
-
Gil-Leiva, I.; Munoz, J.V.R.: Analisis de los descriptores de diferentes areas del conocimiento indizades en bases de datos del CSIC : Aplicacion a la indizacion automatica (1997)
0.00
0.0018603605 = product of: 0.011162163 = sum of: 0.011162163 = weight(_text_:in in 2637) [ClassicSimilarity], result of: 0.011162163 = score(doc=2637,freq=8.0), product of: 0.061893053 = queryWeight, product of: 1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218) 0.045501083 = queryNorm 0.18034597 = fieldWeight in 2637, product of: 2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of: 8.0 = termFreq=8.0 1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218) 0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2637) 0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Abstract
- Studies the value of scientific articles' titles and abstracts as sources of terms for document indexing in relation to 6 areas of knowledge: library and information science, medicine, chemistry, biology, psychology and physics, indexed in the databases ISOC, IME and ICYT of the CSIC. Also examines the syntagmatic structures of the indexing terms found in the field 'descriptors'. as well as the relationship between length of document and number of descriptors. Concludes that if the abstracts are not well made and the titles are not precise, they are not definitive sources for the extractions of concepts; the most common syntactic structure is the noun phrase, followed by noun+adjective and noun+noun; and no significant relationship was found between length of document and number of descriptors assigned to it
- Footnote
- Übers. d. Titels: Descriptors analysis on different knowledge ares in CSIC databases: application on automatic indexing
-
Leyva, I.G.; Munoz, J.V.R.: Tendencias en los sistemas de indizacion automatica : estudio evolutivo (1996)
0.00
0.0017539648 = product of: 0.010523789 = sum of: 0.010523789 = weight(_text_:in in 1462) [ClassicSimilarity], result of: 0.010523789 = score(doc=1462,freq=4.0), product of: 0.061893053 = queryWeight, product of: 1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218) 0.045501083 = queryNorm 0.17003182 = fieldWeight in 1462, product of: 2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of: 4.0 = termFreq=4.0 1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218) 0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1462) 0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Abstract
- Early research at the end of the 1950s on computerized indexing used statistical methods based on e.g. frequency, probability, clustering, and relevance. In the 1960s interest began to focus on linguistic analysis and natural language processing e.g. morphological, morphosyntactical, syntactical and semantic analysis. Since the 1980s computerized indexing research has widened to include images, graphics and sound. Examples are given of notable systems developed within each line of approach
- Footnote
- Übers. d. Titels: Tendencies in computerized indexing systems: an evolutionary study