Search (18 results, page 1 of 1)

0.02615818 = product of:
  0.05231636 = sum of:
    0.05231636 = product of:
      0.10463272 = sum of:
        0.10463272 = weight(_text_:22 in 5743) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10463272 = score(doc=5743,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15935703 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04550679 = queryNorm
            0.6565931 = fieldWeight in 5743, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5743)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

30. 3.2002 19:45:22

Source

Revista Española de Documentaçion Cientifica. 22(1999) no.2, S.198-219

0.02227982 = product of:
  0.04455964 = sum of:
    0.04455964 = product of:
      0.08911928 = sum of:
        0.08911928 = weight(_text_:subject in 1104) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08911928 = score(doc=1104,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.16275941 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04550679 = queryNorm
            0.5475522 = fieldWeight in 1104, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1104)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Gives guidelines for the establishment of subject acces points to statistics and company reports using subject headings in the Catalan Universal Decimal Classification. The practice followed in the Library of Social Sciences is also used throughout the other libraries at the Autonomous University of Barcelona

Footnote

Übers. d. Titles: Subject access to statistical data sources: the UAB catalogue

0.018496625 = product of:
  0.03699325 = sum of:
    0.03699325 = product of:
      0.0739865 = sum of:
        0.0739865 = weight(_text_:22 in 3894) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0739865 = score(doc=3894,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15935703 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04550679 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3894, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3894)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

Revista interamericana de bibliotecologia. 22(1999) no.1, S.21-35

0.01591747 = product of:
  0.03183494 = sum of:
    0.03183494 = product of:
      0.06366988 = sum of:
        0.06366988 = weight(_text_:subject in 4652) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06366988 = score(doc=4652,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.16275941 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04550679 = queryNorm
            0.3911902 = fieldWeight in 4652, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4652)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Describes an approach to indexing which seeks to eliminate the shortcoming of the representation of information in existing bibliographic catalogues: Subject Access Project (SAP) indexing which has been used successfully at Lund University and elsewhere. Existing catalogue records have been enriched with terms selected from lists of contents and indexes in books thus facilitating access to specific parts of documents and smaller semantic entites such as chapter titles, subject titles and data in graphic or tabulated form available in a wide range of publications

0.015413855 = product of:
  0.03082771 = sum of:
    0.03082771 = product of:
      0.06165542 = sum of:
        0.06165542 = weight(_text_:22 in 2241) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06165542 = score(doc=2241,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15935703 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04550679 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2241, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2241)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

Boletin de la Asociacion Andaluza de Bibliotecarios. 14(1999) no.57, S.11-22

0.015413855 = product of:
  0.03082771 = sum of:
    0.03082771 = product of:
      0.06165542 = sum of:
        0.06165542 = weight(_text_:22 in 348) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06165542 = score(doc=348,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15935703 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04550679 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 348, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=348)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

Revista Española de Documentaçion Cientifica. 22(1999) no.1, S.34-49

0.012863259 = product of:
  0.025726518 = sum of:
    0.025726518 = product of:
      0.051453035 = sum of:
        0.051453035 = weight(_text_:subject in 5554) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.051453035 = score(doc=5554,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16275941 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04550679 = queryNorm
            0.31612942 = fieldWeight in 5554, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5554)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Examines the meaning of combinatory; coordinated; pre- and postcoordination. Finds that different international standards are not consistent and the lack of precision and confused terminology produces serious conceptual errors such as subject heading lists into 'combinatory' indexing langugaes, or excluding them from the imprecise dimension 'classificatory-combinatory languages'

0.012863259 = product of:
  0.025726518 = sum of:
    0.025726518 = product of:
      0.051453035 = sum of:
        0.051453035 = weight(_text_:subject in 6679) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.051453035 = score(doc=6679,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16275941 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04550679 = queryNorm
            0.31612942 = fieldWeight in 6679, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6679)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Knowledge organisation is an interdisciplinary subject drawing from the fields of psychology, linguistics, economy, sociology, information science and computing. Examines the need for controlling the transfer of knowledge, discussing knowledge acquisition and representation, the role of the information scientist and the practical work of information professionals

0.012863259 = product of:
  0.025726518 = sum of:
    0.025726518 = product of:
      0.051453035 = sum of:
        0.051453035 = weight(_text_:subject in 7855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.051453035 = score(doc=7855,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16275941 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04550679 = queryNorm
            0.31612942 = fieldWeight in 7855, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7855)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Discusses the development of the concept of documentation throughout the history of the human race, one that has been the subject of much written research both within and outside Spain. Defines the concept in general terms and discusses it from a scientific, informational, linguistic, and educational perspective. Explains what the term information sciences encompasses

0.012331083 = product of:
  0.024662167 = sum of:
    0.024662167 = product of:
      0.049324334 = sum of:
        0.049324334 = weight(_text_:22 in 2054) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.049324334 = score(doc=2054,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15935703 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04550679 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2054, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2054)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

22. 9.1998 10:14:50

0.012331083 = product of:
  0.024662167 = sum of:
    0.024662167 = product of:
      0.049324334 = sum of:
        0.049324334 = weight(_text_:22 in 2923) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.049324334 = score(doc=2923,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15935703 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04550679 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2923, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2923)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

11. 2.1999 21:02:22

0.011255352 = product of:
  0.022510704 = sum of:
    0.022510704 = product of:
      0.045021407 = sum of:
        0.045021407 = weight(_text_:subject in 5433) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.045021407 = score(doc=5433,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16275941 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04550679 = queryNorm
            0.27661324 = fieldWeight in 5433, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5433)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Discusses the course content and instructional sequence for teaching knowledge organization in universities as an interdisciplinary subject. Covers the interdisciplinary background and vocabulary; the representation-retrieval chain; and practice of information retrieval from a semantic-cognitve point of view. This should be followed by classification, indexing and abstracting. When enough practical experience has been acquired, students should be taught the creation, adaptation and maintenance of documentary languages. Finally, students should be introduced to automatic representation and organization of knowledge

0.011255352 = product of:
  0.022510704 = sum of:
    0.022510704 = product of:
      0.045021407 = sum of:
        0.045021407 = weight(_text_:subject in 6730) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.045021407 = score(doc=6730,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16275941 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04550679 = queryNorm
            0.27661324 = fieldWeight in 6730, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6730)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Considers historical and systematic approaches to the development of documentary languages and knowledge classification. Proposes an alternative scheme for knowledge organisation based on the views of information managers and scientific classification structures. The adoption of an interdisciplinary approach permits an understanding of the history of knowledge organisation and the development of systems and methods of taxonomy. The origin of hierarchical and associative structures for documentary languages is traditionally the domain of librarians. Classification schemes should be able to survive change and subject integration

0.011255352 = product of:
  0.022510704 = sum of:
    0.022510704 = product of:
      0.045021407 = sum of:
        0.045021407 = weight(_text_:subject in 340) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.045021407 = score(doc=340,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16275941 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04550679 = queryNorm
            0.27661324 = fieldWeight in 340, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=340)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Report of a study from the user's point of view, investigating the facility with which bibliographical material can be identified in a multidisciplinary field, the prospective for peace, from the University's resources. Searches (uniterm and relational) were effected using all available tools - OPACs, CD-ROM collections, online databases, manual catalogues, the Internet - both on the University's system and on national research institutions. Overall results returned a low rate of pertinence (1,86%). This is due not to lack of user search expertise but the lack of subject specific indexing coupled with using a MARC format

0.010789698 = product of:
  0.021579396 = sum of:
    0.021579396 = product of:
      0.043158792 = sum of:
        0.043158792 = weight(_text_:22 in 2825) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.043158792 = score(doc=2825,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15935703 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04550679 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2825, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2825)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

30. 1.1999 19:22:45

0.009647444 = product of:
  0.019294888 = sum of:
    0.019294888 = product of:
      0.038589776 = sum of:
        0.038589776 = weight(_text_:subject in 990) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.038589776 = score(doc=990,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16275941 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04550679 = queryNorm
            0.23709705 = fieldWeight in 990, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=990)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

The idea of classification is based on the concept of fixed and absolute order, though each classification system reflects its historical origin and its subject to the characteristics of the individual who applies it as well as variations in the real world. Traditional classifications sought to establish differences and hierarchies, reflected in libraries in such systems as LC and Dewey. The scientific revolution of the mid 20th century introduced theories of interdisciplinarity resulting in the need for new approaches to library classification as a practical tool for locating texts as well as a way of ordering concepts. Computerised systems offer the advantage of flexibility, with the concomitant problem of noise. Users must therefore be trained to understand that categories and networks are employed not as dogmatically but relatively

0.0064316294 = product of:
  0.012863259 = sum of:
    0.012863259 = product of:
      0.025726518 = sum of:
        0.025726518 = weight(_text_:subject in 6099) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025726518 = score(doc=6099,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16275941 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04550679 = queryNorm
            0.15806471 = fieldWeight in 6099, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=6099)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

This article examines some of the ways in which the Biblioteca Daniel Cosio Villegas of El Colegio de Mexico is responding to meet goals stated in the Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico's 1997-2000 Development Plan. The Plan aims to prepare students for life-long learning by teaching them reasoning and questioning skills as well a competencies in selecting, organizing and processing information from diverse systems and sources. It notes the need to discover the skill library professionals must have in order to assist patrons effectively to become self-sufficient users of information. The environment examined is one where most college and university students are products of a very traditional primary and secondary educational system that emphasizes learning through the use of class lectures and assigned textbooks rather than research and self-discovery. The author points out the need for library professionals in Mexico's institutions of higher education to teach students how to learn to access and process information themselves in order to transform this information into knowledge they can use. Some of the administrative changes made at the Biblioteca Daniel Cosio Villegas to accomplish this are described. These include: more participation by library professionals in planning; favoring matrical organization between departments and projects and making decisions in a more collegial fashion; subject specialization by library professionals who select, catalog, classify and give service in a specific area; and incorporation of the user into the evaluation of existing processes and services and the creation of new ones which favor a more efficacious development of their information skills. The author concludes by proposing three basic principles to guide the re-engineering process that must be undertaken by academic libraries if they are to survive and seek to shape the future of information technology rather than just responding to the challenges it presents. These principles are: the value which accrues to information by transforming it into knowledge can be analyzed systematically; the value which accrues to technology is incremented by the degree to which it is accepted by library professionals and users; and this acceptance is a function of other variables which can be understood and controlled, especially the frequency of use resulting in the development of information skills. The improvement of information skills of library professionals and users therefore constitutes the principles objective of technological integration

0.0064316294 = product of:
  0.012863259 = sum of:
    0.012863259 = product of:
      0.025726518 = sum of:
        0.025726518 = weight(_text_:subject in 2659) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025726518 = score(doc=2659,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16275941 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04550679 = queryNorm
            0.15806471 = fieldWeight in 2659, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.576596 = idf(docFreq=3361, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2659)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

The field of knowledge organization (KO) can be described as composed of the four distinct but connected layers of theory, systems, representation, and application. This paper focuses on the relations between KO theory and KO systems. It is acknowledged how the structure of KO systems is the product of a mixture of ontological, epistemological, and pragmatical factors. However, different systems give different priorities to each factor. A more ontologically-oriented approach, though not offering quick solutions for any particular group of users, will produce systems of wide and long-lasting application as they are based on general, shareable principles. I take the case of the ontological theory of integrative levels, which has been considered as a useful source for general classifications for several decades, and is currently implemented in the Integrative Levels Classification system. The theory produces a sequence of main classes modelling a natural order between phenomena. This order has interesting effects also on other features of the system, like the citation order of concepts within compounds. As it has been shown by facet analytical theory, it is useful that citation order follow a principle of inversion, as compared to the order of the same concepts in the schedules. In the light of integrative levels theory, this principle also acquires an ontological meaning: phenomena of lower level should be cited first, as most often they act as specifications of higher-level ones. This ontological principle should be complemented by consideration of the epistemological treatment of phenomena: in case a lower-level phenomenon is the main theme, it can be promoted to the leading position in the compound subject heading. The integration of these principles is believed to produce optimal results in the ordering of knowledge contents.