Scholarly metrics under the microscope : from citation analysis to academic auditing (2015)
0.00
0.0021099844 = product of:
0.021099843 = sum of:
0.0048913 = weight(_text_:in in 4654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0048913 = score(doc=4654,freq=2.0), product of:
0.04068264 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.029908108 = queryNorm
0.120230645 = fieldWeight in 4654, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4654)
0.016208543 = product of:
0.032417085 = sum of:
0.032417085 = weight(_text_:22 in 4654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032417085 = score(doc=4654,freq=2.0), product of:
0.104733095 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.029908108 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4654, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4654)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.1 = coord(2/20)
- Date
- 22. 1.2017 17:12:50
- Footnote
- Rez. in JASIST 67(2017) no.2, S.537-538 (Ronald Rousseau).
