Search (5 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × subject_ss:"Information science"
  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  1. Covert and overt : recollecting and connecting intelligence service and information science (2005) 0.01
    0.0050136214 = product of:
      0.010027243 = sum of:
        0.010027243 = product of:
          0.020054486 = sum of:
            0.020054486 = weight(_text_:22 in 69) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.020054486 = score(doc=69,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.1832595 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0523325 = queryNorm
                0.109432176 = fieldWeight in 69, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=69)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Classification
    327.12 22
    DDC
    327.12 22
  2. Janich, P.: Was ist Information? : Kritik einer Legende (2006) 0.00
    0.004257941 = product of:
      0.008515882 = sum of:
        0.008515882 = product of:
          0.017031765 = sum of:
            0.017031765 = weight(_text_:4 in 1639) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.017031765 = score(doc=1639,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14201462 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0523325 = queryNorm
                0.11992966 = fieldWeight in 1639, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1639)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Inhalt: 1 Information und Legende 2 Erblasten - Wer hat die Naturwissenschaften naturalisiert? - Wer hat die Theorie formalisiert? - Wer hat die Kommunikation mechanisiert? 3 Dogmengeschichten - Semiotik (Zeichentheorie) - Kybernetik (Maschinentheorie) - Politik (Erfolgstheorie) - Die Pfade des Irrtums 4 Informationsbegriffe heute - Der Nachrichtenkomplex - Das Geschwätz der Moleküle und Neuronen - Das Geistlose in der Maschine 5 Methodische Reparaturen - Üblichkeiten und Zwecke als Investition - Für Reden verantwortlich - Kommunizieren und Informieren, terminologisch - Leistungsgleichheit und technische Imitation - Modelle des Natürlichen 6 Konsequenzen
  3. Vickery, B.C.; Vickery, A.: Information science in theory and practice (2004) 0.00
    0.0026612133 = product of:
      0.0053224266 = sum of:
        0.0053224266 = product of:
          0.010644853 = sum of:
            0.010644853 = weight(_text_:4 in 4320) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.010644853 = score(doc=4320,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14201462 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0523325 = queryNorm
                0.07495604 = fieldWeight in 4320, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=4320)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Weitere Rezension in. Mitteilungen VÖB 57(2004) H.3/4, S.84-86 (O. Oberhauser): " ... Fazit: Wer sich von der Neuauflage von Vickery & Vickery eine auf dem neuesten Stand befindliche Einführung in die Informationswissenschaft erhofft hat, wird enttäuscht sein. Für jene Personen, die das Buch hingegen noch nicht kannten, bzw. jene Bibliotheken, die die ältere Auflage nicht im Bestand haben, ist diese dritte Auflage, ungeachtet ihrer Schwächen und des überhöhten Preises, ein "Muss"!
  4. Theories of information behavior (2005) 0.00
    0.0021289706 = product of:
      0.004257941 = sum of:
        0.004257941 = product of:
          0.008515882 = sum of:
            0.008515882 = weight(_text_:4 in 68) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.008515882 = score(doc=68,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14201462 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0523325 = queryNorm
                0.05996483 = fieldWeight in 68, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=68)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    1. historisch (die Gegenwart aus der Vergangheit heraus verstehen) 2. konstruktivistisch (Individuen konstruieren unter dem Einfluss ihres sozialen Kontexts das Verständnis ihrer Welten) 3. diskursanalytisch (Sprache konstituiert die Konstruktion der Identität und die Ausbildung von Bedeutungen) 4. philosophisch-analytisch (rigorose Analyse von Begriffen und Thesen) 5. kritische Theorie (Analyse versteckter Macht- und Herrschaftsmuster) 6. ethnographisch (Verständnis von Menschen durch Hineinversetzen in deren Kulturen) 7. sozialkognitiv (sowohl das Denken des Individuums als auch dessen sozialer bzw. fachlicher Umraum beeinflussen die Informationsnutzung) 8. kognitiv (Fokus auf das Denken der Individuen im Zusammenhang mit Suche, Auffindung und Nutzung von Information) 9. bibliometrisch (statistische Eigenschaften von Information) 10. physikalisch (Signalübertragung, Informationstheorie) 11. technisch (Informationsbedürfnisse durch immer bessere Systeme und Dienste erfüllen) 12. benutzerorientierte Gestaltung ("usability", Mensch-Maschine-Interaktion) 13. evolutionär (Anwendung von Ergebnissen von Biologie und Evolutionspsychologie auf informationsbezogene Phänomene). Bates Beitrag ist, wie stets, wohldurchdacht, didaktisch gut aufbereitet und in klarer Sprache abgefasst, sodass man ihn mit Freude und Gewinn liest. Zu letzterem trägt auch noch die umfangreiche Liste von Literaturangaben bei, mit der sich insbesondere die 13 genannten Metatheorien optimal weiterverfolgen lassen. . . .
  5. Crowley, W.: Spanning the theory-practice divide in library and information science (2005) 0.00
    0.0021289706 = product of:
      0.004257941 = sum of:
        0.004257941 = product of:
          0.008515882 = sum of:
            0.008515882 = weight(_text_:4 in 439) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.008515882 = score(doc=439,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14201462 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0523325 = queryNorm
                0.05996483 = fieldWeight in 439, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.7136984 = idf(docFreq=7967, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=439)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: JASIST. 58(2007) no.4, S.606-607 (L.E. Harris): "Spanning is not a methodological "how-to"; rather it is a "how-tothink" book, intended for academicians and practitioners, on developing useful theory. Each chapter opens with a brief scenario, generally derived from Crowley's extensive personal experience as a librarian, university professor, and consultant, exemplifying the theme for that chapter. In chapter one, "Theorizing for Diverging Contexts: Why Research Results and Theory Development are So Little Used Outside the Campus," Crowley describes a doctoral candidate's experience in presenting her research at a national conference of working professionals. When the presentation is negatively received, the student's mentor rationalized the response by stating, "You have to remember, most of the people in the audience only have a master's degree" (p. 2). From this example, a cogent argument is distilled on how pervasive the theorypractice divide is in various academic domains, such as business, law, sociology, and LIS. What is useful research and theory for academicians seeking career and professional advancement does not translate into for practitioners engaged in specific institutional/organizational environments. Cultural pragmatism is introduced as an aid to researchers in both camps for its inclusion of context specificity and the need for testing a theory's usefulness through continually analyzed experience. Herein, the structural foundation for the bridge is constructed in the section on communication. The development of an interlanguage between academicians and practitioners will minimize incommensurability, "the perceived inability of humans to communicate effectively with one another due to a lack of common standards for meaning and other shared foundations" (p. 15). In this vein, Crowley presents five maxims, based on the works of John Stuart Mill, for developing useful, real world theory. The chapter ends, as do several others, addressing the divide specifically in the LIS domain. One of the most thought-provoking chapters is "Developing a Research Philosophy," which includes sections on inductive reasoning, how people really think, and a discussion of the battle between intellectual formations and internalized models. As a teacher of experienced and/or mature students in an LIS program, I instantly recognized the description of a reoccurring classroom event: what happens when introducing theory or research results that contradict students' experiences, and therefore, their internalized models of "how things really work in the field." Crowley suggests that in seeking a research philosophy, persuasion should not be a primary concern. This simple suggestion encouraged me to reconsider my posture when faced with this classroom issue. However, this chapter may be considered one of the weakest in the book, because of its rather slim treatment of considerations for selecting a useful research philosophy, despite the emphasis on the importance of the concept. Nevertheless, this chapter is foundational to the work presented in the remaining chapters.

Languages

Types