Search (3 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × subject_ss:"Internet searching"
  1. Rogers, R.: Digital methods (2013) 0.02
    0.021634083 = product of:
      0.043268166 = sum of:
        0.043268166 = product of:
          0.12980449 = sum of:
            0.12980449 = weight(_text_:objects in 2354) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.12980449 = score(doc=2354,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.31904724 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.060026903 = queryNorm
                0.4068504 = fieldWeight in 2354, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2354)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    In Digital Methods, Richard Rogers proposes a methodological outlook for social and cultural scholarly research on the Web that seeks to move Internet research beyond the study of online culture. It is not a toolkit for Internet research, or operating instructions for a software package; it deals with broader questions. How can we study social media to learn something about society rather than about social media use? How can hyperlinks reveal not just the value of a Web site but the politics of association? Rogers proposes repurposing Web-native techniques for research into cultural change and societal conditions. We can learn to reapply such "methods of the medium" as crawling and crowd sourcing, PageRank and similar algorithms, tag clouds and other visualizations; we can learn how they handle hits, likes, tags, date stamps, and other Web-native objects. By "thinking along" with devices and the objects they handle, digital research methods can follow the evolving methods of the medium. Rogers uses this new methodological outlook to examine the findings of inquiries into 9/11 search results, the recognition of climate change skeptics by climate-change-related Web sites, the events surrounding the Srebrenica massacre according to Dutch, Serbian, Bosnian, and Croatian Wikipedias, presidential candidates' social media "friends," and the censorship of the Iranian Web. With Digital Methods, Rogers introduces a new vision and method for Internet research and at the same time applies them to the Web's objects of study, from tiny particles (hyperlinks) to large masses (social media).
  2. Digital research confidential : the secrets of studying behavior online (2015) 0.01
    0.012490443 = product of:
      0.024980886 = sum of:
        0.024980886 = product of:
          0.074942656 = sum of:
            0.074942656 = weight(_text_:objects in 3702) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.074942656 = score(doc=3702,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.31904724 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.060026903 = queryNorm
                0.23489517 = fieldWeight in 3702, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3702)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The realm of the digital offers both new methods of research and new objects of study. Because the digital environment for scholarship is constantly evolving, researchers must sometimes improvise, change their plans, and adapt. These details are often left out of research write-ups, leaving newcomers to the field frustrated when their approaches do not work as expected. Digital Research Confidential offers scholars a chance to learn from their fellow researchers' mistakes -- and their successes. The book -- a follow-up to Eszter Hargittai's widely read Research Confidential -- presents behind-the-scenes, nuts-and-bolts stories of digital research projects, written by established and rising scholars. They discuss such challenges as archiving, Web crawling, crowdsourcing, and confidentiality. They do not shrink from specifics, describing such research hiccups as an ethnographic interview so emotionally draining that afterward the researcher retreated to a bathroom to cry, and the seemingly simple research question about Wikipedia that mushroomed into years of work on millions of data points. Digital Research Confidential will be an essential resource for scholars in every field.
  3. Huberman, B.: ¬The laws of the Web: : patterns in the ecology of information (2001) 0.01
    0.008132817 = product of:
      0.016265634 = sum of:
        0.016265634 = product of:
          0.03253127 = sum of:
            0.03253127 = weight(_text_:22 in 6123) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03253127 = score(doc=6123,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21020399 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.060026903 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 6123, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=6123)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22.10.2006 10:22:33