Search (4 results, page 1 of 1)

0.073079415 = product of:
  0.14615883 = sum of:
    0.08487962 = weight(_text_:lists in 2749) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08487962 = score(doc=2749,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.3540935 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.4240103 = idf(docFreq=529, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0652826 = queryNorm
        0.23970965 = fieldWeight in 2749, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.4240103 = idf(docFreq=529, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2749)
    0.061279204 = weight(_text_:22 in 2749) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.061279204 = score(doc=2749,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.22860853 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0652826 = queryNorm
        0.268053 = fieldWeight in 2749, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2749)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Classification

658.4/038 22

Date

22. 3.2009 18:43:51

DDC

658.4/038 22

Footnote

Rez. in: JASIST 60(2006) no.3, S.642 (A.E. Prentice): "What is knowledge management (KM)? How do we define it? How do we use it and what are the benefits? KM is still an operational discipline that has yet to have an academic foundation. Its core has yet to solidify and concepts and practices remain fluid, making it difficult to discuss or even to identify the range of relevant elements. Being aware of this lack of a well-structured retrievable disciplinary literature, the editors made a practice of attending trade shows and conferences attended by KM professionals to look for presentations that would in some way expand knowledge of the field. They asked presenters to turn their paper into a book chapter, which is the major source of the material in this book. Although this is a somewhat chancy method of identifying authors and topics, several of the papers are excellent and a number add to an understanding of KM. Because of the fluidity of the area of study, the editors devised a three-dimensional topic expansion approach to the content so that the reader can follow themes in the papers that would not have been easy to do if one relied solely on the table of contents. The table of contents organizes the presentations into eight subject sections, each section with a foreword that introduces the topic and indicates briefly the contribution of each chapter to the overall section title. Following this, the Roadmap lists 18 topics or themes that appear in the book and relevant chapters where information on the theme can be found. Readers have the choice of following themes using the roadmap or of reading the book section by section. ..."

0.01591493 = product of:
  0.06365972 = sum of:
    0.06365972 = weight(_text_:lists in 609) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06365972 = score(doc=609,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.3540935 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.4240103 = idf(docFreq=529, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0652826 = queryNorm
        0.17978224 = fieldWeight in 609, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.4240103 = idf(docFreq=529, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=609)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Footnote

Rez. in: JASIST 58(2007) no.12, S.1909-1910 (Andrea Japzon): "Jay Liebowitz has written extensively on expert systems, knowledge management (KM), and information systems, as evidenced by the publication of almost 30 books and more than 200 articles on the subjects. What They Didn't Tell You about Knowledge Management offers a concise practical guide specifically for the LIS professional. The hook is best suited to those LIS professionals who arc currently involved with a KM initiative, are interested in pursuing a career in KM, or are working in corporate or government libraries. The hook is concise with only 84 pages of text and another 20 pages of appendices. This work provides only the briefest of overviews on KM, making it a starting point for the uninitiated. For richer descriptions and greater development of KM concepts and practices, The Knowledge Management Yearbook (Cortada & Woods, 2000) or Liebowitz's Knowledge Management Handbook (1999) should be consulted. The hook is filled with charts, bulleted lists, and excerpts from other publications meant to quickly guide the reader through the knowledge-management landscape. These examples are from KM in practice and provide the reader with a sense of how KM manifests itself in the workplace. While the examples are the strength of the book, Liebowitz does not explain or describe them in enough detail to integrate them into the work as a whole. However, the references that accompany each chapter are well chosen and provide the reader with the opportunity to explore in greater detail any of the concepts or practices presented.

0.010609953 = product of:
  0.04243981 = sum of:
    0.04243981 = weight(_text_:lists in 1804) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04243981 = score(doc=1804,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.3540935 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.4240103 = idf(docFreq=529, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0652826 = queryNorm
        0.11985482 = fieldWeight in 1804, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.4240103 = idf(docFreq=529, maxDocs=44218)
          0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=1804)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Footnote

Rez. in: KO 34(2007) no.4, S.266-267 (E. Quintarelli): "The knowledge and information world we live in can rarely be described from a single coherent and predictable point of view. In the global economy and mass society, an explosion of knowledge sources, different paradigms and information-seeking behaviors, fruition contexts and access devices are overloading our existence with an incredible amount of signals and stimulations, all competing for our limited attention. Taxonomies are often cited as tools to cope with, organize and make sense of this complex and ambiguous environment. Leveraging an extensive review of literature from a variety of disciplines, as well as a wide range of relevant real-life case studies, Organising Knowledge by Patrick Lambe has the great merit of liberating taxonomies from their recurring obscure and limitative definition, making them living, evolving and working tools to manage knowledge within organizations. Primarily written for knowledge and information managers, this book can help a much larger audience of practitioners and students who wish to design, develop and maintain taxonomies for large-scale coordination and organizational effectiveness both within and across societies. Patrick Lambe opens ours eyes to the fact that, far from being just a synonym for pure hierarchical trees to improve navigation, find-ability and information retrieval, taxonomies take multiple forms (from lists, to trees, facets and system maps) and play different roles, ranging from basic information organization to more subtle tasks, such as establishing common ground, overcoming boundaries, discovering new opportunities and helping in sense-making.

0.008844891 = product of:
  0.035379563 = sum of:
    0.035379563 = weight(_text_:22 in 320) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.035379563 = score(doc=320,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.22860853 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0652826 = queryNorm
        0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 320, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=320)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Date

22. 5.2007 10:37:38