Search (2 results, page 1 of 1)

0.0058634304 = product of:
  0.023453722 = sum of:
    0.023453722 = product of:
      0.046907444 = sum of:
        0.046907444 = weight(_text_:intelligenz in 4170) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.046907444 = score(doc=4170,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21362439 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.678294 = idf(docFreq=410, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037621226 = queryNorm
            0.21957907 = fieldWeight in 4170, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.678294 = idf(docFreq=410, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=4170)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Angestoßen durch Forschungen an neurologischen Patienten, tritt der Neurobiologe Damasio an, das seit Decartes tradierte naturwissenschaftliche Axiom der Trennung von Körper und Geist, von Vernunft und Gefühl, wissenschaftlich zu widerlegen: Ein Mensch, dessen emotionales Verhalten durch Hirnverletzungen gestört ist, vermag auch sog. rationale Entscheidungen nicht mehr angemessen zu treffen. Diese Beobachtung an Betroffenen fundiert der Autor ausführlich und verdichtet sie in der generellen Erkenntnis, daß Vernunft und Gefühl nicht getrennt voneinander agieren, sondern daß sie untereinander vernetzt sind, ja, daß Gefühle und Empfindungen sogar unentbehrlich seien für rationales Verhalten. Eine Bestätigung dieser Erkenntnisse widerfährt Damasio durch die aktuelle Diskussion um die sogenannte emotionale Intelligenz.

0.0017656278 = product of:
  0.007062511 = sum of:
    0.007062511 = product of:
      0.021187533 = sum of:
        0.021187533 = weight(_text_:k in 3568) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021187533 = score(doc=3568,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13429943 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037621226 = queryNorm
            0.15776339 = fieldWeight in 3568, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3568)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Content

G. Gainotti, M.C. Silveri, A. Daniele, L. Giustolisi, Neuroanatomical Correlates of Category-specific Semantic Disorders: A Critical Survey. J. S. Snowden, H. L. Griffiths, D. Neary, Autobiographical Experience and Word Meaning. L. Cipolotti, E.K. Warrington, Towards a Unitary Account of Access Dysphasia: A Single Case Study. E. Forde, G.W. Humphreys, Refractory Semantics in Global Aphasia: On Semantic Organisation and the Access-Storage Distinction in Neuropsychology. A. E. Hillis, A. Caramazza, The Compositionality of Lexical Semantic Representations: Clues from Semantic Errors in Object Naming. H.E. Moss, L.K. Tyler, Investigating Semantic Memory Impairments: The Contribution of Semantic Priming. K.R. Laws, S.A. Humber, D.J.C. Ramsey, R.A. McCarthy, Probing Sensory and Associative Semantics for Animals and Objects in Normal Subjects. K.R. Laws, J.J. Evans, J. R. Hodges, R.A. McCarthy, Naming without Knowing and Appearance without Associations: Evidence for Constructive Processes in Semantic Memory? J. Powell, J. Davidoff, Selective Impairments of Object-knowledge in a Case of Acquired Cortical Blindness. J.R. Hodges, N. Graham, K. Patterson, Charting the Progression in Semantic Dementia: Implications for the Organisation of Semantic Memory. E. Funnell, Objects and Properties: A Study of the Breakdown of Semantic Memory. L.J. Tippett, S. McAuliffe, M. J. Farrar, Preservation of Categorical Knowledge in Alzheimer's Disease: A Computational Account. G. W. Humphreys, C. Lamote, T.J. Lloyd-Jones, An Interactive Activation Approach to Object Processing: Effects of Structural Similarity, Name Frequency, and Task in Normality and Pathology.