Scholarly metrics under the microscope : from citation analysis to academic auditing (2015)
0.01
0.009028611 = product of:
0.08125749 = sum of:
0.08125749 = product of:
0.12188624 = sum of:
0.082272515 = weight(_text_:2017 in 4654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.082272515 = score(doc=4654,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18444215 = queryWeight, product of:
5.046608 = idf(docFreq=772, maxDocs=44218)
0.036547747 = queryNorm
0.44606134 = fieldWeight in 4654, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.046608 = idf(docFreq=772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4654)
0.039613724 = weight(_text_:22 in 4654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.039613724 = score(doc=4654,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12798399 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.036547747 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4654, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4654)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
- Date
- 22. 1.2017 17:12:50
- Footnote
- Rez. in JASIST 67(2017) no.2, S.537-538 (Ronald Rousseau).