Search (5 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × subject_ss:"Semantics"
  • × type_ss:"m"
  1. Fischer, W.L.: Äquivalenz- und Toleranzstrukturen in der Linguistik : zur Theorie der Synonyma (1973) 0.02
    0.015625037 = product of:
      0.031250075 = sum of:
        0.031250075 = product of:
          0.04687511 = sum of:
            0.044797383 = weight(_text_:k in 66) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.044797383 = score(doc=66,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.16225883 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04545348 = queryNorm
                0.27608594 = fieldWeight in 66, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=66)
            0.00207773 = weight(_text_:s in 66) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.00207773 = score(doc=66,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.049418733 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04545348 = queryNorm
                0.04204337 = fieldWeight in 66, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=66)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Wir beschränken uns daher auf die Darstellung des sprachlichen Feldbegriffes durch ein mathematisches Modell ... bzw.: wir definieren das sprachliche Feld über ein mathematisches Modell. Die Feldeigenschaften in einem System sprachlicher Entitäten sind zunächst solche des gegenseitigen Benachbartseins. Wir können von syntaktischen und/oder semantischen Umgebungen sprechen, in denen jeweils alle zu einem Wort (einer sprachlichen Einheit) synonymen oder sinnverwandten oder strukturverwandten Worte (Einheiten) liegen. Die Eigenschaften von Wortfeldern sind also in dieser Sicht vornehmlich topologischer Natur. Dabei bleibt es gleichgültig, welchem Autor man folgt, wenn man den Feldbegriff in der Sprache zu erfassen trachtet. Immer sind es Umgebungs-, Nachbarschaftsrelationen und fundierende Toleranzrelationen, die als formaler, sprich: mathematischer Kern inhärent sind. Bemerkungen über die Möglichkeit einer algebraisch-topologischen Kennzeichnung von Wortfeldsystemen beschließen Teil 3. In Teil 4. stellen wir den Begriff der k-Toleranzrelation vor. Relationen dieser Art stehen in gewissem Sinne zwischen den Äquivalenzrelationen und den Toleranzrelationen. Mit Modellbildungen auf der Basis von k-Toleranzrelationen kommt man der Realität der Sprache vielleicht am nächsten. Für den Problemkreis der Synonymität bedeutet ihre Einführung, daß man jetzt weder die Gültigkeit strenger Äquivalenz noch die schwache Bedingung der Ununterscheidbarkeit fordert, sondern nur eine k-Ununterscheidbarkeit. Relationentheoretisch entspricht dem die Forderung einer abgeschwächten Transitivität. In Teil 5. deuten wir an, wie man die in Teil 3. angegebenen Definitionsschemata für Synonyma auf der Grundlage der k-Toleranzräume verschärfen kann.
    Pages
    90 S
  2. Semantic knowledge and semantic representations (1995) 0.01
    0.010302719 = product of:
      0.020605437 = sum of:
        0.020605437 = product of:
          0.030908156 = sum of:
            0.025598504 = weight(_text_:k in 3568) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.025598504 = score(doc=3568,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16225883 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04545348 = queryNorm
                0.15776339 = fieldWeight in 3568, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3568)
            0.0053096525 = weight(_text_:s in 3568) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0053096525 = score(doc=3568,freq=10.0), product of:
                0.049418733 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04545348 = queryNorm
                0.1074421 = fieldWeight in 3568, product of:
                  3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                    10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3568)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    G. Gainotti, M.C. Silveri, A. Daniele, L. Giustolisi, Neuroanatomical Correlates of Category-specific Semantic Disorders: A Critical Survey. J. S. Snowden, H. L. Griffiths, D. Neary, Autobiographical Experience and Word Meaning. L. Cipolotti, E.K. Warrington, Towards a Unitary Account of Access Dysphasia: A Single Case Study. E. Forde, G.W. Humphreys, Refractory Semantics in Global Aphasia: On Semantic Organisation and the Access-Storage Distinction in Neuropsychology. A. E. Hillis, A. Caramazza, The Compositionality of Lexical Semantic Representations: Clues from Semantic Errors in Object Naming. H.E. Moss, L.K. Tyler, Investigating Semantic Memory Impairments: The Contribution of Semantic Priming. K.R. Laws, S.A. Humber, D.J.C. Ramsey, R.A. McCarthy, Probing Sensory and Associative Semantics for Animals and Objects in Normal Subjects. K.R. Laws, J.J. Evans, J. R. Hodges, R.A. McCarthy, Naming without Knowing and Appearance without Associations: Evidence for Constructive Processes in Semantic Memory? J. Powell, J. Davidoff, Selective Impairments of Object-knowledge in a Case of Acquired Cortical Blindness. J.R. Hodges, N. Graham, K. Patterson, Charting the Progression in Semantic Dementia: Implications for the Organisation of Semantic Memory. E. Funnell, Objects and Properties: A Study of the Breakdown of Semantic Memory. L.J. Tippett, S. McAuliffe, M. J. Farrar, Preservation of Categorical Knowledge in Alzheimer's Disease: A Computational Account. G. W. Humphreys, C. Lamote, T.J. Lloyd-Jones, An Interactive Activation Approach to Object Processing: Effects of Structural Similarity, Name Frequency, and Task in Normality and Pathology.
    Pages
    IV S., S. 226-596
    Type
    s
  3. Handbook of metadata, semantics and ontologies (2014) 0.00
    6.854732E-4 = product of:
      0.0013709464 = sum of:
        0.0013709464 = product of:
          0.0041128392 = sum of:
            0.0041128392 = weight(_text_:s in 5134) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0041128392 = score(doc=5134,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.049418733 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04545348 = queryNorm
                0.0832243 = fieldWeight in 5134, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5134)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Cataloging and classification quarterly 54(2016) no.7, S.504-505 (Claudia Horning).
    Pages
    viii, 570 S
    Type
    s
  4. Kavouras, M.; Kokla, M.: Theories of geographic concepts : ontological approaches to semantic integration (2008) 0.00
    5.596865E-4 = product of:
      0.001119373 = sum of:
        0.001119373 = product of:
          0.003358119 = sum of:
            0.003358119 = weight(_text_:s in 3275) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.003358119 = score(doc=3275,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.049418733 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04545348 = queryNorm
                0.06795235 = fieldWeight in 3275, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3275)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: KO 36(2009) no.2/3, S.178-180 (Birger Hjørland): " ... Theories of Geographic Concepts offers, despite such omissions, a rich and valuable overview of a complicated field. The different perspectives it presents are views and concepts that are at the centre of attention in contemporary research. Our field of KO cannot afford to ignore this literature and it is important that we come in closer contact with specific domains, including geography. This book should therefore be included in libraries and collections serving research and teaching in Knowledge Organization."
    Pages
    xvii, 319 S
  5. Semantic role universals and argument linking : theoretical, typological, and psycholinguistic perspectives (2006) 0.00
    5.596865E-4 = product of:
      0.001119373 = sum of:
        0.001119373 = product of:
          0.003358119 = sum of:
            0.003358119 = weight(_text_:s in 3670) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.003358119 = score(doc=3670,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.049418733 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04545348 = queryNorm
                0.06795235 = fieldWeight in 3670, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3670)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Pages
    viii, 363 S
    Type
    s

Years

Languages