Search (4 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Aufstellungssysteme Öffentlicher Bibliotheken"
  • × type_ss:"a"
  1. Umlauf, K.: Klassifikationen in Öffentlichen Bibliotheken (2018) 0.01
    0.008140382 = product of:
      0.15466726 = sum of:
        0.15466726 = weight(_text_:anwendungsbereich in 4278) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15466726 = score(doc=4278,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22708645 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.806516 = idf(docFreq=17, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025786186 = queryNorm
            0.68109417 = fieldWeight in 4278, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.806516 = idf(docFreq=17, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4278)
      0.05263158 = coord(1/19)
    
    Abstract
    Dieser Beitrag behandelt die in Österreich und Deutschland in Öffentlichen Bibliotheken weit verbreiteten Klassifikationen. Dies sind in Deutschland im Wesentlichen die Systematik für Bibliotheken (SfB), die Allgemeine Systematik für Öffentliche Bibliotheken (ASB), die daraus entwickelte Systematik der Stadtbibliothek Duisburg (SSD), die Klassifikation für Allgemeinbibliotheken (KAB) sowie die beiden konfessionell geprägten und verwendeten Klassifikationen Sachbuchsystematik für Katholische öffentliche Büchereien (SKB) und Systematik für evangelische Büchereien (SEB). In Österreich wird weitestgehend die Österreichische Systematik für öffentliche Bibliotheken (ÖSÖB) verwendet. Diese Klassifikationen werden unter dem Gesichtspunkt ihrer formalen Eigenschaften (Hierarchien, Klassenbeschreibungen) und unter der Fragestellung ihrer inhaltlichen Eignung für den Anwendungsbereich untersucht.
  2. Hyman, R.J.: Access to library collections : summary of a documentary and opinion survey on the direct shelf approach and browsing (1971) 0.00
    0.0024253603 = product of:
      0.046081845 = sum of:
        0.046081845 = weight(_text_:services in 2428) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.046081845 = score(doc=2428,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.094670646 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025786186 = queryNorm
            0.4867596 = fieldWeight in 2428, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2428)
      0.05263158 = coord(1/19)
    
    Source
    Library resources and technical services. 15(1971), S.479-491
  3. Cooper, L.: Problems associated with the ability of elementary school children to successfully retrieve material in the school library media center and some alternative methods of classification which may help to alleviate these problems : a case study of the Common School Library, Amherst, Massachusetts (1996) 0.00
    0.0014147937 = product of:
      0.026881078 = sum of:
        0.026881078 = weight(_text_:services in 6743) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026881078 = score(doc=6743,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.094670646 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.025786186 = queryNorm
            0.28394312 = fieldWeight in 6743, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.6713707 = idf(docFreq=3057, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6743)
      0.05263158 = coord(1/19)
    
    Source
    Public and access services quarterly. 2(1996) no.1, S.47-63
  4. Tiggelen, N. van: ¬Een landelijk systeem zou ideaal zijn : bibliotheken van Leerdam en Weert experimenteren met alternatieve plaatsing (1998) 0.00
    7.3550997E-4 = product of:
      0.013974689 = sum of:
        0.013974689 = product of:
          0.027949378 = sum of:
            0.027949378 = weight(_text_:22 in 4494) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.027949378 = score(doc=4494,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.09029883 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.025786186 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4494, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4494)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.05263158 = coord(1/19)
    
    Source
    BibliotheekBlad. 2(1998) no.10/11, S.22-24