Search (34 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"Auszeichnungssprachen"
  1. Trotman, A.: Searching structured documents (2004) 0.02 
    0.021551177 = product of:
  0.043102354 = sum of:
    0.043102354 = sum of:
      0.006214797 = weight(_text_:e in 2538) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.006214797 = score(doc=2538,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.055905603 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
            0.038894374 = queryNorm
          0.1111659 = fieldWeight in 2538, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2538)
      0.036887556 = weight(_text_:22 in 2538) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.036887556 = score(doc=2538,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.13620147 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.038894374 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2538, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2538)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    14. 8.2004 10:39:22
    Language
    e
  2. Ioannides, D.: XML schema languages : beyond DTD (2000) 0.02 
    0.018472435 = product of:
  0.03694487 = sum of:
    0.03694487 = sum of:
      0.0053269686 = weight(_text_:e in 720) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.0053269686 = score(doc=720,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.055905603 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
            0.038894374 = queryNorm
          0.09528506 = fieldWeight in 720, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=720)
      0.031617902 = weight(_text_:22 in 720) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.031617902 = score(doc=720,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.13620147 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.038894374 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 720, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=720)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    28. 1.2006 19:01:22
    Language
    e
  3. as: XML: Extensible Markup Language : I: Was ist XML? (2001) 0.01 
    0.013174127 = product of:
  0.026348254 = sum of:
    0.026348254 = product of:
      0.052696507 = sum of:
        0.052696507 = weight(_text_:22 in 4950) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.052696507 = score(doc=4950,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13620147 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038894374 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4950, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4950)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    30. 3.2003 11:06:22
  4. Miller, D.R.; Clarke, K.S.: Putting XML to work in the library : tools for improving access and management (2004) 0.01 
    0.012136143 = sum of:
  0.009472658 = product of:
    0.07578126 = sum of:
      0.07578126 = weight(_text_:authors in 1438) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.07578126 = score(doc=1438,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.17731223 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.038894374 = queryNorm
          0.42738882 = fieldWeight in 1438, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1438)
    0.125 = coord(1/8)
  0.0026634843 = product of:
    0.0053269686 = sum of:
      0.0053269686 = weight(_text_:e in 1438) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.0053269686 = score(doc=1438,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.055905603 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
            0.038894374 = queryNorm
          0.09528506 = fieldWeight in 1438, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1438)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    The authors, hoping to stimulate interest in XML (Extensible Markup Language) and explain its value to the library community, offer a fine introduction to the topic. The opening chapter defines XML as "a system for electronically tagging or marking up documents in order to label, organize, and categorize their content" and then goes on to describe its origins and fundamental building blocks. Subsequent chapters address related technologies, schema development, XML-based tools, and current and future library uses. The authors argue persuasively for increased XML use, emphasizing its advantages over HTML in flexibility, interoperability, extensibility, and internationalization. Information is detailed, deftly written, and supported by numerous examples. Readers without a technological bent may find the text daunting, but their perseverance will be richly rewarded. Particularly recommended for webmasters and those working in library information systems and technical services.
    Language
    e
  5. Schröder, A.: Web der Zukunft : RDF - Der erste Schritt zum semantischen Web 0.01 
    0.010539302 = product of:
  0.021078603 = sum of:
    0.021078603 = product of:
      0.042157207 = sum of:
        0.042157207 = weight(_text_:22 in 1457) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042157207 = score(doc=1457,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13620147 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038894374 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1457, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1457)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Seit dem 22. Februar 1999 ist das Resource Description Framework (RDF) als W3C-Empfehlung verfügbar. Doch was steckt hinter diesem Standard, der das Zeitalter des Semantischen Webs einläuten soll? Was RDF bedeutet, wozu man es einsetzt, welche Vorteile es gegenüber XML hat und wie man RDF anwendet, soll in diesem Artikel erläutert werden.
  6. Anderson, R.; Birbeck, M.; Kay, M.; Livingstone, S.; Loesgen, B.; Martin, D.; Mohr, S.; Ozu, N.; Peat, B.; Pinnock, J.; Stark, P.; Williams, K.: XML professionell : behandelt W3C DOM, SAX, CSS, XSLT, DTDs, XML Schemas, XLink, XPointer, XPath, E-Commerce, BizTalk, B2B, SOAP, WAP, WML (2000) 0.01 
    0.0092362175 = product of:
  0.018472435 = sum of:
    0.018472435 = sum of:
      0.0026634843 = weight(_text_:e in 729) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.0026634843 = score(doc=729,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.055905603 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
            0.038894374 = queryNorm
          0.04764253 = fieldWeight in 729, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=729)
      0.015808951 = weight(_text_:22 in 729) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.015808951 = score(doc=729,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.13620147 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.038894374 = queryNorm
          0.116070345 = fieldWeight in 729, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=729)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 6.2005 15:12:11
  7. Patrick, D.A.: XML in der Praxis : Unternehmensübergreifende Vorteile durch Enterprise Content Management (1999) 0.01 
    0.009221889 = product of:
  0.018443778 = sum of:
    0.018443778 = product of:
      0.036887556 = sum of:
        0.036887556 = weight(_text_:22 in 1461) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.036887556 = score(doc=1461,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13620147 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038894374 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1461, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1461)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    30. 3.2003 10:50:22
  8. Mayo, D.; Bowers, K.: ¬The devil's shoehorn : a case study of EAD to ArchivesSpace migration at a large university (2017) 0.01 
    0.0078013875 = sum of:
  0.005581817 = product of:
    0.044654537 = sum of:
      0.044654537 = weight(_text_:authors in 3373) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.044654537 = score(doc=3373,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.17731223 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.038894374 = queryNorm
          0.25184128 = fieldWeight in 3373, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3373)
    0.125 = coord(1/8)
  0.0022195703 = product of:
    0.0044391407 = sum of:
      0.0044391407 = weight(_text_:e in 3373) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.0044391407 = score(doc=3373,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.055905603 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
            0.038894374 = queryNorm
          0.07940422 = fieldWeight in 3373, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3373)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    A band of archivists and IT professionals at Harvard took on a project to convert nearly two million descriptions of archival collection components from marked-up text into the ArchivesSpace archival metadata management system. Starting in the mid-1990s, Harvard was an alpha implementer of EAD, an SGML (later XML) text markup language for electronic inventories, indexes, and finding aids that archivists use to wend their way through the sometimes quirky filing systems that bureaucracies establish for their records or the utter chaos in which some individuals keep their personal archives. These pathfinder documents, designed to cope with messy reality, can themselves be difficult to classify. Portions of them are rigorously structured, while other parts are narrative. Early documents predate the establishment of the standard; many feature idiosyncratic encoding that had been through several machine conversions, while others were freshly encoded and fairly consistent. In this paper, we will cover the practical and technical challenges involved in preparing a large (900MiB) corpus of XML for ingest into an open-source archival information system (ArchivesSpace). This case study will give an overview of the project, discuss problem discovery and problem solving, and address the technical challenges, analysis, solutions, and decisions and provide information on the tools produced and lessons learned. The authors of this piece are Kate Bowers, Collections Services Archivist for Metadata, Systems, and Standards at the Harvard University Archive, and Dave Mayo, a Digital Library Software Engineer for Harvard's Library and Technology Services. Kate was heavily involved in both metadata analysis and later problem solving, while Dave was the sole full-time developer assigned to the migration project.
    Language
    e
  9. Vonhoegen, H.: Einstieg in XML (2002) 0.00 
    0.0046109445 = product of:
  0.009221889 = sum of:
    0.009221889 = product of:
      0.018443778 = sum of:
        0.018443778 = weight(_text_:22 in 4002) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018443778 = score(doc=4002,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13620147 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038894374 = queryNorm
            0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 4002, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=4002)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Footnote
    Rez. in: XML Magazin und Web Services 2003, H.1, S.14 (S. Meyen): "Seit dem 22. Februar 1999 ist das Resource Description Framework (RDF) als W3C-Empfehlung verfügbar. Doch was steckt hinter diesem Standard, der das Zeitalter des Semantischen Webs einläuten soll? Was RDF bedeutet, wozu man es einsetzt, welche Vorteile es gegenüber XML hat und wie man RDF anwendet, soll in diesem Artikel erläutert werden. Schlägt man das Buch auf und beginnt, im EinleitungsKapitel zu schmökern, fällt sogleich ins Auge, dass der Leser nicht mit Lektionen im Stile von "bei XML sind die spitzen Klammern ganz wichtig" belehrt wird, obgleich es sich um ein Buch für Anfänger handelt. Im Gegenteil: Es geht gleich zur Sache und eine gesunde Mischung an Vorkenntnissen wird vorausgesetzt. Wer sich heute für XML interessiert, der hat ja mit 99-prozentiger Wahrscheinlichkeit schon seine einschlägigen Erfahrungen mit HTML und dem Web gemacht und ist kein Newbie in dem Reich der spitzen Klammern und der (einigermaßen) wohlformatierten Dokumente. Und hier liegt eine deutliche Stärke des Werkes Helmut Vonhoegens, der seinen Einsteiger-Leser recht gut einzuschätzen weiß und ihn daher praxisnah und verständlich ans Thema heranführt. Das dritte Kapitel beschäftigt sich mit der Document Type Definition (DTD) und beschreibt deren Einsatzziele und Verwendungsweisen. Doch betont der Autor hier unablässig die Begrenztheit dieses Ansatzes, welche den Ruf nach einem neuen Konzept deutlich macht: XML Schema, welches er im folgenden Kapitel darstellt. Ein recht ausführliches Kapitel widmet sich dann dem relativ aktuellen XML Schema-Konzept und erläutert dessen Vorzüge gegenüber der DTD (Modellierung komplexer Datenstrukturen, Unterstützung zahlreicher Datentypen, Zeichenbegrenzungen u.v.m.). XML Schema legt, so erfährt der Leser, wie die alte DTD, das Vokabular und die zulässige Grammatik eines XML-Dokuments fest, ist aber seinerseits ebenfalls ein XML-Dokument und kann (bzw. sollte) wie jedes andere XML auf Wohlgeformtheit überprüft werden. Weitere Kapitel behandeln die Navigations-Standards XPath, XLink und XPointer, Transformationen mit XSLT und XSL und natürlich die XML-Programmierschnittstellen DOM und SAX. Dabei kommen verschiedene Implementierungen zum Einsatz und erfreulicherweise werden Microsoft-Ansätze auf der einen und Java/Apache-Projekte auf der anderen Seite in ungefähr vergleichbarem Umfang vorgestellt. Im letzten Kapitel schließlich behandelt Vonhoegen die obligatorischen Web Services ("Webdienste") als Anwendungsfall von XML und demonstriert ein kleines C#- und ASP-basiertes Beispiel (das Java-Äquivalent mit Apache Axis fehlt leider). "Einstieg in XML" präsentiert seinen Stoff in klar verständlicher Form und versteht es, seine Leser auf einem guten Niveau "abzuholen". Es bietet einen guten Überblick über die Grundlagen von XML und kann - zumindest derzeit noch - mit recht hoher Aktualität aufwarten."
  10. Thuraisingham, B.: XML databases and the semantic Web (2002) 0.00 
    0.0031073985 = product of:
  0.006214797 = sum of:
    0.006214797 = product of:
      0.012429594 = sum of:
        0.012429594 = weight(_text_:e in 3754) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012429594 = score(doc=3754,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.055905603 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038894374 = queryNorm
            0.2223318 = fieldWeight in 3754, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3754)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Language
    e
  11. Vanhoutte, E.; Branden, R. van den: Text Encoding Initiative (TEI) (2009) 0.00 
    0.003075527 = product of:
  0.006151054 = sum of:
    0.006151054 = product of:
      0.012302108 = sum of:
        0.012302108 = weight(_text_:e in 3889) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012302108 = score(doc=3889,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.055905603 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038894374 = queryNorm
            0.22005144 = fieldWeight in 3889, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3889)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Footnote
    Vgl.: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/book/10.1081/E-ELIS3.
    Language
    e
  12. Mintert, S.; Wilde, E.; Behme, H.: Auszeichnend : Editoren für Extensible Markup Language (2002) 0.00 
    0.0026634843 = product of:
  0.0053269686 = sum of:
    0.0053269686 = product of:
      0.010653937 = sum of:
        0.010653937 = weight(_text_:e in 4759) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010653937 = score(doc=4759,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.055905603 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038894374 = queryNorm
            0.19057012 = fieldWeight in 4759, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4759)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  13. Qin, J.: Representation and organization of information in the Web space : from MARC to XML (2000) 0.00 
    0.0026634843 = product of:
  0.0053269686 = sum of:
    0.0053269686 = product of:
      0.010653937 = sum of:
        0.010653937 = weight(_text_:e in 3918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010653937 = score(doc=3918,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.055905603 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038894374 = queryNorm
            0.19057012 = fieldWeight in 3918, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3918)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Language
    e
  14. Wusteman, J.: XML to the desktop (2003) 0.00 
    0.0025111572 = product of:
  0.0050223144 = sum of:
    0.0050223144 = product of:
      0.010044629 = sum of:
        0.010044629 = weight(_text_:e in 4774) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010044629 = score(doc=4774,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.055905603 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038894374 = queryNorm
            0.17967124 = fieldWeight in 4774, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4774)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Now that XML is five years old, is it time for e-libraries to start exploiting its full potential by delivering it to the end user rather than converting it to HTML first? What, if any, would be the advantages to users and providers? Could browsers cope? And is it worth the bother?
    Language
    e
  15. Warwick, C.; Pritchard, E.: 'Hyped' text markup language : XML and the future of web markup (2000) 0.00 
    0.0023066455 = product of:
  0.004613291 = sum of:
    0.004613291 = product of:
      0.009226582 = sum of:
        0.009226582 = weight(_text_:e in 718) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009226582 = score(doc=718,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.055905603 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038894374 = queryNorm
            0.16503859 = fieldWeight in 718, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=718)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    There is a widespread perception that, in terms of web-technology, XML is going to be the 'next big thing'. Given the amount of comment that it has generated, it seems to be on its way to achieving that status. But how much of the praise should be taken at face value, and how much of the hype is credible? In the following article we examine some of the claims made about the importance of XML and consider how far the enthusiasm about it can be justified. Will XML cause a revolution that will change the way that everyone uses the Internet, whether as searchers or data creators? Or is it a tool for certain types of e-commerce and large-scale markup, which may not have a significant impact on the majority of web users?
    Language
    e
  16. Chang, M.: ¬An electronic finding aid using extensible markup language (XML) and encoded archival description (EAD) (2000) 0.00 
    0.0021972626 = product of:
  0.004394525 = sum of:
    0.004394525 = product of:
      0.00878905 = sum of:
        0.00878905 = weight(_text_:e in 4886) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.00878905 = score(doc=4886,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.055905603 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038894374 = queryNorm
            0.15721233 = fieldWeight in 4886, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4886)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Increasingly, XML applications are appearing on the World Wide Web, from e-commerce to information management. In the case of libraries and archives, XML enables more flexible information management and retrieval than using MARC or a relational database management system. Describes a project to explore the use of XML and the EAD, and the development of a prototype electronic finding aid. It focuses on the technical aspects, and reviews the options available and the choices made. This is done within the setting of a small- to medium-sized archive with minimal tools and resources.
    Language
    e
  17. Peis, E.; Moya, F. de; Fernández-Molina, J.C.: Encoded archival description (EAD) conversion : a methodological proposal (2000) 0.00 
    0.0021972626 = product of:
  0.004394525 = sum of:
    0.004394525 = product of:
      0.00878905 = sum of:
        0.00878905 = weight(_text_:e in 4899) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.00878905 = score(doc=4899,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.055905603 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038894374 = queryNorm
            0.15721233 = fieldWeight in 4899, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4899)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Language
    e
  18. Wusteman, J.: Document Type Definition (DTD) (2009) 0.00 
    0.0021972626 = product of:
  0.004394525 = sum of:
    0.004394525 = product of:
      0.00878905 = sum of:
        0.00878905 = weight(_text_:e in 3766) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.00878905 = score(doc=3766,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.055905603 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038894374 = queryNorm
            0.15721233 = fieldWeight in 3766, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3766)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Footnote
    Vgl.: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/book/10.1081/E-ELIS3.
    Language
    e
  19. Salminen, A.: Modeling documents in their context (2009) 0.00 
    0.0021972626 = product of:
  0.004394525 = sum of:
    0.004394525 = product of:
      0.00878905 = sum of:
        0.00878905 = weight(_text_:e in 3847) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.00878905 = score(doc=3847,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.055905603 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038894374 = queryNorm
            0.15721233 = fieldWeight in 3847, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3847)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Footnote
    Vgl.: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/book/10.1081/E-ELIS3.
    Language
    e
  20. Marcoux, Y.; Rizkallah, E.: Knowledge organization in the light of intertextual semantics : a natural-language analysis of controlled vocabularies (2008) 0.00 
    0.001883368 = product of:
  0.003766736 = sum of:
    0.003766736 = product of:
      0.007533472 = sum of:
        0.007533472 = weight(_text_:e in 2241) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.007533472 = score(doc=2241,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.055905603 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038894374 = queryNorm
            0.13475344 = fieldWeight in 2241, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2241)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Language
    e

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 28
  • d 6

Types

  • a 21
  • m 8
  • el 6
  • n 2
  • s 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications