Search (16 results, page 1 of 1)

Goh, A.; Hui, S.C.: TES: a text extraction system (1996) 0.06

0.063940994 = product of:
  0.14919566 = sum of:
    0.056486145 = weight(_text_:digital in 6599) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.056486145 = score(doc=6599,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.16201277 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04107254 = queryNorm
        0.34865242 = fieldWeight in 6599, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6599)
    0.07045048 = weight(_text_:techniques in 6599) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07045048 = score(doc=6599,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18093403 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.405231 = idf(docFreq=1467, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04107254 = queryNorm
        0.3893711 = fieldWeight in 6599, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.405231 = idf(docFreq=1467, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6599)
    0.022259047 = product of:
      0.044518095 = sum of:
        0.044518095 = weight(_text_:22 in 6599) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.044518095 = score(doc=6599,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14382903 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04107254 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6599, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6599)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.42857143 = coord(3/7)

Abstract: With the onset of the information explosion arising from digital libraries and access to a wealth of information through the Internet, the need to efficiently determine the relevance of a document becomes even more urgent. Describes a text extraction system (TES), which retrieves a set of sentences from a document to form an indicative abstract. Such an automated process enables information to be filtered more quickly. Discusses the combination of various text extraction techniques. Compares results with manually produced abstracts
Date: 26. 2.1997 10:22:43

Salton, G.: Automatic text structuring and summarization (1997) 0.04

0.039781027 = product of:
  0.13923359 = sum of:
    0.05205557 = weight(_text_:processing in 145) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05205557 = score(doc=145,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1662677 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04107254 = queryNorm
        0.3130829 = fieldWeight in 145, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=145)
    0.08717802 = weight(_text_:techniques in 145) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08717802 = score(doc=145,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.18093403 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.405231 = idf(docFreq=1467, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04107254 = queryNorm
        0.48182213 = fieldWeight in 145, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.405231 = idf(docFreq=1467, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=145)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)

Abstract: Applies the ideas from the automatic link generation research to automatic text summarisation. Using techniques for inter-document link generation, generates intra-document links between passages of a document. Based on the intra-document linkage pattern of a text, characterises the structure of the text. Applies the knowledge of text structure to do automatic text summarisation by passage extraction. Evaluates a set of 50 summaries generated using these techniques by comparing the to paragraph extracts constructed by humans. The automatic summarisation methods perform well, especially in view of the fact that the summaries generates by 2 humans for the same article are surprisingly dissimilar
Source: Information processing and management. 33(1997) no.2, S.193-207

Summarising software for publishing (1996) 0.04

0.036267605 = product of:
  0.12693661 = sum of:
    0.056486145 = weight(_text_:digital in 5121) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.056486145 = score(doc=5121,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.16201277 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04107254 = queryNorm
        0.34865242 = fieldWeight in 5121, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.944552 = idf(docFreq=2326, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5121)
    0.07045048 = weight(_text_:techniques in 5121) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07045048 = score(doc=5121,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18093403 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.405231 = idf(docFreq=1467, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04107254 = queryNorm
        0.3893711 = fieldWeight in 5121, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.405231 = idf(docFreq=1467, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5121)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)

Abstract: Reviews 4 software packages designed to provide accurate and indicative summaries of documents by taking the documents and creating distinctive abstracts from them. The products reviewed are: Oracle's ConText; InText's Object Analyzer; Iconovex's AnchorPage; and Software Scientific's Interrogator. Techniques used by the products include: the use of dictionaries of known words and phrases to interpret documents; and heuristic analysis involving weighting all the words in the document solely on their occurrence and position within the document
Source: Digital publisher. 1(1996) no.4, S.15-20

Bateman, J.; Teich, E.: Selective information presentation in an integrated publication system : an application of genre-driven text generation (1995) 0.01

0.014873021 = product of:
  0.10411114 = sum of:
    0.10411114 = weight(_text_:processing in 2928) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.10411114 = score(doc=2928,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1662677 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04107254 = queryNorm
        0.6261658 = fieldWeight in 2928, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2928)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

Source: Information processing and management. 31(1995) no.5, S.753-767

Moens, M.-F.; Uyttendaele, C.; Dumotier, J.: Abstracting of legal cases : the potential of clustering based on the selection of representative objects (1999) 0.01
```
0.010674859 = product of:
  0.07472401 = sum of:
    0.07472401 = weight(_text_:techniques in 2944) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07472401 = score(doc=2944,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.18093403 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.405231 = idf(docFreq=1467, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04107254 = queryNorm
        0.4129904 = fieldWeight in 2944, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.405231 = idf(docFreq=1467, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2944)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
```
Abstract

The SALOMON project automatically summarizes Belgian criminal cases in order to improve access to the large number of existing and future court decisions. SALOMON extracts text units from the case text to form a case summary. Such a case summary facilitates the rapid determination of the relevance of the case or may be employed in text search. an important part of the research concerns the development of techniques for automatic recognition of representative text paragraphs (or sentences) in texts of unrestricted domains. these techniques are employed to eliminate redundant material in the case texts, and to identify informative text paragraphs which are relevant to include in the case summary. An evaluation of a test set of 700 criminal cases demonstrates that the algorithms have an application potential for automatic indexing, abstracting, and text linkage

Johnson, F.C.; Paice, C.D.; Black, W.J.; Neal, A.P.: ¬The application of linguistic processing to automatic abstract generation (1993) 0.01

0.010623586 = product of:
  0.0743651 = sum of:
    0.0743651 = weight(_text_:processing in 2290) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0743651 = score(doc=2290,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1662677 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04107254 = queryNorm
        0.4472613 = fieldWeight in 2290, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2290)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

McKeown, K.; Robin, J.; Kukich, K.: Generating concise natural language summaries (1995) 0.01

0.010623586 = product of:
  0.0743651 = sum of:
    0.0743651 = weight(_text_:processing in 2932) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0743651 = score(doc=2932,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1662677 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04107254 = queryNorm
        0.4472613 = fieldWeight in 2932, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2932)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

Source: Information processing and management. 31(1995) no.5, S.703-733

Endres-Niggemeyer, B.; Maier, E.; Sigel, A.: How to implement a naturalistic model of abstracting : four core working steps of an expert abstractor (1995) 0.01
```
0.010516814 = product of:
  0.0736177 = sum of:
    0.0736177 = weight(_text_:processing in 2930) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0736177 = score(doc=2930,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.1662677 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04107254 = queryNorm
        0.4427661 = fieldWeight in 2930, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2930)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
```
Abstract

4 working steps taken from a comprehensive empirical model of expert abstracting are studied in order to prepare an explorative implementation of a simulation model. It aims at explaining the knowledge processing activities during professional summarizing. Following the case-based and holistic strategy of qualitative empirical research, the main features of the simulation system were developed by investigating in detail a small but central test case - 4 working steps where an expert abstractor discovers what the paper is about and drafts the topic sentence of the abstract

Source

Information processing and management. 31(1995) no.5, S.631-674
Uyttendaele, C.; Moens, M.-F.; Dumortier, J.: SALOMON: automatic abstracting of legal cases for effective access to court decisions (1998) 0.01
```
0.008806311 = product of:
  0.06164417 = sum of:
    0.06164417 = weight(_text_:techniques in 495) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06164417 = score(doc=495,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18093403 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.405231 = idf(docFreq=1467, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04107254 = queryNorm
        0.3406997 = fieldWeight in 495, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.405231 = idf(docFreq=1467, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=495)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
```
Abstract

The SALOMON project summarises Belgian criminal cases in order to improve access to the large number of existing and future cases. A double methodology was used when developing SALOMON: the cases are processed by employing additional knowledge to interpret structural patterns and features on the one hand and by way of occurrence statistics of index terms on the other. SALOMON performs an initial categorisation and structuring of the cases and subsequently extracts the most relevant text units of the alleged offences and of the opinion of the court. The SALOMON techniques do not themselves solve any legal questions, but they do guide the use effectively towards relevant texts

Brandow, R.; Mitze, K.; Rau, L.F.: Automatic condensation of electronic publications by sentence selection (1995) 0.01

0.008498869 = product of:
  0.05949208 = sum of:
    0.05949208 = weight(_text_:processing in 2929) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05949208 = score(doc=2929,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1662677 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04107254 = queryNorm
        0.35780904 = fieldWeight in 2929, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2929)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

Source: Information processing and management. 31(1995) no.5, S.675-685

Sparck Jones, K.; Endres-Niggemeyer, B.: Introduction: automatic summarizing (1995) 0.01

0.008498869 = product of:
  0.05949208 = sum of:
    0.05949208 = weight(_text_:processing in 2931) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05949208 = score(doc=2931,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1662677 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04107254 = queryNorm
        0.35780904 = fieldWeight in 2931, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2931)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

Source: Information processing and management. 31(1995) no.5, S.625-630

Automatic summarizing : introduction (1995) 0.01

0.008498869 = product of:
  0.05949208 = sum of:
    0.05949208 = weight(_text_:processing in 626) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05949208 = score(doc=626,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1662677 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04107254 = queryNorm
        0.35780904 = fieldWeight in 626, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=626)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

Source: Information processing and management. 31(1995) no.5, S.625-630

Maybury, M.T.: Generating summaries from event data (1995) 0.01

0.006374152 = product of:
  0.04461906 = sum of:
    0.04461906 = weight(_text_:processing in 2349) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04461906 = score(doc=2349,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1662677 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04107254 = queryNorm
        0.26835677 = fieldWeight in 2349, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2349)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

Source: Information processing and management. 31(1995) no.5, S.735-751

Moens, M.-F.; Uyttendaele, C.: Automatic text structuring and categorization as a first step in summarizing legal cases (1997) 0.01

0.006374152 = product of:
  0.04461906 = sum of:
    0.04461906 = weight(_text_:processing in 2256) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04461906 = score(doc=2256,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1662677 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04107254 = queryNorm
        0.26835677 = fieldWeight in 2256, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2256)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

Source: Information processing and management. 33(1997) no.6, S.727-737

Robin, J.; McKeown, K.: Empirically designing and evaluating a new revision-based model for summary generation (1996) 0.00

0.003179864 = product of:
  0.022259047 = sum of:
    0.022259047 = product of:
      0.044518095 = sum of:
        0.044518095 = weight(_text_:22 in 6751) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.044518095 = score(doc=6751,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14382903 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04107254 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6751, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6751)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

Date: 6. 3.1997 16:22:15

Jones, P.A.; Bradbeer, P.V.G.: Discovery of optimal weights in a concept selection system (1996) 0.00

0.003179864 = product of:
  0.022259047 = sum of:
    0.022259047 = product of:
      0.044518095 = sum of:
        0.044518095 = weight(_text_:22 in 6974) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.044518095 = score(doc=6974,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14382903 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04107254 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6974, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6974)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

Source: Information retrieval: new systems and current research. Proceedings of the 16th Research Colloquium of the British Computer Society Information Retrieval Specialist Group, Drymen, Scotland, 22-23 Mar 94. Ed.: R. Leon

Search (16 results, page 1 of 1)

Authors

Types

Themes