Search (3 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Automatisches Abstracting"
  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. Abdi, A.; Idris, N.; Alguliev, R.M.; Aliguliyev, R.M.: Automatic summarization assessment through a combination of semantic and syntactic information for intelligent educational systems (2015) 0.02 
    0.021866908 = product of:
  0.043733817 = sum of:
    0.043733817 = product of:
      0.08746763 = sum of:
        0.08746763 = weight(_text_:n in 2681) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08746763 = score(doc=2681,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.2163874 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050186608 = queryNorm
            0.40421778 = fieldWeight in 2681, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2681)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Summary writing is a process for creating a short version of a source text. It can be used as a measure of understanding. As grading students' summaries is a very time-consuming task, computer-assisted assessment can help teachers perform the grading more effectively. Several techniques, such as BLEU, ROUGE, N-gram co-occurrence, Latent Semantic Analysis (LSA), LSA_Ngram and LSA_ERB, have been proposed to support the automatic assessment of students' summaries. Since these techniques are more suitable for long texts, their performance is not satisfactory for the evaluation of short summaries. This paper proposes a specialized method that works well in assessing short summaries. Our proposed method integrates the semantic relations between words, and their syntactic composition. As a result, the proposed method is able to obtain high accuracy and improve the performance compared with the current techniques. Experiments have displayed that it is to be preferred over the existing techniques. A summary evaluation system based on the proposed method has also been developed.
  2. Wang, W.; Hwang, D.: Abstraction Assistant : an automatic text abstraction system (2010) 0.02 
    0.018780733 = product of:
  0.037561465 = sum of:
    0.037561465 = product of:
      0.15024586 = sum of:
        0.15024586 = weight(_text_:author's in 3981) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15024586 = score(doc=3981,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3372617 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050186608 = queryNorm
            0.44548744 = fieldWeight in 3981, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3981)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    In the interest of standardization and quality assurance, it is desirable for authors and staff of access services to follow the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) guidelines in preparing abstracts. Using the statistical approach an extraction system (the Abstraction Assistant) was developed to generate informative abstracts to meet the ANSI guidelines for structural content elements. The system performance is evaluated by comparing the system-generated abstracts with the author's original abstracts and the manually enhanced system abstracts on three criteria: balance (satisfaction of the ANSI standards), fluency (text coherence), and understandability (clarity). The results suggest that it is possible to use the system output directly without manual modification, but there are issues that need to be addressed in further studies to make the system a better tool.
  3. Kim, H.H.; Kim, Y.H.: Generic speech summarization of transcribed lecture videos : using tags and their semantic relations (2016) 0.01 
    0.008499491 = product of:
  0.016998982 = sum of:
    0.016998982 = product of:
      0.033997964 = sum of:
        0.033997964 = weight(_text_:22 in 2640) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.033997964 = score(doc=2640,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17574495 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050186608 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2640, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2640)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 1.2016 12:29:41

Authors