Search (27 results, page 1 of 2)

0.030103525 = product of:
  0.09031057 = sum of:
    0.055643205 = weight(_text_:propose in 2640) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.055643205 = score(doc=2640,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19617504 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.1344433 = idf(docFreq=707, maxDocs=44218)
          0.038207654 = queryNorm
        0.2836406 = fieldWeight in 2640, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.1344433 = idf(docFreq=707, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2640)
    0.034667365 = product of:
      0.052001044 = sum of:
        0.026117997 = weight(_text_:29 in 2640) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026117997 = score(doc=2640,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13440257 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038207654 = queryNorm
            0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 2640, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2640)
        0.025883049 = weight(_text_:22 in 2640) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025883049 = score(doc=2640,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13379669 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038207654 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2640, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2640)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)

Abstract

We propose a tag-based framework that simulates human abstractors' ability to select significant sentences based on key concepts in a sentence as well as the semantic relations between key concepts to create generic summaries of transcribed lecture videos. The proposed extractive summarization method uses tags (viewer- and author-assigned terms) as key concepts. Our method employs Flickr tag clusters and WordNet synonyms to expand tags and detect the semantic relations between tags. This method helps select sentences that have a greater number of semantically related key concepts. To investigate the effectiveness and uniqueness of the proposed method, we compare it with an existing technique, latent semantic analysis (LSA), using intrinsic and extrinsic evaluations. The results of intrinsic evaluation show that the tag-based method is as or more effective than the LSA method. We also observe that in the extrinsic evaluation, the grand mean accuracy score of the tag-based method is higher than that of the LSA method, with a statistically significant difference. Elaborating on our results, we discuss the theoretical and practical implications of our findings for speech video summarization and retrieval.

Date

22. 1.2016 12:29:41

0.029132461 = product of:
  0.08739738 = sum of:
    0.07869138 = weight(_text_:propose in 5400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07869138 = score(doc=5400,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.19617504 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.1344433 = idf(docFreq=707, maxDocs=44218)
          0.038207654 = queryNorm
        0.40112838 = fieldWeight in 5400, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          5.1344433 = idf(docFreq=707, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5400)
    0.008706 = product of:
      0.026117997 = sum of:
        0.026117997 = weight(_text_:29 in 5400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026117997 = score(doc=5400,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13440257 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038207654 = queryNorm
            0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 5400, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5400)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)

Abstract

Automatic subject prediction is a desirable feature for modern digital library systems, as manual indexing can no longer cope with the rapid growth of digital collections. It is also desirable to be able to identify a small set of entities (e.g., authors, citations, bibliographic records) which are most relevant to a query. This gets more difficult when the amount of data increases dramatically. Data sparsity and model scalability are the major challenges to solving this type of extreme multilabel classification problem automatically. In this paper, we propose to address this problem in two steps: we first embed different types of entities into the same semantic space, where similarity could be computed easily; second, we propose a novel non-parametric method to identify the most relevant entities in addition to direct semantic similarities. We show how effectively this approach predicts even very specialised subjects, which are associated with few documents in the training set and are more problematic for a classifier.

Date

29. 9.2019 12:18:42

0.021423629 = product of:
  0.064270884 = sum of:
    0.055643205 = weight(_text_:propose in 889) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.055643205 = score(doc=889,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19617504 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.1344433 = idf(docFreq=707, maxDocs=44218)
          0.038207654 = queryNorm
        0.2836406 = fieldWeight in 889, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.1344433 = idf(docFreq=707, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=889)
    0.008627683 = product of:
      0.025883049 = sum of:
        0.025883049 = weight(_text_:22 in 889) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025883049 = score(doc=889,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13379669 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038207654 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 889, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=889)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)

Abstract

The automatic summarization of scientific articles differs from other text genres because of the structured format and longer text length. Previous approaches have focused on tackling the lengthy nature of scientific articles, aiming to improve the computational efficiency of summarizing long text using a flat, unstructured abstract. However, the structured format of scientific articles and characteristics of each section have not been fully explored, despite their importance. The lack of a sufficient investigation and discussion of various characteristics for each section and their influence on summarization results has hindered the practical use of automatic summarization for scientific articles. To provide a balanced abstract proportionally emphasizing each section of a scientific article, the community introduced the structured abstract, an abstract with distinct, labeled sections. Using this information, in this study, we aim to understand tasks ranging from data preparation to model evaluation from diverse viewpoints. Specifically, we provide a preprocessed large-scale dataset and propose a summarization method applying the introduction, methods, results, and discussion (IMRaD) format reflecting the characteristics of each section. We also discuss the objective benchmarks and perspectives of state-of-the-art algorithms and present the challenges and research directions in this area.

Date

22. 1.2023 18:57:12

0.021423629 = product of:
  0.064270884 = sum of:
    0.055643205 = weight(_text_:propose in 1012) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.055643205 = score(doc=1012,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19617504 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.1344433 = idf(docFreq=707, maxDocs=44218)
          0.038207654 = queryNorm
        0.2836406 = fieldWeight in 1012, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.1344433 = idf(docFreq=707, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1012)
    0.008627683 = product of:
      0.025883049 = sum of:
        0.025883049 = weight(_text_:22 in 1012) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025883049 = score(doc=1012,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13379669 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038207654 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1012, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1012)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)

Abstract

With the wide application of keyphrases in many Information Retrieval (IR) and Natural Language Processing (NLP) tasks, automatic keyphrase prediction has been emerging. However, these statistically important phrases are contributing increasingly less to the related tasks because the end-to-end learning mechanism enables models to learn the important semantic information of the text directly. Similarly, keyphrases are of little help for readers to quickly grasp the paper's main idea because the relationship between the keyphrase and the paper is not explicit to readers. Therefore, we propose to generate keyphrases with specific functions for readers to bridge the semantic gap between them and the information producers, and verify the effectiveness of the keyphrase function for assisting users' comprehension with a user experiment. A controllable keyphrase generation framework (the CKPG) that uses the keyphrase function as a control code to generate categorized keyphrases is proposed and implemented based on Transformer, BART, and T5, respectively. For the Computer Science domain, the Macro-avgs of , , and on the Paper with Code dataset are up to 0.680, 0.535, and 0.558, respectively. Our experimental results indicate the effectiveness of the CKPG models.

Date

22. 6.2023 14:55:20

0.016062811 = product of:
  0.096376866 = sum of:
    0.096376866 = weight(_text_:propose in 946) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.096376866 = score(doc=946,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.19617504 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.1344433 = idf(docFreq=707, maxDocs=44218)
          0.038207654 = queryNorm
        0.49127996 = fieldWeight in 946, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          5.1344433 = idf(docFreq=707, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=946)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)

Abstract

Most knowledge accumulated through scientific discoveries in genomics and related biomedical disciplines is buried in the vast amount of biomedical literature. Since understanding gene regulations is fundamental to biomedical research, summarizing all the existing knowledge about a gene based on literature is highly desirable to help biologists digest the literature. In this paper, we present a study of methods for automatically generating gene summaries from biomedical literature. Unlike most existing work on automatic text summarization, in which the generated summary is often a list of extracted sentences, we propose to generate a semi-structured summary which consists of sentences covering specific semantic aspects of a gene. Such a semi-structured summary is more appropriate for describing genes and poses special challenges for automatic text summarization. We propose a two-stage approach to generate such a summary for a given gene - first retrieving articles about a gene and then extracting sentences for each specified semantic aspect. We address the issue of gene name variation in the first stage and propose several different methods for sentence extraction in the second stage. We evaluate the proposed methods using a test set with 20 genes. Experiment results show that the proposed methods can generate useful semi-structured gene summaries automatically from biomedical literature, and our proposed methods outperform general purpose summarization methods. Among all the proposed methods for sentence extraction, a probabilistic language modeling approach that models gene context performs the best.

0.012983414 = product of:
  0.077900484 = sum of:
    0.077900484 = weight(_text_:propose in 954) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.077900484 = score(doc=954,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19617504 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.1344433 = idf(docFreq=707, maxDocs=44218)
          0.038207654 = queryNorm
        0.3970968 = fieldWeight in 954, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.1344433 = idf(docFreq=707, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=954)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)

Abstract

In the field of law there is an absolute need for summarizing the texts of court decisions in order to make the content of the cases easily accessible for legal professionals. During the SALOMON and MOSAIC projects we investigated the summarization and retrieval of legal cases. This article presents some of the main findings while integrating the research results of experiments on legal document summarization by other research groups. In addition, we propose novel avenues of research for automatic text summarization, which we currently exploit when summarizing court decisions in the ACILA project. Techniques for automated concept learning and argument recognition are here the most challenging.

0.012983414 = product of:
  0.077900484 = sum of:
    0.077900484 = weight(_text_:propose in 2448) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.077900484 = score(doc=2448,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19617504 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.1344433 = idf(docFreq=707, maxDocs=44218)
          0.038207654 = queryNorm
        0.3970968 = fieldWeight in 2448, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.1344433 = idf(docFreq=707, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2448)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)

Abstract

In existing unsupervised methods, Latent Semantic Analysis (LSA) is used for sentence selection. However, the obtained results are less meaningful, because singular vectors are used as the bases for sentence selection from given documents, and singular vector components can have negative values. We propose a new unsupervised method using Non-negative Matrix Factorization (NMF) to select sentences for automatic generic document summarization. The proposed method uses non-negative constraints, which are more similar to the human cognition process. As a result, the method selects more meaningful sentences for generic document summarization than those selected using LSA.

0.012983414 = product of:
  0.077900484 = sum of:
    0.077900484 = weight(_text_:propose in 2972) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.077900484 = score(doc=2972,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19617504 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.1344433 = idf(docFreq=707, maxDocs=44218)
          0.038207654 = queryNorm
        0.3970968 = fieldWeight in 2972, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.1344433 = idf(docFreq=707, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2972)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)

Abstract

General graph random walk has been successfully applied in multi-document summarization, but it has some limitations to process documents by this way. In this paper, we propose a novel hypergraph based vertex-reinforced random walk framework for multi-document summarization. The framework first exploits the Hierarchical Dirichlet Process (HDP) topic model to learn a word-topic probability distribution in sentences. Then the hypergraph is used to capture both cluster relationship based on the word-topic probability distribution and pairwise similarity among sentences. Finally, a time-variant random walk algorithm for hypergraphs is developed to rank sentences which ensures sentence diversity by vertex-reinforcement in summaries. Experimental results on the public available dataset demonstrate the effectiveness of our framework.

0.011656174 = product of:
  0.06993704 = sum of:
    0.06993704 = weight(_text_:forschung in 6603) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06993704 = score(doc=6603,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1858777 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8649335 = idf(docFreq=926, maxDocs=44218)
          0.038207654 = queryNorm
        0.376253 = fieldWeight in 6603, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.8649335 = idf(docFreq=926, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6603)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)

Abstract

Die vorliegende Auswahlbibliographie ist in 9 Themenbereiche unterteilt. Der erste Abschnitt enthält Literatur, in der auf Abstracts und Abstracting-Verfahren allgemein eingegangen und ein Überblick über den Stand der Forschung gegeben wird. Im nächsten Abschnitt werden solche Aufsätze referiert, die die historische Entwicklung des Abstracting beschreiben. Im dritten Teil sind Abstracting-Richtlinien verschiedener Institutionen aufgelistet. Lexikalische, syntaktische und semantische Textkondensierungsverfahren sind das Thema der in Abschnitt 4 präsentierten Arbeiten. Textstrukturen von Abstracts werden unter Punkt 5 betrachtet, und die Arbeiten des nächsten Themenbereiches befassen sich mit dem Problem des Schreibens von Abstracts. Der siebte Abschnitt listet sog. 'maschinelle' und maschinen-unterstützte Abstracting-Methoden auf. Anschließend werden 'maschinelle' und maschinenunterstützte Abstracting-Verfahren, Abstracts im Vergleich zu ihren Primärtexten sowie Abstracts im allgemeien bewertet. Den Abschluß bilden Bibliographien

0.011128641 = product of:
  0.06677184 = sum of:
    0.06677184 = weight(_text_:propose in 941) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06677184 = score(doc=941,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19617504 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.1344433 = idf(docFreq=707, maxDocs=44218)
          0.038207654 = queryNorm
        0.3403687 = fieldWeight in 941, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.1344433 = idf(docFreq=707, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=941)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)

Abstract

We argue that the quality of a summary can be evaluated based on how many concepts in the original document(s) that can be preserved after summarization. Here, a concept refers to an abstract or concrete entity or its action often expressed by diverse terms in text. Summary generation can thus be considered as an optimization problem of selecting a set of sentences with minimal answer loss. In this paper, we propose a document concept lattice that indexes the hierarchy of local topics tied to a set of frequent concepts and the corresponding sentences containing these topics. The local topics will specify the promising sub-spaces related to the selected concepts and sentences. Based on this lattice, the summary is an optimized selection of a set of distinct and salient local topics that lead to maximal coverage of concepts with the given number of sentences. Our summarizer based on the concept lattice has demonstrated competitive performance in Document Understanding Conference 2005 and 2006 evaluations as well as follow-on tests.

0.011128641 = product of:
  0.06677184 = sum of:
    0.06677184 = weight(_text_:propose in 942) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06677184 = score(doc=942,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19617504 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.1344433 = idf(docFreq=707, maxDocs=44218)
          0.038207654 = queryNorm
        0.3403687 = fieldWeight in 942, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.1344433 = idf(docFreq=707, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=942)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)

Abstract

The high quality evaluation of generated summaries is needed if we are to improve automatic summarization systems. Although human evaluation provides better results than automatic evaluation methods, its cost is huge and it is difficult to reproduce the results. Therefore, we need an automatic method that simulates human evaluation if we are to improve our summarization system efficiently. Although automatic evaluation methods have been proposed, they are unreliable when used for individual summaries. To solve this problem, we propose a supervised automatic evaluation method based on a new regression model called the voted regression model (VRM). VRM has two characteristics: (1) model selection based on 'corrected AIC' to avoid multicollinearity, (2) voting by the selected models to alleviate the problem of overfitting. Evaluation results obtained for TSC3 and DUC2004 show that our method achieved error reductions of about 17-51% compared with conventional automatic evaluation methods. Moreover, our method obtained the highest correlation coefficients in several different experiments.

0.011128641 = product of:
  0.06677184 = sum of:
    0.06677184 = weight(_text_:propose in 949) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06677184 = score(doc=949,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19617504 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.1344433 = idf(docFreq=707, maxDocs=44218)
          0.038207654 = queryNorm
        0.3403687 = fieldWeight in 949, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.1344433 = idf(docFreq=707, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=949)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)

Abstract

We propose a new method for using anaphoric information in Latent Semantic Analysis (lsa), and discuss its application to develop an lsa-based summarizer which achieves a significantly better performance than a system not using anaphoric information, and a better performance by the rouge measure than all but one of the single-document summarizers participating in DUC-2002. Anaphoric information is automatically extracted using a new release of our own anaphora resolution system, guitar, which incorporates proper noun resolution. Our summarizer also includes a new approach for automatically identifying the dimensionality reduction of a document on the basis of the desired summarization percentage. Anaphoric information is also used to check the coherence of the summary produced by our summarizer, by a reference checker module which identifies anaphoric resolution errors caused by sentence extraction.

0.011128641 = product of:
  0.06677184 = sum of:
    0.06677184 = weight(_text_:propose in 953) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06677184 = score(doc=953,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19617504 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.1344433 = idf(docFreq=707, maxDocs=44218)
          0.038207654 = queryNorm
        0.3403687 = fieldWeight in 953, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.1344433 = idf(docFreq=707, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=953)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)

Abstract

Due to a large variety of noisy information embedded in Web pages, Web-page classification is much more difficult than pure-text classification. In this paper, we propose to improve the Web-page classification performance by removing the noise through summarization techniques. We first give empirical evidence that ideal Web-page summaries generated by human editors can indeed improve the performance of Web-page classification algorithms. We then put forward a new Web-page summarization algorithm based on Web-page layout and evaluate it along with several other state-of-the-art text summarization algorithms on the LookSmart Web directory. Experimental results show that the classification algorithms (NB or SVM) augmented by any summarization approach can achieve an improvement by more than 5.0% as compared to pure-text-based classification algorithms. We further introduce an ensemble method to combine the different summarization algorithms. The ensemble summarization method achieves more than 12.0% improvement over pure-text based methods.

0.009273868 = product of:
  0.055643205 = sum of:
    0.055643205 = weight(_text_:propose in 3459) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.055643205 = score(doc=3459,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19617504 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.1344433 = idf(docFreq=707, maxDocs=44218)
          0.038207654 = queryNorm
        0.2836406 = fieldWeight in 3459, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.1344433 = idf(docFreq=707, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3459)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)

Abstract

In this article, the authors address the problem of sentence ranking in summarization. Although most existing summarization approaches are concerned with the information embodied in a particular topic (including a set of documents and an associated query) for sentence ranking, they propose a novel ranking approach that incorporates intertopic information mining. Intertopic information, in contrast to intratopic information, is able to reveal pairwise topic relationships and thus can be considered as the bridge across different topics. In this article, the intertopic information is used for transferring word importance learned from known topics to unknown topics under a learning-based summarization framework. To mine this information, the authors model the topic relationship by clustering all the words in both known and unknown topics according to various kinds of word conceptual labels, which indicate the roles of the words in the topic. Based on the mined relationships, we develop a probabilistic model using manually generated summaries provided for known topics to predict ranking scores for sentences in unknown topics. A series of experiments have been conducted on the Document Understanding Conference (DUC) 2006 data set. The evaluation results show that intertopic information is indeed effective for sentence ranking and the resultant summarization system performs comparably well to the best-performing DUC participating systems on the same data set.

0.009273868 = product of:
  0.055643205 = sum of:
    0.055643205 = weight(_text_:propose in 5358) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.055643205 = score(doc=5358,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19617504 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.1344433 = idf(docFreq=707, maxDocs=44218)
          0.038207654 = queryNorm
        0.2836406 = fieldWeight in 5358, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.1344433 = idf(docFreq=707, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5358)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)

Abstract

We propose and evaluate a video summarization method based on a topic relevance model, a maximal marginal relevance (MMR), and discriminant analysis to generate a semantically meaningful video skim. The topic relevance model uses event-related potential (ERP) components to describe the process of topic relevance judgment. More specifically, the topic relevance model indicates that N400 and P600, which have been successfully applied to the mismatch process of a stimulus and the discourse-internal reorganization and integration process of a stimulus, respectively, are used for the topic mismatch process of a topic-irrelevant video shot and the topic formation process of a topic-relevant video shot. To evaluate our proposed ERP/MMR-based method, we compared the video skims generated by the ERP/MMR-based, ERP-based, and shot boundary detection (SBD) methods with ground truth skims. The results showed that at a significance level of 0.05, the ROUGE-1 scores of the ERP/MMR method are statistically higher than those of the SBD method, and the diversity scores of the ERP/MMR method are statistically higher than those of the ERP method. This study suggested that the proposed method may be applied to the construction of a video skim without operational intervention, such as the insertion of a black screen between video shots.

0.009273868 = product of:
  0.055643205 = sum of:
    0.055643205 = weight(_text_:propose in 213) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.055643205 = score(doc=213,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19617504 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.1344433 = idf(docFreq=707, maxDocs=44218)
          0.038207654 = queryNorm
        0.2836406 = fieldWeight in 213, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.1344433 = idf(docFreq=707, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=213)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)

Abstract

Online reputation management (ORM) comprises the collection of techniques that help monitoring and improving the public image of an entity (companies, products, institutions) on the Internet. The ORM experts try to minimize the negative impact of the information about an entity while maximizing the positive material for being more trustworthy to the customers. Due to the huge amount of information that is published on the Internet every day, there is a need to summarize the entire flow of information to obtain only those data that are relevant to the entities. Traditionally the automatic summarization task in the ORM scenario takes some in-domain signals into account such as popularity, polarity for reputation and novelty but exists other feature to be considered, the authority of the people. This authority depends on the ability to convince others and therefore to influence opinions. In this work, we propose the use of authority signals that measures the influence of a user jointly with (a) priority signals related to the ORM domain and (b) information regarding the different topics that influential people is talking about. Our results indicate that the use of authority signals may significantly improve the quality of the summaries that are automatically generated.

0.005745666 = product of:
  0.034473997 = sum of:
    0.034473997 = product of:
      0.103421986 = sum of:
        0.103421986 = weight(_text_:29 in 4667) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.103421986 = score(doc=4667,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13440257 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038207654 = queryNorm
            0.7694941 = fieldWeight in 4667, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4667)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)

Date

27.11.2005 18:29:55

Source

Journal of information science. 29(2003) no.5, S.405-418

0.002902 = product of:
  0.017412 = sum of:
    0.017412 = product of:
      0.052235994 = sum of:
        0.052235994 = weight(_text_:29 in 1949) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.052235994 = score(doc=1949,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13440257 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038207654 = queryNorm
            0.38865322 = fieldWeight in 1949, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1949)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)

Date

16. 8.1998 12:30:29

0.0023215997 = product of:
  0.013929598 = sum of:
    0.013929598 = product of:
      0.041788794 = sum of:
        0.041788794 = weight(_text_:29 in 4897) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041788794 = score(doc=4897,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13440257 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038207654 = queryNorm
            0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 4897, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4897)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)

Date

17. 8.1996 10:29:59

0.0023007155 = product of:
  0.013804292 = sum of:
    0.013804292 = product of:
      0.041412875 = sum of:
        0.041412875 = weight(_text_:22 in 6599) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041412875 = score(doc=6599,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13379669 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.038207654 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6599, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6599)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)

Date

26. 2.1997 10:22:43