Search (2 results, page 1 of 1)
- Did you mean:
- rvk_ss%3a%2200 74500 allgemeines %2f buch- und bibliothekswesen%2c informationswissenschaft %2f bibliothekswesen %2f kataloge%2c katalogisierung %2f titelaufnahme%2c katalogisierungs im ausland %28.6 1%29 %2f international%2c allgemeinen%22 2
- rvk_ss%3a%2200 74500 allgemeines %2f buch- und bibliothekswesen%2c informationswissenschaft %2f bibliothekswesen %2f kataloge%2c katalogisierung %2f titelaufnahme%2c katalogisierungs im auslands %28.6 1%29 %2f international%2c allgemeines%22 2
- rvk_ss%3a%2200 74500 allgemeines %2f buch- und bibliothekswesen%2c informationswissenschaft %2f bibliothekswesen %2f kataloge%2c katalogisierung %2f titelaufnahmen%2c katalogisierungs im ausland %28.6 1%29 %2f international%2c allgemeines%22 2
- rvk_ss%3a%2200 74500 allgemeines %2f buch- und bibliothekswesen%2c informationswissenschaft %2f bibliothekswesen %2f kataloge%2c katalogisierungs %2f titelaufnahme%2c katalogisierungs im ausland %28.6 1%29 %2f international%2c allgemeines%22 2
- rvk_ss%3a%2200 74500 allgemeines %2f buch- und bibliothekswesen%2c informationswissenschaft %2f bibliothekswesen %2f katalogen%2c katalogisierung %2f titelaufnahme%2c katalogisierungs im ausland %28.6 1%29 %2f international%2c allgemeines%22 2
-
Pulgarin, A.; Gil-Leiva, I.: Bibliometric analysis of the automatic indexing literature : 1956-2000 (2004)
0.00
0.0016458833 = product of: 0.037855316 = sum of: 0.037855316 = weight(_text_:informationswissenschaft in 2566) [ClassicSimilarity], result of: 0.037855316 = score(doc=2566,freq=2.0), product of: 0.10865694 = queryWeight, product of: 4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218) 0.024120769 = queryNorm 0.348393 = fieldWeight in 2566, product of: 1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of: 2.0 = termFreq=2.0 4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218) 0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2566) 0.04347826 = coord(1/23)
- Field
- Informationswissenschaft
-
Gomez, I.: Coping with the problem of subject classification diversity (1996)
0.00
4.5129156E-4 = product of: 0.010379706 = sum of: 0.010379706 = product of: 0.020759411 = sum of: 0.020759411 = weight(_text_:international in 5074) [ClassicSimilarity], result of: 0.020759411 = score(doc=5074,freq=2.0), product of: 0.08046399 = queryWeight, product of: 3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218) 0.024120769 = queryNorm 0.2579963 = fieldWeight in 5074, product of: 1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of: 2.0 = termFreq=2.0 3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218) 0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5074) 0.5 = coord(1/2) 0.04347826 = coord(1/23)
- Abstract
- The delimination of a research field in bibliometric studies presents the problem of the diversity of subject classifications used in the sources of input and output data. Classification of documents according the thematic codes or keywords is the most accurate method, mainly used is specialized bibliographic or patent databases. Classification of journals in disciplines presents lower specifity, and some shortcomings as the change over time of both journals and disciplines and the increasing interdisciplinarity of research. Standardization of subject classifications emerges as an important point in bibliometric studies in order to allow international comparisons, although flexibility is needed to meet the needs of local studies