Search (3 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Automatisches Indexieren"
  • × theme_ss:"Internet"
  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  1. Thirion, B.; Leroy, J.P.; Baudic, F.; Douyère, M.; Piot, J.; Darmoni, S.J.: SDI selecting, decribing, and indexing : did you mean automatically? (2001) 0.01 
    0.007405799 = product of:
  0.044434793 = sum of:
    0.044434793 = weight(_text_:internet in 6198) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.044434793 = score(doc=6198,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.11352337 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
          0.038453303 = queryNorm
        0.3914154 = fieldWeight in 6198, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6198)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Theme
    Internet
  2. Bloomfield, M.: Indexing : neglected and poorly understood (2001) 0.01 
    0.007405799 = product of:
  0.044434793 = sum of:
    0.044434793 = weight(_text_:internet in 5439) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.044434793 = score(doc=5439,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.11352337 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
          0.038453303 = queryNorm
        0.3914154 = fieldWeight in 5439, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5439)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    The growth of the Internet has highlighted the use of machine indexing. The difficulties in using the Internet as a searching device can be frustrating. The use of the term "Python" is given as an example. Machine indexing is noted as "rotten" and human indexing as "capricious." The problem seems to be a lack of a theoretical foundation for the art of indexing. What librarians have learned over the last hundred years has yet to yield a consistent approach to what really works best in preparing index terms and in the ability of our customers to search the various indexes. An attempt is made to consider the elements of indexing, their pros and cons. The argument is made that machine indexing is far too prolific in its production of index terms. Neither librarians nor computer programmers have made much progress to improve Internet indexing. Human indexing has had the same problems for over fifty years.
    Theme
    Internet
  3. Rasmussen, E.M.: Indexing and retrieval for the Web (2002) 0.00 
    0.0048299627 = product of:
  0.028979775 = sum of:
    0.028979775 = weight(_text_:internet in 4285) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.028979775 = score(doc=4285,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.11352337 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
          0.038453303 = queryNorm
        0.25527585 = fieldWeight in 4285, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=4285)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    The introduction and growth of the World Wide Web (WWW, or Web) have resulted in a profound change in the way individuals and organizations access information. In terms of volume, nature, and accessibility, the characteristics of electronic information are significantly different from those of even five or six years ago. Control of, and access to, this flood of information rely heavily an automated techniques for indexing and retrieval. According to Gudivada, Raghavan, Grosky, and Kasanagottu (1997, p. 58), "The ability to search and retrieve information from the Web efficiently and effectively is an enabling technology for realizing its full potential." Almost 93 percent of those surveyed consider the Web an "indispensable" Internet technology, second only to e-mail (Graphie, Visualization & Usability Center, 1998). Although there are other ways of locating information an the Web (browsing or following directory structures), 85 percent of users identify Web pages by means of a search engine (Graphie, Visualization & Usability Center, 1998). A more recent study conducted by the Stanford Institute for the Quantitative Study of Society confirms the finding that searching for information is second only to e-mail as an Internet activity (Nie & Ebring, 2000, online). In fact, Nie and Ebring conclude, "... the Internet today is a giant public library with a decidedly commercial tilt. The most widespread use of the Internet today is as an information search utility for products, travel, hobbies, and general information. Virtually all users interviewed responded that they engaged in one or more of these information gathering activities."
    Theme
    Internet

Authors