-
Faraj, N.: Analyse d'une methode d'indexation automatique basée sur une analyse syntaxique de texte (1996)
0.13
0.12597175 = product of:
0.18895762 = sum of:
0.14345708 = weight(_text_:systematic in 685) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14345708 = score(doc=685,freq=2.0), product of:
0.28397155 = queryWeight, product of:
5.715473 = idf(docFreq=395, maxDocs=44218)
0.049684696 = queryNorm
0.5051812 = fieldWeight in 685, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.715473 = idf(docFreq=395, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=685)
0.045500536 = product of:
0.09100107 = sum of:
0.09100107 = weight(_text_:indexing in 685) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09100107 = score(doc=685,freq=4.0), product of:
0.19018644 = queryWeight, product of:
3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
0.049684696 = queryNorm
0.47848347 = fieldWeight in 685, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=685)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Evaluates an automatic indexing method based on syntactical text analysis combined with statistical analysis. Tests many combinations for the choice of term categories and weighting methods. The experiment, conducted on a software engineering corpus, shows systematic improvement in the use of syntactic term phrases compared to using only individual words as index terms
- Footnote
- Übers. d. Titels: Analysis of an automatic indexing method based on syntactic analysis of text
-
Ward, M.L.: ¬The future of the human indexer (1996)
0.05
0.052867796 = product of:
0.15860339 = sum of:
0.15860339 = sum of:
0.11821385 = weight(_text_:indexing in 7244) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11821385 = score(doc=7244,freq=12.0), product of:
0.19018644 = queryWeight, product of:
3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
0.049684696 = queryNorm
0.6215682 = fieldWeight in 7244, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=7244)
0.04038954 = weight(_text_:22 in 7244) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04038954 = score(doc=7244,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17398734 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.049684696 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 7244, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=7244)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Considers the principles of indexing and the intellectual skills involved in order to determine what automatic indexing systems would be required in order to supplant or complement the human indexer. Good indexing requires: considerable prior knowledge of the literature; judgement as to what to index and what depth to index; reading skills; abstracting skills; and classification skills, Illustrates these features with a detailed description of abstracting and indexing processes involved in generating entries for the mechanical engineering database POWERLINK. Briefly assesses the possibility of replacing human indexers with specialist indexing software, with particular reference to the Object Analyzer from the InTEXT automatic indexing system and using the criteria described for human indexers. At present, it is unlikely that the automatic indexer will replace the human indexer, but when more primary texts are available in electronic form, it may be a useful productivity tool for dealing with large quantities of low grade texts (should they be wanted in the database)
- Date
- 9. 2.1997 18:44:22
-
Kutschekmanesch, S.; Lutes, B.; Moelle, K.; Thiel, U.; Tzeras, K.: Automated multilingual indexing : a synthesis of rule-based and thesaurus-based methods (1998)
0.05
0.04925008 = product of:
0.14775024 = sum of:
0.14775024 = sum of:
0.08043434 = weight(_text_:indexing in 4157) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08043434 = score(doc=4157,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19018644 = queryWeight, product of:
3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
0.049684696 = queryNorm
0.42292362 = fieldWeight in 4157, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4157)
0.06731591 = weight(_text_:22 in 4157) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06731591 = score(doc=4157,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17398734 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.049684696 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4157, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4157)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Information und Märkte: 50. Deutscher Dokumentartag 1998, Kongreß der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Dokumentation e.V. (DGD), Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn, 22.-24. September 1998. Hrsg. von Marlies Ockenfeld u. Gerhard J. Mantwill
-
Tsareva, P.V.: Algoritmy dlya raspoznavaniya pozitivnykh i negativnykh vkhozdenii deskriptorov v tekst i protsedura avtomaticheskoi klassifikatsii tekstov (1999)
0.05
0.04925008 = product of:
0.14775024 = sum of:
0.14775024 = sum of:
0.08043434 = weight(_text_:indexing in 374) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08043434 = score(doc=374,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19018644 = queryWeight, product of:
3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
0.049684696 = queryNorm
0.42292362 = fieldWeight in 374, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=374)
0.06731591 = weight(_text_:22 in 374) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06731591 = score(doc=374,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17398734 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.049684696 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 374, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=374)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 1. 4.2002 10:22:41
- Footnote
- Übers. des Titels: Algorithms for selection of positive and negative descriptors from text and automated text indexing
-
Bordoni, L.; Pazienza, M.T.: Documents automatic indexing in an environmental domain (1997)
0.04
0.042249024 = product of:
0.12674707 = sum of:
0.12674707 = sum of:
0.079625934 = weight(_text_:indexing in 530) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.079625934 = score(doc=530,freq=4.0), product of:
0.19018644 = queryWeight, product of:
3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
0.049684696 = queryNorm
0.41867304 = fieldWeight in 530, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=530)
0.047121134 = weight(_text_:22 in 530) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047121134 = score(doc=530,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17398734 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.049684696 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 530, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=530)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Describes an application of Natural Language Processing (NLP) techniques, in HIRMA (Hypertextual Information Retrieval Managed by ARIOSTO), to the problem of document indexing by referring to a system which incorporates natural language processing techniques to determine the subject of the text of documents and to associate them with relevant semantic indexes. Describes briefly the overall system, details of its implementation on a corpus of scientific abstracts related to environmental topics and experimental evidence of the system's behaviour. Analyzes in detail an experiment designed to evaluate the system's retrieval ability in terms of recall and precision
- Source
- International forum on information and documentation. 22(1997) no.1, S.17-28
-
Milstead, J.L.: Thesauri in a full-text world (1998)
0.03
0.030177874 = product of:
0.09053362 = sum of:
0.09053362 = sum of:
0.05687567 = weight(_text_:indexing in 2337) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05687567 = score(doc=2337,freq=4.0), product of:
0.19018644 = queryWeight, product of:
3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
0.049684696 = queryNorm
0.29905218 = fieldWeight in 2337, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2337)
0.033657953 = weight(_text_:22 in 2337) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033657953 = score(doc=2337,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17398734 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.049684696 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2337, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2337)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Despite early claims to the contemporary, thesauri continue to find use as access tools for information in the full-text environment. Their mode of use is changing, but this change actually represents an expansion rather than a contrdiction of their utility. Thesauri and similar vocabulary tools can complement full-text access by aiding users in focusing their searches, by supplementing the linguistic analysis of the text search engine, and even by serving as one of the tools used by the linguistic engine for its analysis. While human indexing contunues to be used for many databases, the trend is to increase the use of machine aids for this purpose. All machine-aided indexing (MAI) systems rely on thesauri as the basis for term selection. In the 21st century, the balance of effort between human and machine will change at both input and output, but thesauri will continue to play an important role for the foreseeable future
- Date
- 22. 9.1997 19:16:05
-
Humphrey, S.M.: Automatic indexing of documents from journal descriptors : a preliminary investigation (1999)
0.03
0.025435574 = product of:
0.07630672 = sum of:
0.07630672 = product of:
0.15261345 = sum of:
0.15261345 = weight(_text_:indexing in 3769) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.15261345 = score(doc=3769,freq=20.0), product of:
0.19018644 = queryWeight, product of:
3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
0.049684696 = queryNorm
0.80244124 = fieldWeight in 3769, product of:
4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
20.0 = termFreq=20.0
3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3769)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- A new, fully automated approach for indedexing documents is presented based on associating textwords in a training set of bibliographic citations with the indexing of journals. This journal-level indexing is in the form of a consistent, timely set of journal descriptors (JDs) indexing the individual journals themselves. This indexing is maintained in journal records in a serials authority database. The advantage of this novel approach is that the training set does not depend on previous manual indexing of thousands of documents (i.e., any such indexing already in the training set is not used), but rather the relatively small intellectual effort of indexing at the journal level, usually a matter of a few thousand unique journals for which retrospective indexing to maintain consistency and currency may be feasible. If successful, JD indexing would provide topical categorization of documents outside the training set, i.e., journal articles, monographs, Web documents, reports from the grey literature, etc., and therefore be applied in searching. Because JDs are quite general, corresponding to subject domains, their most problable use would be for improving or refining search results
-
Wan, T.-L.; Evens, M.; Wan, Y.-W.; Pao, Y.-Y.: Experiments with automatic indexing and a relational thesaurus in a Chinese information retrieval system (1997)
0.02
0.024827747 = product of:
0.07448324 = sum of:
0.07448324 = product of:
0.14896648 = sum of:
0.14896648 = weight(_text_:indexing in 956) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14896648 = score(doc=956,freq=14.0), product of:
0.19018644 = queryWeight, product of:
3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
0.049684696 = queryNorm
0.78326553 = fieldWeight in 956, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=956)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- This article describes a series of experiments with an interactive Chinese information retrieval system named CIRS and an interactive relational thesaurus. 2 important issues have been explored: whether thesauri enhance the retrieval effectiveness of Chinese documents, and whether automatic indexing can complete with manual indexing in a Chinese information retrieval system. Recall and precision are used to measure and evaluate the effectiveness of the system. Statistical analysis of the recall and precision measures suggest that the use of the relational thesaurus does improve the retrieval effectiveness both in the automatic indexing environment and in the manual indexing environment and that automatic indexing is at least as good as manual indexing
-
Plaunt, C.; Norgard, B.A.: ¬An association-based method for automatic indexing with a controlled vocabulary (1998)
0.02
0.02462504 = product of:
0.07387512 = sum of:
0.07387512 = sum of:
0.04021717 = weight(_text_:indexing in 1794) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04021717 = score(doc=1794,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19018644 = queryWeight, product of:
3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
0.049684696 = queryNorm
0.21146181 = fieldWeight in 1794, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1794)
0.033657953 = weight(_text_:22 in 1794) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033657953 = score(doc=1794,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17398734 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.049684696 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1794, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1794)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Date
- 11. 9.2000 19:53:22
-
Kim, P.K.: ¬An automatic indexing of compound words based on mutual information for Korean text retrieval (1995)
0.02
0.02398089 = product of:
0.071942665 = sum of:
0.071942665 = product of:
0.14388533 = sum of:
0.14388533 = weight(_text_:indexing in 620) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14388533 = score(doc=620,freq=10.0), product of:
0.19018644 = queryWeight, product of:
3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
0.049684696 = queryNorm
0.7565488 = fieldWeight in 620, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=620)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Presents an automatic indexing technique for compound words suitable for an agglutinative language, specifically Korean. Discusses some construction conditions for compound words and the rules for decomposing compound words to enhance the exhaustivity of indexing, demonstrating that this system, mutual information, enhances both the exhaustivity of indexing and the specifity of terms. Suggests that the construction conditions and rules for decomposition presented may be used in multilingual information retrieval systems to translate the indexing terms of the specific language into those of the language required
-
Li, Z.: Research on dynamic morphological indexing (1998)
0.02
0.02398089 = product of:
0.071942665 = sum of:
0.071942665 = product of:
0.14388533 = sum of:
0.14388533 = weight(_text_:indexing in 3242) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14388533 = score(doc=3242,freq=10.0), product of:
0.19018644 = queryWeight, product of:
3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
0.049684696 = queryNorm
0.7565488 = fieldWeight in 3242, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3242)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Notes that in automatic indexing of Chinese words using dictionary matching methods, there is some difficulty in the indexing of proper nouns. Presents a solution called dynamic morphological indexing, based on work using automatic indexing of archive documents. Presents the algorithm for this solution
-
Hodge, G.M.: Computer-assisted database indexing : the state-of-the-art (1994)
0.02
0.023219395 = product of:
0.06965818 = sum of:
0.06965818 = product of:
0.13931637 = sum of:
0.13931637 = weight(_text_:indexing in 7936) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13931637 = score(doc=7936,freq=6.0), product of:
0.19018644 = queryWeight, product of:
3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
0.049684696 = queryNorm
0.7325252 = fieldWeight in 7936, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=7936)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Discusses the state-of-the art of computer indexing, defines indexing and computer assistance, describes the reasons for renewed interest. Identifies the types of computer support in use using selected operational systems, describes the integration of various computer supports in one databases production system, and speculates on the future
-
Silvester, J.P.; Genuardi, M.T.: Machine-aided indexing from the analysis of natural language text (1994)
0.02
0.02275027 = product of:
0.068250805 = sum of:
0.068250805 = product of:
0.13650161 = sum of:
0.13650161 = weight(_text_:indexing in 2989) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13650161 = score(doc=2989,freq=4.0), product of:
0.19018644 = queryWeight, product of:
3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
0.049684696 = queryNorm
0.7177252 = fieldWeight in 2989, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2989)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Challenges in indexing electronic text and images. Ed.: R. Fidel et al
-
Hmeidi, I.; Kanaan, G.; Evens, M.: Design and implementation of automatic indexing for information retrieval with Arabic documents (1997)
0.02
0.02275027 = product of:
0.068250805 = sum of:
0.068250805 = product of:
0.13650161 = sum of:
0.13650161 = weight(_text_:indexing in 1660) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13650161 = score(doc=1660,freq=16.0), product of:
0.19018644 = queryWeight, product of:
3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
0.049684696 = queryNorm
0.7177252 = fieldWeight in 1660, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1660)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- A corpus of 242 abstracts of Arabic documents on computer science and information systems using the Proceedings of the Saudi Arabian National Conferences as a source was put together. Reports on the design and building of an automatic information retrieval system from scratch to handle Arabic data. Both automatic and manual indexing techniques were implemented. Experiments using measures of recall and precision has demonstrated that automatic indexing is at least as effective as manual indexing and more effective in some cases. Automatic indexing is both cheaper and faster. Results suggests that a wider coverage of the literature can be achieved with less money and produce as good results as with manual indexing. Compares the retrieval results using words as index terms versus stems and roots, and confirms the results obtained by Al-Kharashi and Abu-Salem with smaller corpora that root indexing is more effective than word indexing
-
Jones, K.P.: Natural-language processing and automatic indexing : a reply (1990)
0.02
0.02144916 = product of:
0.064347476 = sum of:
0.064347476 = product of:
0.12869495 = sum of:
0.12869495 = weight(_text_:indexing in 394) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12869495 = score(doc=394,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19018644 = queryWeight, product of:
3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
0.049684696 = queryNorm
0.6766778 = fieldWeight in 394, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=394)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
-
Wellisch, H.H.: ¬The art of indexing and some fallacies of its automation (1992)
0.02
0.02144916 = product of:
0.064347476 = sum of:
0.064347476 = product of:
0.12869495 = sum of:
0.12869495 = weight(_text_:indexing in 3958) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12869495 = score(doc=3958,freq=8.0), product of:
0.19018644 = queryWeight, product of:
3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
0.049684696 = queryNorm
0.6766778 = fieldWeight in 3958, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3958)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Reviews the history of indexing, which began with the rise of the universities in the 13th century, before the invention of printing. Describes the different skills needed for indexing books, periodicals and databases. States the belief that the quest for fully automatic indexing is a futile endeavour; machine-generated indexes need the services of human post-editors if they are to be useful and acceptable
-
Garfield, E.; Sher, I.H.: KeyWords Plus: algorithmic derivative indexing (1993)
0.02
0.02144916 = product of:
0.064347476 = sum of:
0.064347476 = product of:
0.12869495 = sum of:
0.12869495 = weight(_text_:indexing in 4341) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12869495 = score(doc=4341,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19018644 = queryWeight, product of:
3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
0.049684696 = queryNorm
0.6766778 = fieldWeight in 4341, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4341)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
-
Garfield, E.; Sager, N.: Mechanical indexing, structural linguistics and information retrieval (1993)
0.02
0.02144916 = product of:
0.064347476 = sum of:
0.064347476 = product of:
0.12869495 = sum of:
0.12869495 = weight(_text_:indexing in 5900) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12869495 = score(doc=5900,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19018644 = queryWeight, product of:
3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
0.049684696 = queryNorm
0.6766778 = fieldWeight in 5900, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5900)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
-
Harman, D.: Automatic indexing (1994)
0.02
0.02144916 = product of:
0.064347476 = sum of:
0.064347476 = product of:
0.12869495 = sum of:
0.12869495 = weight(_text_:indexing in 7729) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12869495 = score(doc=7729,freq=8.0), product of:
0.19018644 = queryWeight, product of:
3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
0.049684696 = queryNorm
0.6766778 = fieldWeight in 7729, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7729)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Content
- Enthält die Abschnitte: What constitutes a record; What constitutes a word and what 'words' to index; Use of stop lists; Use of suffixing or stemming; Advanced automatic indexing techniques (term weighting, query expansion, the use of multiple-word phrases for indexing)
- Source
- Challenges in indexing electronic text and images. Ed.: R. Fidel et al
-
Prasad, A.R.D.: PROMETHEUS: an automatic indexing system (1996)
0.02
0.02144916 = product of:
0.064347476 = sum of:
0.064347476 = product of:
0.12869495 = sum of:
0.12869495 = weight(_text_:indexing in 5189) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12869495 = score(doc=5189,freq=8.0), product of:
0.19018644 = queryWeight, product of:
3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
0.049684696 = queryNorm
0.6766778 = fieldWeight in 5189, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.8278677 = idf(docFreq=2614, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5189)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- An automatic indexing system using the tools and techniques of artificial intelligence is described. The paper presents the various components of the system like the parser, grammar formalism, lexicon, and the frame based knowledge representation for semantic representation. The semantic representation is based on the Ranganathan school of thought, especially that of Deep Structure of Subject Indexing Languages enunciated by Bhattacharyya. It is attempted to demonstrate the various stepts in indexing by providing an illustration
