Search (16 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Automatisches Indexieren"
  • × type_ss:"a"
  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. Busch, D.: Domänenspezifische hybride automatische Indexierung von bibliographischen Metadaten (2019) 0.03
    0.03171165 = product of:
      0.0634233 = sum of:
        0.0634233 = sum of:
          0.027205998 = weight(_text_:6 in 5628) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.027205998 = score(doc=5628,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.13521942 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.0350742 = idf(docFreq=5777, maxDocs=44218)
                0.044552263 = queryNorm
              0.20119889 = fieldWeight in 5628, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.0350742 = idf(docFreq=5777, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5628)
          0.0362173 = weight(_text_:22 in 5628) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0362173 = score(doc=5628,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15601443 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.044552263 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5628, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5628)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    B.I.T.online. 22(2019) H.6, S.465-469
  2. Mesquita, L.A.P.; Souza, R.R.; Baracho Porto, R.M.A.: Noun phrases in automatic indexing: : a structural analysis of the distribution of relevant terms in doctoral theses (2014) 0.02
    0.021141099 = product of:
      0.042282198 = sum of:
        0.042282198 = sum of:
          0.018137332 = weight(_text_:6 in 1442) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.018137332 = score(doc=1442,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.13521942 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.0350742 = idf(docFreq=5777, maxDocs=44218)
                0.044552263 = queryNorm
              0.1341326 = fieldWeight in 1442, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.0350742 = idf(docFreq=5777, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1442)
          0.024144866 = weight(_text_:22 in 1442) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.024144866 = score(doc=1442,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15601443 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.044552263 = queryNorm
              0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 1442, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1442)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The main objective of this research was to analyze whether there was a characteristic distribution behavior of relevant terms over a scientific text that could contribute as a criterion for their process of automatic indexing. The terms considered in this study were only full noun phrases contained in the texts themselves. The texts were considered a total of 98 doctoral theses of the eight areas of knowledge in a same university. Initially, 20 full noun phrases were automatically extracted from each text as candidates to be the most relevant terms, and each author of each text assigned a relevance value 0-6 (not relevant and highly relevant, respectively) for each of the 20 noun phrases sent. Only, 22.1 % of noun phrases were considered not relevant. A relevance values of the terms assigned by the authors were associated with their positions in the text. Each full noun phrases found in the text was considered as a valid linear position. The results that were obtained showed values resulting from this distribution by considering two types of position: linear, with values consolidated into ten equal consecutive parts; and structural, considering parts of the text (such as introduction, development and conclusion). As a result of considerable importance, all areas of knowledge related to the Natural Sciences showed a characteristic behavior in the distribution of relevant terms, as well as all areas of knowledge related to Social Sciences showed the same characteristic behavior of distribution, but distinct from the Natural Sciences. The difference of the distribution behavior between the Natural and Social Sciences can be clearly visualized through graphs. All behaviors, including the general behavior of all areas of knowledge together, were characterized in polynomial equations and can be applied in future as criteria for automatic indexing. Until the present date this work has become inedited of for two reasons: to present a method for characterizing the distribution of relevant terms in a scientific text, and also, through this method, pointing out a quantitative trait difference between the Natural and Social Sciences.
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
  3. Lepsky, K.: Automatische Indexierung (2012) 0.02
    0.018137332 = product of:
      0.036274664 = sum of:
        0.036274664 = product of:
          0.07254933 = sum of:
            0.07254933 = weight(_text_:6 in 442) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07254933 = score(doc=442,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13521942 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0350742 = idf(docFreq=5777, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044552263 = queryNorm
                0.5365304 = fieldWeight in 442, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.0350742 = idf(docFreq=5777, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=442)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Grundlagen der praktischen Information und Dokumentation. 6. Aufl
  4. Hauer, M.: Tiefenindexierung im Bibliothekskatalog : 17 Jahre intelligentCAPTURE (2019) 0.02
    0.01810865 = product of:
      0.0362173 = sum of:
        0.0362173 = product of:
          0.0724346 = sum of:
            0.0724346 = weight(_text_:22 in 5629) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0724346 = score(doc=5629,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15601443 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044552263 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 5629, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5629)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    B.I.T.online. 22(2019) H.2, S.163-166
  5. Stankovic, R. et al.: Indexing of textual databases based on lexical resources : a case study for Serbian (2016) 0.02
    0.015090541 = product of:
      0.030181082 = sum of:
        0.030181082 = product of:
          0.060362164 = sum of:
            0.060362164 = weight(_text_:22 in 2759) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.060362164 = score(doc=2759,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15601443 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044552263 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2759, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2759)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    1. 2.2016 18:25:22
  6. Lepsky, K.: Automatische Indexierung (2013) 0.01
    0.011335833 = product of:
      0.022671666 = sum of:
        0.022671666 = product of:
          0.045343332 = sum of:
            0.045343332 = weight(_text_:6 in 720) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.045343332 = score(doc=720,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13521942 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0350742 = idf(docFreq=5777, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044552263 = queryNorm
                0.3353315 = fieldWeight in 720, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.0350742 = idf(docFreq=5777, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=720)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Grundlagen der praktischen Information und Dokumentation. Handbuch zur Einführung in die Informationswissenschaft und -praxis. 6., völlig neu gefaßte Ausgabe. Hrsg. von R. Kuhlen, W. Semar u. D. Strauch. Begründet von Klaus Laisiepen, Ernst Lutterbeck, Karl-Heinrich Meyer-Uhlenried
  7. Kasprzik, A.: Voraussetzungen und Anwendungspotentiale einer präzisen Sacherschließung aus Sicht der Wissenschaft (2018) 0.01
    0.010563378 = product of:
      0.021126756 = sum of:
        0.021126756 = product of:
          0.042253513 = sum of:
            0.042253513 = weight(_text_:22 in 5195) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042253513 = score(doc=5195,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15601443 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044552263 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5195, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5195)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Große Aufmerksamkeit richtet sich im Moment auf das Potential von automatisierten Methoden in der Sacherschließung und deren Interaktionsmöglichkeiten mit intellektuellen Methoden. In diesem Kontext befasst sich der vorliegende Beitrag mit den folgenden Fragen: Was sind die Anforderungen an bibliothekarische Metadaten aus Sicht der Wissenschaft? Was wird gebraucht, um den Informationsbedarf der Fachcommunities zu bedienen? Und was bedeutet das entsprechend für die Automatisierung der Metadatenerstellung und -pflege? Dieser Beitrag fasst die von der Autorin eingenommene Position in einem Impulsvortrag und der Podiumsdiskussion beim Workshop der FAG "Erschließung und Informationsvermittlung" des GBV zusammen. Der Workshop fand im Rahmen der 22. Verbundkonferenz des GBV statt.
  8. Franke-Maier, M.: Anforderungen an die Qualität der Inhaltserschließung im Spannungsfeld von intellektuell und automatisch erzeugten Metadaten (2018) 0.01
    0.010563378 = product of:
      0.021126756 = sum of:
        0.021126756 = product of:
          0.042253513 = sum of:
            0.042253513 = weight(_text_:22 in 5344) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042253513 = score(doc=5344,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15601443 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044552263 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5344, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5344)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Spätestens seit dem Deutschen Bibliothekartag 2018 hat sich die Diskussion zu den automatischen Verfahren der Inhaltserschließung der Deutschen Nationalbibliothek von einer politisch geführten Diskussion in eine Qualitätsdiskussion verwandelt. Der folgende Beitrag beschäftigt sich mit Fragen der Qualität von Inhaltserschließung in digitalen Zeiten, wo heterogene Erzeugnisse unterschiedlicher Verfahren aufeinandertreffen und versucht, wichtige Anforderungen an Qualität zu definieren. Dieser Tagungsbeitrag fasst die vom Autor als Impulse vorgetragenen Ideen beim Workshop der FAG "Erschließung und Informationsvermittlung" des GBV am 29. August 2018 in Kiel zusammen. Der Workshop fand im Rahmen der 22. Verbundkonferenz des GBV statt.
  9. Simões, M. da Graça; Machado, L.M.; Souza, R.R.; Almeida, M.B.; Tavares Lopes, A.: Automatic indexing and ontologies : the consistency of research chronology and authoring in the context of Information Science (2018) 0.01
    0.007935083 = product of:
      0.015870165 = sum of:
        0.015870165 = product of:
          0.03174033 = sum of:
            0.03174033 = weight(_text_:6 in 5909) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03174033 = score(doc=5909,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13521942 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0350742 = idf(docFreq=5777, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044552263 = queryNorm
                0.23473203 = fieldWeight in 5909, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.0350742 = idf(docFreq=5777, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5909)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    6. 7.2022 19:14:12
  10. Junger, U.; Schwens, U.: ¬Die inhaltliche Erschließung des schriftlichen kulturellen Erbes auf dem Weg in die Zukunft : Automatische Vergabe von Schlagwörtern in der Deutschen Nationalbibliothek (2017) 0.01
    0.0075452705 = product of:
      0.015090541 = sum of:
        0.015090541 = product of:
          0.030181082 = sum of:
            0.030181082 = weight(_text_:22 in 3780) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030181082 = score(doc=3780,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15601443 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044552263 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3780, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3780)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    19. 8.2017 9:24:22
  11. Gil-Leiva, I.: SISA-automatic indexing system for scientific articles : experiments with location heuristics rules versus TF-IDF rules (2017) 0.01
    0.0068014995 = product of:
      0.013602999 = sum of:
        0.013602999 = product of:
          0.027205998 = sum of:
            0.027205998 = weight(_text_:6 in 3622) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.027205998 = score(doc=3622,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13521942 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0350742 = idf(docFreq=5777, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044552263 = queryNorm
                0.20119889 = fieldWeight in 3622, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.0350742 = idf(docFreq=5777, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3622)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    6. 5.2017 19:25:45
  12. Beckmann, R.; Hinrichs, I.; Janßen, M.; Milmeister, G.; Schäuble, P.: ¬Der Digitale Assistent DA-3 : Eine Plattform für die Inhaltserschließung (2019) 0.01
    0.0068014995 = product of:
      0.013602999 = sum of:
        0.013602999 = product of:
          0.027205998 = sum of:
            0.027205998 = weight(_text_:6 in 5408) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.027205998 = score(doc=5408,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13521942 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0350742 = idf(docFreq=5777, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044552263 = queryNorm
                0.20119889 = fieldWeight in 5408, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.0350742 = idf(docFreq=5777, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5408)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    o-bib: Das offene Bibliotheksjournal. 6(2019) Nr.3, S.1-20
  13. Martins, A.L.; Souza, R.R.; Ribeiro de Mello, H.: ¬The use of noun phrases in information retrieval : proposing a mechanism for automatic classification (2014) 0.01
    0.0060362164 = product of:
      0.012072433 = sum of:
        0.012072433 = product of:
          0.024144866 = sum of:
            0.024144866 = weight(_text_:22 in 1441) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024144866 = score(doc=1441,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15601443 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044552263 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 1441, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1441)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
  14. Greiner-Petter, A.; Schubotz, M.; Cohl, H.S.; Gipp, B.: Semantic preserving bijective mappings for expressions involving special functions between computer algebra systems and document preparation systems (2019) 0.01
    0.0060362164 = product of:
      0.012072433 = sum of:
        0.012072433 = product of:
          0.024144866 = sum of:
            0.024144866 = weight(_text_:22 in 5499) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024144866 = score(doc=5499,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15601443 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044552263 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 5499, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5499)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
  15. Smiraglia, R.P.; Cai, X.: Tracking the evolution of clustering, machine learning, automatic indexing and automatic classification in knowledge organization (2017) 0.01
    0.0056679165 = product of:
      0.011335833 = sum of:
        0.011335833 = product of:
          0.022671666 = sum of:
            0.022671666 = weight(_text_:6 in 3627) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.022671666 = score(doc=3627,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13521942 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0350742 = idf(docFreq=5777, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044552263 = queryNorm
                0.16766575 = fieldWeight in 3627, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.0350742 = idf(docFreq=5777, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3627)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    6. 5.2017 19:44:10
  16. Li, X.; Zhang, A.; Li, C.; Ouyang, J.; Cai, Y.: Exploring coherent topics by topic modeling with term weighting (2018) 0.01
    0.0056679165 = product of:
      0.011335833 = sum of:
        0.011335833 = product of:
          0.022671666 = sum of:
            0.022671666 = weight(_text_:6 in 5045) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.022671666 = score(doc=5045,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13521942 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0350742 = idf(docFreq=5777, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044552263 = queryNorm
                0.16766575 = fieldWeight in 5045, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.0350742 = idf(docFreq=5777, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5045)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 54(2018) no.6, S.1345-1358