-
Lustig, G.: Methoden der automatischen Indexierung (1970)
0.02
0.021249607 = product of:
0.042499214 = sum of:
0.042499214 = product of:
0.08499843 = sum of:
0.08499843 = weight(_text_:g in 4999) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08499843 = score(doc=4999,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17068884 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.04544495 = queryNorm
0.49797297 = fieldWeight in 4999, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4999)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Rapke, K.: Automatische Indexierung von Volltexten für die Gruner+Jahr Pressedatenbank (2001)
0.02
0.021249607 = product of:
0.042499214 = sum of:
0.042499214 = product of:
0.08499843 = sum of:
0.08499843 = weight(_text_:g in 6386) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08499843 = score(doc=6386,freq=8.0), product of:
0.17068884 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.04544495 = queryNorm
0.49797297 = fieldWeight in 6386, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6386)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Retrieval Tests sind die anerkannteste Methode, um neue Verfahren der Inhaltserschließung gegenüber traditionellen Verfahren zu rechtfertigen. Im Rahmen einer Diplomarbeit wurden zwei grundsätzlich unterschiedliche Systeme der automatischen inhaltlichen Erschließung anhand der Pressedatenbank des Verlagshauses Gruner + Jahr (G+J) getestet und evaluiert. Untersucht wurde dabei natürlichsprachliches Retrieval im Vergleich zu Booleschem Retrieval. Bei den beiden Systemen handelt es sich zum einen um Autonomy von Autonomy Inc. und DocCat, das von IBM an die Datenbankstruktur der G+J Pressedatenbank angepasst wurde. Ersteres ist ein auf natürlichsprachlichem Retrieval basierendes, probabilistisches System. DocCat demgegenüber basiert auf Booleschem Retrieval und ist ein lernendes System, das auf Grund einer intellektuell erstellten Trainingsvorlage indexiert. Methodisch geht die Evaluation vom realen Anwendungskontext der Textdokumentation von G+J aus. Die Tests werden sowohl unter statistischen wie auch qualitativen Gesichtspunkten bewertet. Ein Ergebnis der Tests ist, dass DocCat einige Mängel gegenüber der intellektuellen Inhaltserschließung aufweist, die noch behoben werden müssen, während das natürlichsprachliche Retrieval von Autonomy in diesem Rahmen und für die speziellen Anforderungen der G+J Textdokumentation so nicht einsetzbar ist
-
Knorz, G.: Automatische Indexierung (1994)
0.02
0.021249607 = product of:
0.042499214 = sum of:
0.042499214 = product of:
0.08499843 = sum of:
0.08499843 = weight(_text_:g in 4254) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08499843 = score(doc=4254,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17068884 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.04544495 = queryNorm
0.49797297 = fieldWeight in 4254, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4254)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Biebricher, P.; Fuhr, N.; Knorz, G.; Lustig, G.; Schwandtner, M.: Entwicklung und Anwendung des automatischen Indexierungssystems AIR/PHYS (1988)
0.02
0.02003432 = product of:
0.04006864 = sum of:
0.04006864 = product of:
0.08013728 = sum of:
0.08013728 = weight(_text_:g in 2320) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08013728 = score(doc=2320,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17068884 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.04544495 = queryNorm
0.46949342 = fieldWeight in 2320, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2320)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Fuhr, N.: Ranking-Experimente mit gewichteter Indexierung (1986)
0.02
0.018471489 = product of:
0.036942977 = sum of:
0.036942977 = product of:
0.073885955 = sum of:
0.073885955 = weight(_text_:22 in 58) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.073885955 = score(doc=58,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15914047 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04544495 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 58, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=58)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 14. 6.2015 22:12:44
-
Hauer, M.: Automatische Indexierung (2000)
0.02
0.018471489 = product of:
0.036942977 = sum of:
0.036942977 = product of:
0.073885955 = sum of:
0.073885955 = weight(_text_:22 in 5887) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.073885955 = score(doc=5887,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15914047 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04544495 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 5887, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5887)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Wissen in Aktion: Wege des Knowledge Managements. 22. Online-Tagung der DGI, Frankfurt am Main, 2.-4.5.2000. Proceedings. Hrsg.: R. Schmidt
-
Hauer, M.: Tiefenindexierung im Bibliothekskatalog : 17 Jahre intelligentCAPTURE (2019)
0.02
0.018471489 = product of:
0.036942977 = sum of:
0.036942977 = product of:
0.073885955 = sum of:
0.073885955 = weight(_text_:22 in 5629) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.073885955 = score(doc=5629,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15914047 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04544495 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 5629, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5629)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- B.I.T.online. 22(2019) H.2, S.163-166
-
Gaese, V.: "Automatische Klassifikation von Presseartikeln in der Gruner + Jahr Dokumentation" (2003)
0.02
0.018402701 = product of:
0.036805402 = sum of:
0.036805402 = product of:
0.073610805 = sum of:
0.073610805 = weight(_text_:g in 1915) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.073610805 = score(doc=1915,freq=6.0), product of:
0.17068884 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.04544495 = queryNorm
0.43125728 = fieldWeight in 1915, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1915)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Das Klassifizieren von Texten, auch Indexieren, inhaltliches Erschließen oder verschlagworten genannt, gehört seit jeher zu den zwar notwendigen aber sehr aufwändigen Aufgaben von Archiven bzw. Dokumentationen. Ihre unterschiedlichen Zwecke bzw. Anforderungen sind sicher ein Grund dafür, dass es fast ebenso viele Erschließungsinventare, Thesauri oder Schlagwortverzeichnisse wie Dokumentationen gibt. Im folgenden werden Klassifizierung, Indexierung, Erschließung und Verschlagwortung synonym verwendet. In der G+J Dokumentation arbeiten heute ca. 20 Dokumentare an Auswahl und Erschließung von täglich etwa 1.100 Artikeln aus insgesamt ca. 210 Titeln. In der G+J Pressedatenbank sind aktuell ca. 7 Mio Artikel gespeichert, gut 2 Mio als digitaler Volltext (OCR/Satzdaten). Archiviert sind nur Artikel, für die die G+J Dokumentation die entsprechenden Rechte hat.
-
Salton, G.: Another look at automatic text-retrieval systems (1986)
0.02
0.017708007 = product of:
0.035416014 = sum of:
0.035416014 = product of:
0.07083203 = sum of:
0.07083203 = weight(_text_:g in 1356) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07083203 = score(doc=1356,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17068884 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.04544495 = queryNorm
0.4149775 = fieldWeight in 1356, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1356)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Biebricher, P.; Fuhr, N.; Niewelt, B.: ¬Der AIR-Retrievaltest (1986)
0.02
0.017708007 = product of:
0.035416014 = sum of:
0.035416014 = product of:
0.07083203 = sum of:
0.07083203 = weight(_text_:g in 4040) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07083203 = score(doc=4040,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17068884 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.04544495 = queryNorm
0.4149775 = fieldWeight in 4040, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4040)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Automatische Indexierung zwischen Forschung und Anwendung, Hrsg.: G. Lustig
-
Salton, G.; Wong, A.; Yang, C.S.: ¬A vector space model for automatic indexing (1975)
0.02
0.017708007 = product of:
0.035416014 = sum of:
0.035416014 = product of:
0.07083203 = sum of:
0.07083203 = weight(_text_:g in 1934) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07083203 = score(doc=1934,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17068884 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.04544495 = queryNorm
0.4149775 = fieldWeight in 1934, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1934)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Salton, G.; Allan, J.; Buckley, C.; Singhal, A.: Automatic analysis, theme generation, and summarization of machine readable texts (1994)
0.02
0.017708007 = product of:
0.035416014 = sum of:
0.035416014 = product of:
0.07083203 = sum of:
0.07083203 = weight(_text_:g in 1949) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07083203 = score(doc=1949,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17068884 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.04544495 = queryNorm
0.4149775 = fieldWeight in 1949, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1949)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
McKiernan, G.: Automated categorisation of Web resources : a profile of selected projects, research, products, and services (1996)
0.02
0.017708007 = product of:
0.035416014 = sum of:
0.035416014 = product of:
0.07083203 = sum of:
0.07083203 = weight(_text_:g in 2533) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07083203 = score(doc=2533,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17068884 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.04544495 = queryNorm
0.4149775 = fieldWeight in 2533, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2533)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Yongcheng, W.; Xiaoming, G.; Lixia, W.: Automatic indexing on subject of Chinese text (1998)
0.02
0.017708007 = product of:
0.035416014 = sum of:
0.035416014 = product of:
0.07083203 = sum of:
0.07083203 = weight(_text_:g in 3241) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07083203 = score(doc=3241,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17068884 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.04544495 = queryNorm
0.4149775 = fieldWeight in 3241, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3241)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Rapke, K.: Automatische Indexierung von Volltexten für die Gruner+Jahr Pressedatenbank (2001)
0.02
0.017708007 = product of:
0.035416014 = sum of:
0.035416014 = product of:
0.07083203 = sum of:
0.07083203 = weight(_text_:g in 5863) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07083203 = score(doc=5863,freq=8.0), product of:
0.17068884 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.04544495 = queryNorm
0.4149775 = fieldWeight in 5863, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5863)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Retrievaltests sind die anerkannteste Methode, um neue Verfahren der Inhaltserschließung gegenüber traditionellen Verfahren zu rechtfertigen. Im Rahmen einer Diplomarbeit wurden zwei grundsätzlich unterschiedliche Systeme der automatischen inhaltlichen Erschließung anhand der Pressedatenbank des Verlagshauses Gruner + Jahr (G+J) getestet und evaluiert. Untersucht wurde dabei natürlichsprachliches Retrieval im Vergleich zu Booleschem Retrieval. Bei den beiden Systemen handelt es sich zum einen um Autonomy von Autonomy Inc. und DocCat, das von IBM an die Datenbankstruktur der G+J Pressedatenbank angepasst wurde. Ersteres ist ein auf natürlichsprachlichem Retrieval basierendes, probabilistisches System. DocCat demgegenüber basiert auf Booleschem Retrieval und ist ein lernendes System, das aufgrund einer intellektuell erstellten Trainingsvorlage indexiert. Methodisch geht die Evaluation vom realen Anwendungskontext der Textdokumentation von G+J aus. Die Tests werden sowohl unter statistischen wie auch qualitativen Gesichtspunkten bewertet. Ein Ergebnis der Tests ist, dass DocCat einige Mängel gegenüber der intellektuellen Inhaltserschließung aufweist, die noch behoben werden müssen, während das natürlichsprachliche Retrieval von Autonomy in diesem Rahmen und für die speziellen Anforderungen der G+J Textdokumentation so nicht einsetzbar ist
-
Chartron, G.; Dalbin, S.; Monteil, M.-G.; Verillon, M.: Indexation manuelle et indexation automatique : dépasser les oppositions (1989)
0.02
0.017530032 = product of:
0.035060063 = sum of:
0.035060063 = product of:
0.070120126 = sum of:
0.070120126 = weight(_text_:g in 3516) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.070120126 = score(doc=3516,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17068884 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.04544495 = queryNorm
0.41080675 = fieldWeight in 3516, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3516)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Kutschekmanesch, S.; Lutes, B.; Moelle, K.; Thiel, U.; Tzeras, K.: Automated multilingual indexing : a synthesis of rule-based and thesaurus-based methods (1998)
0.02
0.015392908 = product of:
0.030785816 = sum of:
0.030785816 = product of:
0.06157163 = sum of:
0.06157163 = weight(_text_:22 in 4157) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06157163 = score(doc=4157,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15914047 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04544495 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4157, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4157)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Information und Märkte: 50. Deutscher Dokumentartag 1998, Kongreß der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Dokumentation e.V. (DGD), Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn, 22.-24. September 1998. Hrsg. von Marlies Ockenfeld u. Gerhard J. Mantwill
-
Tsareva, P.V.: Algoritmy dlya raspoznavaniya pozitivnykh i negativnykh vkhozdenii deskriptorov v tekst i protsedura avtomaticheskoi klassifikatsii tekstov (1999)
0.02
0.015392908 = product of:
0.030785816 = sum of:
0.030785816 = product of:
0.06157163 = sum of:
0.06157163 = weight(_text_:22 in 374) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06157163 = score(doc=374,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15914047 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04544495 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 374, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=374)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 1. 4.2002 10:22:41
-
Stankovic, R. et al.: Indexing of textual databases based on lexical resources : a case study for Serbian (2016)
0.02
0.015392908 = product of:
0.030785816 = sum of:
0.030785816 = product of:
0.06157163 = sum of:
0.06157163 = weight(_text_:22 in 2759) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06157163 = score(doc=2759,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15914047 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04544495 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2759, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2759)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 1. 2.2016 18:25:22
-
Lustig, G.: Automatische Indexierung : Erfahrungen und Perspektiven (1989)
0.01
0.0141664045 = product of:
0.028332809 = sum of:
0.028332809 = product of:
0.056665618 = sum of:
0.056665618 = weight(_text_:g in 2323) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056665618 = score(doc=2323,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17068884 = queryWeight, product of:
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.04544495 = queryNorm
0.331982 = fieldWeight in 2323, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.7559474 = idf(docFreq=2809, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2323)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
