Search (52 results, page 1 of 3)

0.1072485 = product of:
  0.214497 = sum of:
    0.214497 = sum of:
      0.14023988 = weight(_text_:y in 1952) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.14023988 = score(doc=1952,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.26375747 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05480788 = queryNorm
          0.53170013 = fieldWeight in 1952, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1952)
      0.07425711 = weight(_text_:22 in 1952) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.07425711 = score(doc=1952,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.19192785 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05480788 = queryNorm
          0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 1952, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1952)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

16. 8.1998 12:51:22

Source

Proceedings of the 11th annual conference on research and development in information retrieval. Ed.: Y. Chiaramella

0.042507958 = product of:
  0.085015915 = sum of:
    0.085015915 = product of:
      0.17003183 = sum of:
        0.17003183 = weight(_text_:y in 956) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.17003183 = score(doc=956,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.26375747 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05480788 = queryNorm
            0.6446522 = fieldWeight in 956, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=956)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

0.036649212 = sum of:
  0.02179779 = product of:
    0.08719116 = sum of:
      0.08719116 = weight(_text_:authors in 5499) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.08719116 = score(doc=5499,freq=6.0), product of:
          0.24985893 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05480788 = queryNorm
          0.34896153 = fieldWeight in 5499, product of:
            2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
              6.0 = termFreq=6.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5499)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.014851422 = product of:
    0.029702844 = sum of:
      0.029702844 = weight(_text_:22 in 5499) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.029702844 = score(doc=5499,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.19192785 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05480788 = queryNorm
          0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 5499, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5499)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Purpose Modern mathematicians and scientists of math-related disciplines often use Document Preparation Systems (DPS) to write and Computer Algebra Systems (CAS) to calculate mathematical expressions. Usually, they translate the expressions manually between DPS and CAS. This process is time-consuming and error-prone. The purpose of this paper is to automate this translation. This paper uses Maple and Mathematica as the CAS, and LaTeX as the DPS. Design/methodology/approach Bruce Miller at the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) developed a collection of special LaTeX macros that create links from mathematical symbols to their definitions in the NIST Digital Library of Mathematical Functions (DLMF). The authors are using these macros to perform rule-based translations between the formulae in the DLMF and CAS. Moreover, the authors develop software to ease the creation of new rules and to discover inconsistencies. Findings The authors created 396 mappings and translated 58.8 percent of DLMF formulae (2,405 expressions) successfully between Maple and DLMF. For a significant percentage, the special function definitions in Maple and the DLMF were different. An atomic symbol in one system maps to a composite expression in the other system. The translator was also successfully used for automatic verification of mathematical online compendia and CAS. The evaluation techniques discovered two errors in the DLMF and one defect in Maple. Originality/value This paper introduces the first translation tool for special functions between LaTeX and CAS. The approach improves error-prone manual translations and can be used to verify mathematical online compendia and CAS.

Date

20. 1.2015 18:30:22

0.034295477 = sum of:
  0.015731199 = product of:
    0.062924795 = sum of:
      0.062924795 = weight(_text_:authors in 1794) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.062924795 = score(doc=1794,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.24985893 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05480788 = queryNorm
          0.25184128 = fieldWeight in 1794, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1794)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.018564278 = product of:
    0.037128557 = sum of:
      0.037128557 = weight(_text_:22 in 1794) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.037128557 = score(doc=1794,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.19192785 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05480788 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1794, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1794)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

In this article, we describe and test a two-stage algorithm based on a lexical collocation technique which maps from the lexical clues contained in a document representation into a controlled vocabulary list of subject headings. Using a collection of 4.626 INSPEC documents, we create a 'dictionary' of associations between the lexical items contained in the titles, authors, and abstracts, and controlled vocabulary subject headings assigned to those records by human indexers using a likelihood ratio statistic as the measure of association. In the deployment stage, we use the dictiony to predict which of the controlled vocabulary subject headings best describe new documents when they are presented to the system. Our evaluation of this algorithm, in which we compare the automatically assigned subject headings to the subject headings assigned to the test documents by human catalogers, shows that we can obtain results comparable to, and consistent with, human cataloging. In effect we have cast this as a classic partial match information retrieval problem. We consider the problem to be one of 'retrieving' (or assigning) the most probably 'relevant' (or correct) controlled vocabulary subject headings to a document based on the clues contained in that document

Date

11. 9.2000 19:53:22

0.029702844 = product of:
  0.05940569 = sum of:
    0.05940569 = product of:
      0.11881138 = sum of:
        0.11881138 = weight(_text_:22 in 402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11881138 = score(doc=402,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19192785 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05480788 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 402, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=402)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

Information processing and management. 22(1986) no.6, S.465-476

0.028047977 = product of:
  0.056095954 = sum of:
    0.056095954 = product of:
      0.11219191 = sum of:
        0.11219191 = weight(_text_:y in 36) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11219191 = score(doc=36,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.26375747 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05480788 = queryNorm
            0.4253601 = fieldWeight in 36, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=36)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

0.02743638 = sum of:
  0.012584958 = product of:
    0.050339833 = sum of:
      0.050339833 = weight(_text_:authors in 1442) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.050339833 = score(doc=1442,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.24985893 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05480788 = queryNorm
          0.20147301 = fieldWeight in 1442, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1442)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.014851422 = product of:
    0.029702844 = sum of:
      0.029702844 = weight(_text_:22 in 1442) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.029702844 = score(doc=1442,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.19192785 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.05480788 = queryNorm
          0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 1442, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1442)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

The main objective of this research was to analyze whether there was a characteristic distribution behavior of relevant terms over a scientific text that could contribute as a criterion for their process of automatic indexing. The terms considered in this study were only full noun phrases contained in the texts themselves. The texts were considered a total of 98 doctoral theses of the eight areas of knowledge in a same university. Initially, 20 full noun phrases were automatically extracted from each text as candidates to be the most relevant terms, and each author of each text assigned a relevance value 0-6 (not relevant and highly relevant, respectively) for each of the 20 noun phrases sent. Only, 22.1 % of noun phrases were considered not relevant. A relevance values of the terms assigned by the authors were associated with their positions in the text. Each full noun phrases found in the text was considered as a valid linear position. The results that were obtained showed values resulting from this distribution by considering two types of position: linear, with values consolidated into ten equal consecutive parts; and structural, considering parts of the text (such as introduction, development and conclusion). As a result of considerable importance, all areas of knowledge related to the Natural Sciences showed a characteristic behavior in the distribution of relevant terms, as well as all areas of knowledge related to Social Sciences showed the same characteristic behavior of distribution, but distinct from the Natural Sciences. The difference of the distribution behavior between the Natural and Social Sciences can be clearly visualized through graphs. All behaviors, including the general behavior of all areas of knowledge together, were characterized in polynomial equations and can be applied in future as criteria for automatic indexing. Until the present date this work has become inedited of for two reasons: to present a method for characterizing the distribution of relevant terms in a scientific text, and also, through this method, pointing out a quantitative trait difference between the Natural and Social Sciences.

Source

Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik

0.025989987 = product of:
  0.051979974 = sum of:
    0.051979974 = product of:
      0.10395995 = sum of:
        0.10395995 = weight(_text_:22 in 262) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10395995 = score(doc=262,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19192785 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05480788 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 262, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=262)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

20.10.2000 12:22:23

0.025989987 = product of:
  0.051979974 = sum of:
    0.051979974 = product of:
      0.10395995 = sum of:
        0.10395995 = weight(_text_:22 in 6265) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10395995 = score(doc=6265,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19192785 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05480788 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6265, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6265)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

Information outlook. 9(2005) no.8, S.22-23

0.024791144 = product of:
  0.049582288 = sum of:
    0.049582288 = product of:
      0.099164575 = sum of:
        0.099164575 = weight(_text_:y in 5769) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.099164575 = score(doc=5769,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.26375747 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05480788 = queryNorm
            0.37596878 = fieldWeight in 5769, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5769)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Abstract

Statistical association measures have been widely applied in information retrieval research, usually employing a clustering of documents or terms on the basis of their relationships. Applications of the association measures for term clustering include automatic thesaurus construction and query expansion. This research evaluates the similarity of six association measures by comparing the relationship and behavior they demonstrate in various analyses of a test corpus. Analysis techniques include comparisons of highly ranked term pairs and term clusters, analyses of the correlation among the association measures using Pearson's correlation coefficient and MDS mapping, and an analysis of the impact of a term frequency on the association values by means of z-score. The major findings of the study are as follows: First, the most similar association measures are mutual information and Yule's coefficient of colligation Y, whereas cosine and Jaccard coefficients, as well as X**2 statistic and likelihood ratio, demonstrate quite similar behavior for terms with high frequency. Second, among all the measures, the X**2 statistic is the least affected by the frequency of terms. Third, although cosine and Jaccard coefficients tend to emphasize high frequency terms, mutual information and Yule's Y seem to overestimate rare terms

0.024791144 = product of:
  0.049582288 = sum of:
    0.049582288 = product of:
      0.099164575 = sum of:
        0.099164575 = weight(_text_:y in 63) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.099164575 = score(doc=63,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.26375747 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05480788 = queryNorm
            0.37596878 = fieldWeight in 63, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=63)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

0.022277132 = product of:
  0.044554263 = sum of:
    0.044554263 = product of:
      0.08910853 = sum of:
        0.08910853 = weight(_text_:22 in 58) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08910853 = score(doc=58,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19192785 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05480788 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 58, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=58)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

14. 6.2015 22:12:44

0.022277132 = product of:
  0.044554263 = sum of:
    0.044554263 = product of:
      0.08910853 = sum of:
        0.08910853 = weight(_text_:22 in 5887) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08910853 = score(doc=5887,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19192785 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05480788 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 5887, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5887)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

Wissen in Aktion: Wege des Knowledge Managements. 22. Online-Tagung der DGI, Frankfurt am Main, 2.-4.5.2000. Proceedings. Hrsg.: R. Schmidt

0.022277132 = product of:
  0.044554263 = sum of:
    0.044554263 = product of:
      0.08910853 = sum of:
        0.08910853 = weight(_text_:22 in 2051) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08910853 = score(doc=2051,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19192785 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05480788 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 2051, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2051)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

14. 6.2015 22:12:56

0.022277132 = product of:
  0.044554263 = sum of:
    0.044554263 = product of:
      0.08910853 = sum of:
        0.08910853 = weight(_text_:22 in 5629) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08910853 = score(doc=5629,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19192785 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05480788 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 5629, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5629)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

B.I.T.online. 22(2019) H.2, S.163-166

0.021035982 = product of:
  0.042071965 = sum of:
    0.042071965 = product of:
      0.08414393 = sum of:
        0.08414393 = weight(_text_:y in 1557) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08414393 = score(doc=1557,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.26375747 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05480788 = queryNorm
            0.3190201 = fieldWeight in 1557, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1557)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

0.018564278 = product of:
  0.037128557 = sum of:
    0.037128557 = product of:
      0.07425711 = sum of:
        0.07425711 = weight(_text_:22 in 4157) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07425711 = score(doc=4157,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19192785 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05480788 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4157, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4157)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source

Information und Märkte: 50. Deutscher Dokumentartag 1998, Kongreß der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Dokumentation e.V. (DGD), Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn, 22.-24. September 1998. Hrsg. von Marlies Ockenfeld u. Gerhard J. Mantwill

0.018564278 = product of:
  0.037128557 = sum of:
    0.037128557 = product of:
      0.07425711 = sum of:
        0.07425711 = weight(_text_:22 in 374) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07425711 = score(doc=374,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19192785 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05480788 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 374, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=374)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

1. 4.2002 10:22:41

0.018564278 = product of:
  0.037128557 = sum of:
    0.037128557 = product of:
      0.07425711 = sum of:
        0.07425711 = weight(_text_:22 in 2759) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07425711 = score(doc=2759,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19192785 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05480788 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2759, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2759)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date

1. 2.2016 18:25:22

0.017529985 = product of:
  0.03505997 = sum of:
    0.03505997 = product of:
      0.07011994 = sum of:
        0.07011994 = weight(_text_:y in 5045) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07011994 = score(doc=5045,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.26375747 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05480788 = queryNorm
            0.26585007 = fieldWeight in 5045, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5045)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)