-
Fuhr, N.; Niewelt, B.: ¬Ein Retrievaltest mit automatisch indexierten Dokumenten (1984)
0.08
0.07512077 = product of:
0.15024154 = sum of:
0.15024154 = sum of:
0.050303716 = weight(_text_:h in 262) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.050303716 = score(doc=262,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13089918 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.052687407 = queryNorm
0.38429362 = fieldWeight in 262, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=262)
0.09993783 = weight(_text_:22 in 262) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09993783 = score(doc=262,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18450232 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052687407 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 262, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=262)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 20.10.2000 12:22:23
- Source
- Deutscher Dokumentartag 1983, Göttingen, 3.-7.10.1983: Fachinformation und Bildschirmtext. Bearb.: H. Strohl-Goebel
-
Fuhr, N.: Ranking-Experimente mit gewichteter Indexierung (1986)
0.06
0.06438923 = product of:
0.12877846 = sum of:
0.12877846 = sum of:
0.04311747 = weight(_text_:h in 58) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04311747 = score(doc=58,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13089918 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.052687407 = queryNorm
0.32939452 = fieldWeight in 58, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=58)
0.085660994 = weight(_text_:22 in 58) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.085660994 = score(doc=58,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18450232 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052687407 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 58, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=58)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 14. 6.2015 22:12:44
- Source
- Deutscher Dokumentartag 1985, Nürnberg, 1.-4.10.1985: Fachinformation: Methodik - Management - Markt; neue Entwicklungen, Berufe, Produkte. Bearb.: H. Strohl-Goebel
-
Hauer, M.: Tiefenindexierung im Bibliothekskatalog : 17 Jahre intelligentCAPTURE (2019)
0.06
0.06438923 = product of:
0.12877846 = sum of:
0.12877846 = sum of:
0.04311747 = weight(_text_:h in 5629) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04311747 = score(doc=5629,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13089918 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.052687407 = queryNorm
0.32939452 = fieldWeight in 5629, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5629)
0.085660994 = weight(_text_:22 in 5629) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.085660994 = score(doc=5629,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18450232 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052687407 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 5629, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5629)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- B.I.T.online. 22(2019) H.2, S.163-166
-
Lepsky, K.; Vorhauer, J.: Lingo - ein open source System für die Automatische Indexierung deutschsprachiger Dokumente (2006)
0.04
0.042926155 = product of:
0.08585231 = sum of:
0.08585231 = sum of:
0.028744983 = weight(_text_:h in 3581) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028744983 = score(doc=3581,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13089918 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.052687407 = queryNorm
0.21959636 = fieldWeight in 3581, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3581)
0.05710733 = weight(_text_:22 in 3581) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05710733 = score(doc=3581,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18450232 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052687407 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3581, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3581)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 24. 3.2006 12:22:02
- Source
- ABI-Technik. 26(2006) H.1, S.18-28
-
Probst, M.; Mittelbach, J.: Maschinelle Indexierung in der Sacherschließung wissenschaftlicher Bibliotheken (2006)
0.04
0.042926155 = product of:
0.08585231 = sum of:
0.08585231 = sum of:
0.028744983 = weight(_text_:h in 1755) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028744983 = score(doc=1755,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13089918 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.052687407 = queryNorm
0.21959636 = fieldWeight in 1755, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1755)
0.05710733 = weight(_text_:22 in 1755) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05710733 = score(doc=1755,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18450232 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052687407 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1755, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1755)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 3.2008 12:35:19
- Source
- Bibliothek: Forschung und Praxis. 30(2006) H.2, S.168-176
-
Renz, M.: Automatische Inhaltserschließung im Zeichen von Wissensmanagement (2001)
0.04
0.037560385 = product of:
0.07512077 = sum of:
0.07512077 = sum of:
0.025151858 = weight(_text_:h in 5671) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025151858 = score(doc=5671,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13089918 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.052687407 = queryNorm
0.19214681 = fieldWeight in 5671, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5671)
0.049968913 = weight(_text_:22 in 5671) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049968913 = score(doc=5671,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18450232 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052687407 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5671, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5671)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 3.2001 13:14:48
- Source
- nfd Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 52(2001) H.2, S.69-78
-
Kasprzik, A.: Voraussetzungen und Anwendungspotentiale einer präzisen Sacherschließung aus Sicht der Wissenschaft (2018)
0.04
0.037560385 = product of:
0.07512077 = sum of:
0.07512077 = sum of:
0.025151858 = weight(_text_:h in 5195) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025151858 = score(doc=5195,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13089918 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.052687407 = queryNorm
0.19214681 = fieldWeight in 5195, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5195)
0.049968913 = weight(_text_:22 in 5195) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049968913 = score(doc=5195,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18450232 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052687407 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5195, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5195)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Große Aufmerksamkeit richtet sich im Moment auf das Potential von automatisierten Methoden in der Sacherschließung und deren Interaktionsmöglichkeiten mit intellektuellen Methoden. In diesem Kontext befasst sich der vorliegende Beitrag mit den folgenden Fragen: Was sind die Anforderungen an bibliothekarische Metadaten aus Sicht der Wissenschaft? Was wird gebraucht, um den Informationsbedarf der Fachcommunities zu bedienen? Und was bedeutet das entsprechend für die Automatisierung der Metadatenerstellung und -pflege? Dieser Beitrag fasst die von der Autorin eingenommene Position in einem Impulsvortrag und der Podiumsdiskussion beim Workshop der FAG "Erschließung und Informationsvermittlung" des GBV zusammen. Der Workshop fand im Rahmen der 22. Verbundkonferenz des GBV statt.
- Source
- ABI-Technik. 38(2018) H.4, S.332-335
-
Franke-Maier, M.: Anforderungen an die Qualität der Inhaltserschließung im Spannungsfeld von intellektuell und automatisch erzeugten Metadaten (2018)
0.04
0.037560385 = product of:
0.07512077 = sum of:
0.07512077 = sum of:
0.025151858 = weight(_text_:h in 5344) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025151858 = score(doc=5344,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13089918 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.052687407 = queryNorm
0.19214681 = fieldWeight in 5344, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5344)
0.049968913 = weight(_text_:22 in 5344) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049968913 = score(doc=5344,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18450232 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052687407 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5344, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5344)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Spätestens seit dem Deutschen Bibliothekartag 2018 hat sich die Diskussion zu den automatischen Verfahren der Inhaltserschließung der Deutschen Nationalbibliothek von einer politisch geführten Diskussion in eine Qualitätsdiskussion verwandelt. Der folgende Beitrag beschäftigt sich mit Fragen der Qualität von Inhaltserschließung in digitalen Zeiten, wo heterogene Erzeugnisse unterschiedlicher Verfahren aufeinandertreffen und versucht, wichtige Anforderungen an Qualität zu definieren. Dieser Tagungsbeitrag fasst die vom Autor als Impulse vorgetragenen Ideen beim Workshop der FAG "Erschließung und Informationsvermittlung" des GBV am 29. August 2018 in Kiel zusammen. Der Workshop fand im Rahmen der 22. Verbundkonferenz des GBV statt.
- Source
- ABI-Technik. 38(2018) H.4, S.327-331
-
Greiner-Petter, A.; Schubotz, M.; Cohl, H.S.; Gipp, B.: Semantic preserving bijective mappings for expressions involving special functions between computer algebra systems and document preparation systems (2019)
0.04
0.03523128 = sum of:
0.020954449 = product of:
0.083817795 = sum of:
0.083817795 = weight(_text_:authors in 5499) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.083817795 = score(doc=5499,freq=6.0), product of:
0.24019209 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.052687407 = queryNorm
0.34896153 = fieldWeight in 5499, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5499)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.014276832 = product of:
0.028553665 = sum of:
0.028553665 = weight(_text_:22 in 5499) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028553665 = score(doc=5499,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18450232 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052687407 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 5499, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5499)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Purpose Modern mathematicians and scientists of math-related disciplines often use Document Preparation Systems (DPS) to write and Computer Algebra Systems (CAS) to calculate mathematical expressions. Usually, they translate the expressions manually between DPS and CAS. This process is time-consuming and error-prone. The purpose of this paper is to automate this translation. This paper uses Maple and Mathematica as the CAS, and LaTeX as the DPS. Design/methodology/approach Bruce Miller at the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) developed a collection of special LaTeX macros that create links from mathematical symbols to their definitions in the NIST Digital Library of Mathematical Functions (DLMF). The authors are using these macros to perform rule-based translations between the formulae in the DLMF and CAS. Moreover, the authors develop software to ease the creation of new rules and to discover inconsistencies. Findings The authors created 396 mappings and translated 58.8 percent of DLMF formulae (2,405 expressions) successfully between Maple and DLMF. For a significant percentage, the special function definitions in Maple and the DLMF were different. An atomic symbol in one system maps to a composite expression in the other system. The translator was also successfully used for automatic verification of mathematical online compendia and CAS. The evaluation techniques discovered two errors in the DLMF and one defect in Maple. Originality/value This paper introduces the first translation tool for special functions between LaTeX and CAS. The approach improves error-prone manual translations and can be used to verify mathematical online compendia and CAS.
- Date
- 20. 1.2015 18:30:22
-
Plaunt, C.; Norgard, B.A.: ¬An association-based method for automatic indexing with a controlled vocabulary (1998)
0.03
0.03296861 = sum of:
0.01512257 = product of:
0.06049028 = sum of:
0.06049028 = weight(_text_:authors in 1794) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06049028 = score(doc=1794,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24019209 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.052687407 = queryNorm
0.25184128 = fieldWeight in 1794, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1794)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.01784604 = product of:
0.03569208 = sum of:
0.03569208 = weight(_text_:22 in 1794) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03569208 = score(doc=1794,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18450232 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052687407 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1794, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1794)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- In this article, we describe and test a two-stage algorithm based on a lexical collocation technique which maps from the lexical clues contained in a document representation into a controlled vocabulary list of subject headings. Using a collection of 4.626 INSPEC documents, we create a 'dictionary' of associations between the lexical items contained in the titles, authors, and abstracts, and controlled vocabulary subject headings assigned to those records by human indexers using a likelihood ratio statistic as the measure of association. In the deployment stage, we use the dictiony to predict which of the controlled vocabulary subject headings best describe new documents when they are presented to the system. Our evaluation of this algorithm, in which we compare the automatically assigned subject headings to the subject headings assigned to the test documents by human catalogers, shows that we can obtain results comparable to, and consistent with, human cataloging. In effect we have cast this as a classic partial match information retrieval problem. We consider the problem to be one of 'retrieving' (or assigning) the most probably 'relevant' (or correct) controlled vocabulary subject headings to a document based on the clues contained in that document
- Date
- 11. 9.2000 19:53:22
-
Busch, D.: Domänenspezifische hybride automatische Indexierung von bibliographischen Metadaten (2019)
0.03
0.032194614 = product of:
0.06438923 = sum of:
0.06438923 = sum of:
0.021558736 = weight(_text_:h in 5628) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021558736 = score(doc=5628,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13089918 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.052687407 = queryNorm
0.16469726 = fieldWeight in 5628, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5628)
0.042830497 = weight(_text_:22 in 5628) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042830497 = score(doc=5628,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18450232 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052687407 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5628, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5628)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- B.I.T.online. 22(2019) H.6, S.465-469
-
Voorhees, E.M.: Implementing agglomerative hierarchic clustering algorithms for use in document retrieval (1986)
0.03
0.028553665 = product of:
0.05710733 = sum of:
0.05710733 = product of:
0.11421466 = sum of:
0.11421466 = weight(_text_:22 in 402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11421466 = score(doc=402,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18450232 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052687407 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 402, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=402)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Information processing and management. 22(1986) no.6, S.465-476
-
Mesquita, L.A.P.; Souza, R.R.; Baracho Porto, R.M.A.: Noun phrases in automatic indexing: : a structural analysis of the distribution of relevant terms in doctoral theses (2014)
0.03
0.026374888 = sum of:
0.012098055 = product of:
0.04839222 = sum of:
0.04839222 = weight(_text_:authors in 1442) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04839222 = score(doc=1442,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24019209 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.052687407 = queryNorm
0.20147301 = fieldWeight in 1442, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1442)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.014276832 = product of:
0.028553665 = sum of:
0.028553665 = weight(_text_:22 in 1442) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028553665 = score(doc=1442,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18450232 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052687407 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 1442, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1442)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- The main objective of this research was to analyze whether there was a characteristic distribution behavior of relevant terms over a scientific text that could contribute as a criterion for their process of automatic indexing. The terms considered in this study were only full noun phrases contained in the texts themselves. The texts were considered a total of 98 doctoral theses of the eight areas of knowledge in a same university. Initially, 20 full noun phrases were automatically extracted from each text as candidates to be the most relevant terms, and each author of each text assigned a relevance value 0-6 (not relevant and highly relevant, respectively) for each of the 20 noun phrases sent. Only, 22.1 % of noun phrases were considered not relevant. A relevance values of the terms assigned by the authors were associated with their positions in the text. Each full noun phrases found in the text was considered as a valid linear position. The results that were obtained showed values resulting from this distribution by considering two types of position: linear, with values consolidated into ten equal consecutive parts; and structural, considering parts of the text (such as introduction, development and conclusion). As a result of considerable importance, all areas of knowledge related to the Natural Sciences showed a characteristic behavior in the distribution of relevant terms, as well as all areas of knowledge related to Social Sciences showed the same characteristic behavior of distribution, but distinct from the Natural Sciences. The difference of the distribution behavior between the Natural and Social Sciences can be clearly visualized through graphs. All behaviors, including the general behavior of all areas of knowledge together, were characterized in polynomial equations and can be applied in future as criteria for automatic indexing. Until the present date this work has become inedited of for two reasons: to present a method for characterizing the distribution of relevant terms in a scientific text, and also, through this method, pointing out a quantitative trait difference between the Natural and Social Sciences.
- Source
- Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
-
Hlava, M.M.K.: Automatic indexing : comparing rule-based and statistics-based indexing systems (2005)
0.02
0.024984457 = product of:
0.049968913 = sum of:
0.049968913 = product of:
0.09993783 = sum of:
0.09993783 = weight(_text_:22 in 6265) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09993783 = score(doc=6265,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18450232 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052687407 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6265, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6265)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Information outlook. 9(2005) no.8, S.22-23
-
Nohr, H.: Grundlagen der automatischen Indexierung : ein Lehrbuch (2003)
0.02
0.024439719 = product of:
0.048879437 = sum of:
0.048879437 = sum of:
0.020325772 = weight(_text_:h in 1767) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020325772 = score(doc=1767,freq=4.0), product of:
0.13089918 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.052687407 = queryNorm
0.15527807 = fieldWeight in 1767, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1767)
0.028553665 = weight(_text_:22 in 1767) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028553665 = score(doc=1767,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18450232 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052687407 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 1767, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1767)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 6.2009 12:46:51
- Footnote
- Rez. in: nfd 54(2003) H.5, S.314 (W. Ratzek): "Um entscheidungsrelevante Daten aus der ständig wachsenden Flut von mehr oder weniger relevanten Dokumenten zu extrahieren, müssen Unternehmen, öffentliche Verwaltung oder Einrichtungen der Fachinformation effektive und effiziente Filtersysteme entwickeln, einsetzen und pflegen. Das vorliegende Lehrbuch von Holger Nohr bietet erstmalig eine grundlegende Einführung in das Thema "automatische Indexierung". Denn: "Wie man Information sammelt, verwaltet und verwendet, wird darüber entscheiden, ob man zu den Gewinnern oder Verlierern gehört" (Bill Gates), heißt es einleitend. Im ersten Kapitel "Einleitung" stehen die Grundlagen im Mittelpunkt. Die Zusammenhänge zwischen Dokumenten-Management-Systeme, Information Retrieval und Indexierung für Planungs-, Entscheidungs- oder Innovationsprozesse, sowohl in Profit- als auch Non-Profit-Organisationen werden beschrieben. Am Ende des einleitenden Kapitels geht Nohr auf die Diskussion um die intellektuelle und automatische Indexierung ein und leitet damit über zum zweiten Kapitel "automatisches Indexieren. Hier geht der Autor überblickartig unter anderem ein auf - Probleme der automatischen Sprachverarbeitung und Indexierung - verschiedene Verfahren der automatischen Indexierung z.B. einfache Stichwortextraktion / Volltextinvertierung, - statistische Verfahren, Pattern-Matching-Verfahren. Die "Verfahren der automatischen Indexierung" behandelt Nohr dann vertiefend und mit vielen Beispielen versehen im umfangreichsten dritten Kapitel. Das vierte Kapitel "Keyphrase Extraction" nimmt eine Passpartout-Status ein: "Eine Zwischenstufe auf dem Weg von der automatischen Indexierung hin zur automatischen Generierung textueller Zusammenfassungen (Automatic Text Summarization) stellen Ansätze dar, die Schlüsselphrasen aus Dokumenten extrahieren (Keyphrase Extraction). Die Grenzen zwischen den automatischen Verfahren der Indexierung und denen des Text Summarization sind fließend." (S. 91). Am Beispiel NCR"s Extractor/Copernic Summarizer beschreibt Nohr die Funktionsweise.
-
Martins, A.L.; Souza, R.R.; Ribeiro de Mello, H.: ¬The use of noun phrases in information retrieval : proposing a mechanism for automatic classification (2014)
0.02
0.021463078 = product of:
0.042926155 = sum of:
0.042926155 = sum of:
0.014372491 = weight(_text_:h in 1441) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014372491 = score(doc=1441,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13089918 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.052687407 = queryNorm
0.10979818 = fieldWeight in 1441, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1441)
0.028553665 = weight(_text_:22 in 1441) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028553665 = score(doc=1441,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18450232 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052687407 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 1441, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1441)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
-
Hauer, M.: Automatische Indexierung (2000)
0.02
0.021415249 = product of:
0.042830497 = sum of:
0.042830497 = product of:
0.085660994 = sum of:
0.085660994 = weight(_text_:22 in 5887) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.085660994 = score(doc=5887,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18450232 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052687407 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 5887, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5887)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Wissen in Aktion: Wege des Knowledge Managements. 22. Online-Tagung der DGI, Frankfurt am Main, 2.-4.5.2000. Proceedings. Hrsg.: R. Schmidt
-
Fuhr, N.: Rankingexperimente mit gewichteter Indexierung (1986)
0.02
0.021415249 = product of:
0.042830497 = sum of:
0.042830497 = product of:
0.085660994 = sum of:
0.085660994 = weight(_text_:22 in 2051) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.085660994 = score(doc=2051,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18450232 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052687407 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 2051, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2051)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 14. 6.2015 22:12:56
-
Lepsky, K.: Maschinelle Indexierung von Titelaufnahmen zur Verbesserung der sachlichen Erschließung in Online-Publikumskatalogen (1994)
0.02
0.017965615 = product of:
0.03593123 = sum of:
0.03593123 = product of:
0.07186246 = sum of:
0.07186246 = weight(_text_:h in 7064) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07186246 = score(doc=7064,freq=8.0), product of:
0.13089918 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.052687407 = queryNorm
0.5489909 = fieldWeight in 7064, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=7064)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Footnote
- [Hausarbeit für den höheren Bibliotheksdienst 1993]. - Rez. in: Mitteilungsblatt VdB NW N.F. 45(1995) H.1, S.98-100 (H. Nohr); Knowledge organization 23(1996) no.1, S.50-52 (H. Schnelling)
- Series
- Kölner Arbeiten zum Bibliotheks- und Dokumentationswesen; H.18
-
Biebricher, N.; Fuhr, N.; Lustig, G.; Schwantner, M.; Knorz, G.: ¬The automatic indexing system AIR/PHYS : from research to application (1988)
0.02
0.01784604 = product of:
0.03569208 = sum of:
0.03569208 = product of:
0.07138416 = sum of:
0.07138416 = weight(_text_:22 in 1952) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07138416 = score(doc=1952,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18450232 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052687407 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 1952, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1952)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 16. 8.1998 12:51:22
