Search (4 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Automatisches Klassifizieren"
  • × theme_ss:"Internet"
  • × type_ss:"el"
  1. Koch, T.; Ardö, A.: Automatic classification of full-text HTML-documents from one specific subject area : DESIRE II D3.6a, Working Paper 2 (2000) 0.03
    0.028620359 = product of:
      0.057240717 = sum of:
        0.057240717 = product of:
          0.114481434 = sum of:
            0.114481434 = weight(_text_:classification in 1667) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.114481434 = score(doc=1667,freq=12.0), product of:
                0.16603322 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05213454 = queryNorm
                0.6895092 = fieldWeight in 1667, product of:
                  3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                    12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1667)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    1 Introduction / 2 Method overview / 3 Ei thesaurus preprocessing / 4 Automatic classification process: 4.1 Matching -- 4.2 Weighting -- 4.3 Preparation for display / 5 Results of the classification process / 6 Evaluations / 7 Software / 8 Other applications / 9 Experiments with universal classification systems / References / Appendix A: Ei classification service: Software / Appendix B: Use of the classification software as subject filter in a WWW harvester.
  2. Koch, T.; Vizine-Goetz, D.: DDC and knowledge organization in the digital library : Research and development. Demonstration pages (1999) 0.02
    0.01752632 = product of:
      0.03505264 = sum of:
        0.03505264 = product of:
          0.07010528 = sum of:
            0.07010528 = weight(_text_:classification in 942) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07010528 = score(doc=942,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.16603322 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05213454 = queryNorm
                0.42223644 = fieldWeight in 942, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=942)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Der Workshop gibt einen Einblick in die aktuelle Forschung und Entwicklung zur Wissensorganisation in digitalen Bibliotheken. Diane Vizine-Goetz vom OCLC Office of Research in Dublin, Ohio, stellt die Forschungsprojekte von OCLC zur Anpassung und Weiterentwicklung der Dewey Decimal Classification als Wissensorganisationsinstrument fuer grosse digitale Dokumentensammlungen vor. Traugott Koch, NetLab, Universität Lund in Schweden, demonstriert die Ansätze und Lösungen des EU-Projekts DESIRE zum Einsatz von intellektueller und vor allem automatischer Klassifikation in Fachinformationsdiensten im Internet.
    Content
    1. Increased Importance of Knowledge Organization in Internet Services - 2. Quality Subject Service and the role of classification - 3. Developing the DDC into a knowledge organization instrument for the digital library. OCLC site - 4. DESIRE's Barefoot Solutions of Automatic Classification - 5. Advanced Classification Solutions in DESIRE and CORC - 6. Future directions of research and development - 7. General references
  3. Shafer, K.E.: Evaluating Scorpion results (1998) 0.01
    0.014605265 = product of:
      0.02921053 = sum of:
        0.02921053 = product of:
          0.05842106 = sum of:
            0.05842106 = weight(_text_:classification in 1569) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05842106 = score(doc=1569,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16603322 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05213454 = queryNorm
                0.35186368 = fieldWeight in 1569, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1569)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Scorpion is a research project at OCLC that builds tools for automatic subject assignment by combining library science and information retrieval techniques. A thesis of Scorpion is that the Dewey Decimal Classification (Dewey) can be used to perform automatic subject assignment for electronic items.
  4. Koch, T.; Ardö, A.; Noodén, L.: ¬The construction of a robot-generated subject index : DESIRE II D3.6a, Working Paper 1 (1999) 0.01
    0.00876316 = product of:
      0.01752632 = sum of:
        0.01752632 = product of:
          0.03505264 = sum of:
            0.03505264 = weight(_text_:classification in 1668) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03505264 = score(doc=1668,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16603322 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05213454 = queryNorm
                0.21111822 = fieldWeight in 1668, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1847067 = idf(docFreq=4974, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1668)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This working paper describes the creation of a test database to carry out the automatic classification tasks of the DESIRE II work package D3.6a on. It is an improved version of NetLab's existing "All" Engineering database created after a comparative study of the outcome of two different approaches to collecting the documents. These two methods were selected from seven different general methodologies to build robot-generated subject indices, presented in this paper. We found a surprisingly low overlap between the Engineering link collections we used as seed pages for the robot and subsequently an even more surprisingly low overlap between the resources collected by the two different approaches. That inspite of using basically the same services to start the harvesting process from. A intellectual evaluation of the contents of both databases showed almost exactly the same percentage of relevant documents (77%), indicating that the main difference between those aproaches was the coverage of the resulting database.