Search (4 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Automatisches Klassifizieren"
  • × theme_ss:"Internet"
  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  1. Walther, R.: Möglichkeiten und Grenzen automatischer Klassifikationen von Web-Dokumenten (2001) 0.00
    0.0033264756 = product of:
      0.03825447 = sum of:
        0.023689501 = weight(_text_:und in 1562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023689501 = score(doc=1562,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.052235067 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.023567878 = queryNorm
            0.4535172 = fieldWeight in 1562, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1562)
        0.014564968 = weight(_text_:im in 1562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014564968 = score(doc=1562,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.066621356 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
              0.023567878 = queryNorm
            0.2186231 = fieldWeight in 1562, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.8267863 = idf(docFreq=7115, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1562)
      0.08695652 = coord(2/23)
    
    Abstract
    Automatische Klassifikationen von Web- und andern Textdokumenten ermöglichen es, betriebsinterne und externe Informationen geordnet zugänglich zu machen. Die Forschung zur automatischen Klassifikation hat sich in den letzten Jahren intensiviert. Das Resultat sind verschiedenen Methoden, die heute in der Praxis einzeln oder kombiniert für die Klassifikation im Einsatz sind. In der vorliegenden Lizenziatsarbeit werden neben allgemeinen Grundsätzen einige Methoden zur automatischen Klassifikation genauer betrachtet und ihre Möglichkeiten und Grenzen erörtert. Daneben erfolgt die Präsentation der Resultate aus einer Umfrage bei Anbieterrfirmen von Softwarelösungen zur automatische Klassifikation von Text-Dokumenten. Die Ausführungen dienen der myax internet AG als Basis, ein eigenes Klassifikations-Produkt zu entwickeln
    Footnote
    Lizenziatsarbeit an der Rechts- und Wirtschaftswissenschaftlichen Fakultät der Universität Bern, Institut für Wirtschaftsinformatik (Prof. G. Knolmayer)
    Imprint
    Bern : Rechts- und Wirtschaftswissenschaftlichen Fakultät
  2. Chung, Y.-M.; Noh, Y.-H.: Developing a specialized directory system by automatically classifying Web documents (2003) 0.00
    4.2027488E-4 = product of:
      0.009666322 = sum of:
        0.009666322 = product of:
          0.019332644 = sum of:
            0.019332644 = weight(_text_:29 in 1566) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.019332644 = score(doc=1566,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08290443 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 1566, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1566)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.04347826 = coord(1/23)
    
    Source
    Journal of information science. 29(2003) no.2, S.117-126
  3. Shafer, K.E.: Automatic Subject Assignment via the Scorpion System (2001) 0.00
    4.0990516E-4 = product of:
      0.0094278185 = sum of:
        0.0094278185 = product of:
          0.018855637 = sum of:
            0.018855637 = weight(_text_:1 in 1043) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.018855637 = score(doc=1043,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.057894554 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.32568932 = fieldWeight in 1043, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1043)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.04347826 = coord(1/23)
    
    Source
    Journal of library administration. 34(2001) nos.1/2, S.187-189
  4. Koch, T.; Ardö, A.: Automatic classification of full-text HTML-documents from one specific subject area : DESIRE II D3.6a, Working Paper 2 (2000) 0.00
    2.7327013E-4 = product of:
      0.0062852125 = sum of:
        0.0062852125 = product of:
          0.012570425 = sum of:
            0.012570425 = weight(_text_:1 in 1667) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.012570425 = score(doc=1667,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.057894554 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.2171262 = fieldWeight in 1667, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1667)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.04347826 = coord(1/23)
    
    Content
    1 Introduction / 2 Method overview / 3 Ei thesaurus preprocessing / 4 Automatic classification process: 4.1 Matching -- 4.2 Weighting -- 4.3 Preparation for display / 5 Results of the classification process / 6 Evaluations / 7 Software / 8 Other applications / 9 Experiments with universal classification systems / References / Appendix A: Ei classification service: Software / Appendix B: Use of the classification software as subject filter in a WWW harvester.

Languages

Types