Search (38 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"Automatisches Klassifizieren"
  • × type_ss:"a"
  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  1. Hotho, A.; Bloehdorn, S.: Data Mining 2004 : Text classification by boosting weak learners based on terms and concepts (2004) 0.07
    0.06787892 = product of:
      0.10181837 = sum of:
        0.08107116 = product of:
          0.24321347 = sum of:
            0.24321347 = weight(_text_:3a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.24321347 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.4327503 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05104385 = queryNorm
                0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.02074721 = product of:
          0.04149442 = sum of:
            0.04149442 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04149442 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17874686 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05104385 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CEAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.91.4940%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&ei=dOXrUMeIDYHDtQahsIGACg&usg=AFQjCNHFWVh6gNPvnOrOS9R3rkrXCNVD-A&sig2=5I2F5evRfMnsttSgFF9g7Q&bvm=bv.1357316858,d.Yms.
    Date
    8. 1.2013 10:22:32
  2. Yoon, Y.; Lee, C.; Lee, G.G.: ¬An effective procedure for constructing a hierarchical text classification system (2006) 0.03
    0.03439779 = product of:
      0.05159668 = sum of:
        0.027391598 = weight(_text_:science in 5273) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027391598 = score(doc=5273,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13445559 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05104385 = queryNorm
            0.20372227 = fieldWeight in 5273, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5273)
        0.02420508 = product of:
          0.04841016 = sum of:
            0.04841016 = weight(_text_:22 in 5273) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04841016 = score(doc=5273,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17874686 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05104385 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5273, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5273)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2006 16:24:52
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 57(2006) no.3, S.431-442
  3. Liu, R.-L.: Context recognition for hierarchical text classification (2009) 0.03
    0.029483816 = product of:
      0.044225723 = sum of:
        0.023478512 = weight(_text_:science in 2760) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023478512 = score(doc=2760,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13445559 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05104385 = queryNorm
            0.17461908 = fieldWeight in 2760, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2760)
        0.02074721 = product of:
          0.04149442 = sum of:
            0.04149442 = weight(_text_:22 in 2760) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04149442 = score(doc=2760,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17874686 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05104385 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2760, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2760)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2009 19:11:54
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 60(2009) no.4, S.803-813
  4. Mengle, S.; Goharian, N.: Passage detection using text classification (2009) 0.02
    0.024569847 = product of:
      0.03685477 = sum of:
        0.019565428 = weight(_text_:science in 2765) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019565428 = score(doc=2765,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13445559 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05104385 = queryNorm
            0.1455159 = fieldWeight in 2765, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2765)
        0.017289342 = product of:
          0.034578685 = sum of:
            0.034578685 = weight(_text_:22 in 2765) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.034578685 = score(doc=2765,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17874686 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05104385 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2765, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2765)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2009 19:14:43
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 60(2009) no.4, S.814-825
  5. Reiner, U.: Automatische DDC-Klassifizierung bibliografischer Titeldatensätze der Deutschen Nationalbibliografie (2009) 0.02
    0.023579285 = product of:
      0.07073785 = sum of:
        0.07073785 = sum of:
          0.043074906 = weight(_text_:index in 3284) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.043074906 = score(doc=3284,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.22304957 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05104385 = queryNorm
              0.1931181 = fieldWeight in 3284, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3284)
          0.027662948 = weight(_text_:22 in 3284) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.027662948 = score(doc=3284,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.17874686 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05104385 = queryNorm
              0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 3284, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3284)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2010 14:41:24
    Footnote
    Vortrag gehalten am 03.06.2009 auf dem 98. Bibliothekartag 2009 in Erfurt; erscheint in: Dialog mit Biliotheken. Vgl. auch: http://www.gbv.de/vgm/info/biblio/01VZG/06Publikationen/2009/index.
  6. Lindholm, J.; Schönthal, T.; Jansson , K.: Experiences of harvesting Web resources in engineering using automatic classification (2003) 0.02
    0.020305708 = product of:
      0.06091712 = sum of:
        0.06091712 = product of:
          0.12183424 = sum of:
            0.12183424 = weight(_text_:index in 4088) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.12183424 = score(doc=4088,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.22304957 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05104385 = queryNorm
                0.5462205 = fieldWeight in 4088, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4088)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Authors describe the background and the work involved in setting up Engine-e, a Web index that uses automatic classification as a mean for the selection of resources in Engineering. Considerations in offering a robot-generated Web index as a successor to a manually indexed quality-controlled subject gateway are also discussed
  7. Subramanian, S.; Shafer, K.E.: Clustering (2001) 0.01
    0.013831474 = product of:
      0.04149442 = sum of:
        0.04149442 = product of:
          0.08298884 = sum of:
            0.08298884 = weight(_text_:22 in 1046) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08298884 = score(doc=1046,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17874686 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05104385 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 1046, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1046)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    5. 5.2003 14:17:22
  8. Golub, K.; Lykke, M.: Automated classification of web pages in hierarchical browsing (2009) 0.01
    0.0126910675 = product of:
      0.0380732 = sum of:
        0.0380732 = product of:
          0.0761464 = sum of:
            0.0761464 = weight(_text_:index in 3614) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0761464 = score(doc=3614,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.22304957 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05104385 = queryNorm
                0.3413878 = fieldWeight in 3614, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.369764 = idf(docFreq=1520, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3614)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - The purpose of this study is twofold: to investigate whether it is meaningful to use the Engineering Index (Ei) classification scheme for browsing, and then, if proven useful, to investigate the performance of an automated classification algorithm based on the Ei classification scheme. Design/methodology/approach - A user study was conducted in which users solved four controlled searching tasks. The users browsed the Ei classification scheme in order to examine the suitability of the classification systems for browsing. The classification algorithm was evaluated by the users who judged the correctness of the automatically assigned classes. Findings - The study showed that the Ei classification scheme is suited for browsing. Automatically assigned classes were on average partly correct, with some classes working better than others. Success of browsing showed to be correlated and dependent on classification correctness. Research limitations/implications - Further research should address problems of disparate evaluations of one and the same web page. Additional reasons behind browsing failures in the Ei classification scheme also need further investigation. Practical implications - Improvements for browsing were identified: describing class captions and/or listing their subclasses from start; allowing for searching for words from class captions with synonym search (easily provided for Ei since the classes are mapped to thesauri terms); when searching for class captions, returning the hierarchical tree expanded around the class in which caption the search term is found. The need for improvements of classification schemes was also indicated. Originality/value - A user-based evaluation of automated subject classification in the context of browsing has not been conducted before; hence the study also presents new findings concerning methodology.
    Object
    Engineering Index Classification
  9. Golub, K.: Automated subject classification of textual web documents (2006) 0.01
    0.011296105 = product of:
      0.033888314 = sum of:
        0.033888314 = weight(_text_:science in 5600) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.033888314 = score(doc=5600,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.13445559 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05104385 = queryNorm
            0.25204095 = fieldWeight in 5600, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5600)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - To provide an integrated perspective to similarities and differences between approaches to automated classification in different research communities (machine learning, information retrieval and library science), and point to problems with the approaches and automated classification as such. Design/methodology/approach - A range of works dealing with automated classification of full-text web documents are discussed. Explorations of individual approaches are given in the following sections: special features (description, differences, evaluation), application and characteristics of web pages. Findings - Provides major similarities and differences between the three approaches: document pre-processing and utilization of web-specific document characteristics is common to all the approaches; major differences are in applied algorithms, employment or not of the vector space model and of controlled vocabularies. Problems of automated classification are recognized. Research limitations/implications - The paper does not attempt to provide an exhaustive bibliography of related resources. Practical implications - As an integrated overview of approaches from different research communities with application examples, it is very useful for students in library and information science and computer science, as well as for practitioners. Researchers from one community have the information on how similar tasks are conducted in different communities. Originality/value - To the author's knowledge, no review paper on automated text classification attempted to discuss more than one community's approach from an integrated perspective.
  10. Wang, J.: ¬An extensive study on automated Dewey Decimal Classification (2009) 0.01
    0.009223231 = product of:
      0.027669692 = sum of:
        0.027669692 = weight(_text_:science in 3172) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027669692 = score(doc=3172,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13445559 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05104385 = queryNorm
            0.20579056 = fieldWeight in 3172, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3172)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    In this paper, we present a theoretical analysis and extensive experiments on the automated assignment of Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC) classes to bibliographic data with a supervised machine-learning approach. Library classification systems, such as the DDC, impose great obstacles on state-of-art text categorization (TC) technologies, including deep hierarchy, data sparseness, and skewed distribution. We first analyze statistically the document and category distributions over the DDC, and discuss the obstacles imposed by bibliographic corpora and library classification schemes on TC technology. To overcome these obstacles, we propose an innovative algorithm to reshape the DDC structure into a balanced virtual tree by balancing the category distribution and flattening the hierarchy. To improve the classification effectiveness to a level acceptable to real-world applications, we propose an interactive classification model that is able to predict a class of any depth within a limited number of user interactions. The experiments are conducted on a large bibliographic collection created by the Library of Congress within the science and technology domains over 10 years. With no more than three interactions, a classification accuracy of nearly 90% is achieved, thus providing a practical solution to the automatic bibliographic classification problem.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 60(2009) no.11, S.2269-2286
  11. Humphrey, S.M.; Névéol, A.; Browne, A.; Gobeil, J.; Ruch, P.; Darmoni, S.J.: Comparing a rule-based versus statistical system for automatic categorization of MEDLINE documents according to biomedical specialty (2009) 0.01
    0.009223231 = product of:
      0.027669692 = sum of:
        0.027669692 = weight(_text_:science in 3300) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027669692 = score(doc=3300,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13445559 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05104385 = queryNorm
            0.20579056 = fieldWeight in 3300, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3300)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Automatic document categorization is an important research problem in Information Science and Natural Language Processing. Many applications, including, Word Sense Disambiguation and Information Retrieval in large collections, can benefit from such categorization. This paper focuses on automatic categorization of documents from the biomedical literature into broad discipline-based categories. Two different systems are described and contrasted: CISMeF, which uses rules based on human indexing of the documents by the Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) controlled vocabulary in order to assign metaterms (MTs), and Journal Descriptor Indexing (JDI), based on human categorization of about 4,000 journals and statistical associations between journal descriptors (JDs) and textwords in the documents. We evaluate and compare the performance of these systems against a gold standard of humanly assigned categories for 100 MEDLINE documents, using six measures selected from trec_eval. The results show that for five of the measures performance is comparable, and for one measure JDI is superior. We conclude that these results favor JDI, given the significantly greater intellectual overhead involved in human indexing and maintaining a rule base for mapping MeSH terms to MTs. We also note a JDI method that associates JDs with MeSH indexing rather than textwords, and it may be worthwhile to investigate whether this JDI method (statistical) and CISMeF (rule-based) might be combined and then evaluated showing they are complementary to one another.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 60(2009) no.12, S.2530-2539
  12. Sebastiani, F.: Classification of text, automatic (2006) 0.01
    0.009130533 = product of:
      0.027391598 = sum of:
        0.027391598 = weight(_text_:science in 5003) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027391598 = score(doc=5003,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13445559 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05104385 = queryNorm
            0.20372227 = fieldWeight in 5003, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5003)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Imprint
    Amsterdam : Elsevier Science Publishers
  13. Dang, E.K.F.; Luk, R.W.P.; Ho, K.S.; Chan, S.C.F.; Lee, D.L.: ¬A new measure of clustering effectiveness : algorithms and experimental studies (2008) 0.01
    0.009130533 = product of:
      0.027391598 = sum of:
        0.027391598 = weight(_text_:science in 1367) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027391598 = score(doc=1367,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13445559 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05104385 = queryNorm
            0.20372227 = fieldWeight in 1367, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1367)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 59(2008) no.3, S.390-406
  14. Yi, K.: Automatic text classification using library classification schemes : trends, issues and challenges (2007) 0.01
    0.00806836 = product of:
      0.02420508 = sum of:
        0.02420508 = product of:
          0.04841016 = sum of:
            0.04841016 = weight(_text_:22 in 2560) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04841016 = score(doc=2560,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17874686 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05104385 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2560, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2560)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    22. 9.2008 18:31:54
  15. Drori, O.; Alon, N.: Using document classification for displaying search results (2003) 0.01
    0.007826171 = product of:
      0.023478512 = sum of:
        0.023478512 = weight(_text_:science in 1565) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023478512 = score(doc=1565,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13445559 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05104385 = queryNorm
            0.17461908 = fieldWeight in 1565, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1565)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Journal of information science. 29(2003) no.2, S.97-106
  16. Chung, Y.-M.; Noh, Y.-H.: Developing a specialized directory system by automatically classifying Web documents (2003) 0.01
    0.007826171 = product of:
      0.023478512 = sum of:
        0.023478512 = weight(_text_:science in 1566) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023478512 = score(doc=1566,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13445559 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05104385 = queryNorm
            0.17461908 = fieldWeight in 1566, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1566)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Journal of information science. 29(2003) no.2, S.117-126
  17. Mukhopadhyay, S.; Peng, S.; Raje, R.; Palakal, M.; Mostafa, J.: Multi-agent information classification using dynamic acquaintance lists (2003) 0.01
    0.007826171 = product of:
      0.023478512 = sum of:
        0.023478512 = weight(_text_:science in 1755) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023478512 = score(doc=1755,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13445559 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05104385 = queryNorm
            0.17461908 = fieldWeight in 1755, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1755)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 54(2003) no.10, S.966-975
  18. Sun, A.; Lim, E.-P.; Ng, W.-K.: Performance measurement framework for hierarchical text classification (2003) 0.01
    0.007826171 = product of:
      0.023478512 = sum of:
        0.023478512 = weight(_text_:science in 1808) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023478512 = score(doc=1808,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13445559 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05104385 = queryNorm
            0.17461908 = fieldWeight in 1808, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1808)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 54(2003) no.11, S.1014-1028
  19. Frank, E.; Paynter, G.W.: Predicting Library of Congress Classifications from Library of Congress Subject Headings (2004) 0.01
    0.007826171 = product of:
      0.023478512 = sum of:
        0.023478512 = weight(_text_:science in 2218) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023478512 = score(doc=2218,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13445559 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05104385 = queryNorm
            0.17461908 = fieldWeight in 2218, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2218)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 55(2004) no.3, S.214-227
  20. Díaz, I.; Ranilla, J.; Montañes, E.; Fernández, J.; Combarro, E.F.: Improving performance of text categorization by combining filtering and support vector machines (2004) 0.01
    0.007826171 = product of:
      0.023478512 = sum of:
        0.023478512 = weight(_text_:science in 2234) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023478512 = score(doc=2234,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13445559 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05104385 = queryNorm
            0.17461908 = fieldWeight in 2234, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2234)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 55(2004) no.7, S.579-592

Languages

  • e 36
  • d 2
  • More… Less…