Search (63 results, page 3 of 4)

  • × theme_ss:"Automatisches Klassifizieren"
  1. Bollmann, P.; Konrad, E.; Schneider, H.-J.; Zuse, H.: Anwendung automatischer Klassifikationsverfahren mit dem System FAKYR (1978) 0.02
    0.016484085 = product of:
      0.06593634 = sum of:
        0.0105139585 = weight(_text_:und in 82) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0105139585 = score(doc=82,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05366975 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024215192 = queryNorm
            0.19590102 = fieldWeight in 82, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=82)
        0.0105139585 = weight(_text_:und in 82) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0105139585 = score(doc=82,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05366975 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024215192 = queryNorm
            0.19590102 = fieldWeight in 82, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=82)
        0.02388051 = weight(_text_:der in 82) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02388051 = score(doc=82,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.054091092 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024215192 = queryNorm
            0.44148692 = fieldWeight in 82, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=82)
        0.0105139585 = weight(_text_:und in 82) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0105139585 = score(doc=82,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05366975 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024215192 = queryNorm
            0.19590102 = fieldWeight in 82, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=82)
        0.0105139585 = weight(_text_:und in 82) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0105139585 = score(doc=82,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05366975 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024215192 = queryNorm
            0.19590102 = fieldWeight in 82, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=82)
      0.25 = coord(5/20)
    
    Abstract
    Es wird ein Verfahren zum Vergelich von Klassifikationen vorgestellt. Es gestattet, die Abweichungen zwischen zwei Klassifikationen zu lokalisieren und erleichtert so die intellektuelle Kontrolle. Das Verfahren ist als Baustein des Systems FAKYR implementiert. Es wird auf Klassifikationen angeandt, die durch graphentheoretische Verfahren entstanden sind. Zunächst wird gezeigt, wie die Veränderung des Schnittes das Klassifikationsergebnis beeinflußt, anschließend wird das Vergleichsverfahren bei der automatischen Erstellung zweisprachiger Termklassen benutzt
    Source
    Kooperation in der Klassifikation I. Proc. der Sekt.1-3 der 2. Fachtagung der Gesellschaft für Klassifikation, Frankfurt-Hoechst, 6.-7.4.1978. Bearb.: W. Dahlberg
  2. Oberhauser, O.: Automatisches Klassifizieren und Bibliothekskataloge (2005) 0.02
    0.01631422 = product of:
      0.06525688 = sum of:
        0.01301036 = weight(_text_:und in 4099) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01301036 = score(doc=4099,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.05366975 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024215192 = queryNorm
            0.24241515 = fieldWeight in 4099, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4099)
        0.01301036 = weight(_text_:und in 4099) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01301036 = score(doc=4099,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.05366975 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024215192 = queryNorm
            0.24241515 = fieldWeight in 4099, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4099)
        0.013215441 = weight(_text_:der in 4099) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013215441 = score(doc=4099,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.054091092 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024215192 = queryNorm
            0.24431825 = fieldWeight in 4099, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4099)
        0.01301036 = weight(_text_:und in 4099) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01301036 = score(doc=4099,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.05366975 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024215192 = queryNorm
            0.24241515 = fieldWeight in 4099, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4099)
        0.01301036 = weight(_text_:und in 4099) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01301036 = score(doc=4099,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.05366975 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024215192 = queryNorm
            0.24241515 = fieldWeight in 4099, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4099)
      0.25 = coord(5/20)
    
    Abstract
    In der bibliothekarischen Welt sind die Vorzüge einer klassifikatorischen Inhaltserschließung seit jeher wohlbekannt. Auch im Zeitalter der Online-Kataloge gibt es dafür keinen wirklichen Ersatz, da - kurz formuliert - ein stichwortbasiertes Retrieval alleine mit Problemen wie Ambiguität und Mehrsprachigkeit nicht fertig zu werden vermag. Zahlreiche Online-Kataloge weisen daher Notationen verschiedener Klassifikationssysteme auf; allerdings sind die darauf basierenden Abfragemöglichkeiten meist noch arg unterentwickelt. Viele Datensätze in OPACs sind aber überhaupt nicht sachlich erschlossen, sei es, dass sie aus retrospektiv konvertierten Nominalkatalogen stammen, sei es, dass ein Mangel an personellen Ressourcen ihre inhaltliche Erschließung verhindert hat. Angesichts großer Mengen solcher Datensätze liegt ein Interesse an automatischen Verfahren zur Sacherschließung durchaus nahe.
  3. Fangmeyer, H.; Gloden, R.: Bewertung und Vergleich von Klassifikationsergebnissen bei automatischen Verfahren (1978) 0.02
    0.015853802 = product of:
      0.06341521 = sum of:
        0.0105139585 = weight(_text_:und in 81) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0105139585 = score(doc=81,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05366975 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024215192 = queryNorm
            0.19590102 = fieldWeight in 81, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=81)
        0.0105139585 = weight(_text_:und in 81) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0105139585 = score(doc=81,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05366975 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024215192 = queryNorm
            0.19590102 = fieldWeight in 81, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=81)
        0.021359377 = weight(_text_:der in 81) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021359377 = score(doc=81,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.054091092 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024215192 = queryNorm
            0.3948779 = fieldWeight in 81, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=81)
        0.0105139585 = weight(_text_:und in 81) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0105139585 = score(doc=81,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05366975 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024215192 = queryNorm
            0.19590102 = fieldWeight in 81, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=81)
        0.0105139585 = weight(_text_:und in 81) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0105139585 = score(doc=81,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05366975 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024215192 = queryNorm
            0.19590102 = fieldWeight in 81, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=81)
      0.25 = coord(5/20)
    
    Source
    Kooperation in der Klassifikation I. Proc. der Sekt.1-3 der 2. Fachtagung der Gesellschaft für Klassifikation, Frankfurt-Hoechst, 6.-7.4.1978. Bearb.: W. Dahlberg
  4. Zhang, X: Rough set theory based automatic text categorization (2005) 0.02
    0.015138399 = product of:
      0.060553595 = sum of:
        0.0105139585 = weight(_text_:und in 2822) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0105139585 = score(doc=2822,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05366975 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024215192 = queryNorm
            0.19590102 = fieldWeight in 2822, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2822)
        0.0105139585 = weight(_text_:und in 2822) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0105139585 = score(doc=2822,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05366975 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024215192 = queryNorm
            0.19590102 = fieldWeight in 2822, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2822)
        0.018497765 = weight(_text_:der in 2822) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018497765 = score(doc=2822,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.054091092 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024215192 = queryNorm
            0.34197432 = fieldWeight in 2822, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2822)
        0.0105139585 = weight(_text_:und in 2822) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0105139585 = score(doc=2822,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05366975 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024215192 = queryNorm
            0.19590102 = fieldWeight in 2822, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2822)
        0.0105139585 = weight(_text_:und in 2822) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0105139585 = score(doc=2822,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05366975 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024215192 = queryNorm
            0.19590102 = fieldWeight in 2822, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2822)
      0.25 = coord(5/20)
    
    Abstract
    Der Forschungsbericht "Rough Set Theory Based Automatic Text Categorization and the Handling of Semantic Heterogeneity" von Xueying Zhang ist in Buchform auf Englisch erschienen. Zhang hat in ihrer Arbeit ein Verfahren basierend auf der Rough Set Theory entwickelt, das Beziehungen zwischen Schlagwörtern verschiedener Vokabulare herstellt. Sie war von 2003 bis 2005 Mitarbeiterin des IZ und ist seit Oktober 2005 Associate Professor an der Nanjing University of Science and Technology.
  5. Chan, L.M.; Lin, X.; Zeng, M.: Structural and multilingual approaches to subject access on the Web (1999) 0.01
    0.014289798 = product of:
      0.057159193 = sum of:
        0.0105139585 = weight(_text_:und in 162) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0105139585 = score(doc=162,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05366975 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024215192 = queryNorm
            0.19590102 = fieldWeight in 162, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=162)
        0.0105139585 = weight(_text_:und in 162) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0105139585 = score(doc=162,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05366975 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024215192 = queryNorm
            0.19590102 = fieldWeight in 162, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=162)
        0.015103361 = weight(_text_:der in 162) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015103361 = score(doc=162,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.054091092 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024215192 = queryNorm
            0.27922085 = fieldWeight in 162, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=162)
        0.0105139585 = weight(_text_:und in 162) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0105139585 = score(doc=162,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05366975 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024215192 = queryNorm
            0.19590102 = fieldWeight in 162, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=162)
        0.0105139585 = weight(_text_:und in 162) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0105139585 = score(doc=162,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05366975 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024215192 = queryNorm
            0.19590102 = fieldWeight in 162, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=162)
      0.25 = coord(5/20)
    
    Abstract
    Zu den großen Herausforderungen einer sinnvollen Suche im WWW gehören die riesige Menge des Verfügbaren und die Sparchbarrieren. Verfahren, die die Web-Ressourcen im Hinblick auf ein effizienteres Retrieval inhaltlich strukturieren, werden daher ebenso dringend benötigt wie Programme, die mit der Sprachvielfalt umgehen können. Im folgenden Vortrag werden wir einige Ansätze diskutieren, die zur Bewältigung der beiden Probleme derzeit unternommen werden
  6. Lindholm, J.; Schönthal, T.; Jansson , K.: Experiences of harvesting Web resources in engineering using automatic classification (2003) 0.01
    0.008411167 = product of:
      0.042055834 = sum of:
        0.0105139585 = weight(_text_:und in 4088) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0105139585 = score(doc=4088,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05366975 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024215192 = queryNorm
            0.19590102 = fieldWeight in 4088, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4088)
        0.0105139585 = weight(_text_:und in 4088) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0105139585 = score(doc=4088,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05366975 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024215192 = queryNorm
            0.19590102 = fieldWeight in 4088, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4088)
        0.0105139585 = weight(_text_:und in 4088) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0105139585 = score(doc=4088,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05366975 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024215192 = queryNorm
            0.19590102 = fieldWeight in 4088, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4088)
        0.0105139585 = weight(_text_:und in 4088) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0105139585 = score(doc=4088,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05366975 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024215192 = queryNorm
            0.19590102 = fieldWeight in 4088, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4088)
      0.2 = coord(4/20)
    
    Footnote
    Auch unter: http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue37/lindholm/ und http://engine-e.lub.lu.se/
  7. Reiner, U.: Automatic analysis of DDC notations (2007) 0.00
    0.0011327522 = product of:
      0.022655042 = sum of:
        0.022655042 = weight(_text_:der in 118) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022655042 = score(doc=118,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.054091092 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024215192 = queryNorm
            0.4188313 = fieldWeight in 118, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=118)
      0.05 = coord(1/20)
    
    Content
    Vortrag während der EDUG-Konferenz der European DDC users' group am 11.06.2007 in Bern.
  8. Subramanian, S.; Shafer, K.E.: Clustering (2001) 0.00
    9.842472E-4 = product of:
      0.019684944 = sum of:
        0.019684944 = product of:
          0.03936989 = sum of:
            0.03936989 = weight(_text_:22 in 1046) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03936989 = score(doc=1046,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08479747 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.024215192 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 1046, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1046)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.05 = coord(1/20)
    
    Date
    5. 5.2003 14:17:22
  9. Vizine-Goetz, D.: NetLab / OCLC collaboration seeks to improve Web searching (1999) 0.00
    9.439601E-4 = product of:
      0.018879201 = sum of:
        0.018879201 = weight(_text_:der in 4180) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018879201 = score(doc=4180,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.054091092 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024215192 = queryNorm
            0.34902605 = fieldWeight in 4180, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4180)
      0.05 = coord(1/20)
    
    Abstract
    Vorstellung verschiedener Projekte zur Verbesserung der Internet-Erschließung mit Hilfe der DDC
  10. HaCohen-Kerner, Y. et al.: Classification using various machine learning methods and combinations of key-phrases and visual features (2016) 0.00
    8.20206E-4 = product of:
      0.01640412 = sum of:
        0.01640412 = product of:
          0.03280824 = sum of:
            0.03280824 = weight(_text_:22 in 2748) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03280824 = score(doc=2748,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08479747 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.024215192 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2748, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2748)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.05 = coord(1/20)
    
    Date
    1. 2.2016 18:25:22
  11. Braun, T.: Dokumentklassifikation durch Clustering (o.J.) 0.00
    6.674806E-4 = product of:
      0.013349611 = sum of:
        0.013349611 = weight(_text_:der in 1671) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013349611 = score(doc=1671,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.054091092 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024215192 = queryNorm
            0.2467987 = fieldWeight in 1671, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1671)
      0.05 = coord(1/20)
    
    Abstract
    Beim Clustering werden Dokumente aufgrund von Ähnlichkeiten untereinander klassifiziert, im Gegensatz z.B. zur Klassifikation anhand einer Ontologie. Bei den gebräuchlichen Clusteringverfahren wird ein Dokument als die Menge seiner Wörter angesehen. Zur Bestimmung der Ähnlichkeit zwischen Dokumenten werden verschiedene Ähnlichkeitsmaße definiert.
  12. Dubin, D.: Dimensions and discriminability (1998) 0.00
    5.7414424E-4 = product of:
      0.011482884 = sum of:
        0.011482884 = product of:
          0.022965768 = sum of:
            0.022965768 = weight(_text_:22 in 2338) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.022965768 = score(doc=2338,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08479747 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.024215192 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2338, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2338)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.05 = coord(1/20)
    
    Date
    22. 9.1997 19:16:05
  13. Automatic classification research at OCLC (2002) 0.00
    5.7414424E-4 = product of:
      0.011482884 = sum of:
        0.011482884 = product of:
          0.022965768 = sum of:
            0.022965768 = weight(_text_:22 in 1563) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.022965768 = score(doc=1563,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08479747 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.024215192 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1563, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1563)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.05 = coord(1/20)
    
    Date
    5. 5.2003 9:22:09
  14. Jenkins, C.: Automatic classification of Web resources using Java and Dewey Decimal Classification (1998) 0.00
    5.7414424E-4 = product of:
      0.011482884 = sum of:
        0.011482884 = product of:
          0.022965768 = sum of:
            0.022965768 = weight(_text_:22 in 1673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.022965768 = score(doc=1673,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08479747 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.024215192 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1673, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1673)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.05 = coord(1/20)
    
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:08:06
  15. Yoon, Y.; Lee, C.; Lee, G.G.: ¬An effective procedure for constructing a hierarchical text classification system (2006) 0.00
    5.7414424E-4 = product of:
      0.011482884 = sum of:
        0.011482884 = product of:
          0.022965768 = sum of:
            0.022965768 = weight(_text_:22 in 5273) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.022965768 = score(doc=5273,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08479747 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.024215192 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5273, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5273)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.05 = coord(1/20)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2006 16:24:52
  16. Yi, K.: Automatic text classification using library classification schemes : trends, issues and challenges (2007) 0.00
    5.7414424E-4 = product of:
      0.011482884 = sum of:
        0.011482884 = product of:
          0.022965768 = sum of:
            0.022965768 = weight(_text_:22 in 2560) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.022965768 = score(doc=2560,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08479747 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.024215192 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2560, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2560)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.05 = coord(1/20)
    
    Date
    22. 9.2008 18:31:54
  17. Yi, K.: Challenges in automated classification using library classification schemes (2006) 0.00
    5.3398445E-4 = product of:
      0.010679688 = sum of:
        0.010679688 = weight(_text_:der in 5810) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010679688 = score(doc=5810,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.054091092 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.024215192 = queryNorm
            0.19743896 = fieldWeight in 5810, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5810)
      0.05 = coord(1/20)
    
    Content
    Vortrag anlässlich der 72ND IFLA General Conference and Council, 20-24 August 2006, Seoul, Korea
  18. Liu, R.-L.: Context recognition for hierarchical text classification (2009) 0.00
    4.921236E-4 = product of:
      0.009842472 = sum of:
        0.009842472 = product of:
          0.019684944 = sum of:
            0.019684944 = weight(_text_:22 in 2760) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.019684944 = score(doc=2760,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08479747 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.024215192 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2760, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2760)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.05 = coord(1/20)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2009 19:11:54
  19. Zhu, W.Z.; Allen, R.B.: Document clustering using the LSI subspace signature model (2013) 0.00
    4.921236E-4 = product of:
      0.009842472 = sum of:
        0.009842472 = product of:
          0.019684944 = sum of:
            0.019684944 = weight(_text_:22 in 690) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.019684944 = score(doc=690,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08479747 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.024215192 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 690, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=690)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.05 = coord(1/20)
    
    Date
    23. 3.2013 13:22:36
  20. Egbert, J.; Biber, D.; Davies, M.: Developing a bottom-up, user-based method of web register classification (2015) 0.00
    4.921236E-4 = product of:
      0.009842472 = sum of:
        0.009842472 = product of:
          0.019684944 = sum of:
            0.019684944 = weight(_text_:22 in 2158) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.019684944 = score(doc=2158,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08479747 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.024215192 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2158, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2158)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.05 = coord(1/20)
    
    Date
    4. 8.2015 19:22:04

Languages

  • d 42
  • e 20
  • a 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 39
  • el 12
  • x 9
  • m 4
  • r 2
  • d 1
  • More… Less…