Search (42 results, page 1 of 3)

  • × theme_ss:"Automatisches Klassifizieren"
  1. HaCohen-Kerner, Y. et al.: Classification using various machine learning methods and combinations of key-phrases and visual features (2016) 0.10
    0.10419048 = product of:
      0.20838097 = sum of:
        0.20838097 = sum of:
          0.13624117 = weight(_text_:y in 2748) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.13624117 = score(doc=2748,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.25623685 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
                0.053245123 = queryNorm
              0.53170013 = fieldWeight in 2748, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2748)
          0.07213979 = weight(_text_:22 in 2748) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.07213979 = score(doc=2748,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18645535 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.053245123 = queryNorm
              0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2748, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2748)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    1. 2.2016 18:25:22
  2. Hotho, A.; Bloehdorn, S.: Data Mining 2004 : Text classification by boosting weak learners based on terms and concepts (2004) 0.09
    0.085067466 = sum of:
      0.063425526 = product of:
        0.2537021 = sum of:
          0.2537021 = weight(_text_:3a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.2537021 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.45141274 = queryWeight, product of:
                8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                0.053245123 = queryNorm
              0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.021641938 = product of:
        0.043283876 = sum of:
          0.043283876 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.043283876 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18645535 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.053245123 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CEAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.91.4940%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&ei=dOXrUMeIDYHDtQahsIGACg&usg=AFQjCNHFWVh6gNPvnOrOS9R3rkrXCNVD-A&sig2=5I2F5evRfMnsttSgFF9g7Q&bvm=bv.1357316858,d.Yms.
    Date
    8. 1.2013 10:22:32
  3. Yoon, Y.; Lee, C.; Lee, G.G.: ¬An effective procedure for constructing a hierarchical text classification system (2006) 0.07
    0.07293334 = product of:
      0.14586668 = sum of:
        0.14586668 = sum of:
          0.09536882 = weight(_text_:y in 5273) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.09536882 = score(doc=5273,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.25623685 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
                0.053245123 = queryNorm
              0.3721901 = fieldWeight in 5273, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5273)
          0.050497856 = weight(_text_:22 in 5273) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.050497856 = score(doc=5273,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18645535 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.053245123 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5273, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5273)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2006 16:24:52
  4. HaCohen-Kerner, Y.; Beck, H.; Yehudai, E.; Rosenstein, M.; Mughaz, D.: Cuisine : classification using stylistic feature sets and/or name-based feature sets (2010) 0.05
    0.04934294 = sum of:
      0.015282649 = product of:
        0.061130594 = sum of:
          0.061130594 = weight(_text_:authors in 3706) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.061130594 = score(doc=3706,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.24273461 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.053245123 = queryNorm
              0.25184128 = fieldWeight in 3706, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3706)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.034060292 = product of:
        0.068120584 = sum of:
          0.068120584 = weight(_text_:y in 3706) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.068120584 = score(doc=3706,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.25623685 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
                0.053245123 = queryNorm
              0.26585007 = fieldWeight in 3706, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3706)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Document classification presents challenges due to the large number of features, their dependencies, and the large number of training documents. In this research, we investigated the use of six stylistic feature sets (including 42 features) and/or six name-based feature sets (including 234 features) for various combinations of the following classification tasks: ethnic groups of the authors and/or periods of time when the documents were written and/or places where the documents were written. The investigated corpus contains Jewish Law articles written in Hebrew-Aramaic, which present interesting problems for classification. Our system CUISINE (Classification UsIng Stylistic feature sets and/or NamE-based feature sets) achieves accuracy results between 90.71 to 98.99% for the seven classification experiments (ethnicity, time, place, ethnicity&time, ethnicity&place, time&place, ethnicity&time&place). For the first six tasks, the stylistic feature sets in general and the quantitative feature set in particular are enough for excellent classification results. In contrast, the name-based feature sets are rather poor for these tasks. However, for the most complex task (ethnicity&time&place), a hill-climbing model using all feature sets succeeds in significantly improving the classification results. Most of the stylistic features (34 of 42) are language-independent and domain-independent. These features might be useful to the community at large, at least for rather simple tasks.
  5. Yu, W.; Gong, Y.: Document clustering by concept factorization (2004) 0.04
    0.04087235 = product of:
      0.0817447 = sum of:
        0.0817447 = product of:
          0.1634894 = sum of:
            0.1634894 = weight(_text_:y in 4084) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.1634894 = score(doc=4084,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.25623685 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.053245123 = queryNorm
                0.6380402 = fieldWeight in 4084, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4084)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  6. Shen, D.; Chen, Z.; Yang, Q.; Zeng, H.J.; Zhang, B.; Lu, Y.; Ma, W.Y.: Web page classification through summarization (2004) 0.03
    0.034060292 = product of:
      0.068120584 = sum of:
        0.068120584 = product of:
          0.13624117 = sum of:
            0.13624117 = weight(_text_:y in 4132) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.13624117 = score(doc=4132,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.25623685 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.053245123 = queryNorm
                0.53170013 = fieldWeight in 4132, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4132)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  7. Chung, Y.-M.; Noh, Y.-H.: Developing a specialized directory system by automatically classifying Web documents (2003) 0.03
    0.028901115 = product of:
      0.05780223 = sum of:
        0.05780223 = product of:
          0.11560446 = sum of:
            0.11560446 = weight(_text_:y in 1566) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11560446 = score(doc=1566,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.25623685 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.053245123 = queryNorm
                0.45116252 = fieldWeight in 1566, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1566)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  8. Khoo, C.S.G.; Ng, K.; Ou, S.: ¬An exploratory study of human clustering of Web pages (2003) 0.03
    0.026654078 = sum of:
      0.012226119 = product of:
        0.048904475 = sum of:
          0.048904475 = weight(_text_:authors in 2741) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.048904475 = score(doc=2741,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.24273461 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.053245123 = queryNorm
              0.20147301 = fieldWeight in 2741, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2741)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.014427959 = product of:
        0.028855918 = sum of:
          0.028855918 = weight(_text_:22 in 2741) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.028855918 = score(doc=2741,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18645535 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.053245123 = queryNorm
              0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2741, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2741)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This study seeks to find out how human beings cluster Web pages naturally. Twenty Web pages retrieved by the Northem Light search engine for each of 10 queries were sorted by 3 subjects into categories that were natural or meaningful to them. lt was found that different subjects clustered the same set of Web pages quite differently and created different categories. The average inter-subject similarity of the clusters created was a low 0.27. Subjects created an average of 5.4 clusters for each sorting. The categories constructed can be divided into 10 types. About 1/3 of the categories created were topical. Another 20% of the categories relate to the degree of relevance or usefulness. The rest of the categories were subject-independent categories such as format, purpose, authoritativeness and direction to other sources. The authors plan to develop automatic methods for categorizing Web pages using the common categories created by the subjects. lt is hoped that the techniques developed can be used by Web search engines to automatically organize Web pages retrieved into categories that are natural to users. 1. Introduction The World Wide Web is an increasingly important source of information for people globally because of its ease of access, the ease of publishing, its ability to transcend geographic and national boundaries, its flexibility and heterogeneity and its dynamic nature. However, Web users also find it increasingly difficult to locate relevant and useful information in this vast information storehouse. Web search engines, despite their scope and power, appear to be quite ineffective. They retrieve too many pages, and though they attempt to rank retrieved pages in order of probable relevance, often the relevant documents do not appear in the top-ranked 10 or 20 documents displayed. Several studies have found that users do not know how to use the advanced features of Web search engines, and do not know how to formulate and re-formulate queries. Users also typically exert minimal effort in performing, evaluating and refining their searches, and are unwilling to scan more than 10 or 20 items retrieved (Jansen, Spink, Bateman & Saracevic, 1998). This suggests that the conventional ranked-list display of search results does not satisfy user requirements, and that better ways of presenting and summarizing search results have to be developed. One promising approach is to group retrieved pages into clusters or categories to allow users to navigate immediately to the "promising" clusters where the most useful Web pages are likely to be located. This approach has been adopted by a number of search engines (notably Northem Light) and search agents.
    Date
    12. 9.2004 9:56:22
  9. Chung, Y.M.; Lee, J.Y.: ¬A corpus-based approach to comparative evaluation of statistical term association measures (2001) 0.02
    0.024084264 = product of:
      0.04816853 = sum of:
        0.04816853 = product of:
          0.09633706 = sum of:
            0.09633706 = weight(_text_:y in 5769) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09633706 = score(doc=5769,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.25623685 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.053245123 = queryNorm
                0.37596878 = fieldWeight in 5769, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5769)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Statistical association measures have been widely applied in information retrieval research, usually employing a clustering of documents or terms on the basis of their relationships. Applications of the association measures for term clustering include automatic thesaurus construction and query expansion. This research evaluates the similarity of six association measures by comparing the relationship and behavior they demonstrate in various analyses of a test corpus. Analysis techniques include comparisons of highly ranked term pairs and term clusters, analyses of the correlation among the association measures using Pearson's correlation coefficient and MDS mapping, and an analysis of the impact of a term frequency on the association values by means of z-score. The major findings of the study are as follows: First, the most similar association measures are mutual information and Yule's coefficient of colligation Y, whereas cosine and Jaccard coefficients, as well as X**2 statistic and likelihood ratio, demonstrate quite similar behavior for terms with high frequency. Second, among all the measures, the X**2 statistic is the least affected by the frequency of terms. Third, although cosine and Jaccard coefficients tend to emphasize high frequency terms, mutual information and Yule's Y seem to overestimate rare terms
  10. Huang, Y.-L.: ¬A theoretic and empirical research of cluster indexing for Mandarine Chinese full text document (1998) 0.02
    0.023842204 = product of:
      0.04768441 = sum of:
        0.04768441 = product of:
          0.09536882 = sum of:
            0.09536882 = weight(_text_:y in 513) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09536882 = score(doc=513,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.25623685 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.053245123 = queryNorm
                0.3721901 = fieldWeight in 513, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=513)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  11. Yang, Y.; Liu, X.: ¬A re-examination of text categorization methods (1999) 0.02
    0.023842204 = product of:
      0.04768441 = sum of:
        0.04768441 = product of:
          0.09536882 = sum of:
            0.09536882 = weight(_text_:y in 3386) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09536882 = score(doc=3386,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.25623685 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.053245123 = queryNorm
                0.3721901 = fieldWeight in 3386, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3386)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  12. Subramanian, S.; Shafer, K.E.: Clustering (2001) 0.02
    0.021641938 = product of:
      0.043283876 = sum of:
        0.043283876 = product of:
          0.08656775 = sum of:
            0.08656775 = weight(_text_:22 in 1046) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08656775 = score(doc=1046,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18645535 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.053245123 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 1046, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1046)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    5. 5.2003 14:17:22
  13. Wu, K.J.; Chen, M.-C.; Sun, Y.: Automatic topics discovery from hyperlinked documents (2004) 0.02
    0.020436175 = product of:
      0.04087235 = sum of:
        0.04087235 = product of:
          0.0817447 = sum of:
            0.0817447 = weight(_text_:y in 2563) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0817447 = score(doc=2563,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.25623685 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.053245123 = queryNorm
                0.3190201 = fieldWeight in 2563, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2563)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  14. Yoon, Y.; Lee, G.G.: Efficient implementation of associative classifiers for document classification (2007) 0.02
    0.020436175 = product of:
      0.04087235 = sum of:
        0.04087235 = product of:
          0.0817447 = sum of:
            0.0817447 = weight(_text_:y in 909) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0817447 = score(doc=909,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.25623685 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.053245123 = queryNorm
                0.3190201 = fieldWeight in 909, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=909)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  15. Ko, Y.; Seo, J.: Text classification from unlabeled documents with bootstrapping and feature projection techniques (2009) 0.02
    0.020436175 = product of:
      0.04087235 = sum of:
        0.04087235 = product of:
          0.0817447 = sum of:
            0.0817447 = weight(_text_:y in 2452) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0817447 = score(doc=2452,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.25623685 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.053245123 = queryNorm
                0.3190201 = fieldWeight in 2452, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2452)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  16. Xu, Y.; Bernard, A.: Knowledge organization through statistical computation : a new approach (2009) 0.02
    0.020436175 = product of:
      0.04087235 = sum of:
        0.04087235 = product of:
          0.0817447 = sum of:
            0.0817447 = weight(_text_:y in 3252) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0817447 = score(doc=3252,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.25623685 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.053245123 = queryNorm
                0.3190201 = fieldWeight in 3252, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3252)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  17. Liu, X.; Yu, S.; Janssens, F.; Glänzel, W.; Moreau, Y.; Moor, B.de: Weighted hybrid clustering by combining text mining and bibliometrics on a large-scale journal database (2010) 0.02
    0.020436175 = product of:
      0.04087235 = sum of:
        0.04087235 = product of:
          0.0817447 = sum of:
            0.0817447 = weight(_text_:y in 3464) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0817447 = score(doc=3464,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.25623685 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.053245123 = queryNorm
                0.3190201 = fieldWeight in 3464, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3464)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  18. Aphinyanaphongs, Y.; Fu, L.D.; Li, Z.; Peskin, E.R.; Efstathiadis, E.; Aliferis, C.F.; Statnikov, A.: ¬A comprehensive empirical comparison of modern supervised classification and feature selection methods for text categorization (2014) 0.02
    0.020436175 = product of:
      0.04087235 = sum of:
        0.04087235 = product of:
          0.0817447 = sum of:
            0.0817447 = weight(_text_:y in 1496) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0817447 = score(doc=1496,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.25623685 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.053245123 = queryNorm
                0.3190201 = fieldWeight in 1496, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1496)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  19. Ko, Y.: ¬A new term-weighting scheme for text classification using the odds of positive and negative class probabilities (2015) 0.02
    0.020436175 = product of:
      0.04087235 = sum of:
        0.04087235 = product of:
          0.0817447 = sum of:
            0.0817447 = weight(_text_:y in 2339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0817447 = score(doc=2339,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.25623685 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.053245123 = queryNorm
                0.3190201 = fieldWeight in 2339, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2339)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  20. Wu, M.; Liu, Y.-H.; Brownlee, R.; Zhang, X.: Evaluating utility and automatic classification of subject metadata from Research Data Australia (2021) 0.02
    0.020436175 = product of:
      0.04087235 = sum of:
        0.04087235 = product of:
          0.0817447 = sum of:
            0.0817447 = weight(_text_:y in 453) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0817447 = score(doc=453,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.25623685 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.053245123 = queryNorm
                0.3190201 = fieldWeight in 453, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.8124003 = idf(docFreq=976, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=453)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    

Years

Languages

  • e 37
  • d 4
  • chi 1
  • More… Less…

Types