-
Hotho, A.; Bloehdorn, S.: Data Mining 2004 : Text classification by boosting weak learners based on terms and concepts (2004)
0.09
0.09035814 = sum of:
0.067370206 = product of:
0.26948082 = sum of:
0.26948082 = weight(_text_:3a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.26948082 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
0.47948787 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.056556646 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.022987934 = product of:
0.045975868 = sum of:
0.045975868 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.045975868 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19805174 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.056556646 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Content
- Vgl.: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CEAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.91.4940%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&ei=dOXrUMeIDYHDtQahsIGACg&usg=AFQjCNHFWVh6gNPvnOrOS9R3rkrXCNVD-A&sig2=5I2F5evRfMnsttSgFF9g7Q&bvm=bv.1357316858,d.Yms.
- Date
- 8. 1.2013 10:22:32
-
Smiraglia, R.P.; Cai, X.: Tracking the evolution of clustering, machine learning, automatic indexing and automatic classification in knowledge organization (2017)
0.04
0.04408829 = sum of:
0.016233137 = product of:
0.06493255 = sum of:
0.06493255 = weight(_text_:authors in 3627) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06493255 = score(doc=3627,freq=2.0), product of:
0.25783125 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.056556646 = queryNorm
0.25184128 = fieldWeight in 3627, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3627)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.027855152 = product of:
0.055710305 = sum of:
0.055710305 = weight(_text_:x in 3627) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.055710305 = score(doc=3627,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23882076 = queryWeight, product of:
4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
0.056556646 = queryNorm
0.23327245 = fieldWeight in 3627, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3627)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- A very important extension of the traditional domain of knowledge organization (KO) arises from attempts to incorporate techniques devised in the computer science domain for automatic concept extraction and for grouping, categorizing, clustering and otherwise organizing knowledge using mechanical means. Four specific terms have emerged to identify the most prevalent techniques: machine learning, clustering, automatic indexing, and automatic classification. Our study presents three domain analytical case analyses in search of answers. The first case relies on citations located using the ISKO-supported "Knowledge Organization Bibliography." The second case relies on works in both Web of Science and SCOPUS. Case three applies co-word analysis and citation analysis to the contents of the papers in the present special issue. We observe scholars involved in "clustering" and "automatic classification" who share common thematic emphases. But we have found no coherence, no common activity and no social semantics. We have not found a research front, or a common teleology within the KO domain. We also have found a lively group of authors who have succeeded in submitting papers to this special issue, and their work quite interestingly aligns with the case studies we report. There is an emphasis on KO for information retrieval; there is much work on clustering (which involves conceptual points within texts) and automatic classification (which involves semantic groupings at the meta-document level).
-
Chan, L.M.; Lin, X.; Zeng, M.L.: Structural and multilingual approaches to subject access on the Web (2000)
0.03
0.03342618 = product of:
0.06685236 = sum of:
0.06685236 = product of:
0.13370472 = sum of:
0.13370472 = weight(_text_:x in 507) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13370472 = score(doc=507,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23882076 = queryWeight, product of:
4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
0.056556646 = queryNorm
0.55985385 = fieldWeight in 507, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=507)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Zhang, X: Rough set theory based automatic text categorization (2005)
0.03
0.031514507 = product of:
0.06302901 = sum of:
0.06302901 = product of:
0.12605803 = sum of:
0.12605803 = weight(_text_:x in 2822) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12605803 = score(doc=2822,freq=4.0), product of:
0.23882076 = queryWeight, product of:
4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
0.056556646 = queryNorm
0.5278353 = fieldWeight in 2822, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2822)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Isbn
- 3-8206-0149-X
-
Khoo, C.S.G.; Ng, K.; Ou, S.: ¬An exploratory study of human clustering of Web pages (2003)
0.03
0.028311798 = sum of:
0.012986509 = product of:
0.051946037 = sum of:
0.051946037 = weight(_text_:authors in 2741) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.051946037 = score(doc=2741,freq=2.0), product of:
0.25783125 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.056556646 = queryNorm
0.20147301 = fieldWeight in 2741, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2741)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.015325289 = product of:
0.030650578 = sum of:
0.030650578 = weight(_text_:22 in 2741) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030650578 = score(doc=2741,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19805174 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.056556646 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2741, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2741)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This study seeks to find out how human beings cluster Web pages naturally. Twenty Web pages retrieved by the Northem Light search engine for each of 10 queries were sorted by 3 subjects into categories that were natural or meaningful to them. lt was found that different subjects clustered the same set of Web pages quite differently and created different categories. The average inter-subject similarity of the clusters created was a low 0.27. Subjects created an average of 5.4 clusters for each sorting. The categories constructed can be divided into 10 types. About 1/3 of the categories created were topical. Another 20% of the categories relate to the degree of relevance or usefulness. The rest of the categories were subject-independent categories such as format, purpose, authoritativeness and direction to other sources. The authors plan to develop automatic methods for categorizing Web pages using the common categories created by the subjects. lt is hoped that the techniques developed can be used by Web search engines to automatically organize Web pages retrieved into categories that are natural to users. 1. Introduction The World Wide Web is an increasingly important source of information for people globally because of its ease of access, the ease of publishing, its ability to transcend geographic and national boundaries, its flexibility and heterogeneity and its dynamic nature. However, Web users also find it increasingly difficult to locate relevant and useful information in this vast information storehouse. Web search engines, despite their scope and power, appear to be quite ineffective. They retrieve too many pages, and though they attempt to rank retrieved pages in order of probable relevance, often the relevant documents do not appear in the top-ranked 10 or 20 documents displayed. Several studies have found that users do not know how to use the advanced features of Web search engines, and do not know how to formulate and re-formulate queries. Users also typically exert minimal effort in performing, evaluating and refining their searches, and are unwilling to scan more than 10 or 20 items retrieved (Jansen, Spink, Bateman & Saracevic, 1998). This suggests that the conventional ranked-list display of search results does not satisfy user requirements, and that better ways of presenting and summarizing search results have to be developed. One promising approach is to group retrieved pages into clusters or categories to allow users to navigate immediately to the "promising" clusters where the most useful Web pages are likely to be located. This approach has been adopted by a number of search engines (notably Northem Light) and search agents.
- Date
- 12. 9.2004 9:56:22
-
Subramanian, S.; Shafer, K.E.: Clustering (2001)
0.02
0.022987934 = product of:
0.045975868 = sum of:
0.045975868 = product of:
0.091951735 = sum of:
0.091951735 = weight(_text_:22 in 1046) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.091951735 = score(doc=1046,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19805174 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.056556646 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 1046, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1046)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 5. 5.2003 14:17:22
-
Chan, L.M.; Lin, X.; Zeng, M.: Structural and multilingual approaches to subject access on the Web (1999)
0.02
0.02228412 = product of:
0.04456824 = sum of:
0.04456824 = product of:
0.08913648 = sum of:
0.08913648 = weight(_text_:x in 162) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08913648 = score(doc=162,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23882076 = queryWeight, product of:
4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
0.056556646 = queryNorm
0.3732359 = fieldWeight in 162, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=162)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Jersek, T.: Automatische DDC-Klassifizierung mit Lingo : Vorgehensweise und Ergebnisse (2012)
0.02
0.02228412 = product of:
0.04456824 = sum of:
0.04456824 = product of:
0.08913648 = sum of:
0.08913648 = weight(_text_:x in 122) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08913648 = score(doc=122,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23882076 = queryWeight, product of:
4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
0.056556646 = queryNorm
0.3732359 = fieldWeight in 122, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=122)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Type
- x
-
Chung, Y.M.; Lee, J.Y.: ¬A corpus-based approach to comparative evaluation of statistical term association measures (2001)
0.02
0.019696567 = product of:
0.039393134 = sum of:
0.039393134 = product of:
0.07878627 = sum of:
0.07878627 = weight(_text_:x in 5769) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07878627 = score(doc=5769,freq=4.0), product of:
0.23882076 = queryWeight, product of:
4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
0.056556646 = queryNorm
0.32989708 = fieldWeight in 5769, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5769)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Statistical association measures have been widely applied in information retrieval research, usually employing a clustering of documents or terms on the basis of their relationships. Applications of the association measures for term clustering include automatic thesaurus construction and query expansion. This research evaluates the similarity of six association measures by comparing the relationship and behavior they demonstrate in various analyses of a test corpus. Analysis techniques include comparisons of highly ranked term pairs and term clusters, analyses of the correlation among the association measures using Pearson's correlation coefficient and MDS mapping, and an analysis of the impact of a term frequency on the association values by means of z-score. The major findings of the study are as follows: First, the most similar association measures are mutual information and Yule's coefficient of colligation Y, whereas cosine and Jaccard coefficients, as well as X**2 statistic and likelihood ratio, demonstrate quite similar behavior for terms with high frequency. Second, among all the measures, the X**2 statistic is the least affected by the frequency of terms. Third, although cosine and Jaccard coefficients tend to emphasize high frequency terms, mutual information and Yule's Y seem to overestimate rare terms
-
Walther, R.: Möglichkeiten und Grenzen automatischer Klassifikationen von Web-Dokumenten (2001)
0.02
0.019498605 = product of:
0.03899721 = sum of:
0.03899721 = product of:
0.07799442 = sum of:
0.07799442 = weight(_text_:x in 1562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07799442 = score(doc=1562,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23882076 = queryWeight, product of:
4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
0.056556646 = queryNorm
0.32658142 = fieldWeight in 1562, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1562)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Type
- x
-
Yang, Y.; Liu, X.: ¬A re-examination of text categorization methods (1999)
0.02
0.019498605 = product of:
0.03899721 = sum of:
0.03899721 = product of:
0.07799442 = sum of:
0.07799442 = weight(_text_:x in 3386) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07799442 = score(doc=3386,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23882076 = queryWeight, product of:
4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
0.056556646 = queryNorm
0.32658142 = fieldWeight in 3386, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3386)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Wille, J.: Automatisches Klassifizieren bibliographischer Beschreibungsdaten : Vorgehensweise und Ergebnisse (2006)
0.02
0.019498605 = product of:
0.03899721 = sum of:
0.03899721 = product of:
0.07799442 = sum of:
0.07799442 = weight(_text_:x in 6090) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07799442 = score(doc=6090,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23882076 = queryWeight, product of:
4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
0.056556646 = queryNorm
0.32658142 = fieldWeight in 6090, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6090)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Type
- x
-
Hu, G.; Zhou, S.; Guan, J.; Hu, X.: Towards effective document clustering : a constrained K-means based approach (2008)
0.02
0.019498605 = product of:
0.03899721 = sum of:
0.03899721 = product of:
0.07799442 = sum of:
0.07799442 = weight(_text_:x in 2113) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07799442 = score(doc=2113,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23882076 = queryWeight, product of:
4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
0.056556646 = queryNorm
0.32658142 = fieldWeight in 2113, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2113)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Reiner, U.: Automatische DDC-Klassifizierung von bibliografischen Titeldatensätzen (2009)
0.02
0.019156612 = product of:
0.038313225 = sum of:
0.038313225 = product of:
0.07662645 = sum of:
0.07662645 = weight(_text_:22 in 611) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07662645 = score(doc=611,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19805174 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.056556646 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 611, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=611)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 8.2009 12:54:24
-
HaCohen-Kerner, Y. et al.: Classification using various machine learning methods and combinations of key-phrases and visual features (2016)
0.02
0.019156612 = product of:
0.038313225 = sum of:
0.038313225 = product of:
0.07662645 = sum of:
0.07662645 = weight(_text_:22 in 2748) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07662645 = score(doc=2748,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19805174 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.056556646 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2748, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2748)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 1. 2.2016 18:25:22
-
Pfeffer, M.: Automatische Vergabe von RVK-Notationen anhand von bibliografischen Daten mittels fallbasiertem Schließen (2007)
0.02
0.01671309 = product of:
0.03342618 = sum of:
0.03342618 = product of:
0.06685236 = sum of:
0.06685236 = weight(_text_:x in 558) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06685236 = score(doc=558,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23882076 = queryWeight, product of:
4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
0.056556646 = queryNorm
0.27992693 = fieldWeight in 558, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=558)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Type
- x
-
Hagedorn, K.; Chapman, S.; Newman, D.: Enhancing search and browse using automated clustering of subject metadata (2007)
0.02
0.01671309 = product of:
0.03342618 = sum of:
0.03342618 = product of:
0.06685236 = sum of:
0.06685236 = weight(_text_:x in 1168) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06685236 = score(doc=1168,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23882076 = queryWeight, product of:
4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
0.056556646 = queryNorm
0.27992693 = fieldWeight in 1168, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1168)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- D-Lib magazine. 13(2007) nos.7/8, x S
-
Helmbrecht-Schaar, A.: Entwicklung eines Verfahrens der automatischen Klassifizierung für Textdokumente aus dem Fachbereich Informatik mithilfe eines fachspezifischen Klassifikationssystems (2007)
0.02
0.01671309 = product of:
0.03342618 = sum of:
0.03342618 = product of:
0.06685236 = sum of:
0.06685236 = weight(_text_:x in 1410) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06685236 = score(doc=1410,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23882076 = queryWeight, product of:
4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
0.056556646 = queryNorm
0.27992693 = fieldWeight in 1410, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1410)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Type
- x
-
Choi, B.; Peng, X.: Dynamic and hierarchical classification of Web pages (2004)
0.02
0.01671309 = product of:
0.03342618 = sum of:
0.03342618 = product of:
0.06685236 = sum of:
0.06685236 = weight(_text_:x in 2555) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06685236 = score(doc=2555,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23882076 = queryWeight, product of:
4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
0.056556646 = queryNorm
0.27992693 = fieldWeight in 2555, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2555)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Liu, X.; Yu, S.; Janssens, F.; Glänzel, W.; Moreau, Y.; Moor, B.de: Weighted hybrid clustering by combining text mining and bibliometrics on a large-scale journal database (2010)
0.02
0.01671309 = product of:
0.03342618 = sum of:
0.03342618 = product of:
0.06685236 = sum of:
0.06685236 = weight(_text_:x in 3464) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06685236 = score(doc=3464,freq=2.0), product of:
0.23882076 = queryWeight, product of:
4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
0.056556646 = queryNorm
0.27992693 = fieldWeight in 3464, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.2226825 = idf(docFreq=1761, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3464)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
