Search (42 results, page 1 of 3)

  • × theme_ss:"Automatisches Klassifizieren"
  1. Hotho, A.; Bloehdorn, S.: Data Mining 2004 : Text classification by boosting weak learners based on terms and concepts (2004) 0.08 
    0.08306394 = sum of:
  0.061931714 = product of:
    0.24772686 = sum of:
      0.24772686 = weight(_text_:3a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.24772686 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.44078097 = queryWeight, product of:
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051991083 = queryNorm
          0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.021132221 = product of:
    0.042264443 = sum of:
      0.042264443 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.042264443 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1820639 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051991083 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    Vgl.: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CEAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.91.4940%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&ei=dOXrUMeIDYHDtQahsIGACg&usg=AFQjCNHFWVh6gNPvnOrOS9R3rkrXCNVD-A&sig2=5I2F5evRfMnsttSgFF9g7Q&bvm=bv.1357316858,d.Yms.
    Date
    8. 1.2013 10:22:32
  2. Khoo, C.S.G.; Ng, K.; Ou, S.: ¬An exploratory study of human clustering of Web pages (2003) 0.03 
    0.026026312 = sum of:
  0.011938166 = product of:
    0.047752663 = sum of:
      0.047752663 = weight(_text_:authors in 2741) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.047752663 = score(doc=2741,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.23701768 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051991083 = queryNorm
          0.20147301 = fieldWeight in 2741, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2741)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.014088147 = product of:
    0.028176295 = sum of:
      0.028176295 = weight(_text_:22 in 2741) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.028176295 = score(doc=2741,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.1820639 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051991083 = queryNorm
          0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2741, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2741)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    This study seeks to find out how human beings cluster Web pages naturally. Twenty Web pages retrieved by the Northem Light search engine for each of 10 queries were sorted by 3 subjects into categories that were natural or meaningful to them. lt was found that different subjects clustered the same set of Web pages quite differently and created different categories. The average inter-subject similarity of the clusters created was a low 0.27. Subjects created an average of 5.4 clusters for each sorting. The categories constructed can be divided into 10 types. About 1/3 of the categories created were topical. Another 20% of the categories relate to the degree of relevance or usefulness. The rest of the categories were subject-independent categories such as format, purpose, authoritativeness and direction to other sources. The authors plan to develop automatic methods for categorizing Web pages using the common categories created by the subjects. lt is hoped that the techniques developed can be used by Web search engines to automatically organize Web pages retrieved into categories that are natural to users. 1. Introduction The World Wide Web is an increasingly important source of information for people globally because of its ease of access, the ease of publishing, its ability to transcend geographic and national boundaries, its flexibility and heterogeneity and its dynamic nature. However, Web users also find it increasingly difficult to locate relevant and useful information in this vast information storehouse. Web search engines, despite their scope and power, appear to be quite ineffective. They retrieve too many pages, and though they attempt to rank retrieved pages in order of probable relevance, often the relevant documents do not appear in the top-ranked 10 or 20 documents displayed. Several studies have found that users do not know how to use the advanced features of Web search engines, and do not know how to formulate and re-formulate queries. Users also typically exert minimal effort in performing, evaluating and refining their searches, and are unwilling to scan more than 10 or 20 items retrieved (Jansen, Spink, Bateman & Saracevic, 1998). This suggests that the conventional ranked-list display of search results does not satisfy user requirements, and that better ways of presenting and summarizing search results have to be developed. One promising approach is to group retrieved pages into clusters or categories to allow users to navigate immediately to the "promising" clusters where the most useful Web pages are likely to be located. This approach has been adopted by a number of search engines (notably Northem Light) and search agents.
    Date
    12. 9.2004 9:56:22
  3. Subramanian, S.; Shafer, K.E.: Clustering (2001) 0.02 
    0.021132221 = product of:
  0.042264443 = sum of:
    0.042264443 = product of:
      0.084528886 = sum of:
        0.084528886 = weight(_text_:22 in 1046) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.084528886 = score(doc=1046,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1820639 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051991083 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 1046, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1046)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    5. 5.2003 14:17:22
  4. Autonomy, Inc.: Automatic classification (o.J.) 0.02 
    0.018251216 = product of:
  0.036502432 = sum of:
    0.036502432 = product of:
      0.073004864 = sum of:
        0.073004864 = weight(_text_:f in 1666) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.073004864 = score(doc=1666,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20722532 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051991083 = queryNorm
            0.35229704 = fieldWeight in 1666, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1666)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    http://www.autonomy.com/Content/Products/IDOL/f/Classification#01
  5. Guerrero-Bote, V.P.; Moya Anegón, F. de; Herrero Solana, V.: Document organization using Kohonen's algorithm (2002) 0.02 
    0.018251216 = product of:
  0.036502432 = sum of:
    0.036502432 = product of:
      0.073004864 = sum of:
        0.073004864 = weight(_text_:f in 2564) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.073004864 = score(doc=2564,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20722532 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051991083 = queryNorm
            0.35229704 = fieldWeight in 2564, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2564)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  6. Reiner, U.: Automatische DDC-Klassifizierung von bibliografischen Titeldatensätzen (2009) 0.02 
    0.017610185 = product of:
  0.03522037 = sum of:
    0.03522037 = product of:
      0.07044074 = sum of:
        0.07044074 = weight(_text_:22 in 611) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07044074 = score(doc=611,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1820639 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051991083 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 611, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=611)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 8.2009 12:54:24
  7. HaCohen-Kerner, Y. et al.: Classification using various machine learning methods and combinations of key-phrases and visual features (2016) 0.02 
    0.017610185 = product of:
  0.03522037 = sum of:
    0.03522037 = product of:
      0.07044074 = sum of:
        0.07044074 = weight(_text_:22 in 2748) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07044074 = score(doc=2748,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1820639 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051991083 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2748, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2748)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    1. 2.2016 18:25:22
  8. Salles, T.; Rocha, L.; Gonçalves, M.A.; Almeida, J.M.; Mourão, F.; Meira Jr., W.; Viegas, F.: ¬A quantitative analysis of the temporal effects on automatic text classification (2016) 0.02 
    0.016131949 = product of:
  0.032263897 = sum of:
    0.032263897 = product of:
      0.064527795 = sum of:
        0.064527795 = weight(_text_:f in 3014) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.064527795 = score(doc=3014,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.20722532 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051991083 = queryNorm
            0.31138954 = fieldWeight in 3014, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3014)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  9. Sebastiani, F.: Classification of text, automatic (2006) 0.02 
    0.015969815 = product of:
  0.03193963 = sum of:
    0.03193963 = product of:
      0.06387926 = sum of:
        0.06387926 = weight(_text_:f in 5003) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06387926 = score(doc=5003,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20722532 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051991083 = queryNorm
            0.3082599 = fieldWeight in 5003, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5003)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  10. Wille, J.: Automatisches Klassifizieren bibliographischer Beschreibungsdaten : Vorgehensweise und Ergebnisse (2006) 0.02 
    0.015969815 = product of:
  0.03193963 = sum of:
    0.03193963 = product of:
      0.06387926 = sum of:
        0.06387926 = weight(_text_:f in 6090) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06387926 = score(doc=6090,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20722532 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051991083 = queryNorm
            0.3082599 = fieldWeight in 6090, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6090)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Diese Arbeit befasst sich mit den praktischen Aspekten des Automatischen Klassifizierens bibliographischer Referenzdaten. Im Vordergrund steht die konkrete Vorgehensweise anhand des eigens zu diesem Zweck entwickelten Open Source-Programms COBRA "Classification Of Bibliographic Records, Automatic". Es werden die Rahmenbedingungen und Parameter f¨ur einen Einsatz im bibliothekarischen Umfeld geklärt. Schließlich erfolgt eine Auswertung von Klassifizierungsergebnissen am Beispiel sozialwissenschaftlicher Daten aus der Datenbank SOLIS.
  11. Bianchini, C.; Bargioni, S.: Automated classification using linked open data : a case study on faceted classification and Wikidata (2021) 0.01 
    0.014772727 = product of:
  0.029545454 = sum of:
    0.029545454 = product of:
      0.11818182 = sum of:
        0.11818182 = weight(_text_:authors in 724) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11818182 = score(doc=724,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.23701768 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051991083 = queryNorm
            0.49862027 = fieldWeight in 724, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=724)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    The Wikidata gadget, CCLitBox, for the automated classification of literary authors and works by a faceted classification and using Linked Open Data (LOD) is presented. The tool reproduces the classification algorithm of class O Literature of the Colon Classification and uses data freely available in Wikidata to create Colon Classification class numbers. CCLitBox is totally free and enables any user to classify literary authors and their works; it is easily accessible to everybody; it uses LOD from Wikidata but missing data for classification can be freely added if necessary; it is readymade for any cooperative and networked project.
  12. Sebastiani, F.: Machine learning in automated text categorization (2002) 0.01 
    0.0136884125 = product of:
  0.027376825 = sum of:
    0.027376825 = product of:
      0.05475365 = sum of:
        0.05475365 = weight(_text_:f in 3389) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05475365 = score(doc=3389,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20722532 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051991083 = queryNorm
            0.26422277 = fieldWeight in 3389, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3389)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  13. Sebastiani, F.: ¬A tutorial an automated text categorisation (1999) 0.01 
    0.0136884125 = product of:
  0.027376825 = sum of:
    0.027376825 = product of:
      0.05475365 = sum of:
        0.05475365 = weight(_text_:f in 3390) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05475365 = score(doc=3390,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20722532 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051991083 = queryNorm
            0.26422277 = fieldWeight in 3390, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3390)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  14. Hung, C.-M.; Chien, L.-F.: Web-based text classification in the absence of manually labeled training documents (2007) 0.01 
    0.0136884125 = product of:
  0.027376825 = sum of:
    0.027376825 = product of:
      0.05475365 = sum of:
        0.05475365 = weight(_text_:f in 87) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05475365 = score(doc=87,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20722532 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051991083 = queryNorm
            0.26422277 = fieldWeight in 87, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=87)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  15. Liu, X.; Yu, S.; Janssens, F.; Glänzel, W.; Moreau, Y.; Moor, B.de: Weighted hybrid clustering by combining text mining and bibliometrics on a large-scale journal database (2010) 0.01 
    0.0136884125 = product of:
  0.027376825 = sum of:
    0.027376825 = product of:
      0.05475365 = sum of:
        0.05475365 = weight(_text_:f in 3464) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05475365 = score(doc=3464,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20722532 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051991083 = queryNorm
            0.26422277 = fieldWeight in 3464, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3464)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  16. Bock, H.-H.: Datenanalyse zur Strukturierung und Ordnung von Information (1989) 0.01 
    0.012327129 = product of:
  0.024654258 = sum of:
    0.024654258 = product of:
      0.049308516 = sum of:
        0.049308516 = weight(_text_:22 in 141) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.049308516 = score(doc=141,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1820639 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051991083 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 141, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=141)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Pages
    S.1-22
  17. Dubin, D.: Dimensions and discriminability (1998) 0.01 
    0.012327129 = product of:
  0.024654258 = sum of:
    0.024654258 = product of:
      0.049308516 = sum of:
        0.049308516 = weight(_text_:22 in 2338) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.049308516 = score(doc=2338,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1820639 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051991083 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2338, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2338)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 9.1997 19:16:05
  18. Automatic classification research at OCLC (2002) 0.01 
    0.012327129 = product of:
  0.024654258 = sum of:
    0.024654258 = product of:
      0.049308516 = sum of:
        0.049308516 = weight(_text_:22 in 1563) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.049308516 = score(doc=1563,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1820639 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051991083 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1563, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1563)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    5. 5.2003 9:22:09
  19. Jenkins, C.: Automatic classification of Web resources using Java and Dewey Decimal Classification (1998) 0.01 
    0.012327129 = product of:
  0.024654258 = sum of:
    0.024654258 = product of:
      0.049308516 = sum of:
        0.049308516 = weight(_text_:22 in 1673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.049308516 = score(doc=1673,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1820639 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051991083 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1673, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1673)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:08:06
  20. Yoon, Y.; Lee, C.; Lee, G.G.: ¬An effective procedure for constructing a hierarchical text classification system (2006) 0.01 
    0.012327129 = product of:
  0.024654258 = sum of:
    0.024654258 = product of:
      0.049308516 = sum of:
        0.049308516 = weight(_text_:22 in 5273) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.049308516 = score(doc=5273,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1820639 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051991083 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5273, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5273)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 7.2006 16:24:52

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 36
  • d 6

Types

  • a 36
  • el 6
  • m 1
  • x 1
  • More… Less…

Themes